What are we going to do about the boomer menace and their censorship spree for the "sake of children"? We all know they are hypocritical and greedy fags who rape kids on their private islands on the side.
Why does nobody call them out?
Why is nobody taking it seriously?

DLsite getting fucked by Visa and MC was the canary
Nobody gave a fuck and now they will pay the price, history repeats itself.

Trump literally said he wasn't on the list retard. Meanwhile you have discord trannies grooming children yet you turn a blind eye to that.

They are literally protecting our male children from matriarchal rape culture

They just want to extend the period of innocence children have by restricted access to materials and events that will corrupt it, because lets be honest, knowledge of evils isn't good, it's just a reality of being human.
This is why people consider intentionally introducing minors to pornographic materials to be nearly as bad as actually molesting them, because both fundamentally corrupt a child's sense of innocence.

>everyone that says you shouldn't molest children is a child molester
Do I need to explicitly detail how stupid this take is? I can, but I don't want to.

>Why does nobody call them out?
Because while people are aware of assholes who will manipulate their emotions, it's difficult to see beyond the immediate argument of "Children should not be exposed to pornographic materials", and what comes after the "solutions" implemented to "solve" the problem.

>Why is nobody taking it seriously?
"People" (I assume you mean organizations that hold the levers of power) do take them seriously. You should instead be asking yourself why no one takes your positions (I assume it's something along the lines of "kids want to watch porn anyway, so any restrictions on viewing it are pointless") seriously.

>>716251161
Trump also said he's for LGBT and kisses the Jerusalem wall or whatever, reconcile that in your head first before you blow up.

>>716251383
Boomers are the way they are because they also watched porn. They will just end up fucking a generation over and do the inverse of what they hope to achieve. Those who throw away freedoms in name of security will neither receive it nor deserve it.

>>716251383
>le porn is evil

You lost me there

>>716251383
There's nothing innocent about children only ignorant. I learned to cum with a jacuzzi jet when I was 7 even though I didn't know for like 5 more years it was related to sex I was still doing it every chance I got.
Kids will unleash unspeakable cruelties for the sake of it like a rabid chimpanzee we are simply lucky they are weaker than us.
If anything I would say we are born evil in a natural state and it's knowledge of good that creates morality. Hiding evil just means it can be discovered on its own without the knowledge of how to use it for good.

It's a perfectly reasonable argument.
I used to be against it but I can't see people being functional at all if they were sheltered all throughout their childhood and never got to experience the taboo and shame

>>716251981
How can you be evil without a sense of morality? Are lions evil when they eat a gazelle? They aren't evil, they are stupid, the problem is we as a society fight tooth and nail to keep them stupid under the guise of "protecting their innocence"

>>716251383
What if we just told kids what sex is? Why do they have to be naive about it? They're going to be having those funny feelings anyway and in some cases rather young.
I'm not saying "fuck them kids"; sex isn't evil and kids only need to be protected from it because they're not learning about it and struggling to understand how the world works, and how they should act in order to not fuck things up.

Puritanism is like a fetish you're not shamed for flaunting.

>>716251827
Yes yes, hell, good intentions, yada yada.
>Boomers
I highly doubt it's only boomers that believe that children shouldn't have access to porn.

>>716251967
Horses and water.

>>716251981
Ignorance of evil is a fundamental part of innocence. Case in point, the moment you gained the knowledge that "jacuzzi jet on cock = good feeling" is when your innocence started cracking.

>Kids are cruel
Inadvertently so. Few are genuine sadists, and typically are cruel only due to them not knowing any better.

>Born evil
No one is born anything. It's only through interactions with the world that we are molded. The idea behind restricting the access of said materials (at least until they're older) is that said children will not be ill formed by its early introduction.

Feminists
Christians
Communists
Fascists
Democrats
Republicans
All want to control your life and all need to be shot.

>>716252801
I had to read that second sentence on the second page a couple of times.

>>716253080
How is sex evil?

>>716253076
>Why not introduce them to it young?
Because it would scar them for life. Unless you mean on the cusp of puberty, in which case sex ed exists, at least where I live.

>Puritanism is like a fetish you're not shamed for flaunting.
First of all I'm not a puritan. I'm a complete and utter degenerate.
Second, how the hell is your brain so rotted that you can seriously conflate the absence of sexual proclivity, with sexual proclivity?

>>716253375
I thought you said I lost you?
No matter, since your question isn't even what I stated, I feel no need to answer it.

>>716253375
It says so in the Bible, and if it doesn’t then it says so in God’s Law written on my heart

>>716253080
>Ignorance of evil is a fundamental part of innocence
>the knowledge that "jacuzzi jet on cock = good feeling" is when your innocence started cracking.
You're literally implying that sex is evil.

>>716253665
The bible doesn't say that

>>716253515
>Because it would scar them for life
How? What is it about sex itself, about putting penises in vag00 while you feel good that would scar them? How does this happen?

I don't see how fucking my big sister's hot friend when I was 10 would've damaged me

Just remember. It won't stop at porn
They will come after violent videogames again as they did before. This is a classic salami politics same as it was with gun control. Fight back or die even if it's a cringe hill to die on, because it will set a precedent.

>>716251161
>guy who demonstrably lies all the time (71% or around there) said something, so it must be true

>>716253764
Because everything contains in it the capacity of good and evil. Sex is no different.

>>716254041
>What specifically about the introduction of sexual knowledge causes children to become emotionally unstable wrecks later in life?
I do not know. Why are you pretending that it doesn't?

>>716254531
>Because everything contains in it the capacity of good and evil
Then kids should be taught nothing? Or why is sex different?

>>716253515
>It would scar them for life
That's a puritanical argument as long as you don't support it with some data and you implied knowledge of sex was an evil in the post I replied to. Also, labeling yourself as a degenerate is like telling your opinion is to be taken much less seriously in this matter and does not even really go against what a puritan might say.

What demonstrably scars them for life is sexual abuse. Sexual abuse is, I believe, more likely to stay hidden when sex is made a taboo.

Could you also specify how I conflated the absence of sexual proclivity, with sexual proclivity?

>>716254531
>I do not know
Who does?
>Why are you pretending that it doesn't?
Because correlation doesn't mean causality and there are plenty other factors like your idea of innocence and puritanism which are also related to such outcome

>>716251161
>Don't even mention Donald
>His Jewish child rapist defense force immediately activates
Curious?

>>716251383
Maintaining innocence of childhood is the responsibility of the parent. If they want to do that by only allowing connections to whitelisted websites, adding parental control, and whatever, that's perfectly fine. Putting the onus on companies to censor their material or require age verification for the sake of children are absurd measures.

>>716253076
Why bother kids with things that they do not need to know about? They'll be thinking about sex for the rest of their lives on the onset of puberty, so there's no reason to burden them with that before they need to. People should be able enjoy their childhoods free of vice.

>>716250074 (OP)
Ban children from the internet and everything.

>>716250074 (OP)
>Boomers are retarded and stuck in their ways
>Millenials are retarded
>Zoomers have been exposed to untold amounts of brainrot and AI, most of them are retarded beyond measurement

>>716254809
What makes you think children aren't interested in knowing about sex and reproduction? Do you think shit like "I show you mine and you show me yours" or "mommy where do kids come from" are just random thoughts in a vacuum?

>>716250074 (OP)
On the one hand, I really get the idea of trying to make it less of a one-click instant-access deal for kids because basically everyone I know accesses porn this way now, and kids are getting into it more easily and younger than used to be the case. On the other hand, pretty much anyone 35 or younger probably accessed copious amounts of online porn as a minor and they're not worse off for it as a generation. Some people get into weird shit or never leave their goon caves, but honestly I don't think any of that's really "new". There's been stories of sex addicts and lazy bastards without jobs since before people even had electricity.

>>716254809
They need to know what sex is so they don't do something stupid like set themselves up to get raped, or stay silent about it, and can develop their sexuality without the effects crippling shame. I'm arguing we would also catch on to actual sexual deviency quicker and could mitigate harmful development in children.
Also
>sex is a vice
Not beating the allegations. I bet you're a real dirty sinner and should be, no, NEED to be punished ever so hard. Could it be you also feel a mighty need to be the one to "corrupt" innocents?

>>716254598
>Then kids should be taught nothing?
Correct, at least until puberty starts taking effect.

>why is sex different?
Because of all the things that can break a child's innocence, sex is the easiest to hide.

>>716254695
>Who does?
Perhaps child psychologists.

>there are plenty other factors like your idea of innocence and puritanism
>I'm literally pretending that I know shit because you're arguing against me
So you don't know shit.

>>716254809
>Maintaining innocence of childhood is the responsibility of the parent.
I'd argue it's also the responsibility of society in general to reduce the exposure overall, just as parents shouldn't let young children on the internet in general, especially unsupervised.

>Censorship
Materials should be age restricted, but age verification should not be a necessity for the majority of cases, no.

>>716251161
Says who, Michael Cohen? Michael Cohen, who lied about Trump constantly solely to make him look bad. Michael Cohen who a year ago would have been perfectly in character to say Trump is on the list even if he didn't actually know, suddenly is out here saying Trump is innocent. Stephen fucking King, who exists to claim Trump is Hitler incarnate first, and write books second, claims there is no list. CNN and MSNBC are shouting 'pfft, shouldn't have pushed the list narrative then' instead of 'Trump is a pedo' FOR ONCE.

NIGGA, DEY ALL ON TEH LIST!!! Michael Cohen would have said Trump was on the list even if he wasn't sure solely to shit on Trump. Therefore, there is only one fucking reason he would ever claim Trump is innocent. It would be a bipartisan purge if the list was released, period. Biden, Trump, you can't get elected in this country with child rape blackmail authorized by the jews first.

>>716254976
Doesn't equal sexual curiosity, pedophiles use this line of thinking to justify harming kids

>>716255546
>catch on to actual sexual deviency quicker and could mitigate harmful development in children.
This is a good argument, I remember reading a study that said sexual imprinting of fetishes happens at ages way lower than people would expect, like very early puberty/late preteen years

>>716254809
My friends and I were comparing our dicks when we were not even in our teens. We found an internet cafe and saw porn there.
All of those friends of mine completed college and got married (they are normalfags)
I'm still here a kissless loser tho.
I don't see a correlation banning porn completely and protecting them, if anything it just causes a reverse psychology/Streisand effect and makes them seek it more. If you told your kid to not go in the drawer, and to not pull out the gun ever, do you expect them to listen? Why did you even mention it to begin with? Let them find out on their own and shame them: >>716252801
They will naturally understand that it's bad - let it be natural.

Autosaged.
Could have moved it to /pol/ instead of killing the discussion.

>>716254976
That's curiosity, not hormones. It's fine to expose them to nudity through art and bathing and it's not like it's a big secret anyways since they've got the bits, but there's no reason to bother them with the specifics because it is not yet a biological imperative.

>>716255546
Some of the general stuff, sure. They should be able to name the reproductive organs and be told that there are dangerous people, but they can't be trusted to protect themselves to begin with and such information would only help after abuse so that they at least have the vocabulary to describe what happened.

Anyways, to bring the discussion back on topic, banning content because kids might see it is always retarded. The only content that should be banned is stuff that contributes to significant moral degradation like extreme real-life sexual and violent content. Fictional stuff might be a gateway, but prosecuting any victimless thought crimes are a waste of time, extraordinary overreach that should not be tolerated, and ungovernable short of brainwashing.

>>716255565
>Correct, at least until puberty starts taking effect.
So they shouldn't know how to read, speak do math, or anything at all? Because knowledge is the gateway to both good and evil after all
>sex is the easiest to hide.
Or is it the only one you care about? I don't see most parents trying to hide GTA or Fortnite from their kids to "protect them" from murder, mainly because this is all just posing for puritan good boy points
>Perhaps child psychologists
Do they? Because they say sexual encounters between children are normal and natural so the issue isn't really sexual acts per se
>So you don't know shit
You don't, what do you think will happen to a sexually active person on a sexually oppressive environment? Persecution, shame, stress and plenty other clear causes for trauma

>>716253080
>good intentions
HAHAHAHAHAHA. The people YOU'RE defending are PEDOPHILES. They just want to control more people with their shit laws and we're not eating that up, senpai. Stop derailing every thread just because you're scared an organized force starts their push back.

im going to be honest and i know this not going to fly...but i do think social media in general and much of the internet should be regulated to adults only kinda like porn you have to be 18 to use the majority of the internet only education sites and maybe chat rooms or forums regulated for kids only...the reason we got this trans epidemic is because we got these kids in grown adult areas getting these crazy ideas in there head.

>>716256320
>they can't be trusted to protect themselves to begin with and such information would only help after abuse
Says you. If you say sex is a need like eating is I don't see how some wouldn't immediately understand it as a predator-prey thing and that getting predated on in any kind of sense is bad, like getting bit. That's why we call them "predators" anyways, right? It's us acknowledging people have a need for sex like they feel the need for food.
There's probably some metaphor of eating the wrong thing or in a wrong way in there. Eating raw food or something.

>>716256948
If nothing else, kids should at least be taught about homosexuality so they'll know to avoid faggots like you.

>>716253086
>Christians
Nope.

Maybe stop acting like degenerates

>>716257174
Kids were sent to die in wars for Jews
These same people allow kids to go through gender transitions at age 3.
These same people perform oral suction circumcision on toddlers and newborns
I'm not going to defend them or take their side, but yes social media has irreversibly been disastrous for social relations.

>>716257330
Your grampy had his stash of playboys, and had shit out your parents out his dick in his teens. Did you shame him? No, it was natural then.
Now we have too many white people and we need to import browns instead to keep the working population stable.

>>716255149
Whats that word?
Edge regret?
People who use to be edgy who don't act edgy anymore. I know this is a Newgrounds thing unless you're Matt.

>>716257905
Based EBF poster

>>716257174
I can agree with that. It's probably impacted kids, but arguably it's been as bad for adults. Kind of hard to put the genie back in the bottle on that one, but I think a start would be total ownership of data and heavily limiting advertising so it's not as influential.

>>716257232
Yeah, I can agree to that too, but it's not like they need to know everything.

>>716251161
oh yeah the guy who owned a modeling agency with a bunch of teenaged girls and also hung out with jeffrey epstein totally isn't on the list or a pedophile.

>>716255687
>>716256320
>Sexual curiosity doesn't mean interest in knowing about sex
Do words even have meaning for you?
>no reason to bother them with the specifics because it is not yet a biological imperative.
What's the biological imperative for geometry and arithmetic?

>>716257174
I think the reason we allegedly have so many trans people, allegedly because I think they are overrepresented in circles familiar to us, is people are both inundated with sex but not taught anything about it by their communities. I'm saying the only community that is actively discussing and being probably very supportive when discussing these things is one that suffers from a mismatch of imposed and inherent sexual characteristics and interests. Guess who are still unsure about their sexualities, acutely aware they're feeling SOMETHING and want to discuss things but can't? Kids.

Part of it could also be changes in average human biology or something.

>>716258429
Wanting to know where babies comes from or how boys and girls are different is about on par with wondering if Santa Claus really is leaving presents under the tree. Come on, dude, you know the difference between wanting to understand something and wanting to fuck it.

>>716257674
Technically we only got involved because of Japan.
Russia and EU were doing all the work.

>>716257232
>There's probably some metaphor of eating the wrong thing or in a wrong way in there. Eating raw food or something.
eating raw cookie dough :^)

>>716250074 (OP)
If this is about the age verification laws, they've already passed in half the states and the Supreme Court refused to strike them down. Getting them repealed is all but impossible as very few representatives will actively oppose them, most of them if they don't support them will just not vote on them and fence sit instead of taking an active stance against them because opposing any bill that advertises itself as "to protect minors" is bad optics. In other words, unless SCOTUS reverses its stance later, these laws are here to stay. The only hope really is that someone comes up with a cheap and non-invasive way of complying with these laws so affected sites and storefronts can continue to operate without losing too much of their userbase.

>>716259612
Raw eggs would probably be better here because cookie dough is still harmful.

>>716258942
>is about on par with wondering if Santa Claus really is leaving presents under the tree.
No it's not, are you insane? Only one of them is knowledge about an important biological function that they REQUIRE to live life as human beings

>>716253515
>it would scar them for life
My school started sex ed in second grade. It was a very mechanical explanation but covered the process well enough. Standard class reaction was
>hahahahaha
>eewwwwww
No one freaked out about it. Within 15 minutes i remember we were asking questions about how sperm enters the egg and how do twins/triplets etc work. Scarred for life, bullshit.

>>716258238
I don't know what "everything" means here. If you're saying kids shouldn't be blasted with porn, I'd say that I agree if for no other reason than because a significant part of it is entangled with our current, in my opinion, harmful outlook on sex.
I don't have a speech ready for a kid I might have or anything but I'll think of something if I get one and give them a rundown.

Innocence is not something I would want to foster is a major issue I feel I might have with you. Loyalty is what I would call a virtue and is a thing I value. I believe that's essentially what we assume innocent women, for example, have, but you can be both knowledgeable of the world and loyal. Innocence is just lack of knowledge and/or experience and is not worth anything.

>>716259641
>The only hope really is that someone comes up with a cheap and non-invasive way of complying with these laws
This might be the endgame, but I think the more likely scenario is just that the big corporate porn sites will comply and no one else will. I don't know about each state, but Texas's law at least doesn't make it a crime to not comply. All it does is explicitly give standing for parents to sue porn sites for damages caused to their child by porn accessed on the site, and only if a certain vague "percentage" of the site's "content" is porn (no language on how that would be quantified). I think most small/unknown sites just won't bother and nothing will change.

I could see sites that sell H-games being impacted the most since they kind of rely on having a stable presence compared to video porn sites that just pop up and rebrand all the time.

>>716259784
To most children, Santa is probably life's most important mystery, but don't pretend you don't get the point being made.

>>716261919
But in reality it's something that doesn't matter, a lie made up by people around them, sex isn't this so you can't even begin to compare them

>>716258942
>>716258429
>>716261919
>>716259784
You two act like we all weren't looking or playing this shit years ago.

I wish people stopped discussing with moralfaggots and started bringing actions instead to repel the censorship shit.

>>716261561
>I don't know about each state, but Texas's law at least doesn't make it a crime to not comply. All it does is explicitly give standing for parents to sue porn sites for damages caused to their child by porn accessed on the site, and only if a certain vague "percentage" of the site's "content" is porn (no language on how that would be quantified). I think most small/unknown sites just won't bother and nothing will change.

The individual state laws don't actually matter, from what I've observed the intended enforcement pipeline is actually the payment processors/credit card companies stepping in and going
>Uh sorry we have to shut down your payments because you're in violation of Texas' state law :)

>>716251383
For 99% of history it was seen as natural to watch your parents plow as a little kid.

>>716262325
>the intended enforcement pipeline is actually the payment processors/credit card companies stepping in
If there's a silver lining to this mess it's that this exact behaviour is making Japan and the EU raise their eyebrows and, apparently in the EU's case, consider creating new payment processors.

>>716263038
Not to mention Japan is already pushing their own payment processor hard. One anon mentioned this thing happening just before their council reunion could have an effect. Honestly shit needs to happen because the obvious intent here is strangling men, especially young men with all sort of draconian control shit.

>>716262349
Yeah like, what's wrong about it?

>>716258429
How would you turn out if you didn't play any of the meet n fuck games when you were a kid?

>>716264654
You can live life thinking about all the ifs...
It'd make you go crazy.

>>716264876
bbut how would you feel right now if you didn't have breakfast this morning.

I'd still like someone to refute
>>716252801
So far it's all been moral pearl clutching narcissistic hypocrisy.

>>716264654
I didn't play shit, I asked my mom about where babies come from when I was 10, she said some bullshit about the stork or the bee which I thought made no sense, then I found my dad's copy of Private Gold's 61: Cleopatra and said
>Ah so that's how they're made
Before jacking off for the first time

I don't give a fuck about children being restricted from accessing porn. Restrict away. The problem is the argument of "protecting the children" is just a cover to ban shit they don't like. If a product is legal, and I want to buy it, and I have the money to buy it, there should be no issue. This isn't about kids because it's the parent's responsibility to prevent little timmy from accessing adult material, it shouldn't be up to two payment processors to determine what can and cannot be purchased as long as it doesn't violate the law.

>>716266510
What difference did that make? You still got a glimpse of sexual shit, as did every generation of kids before you. You didn't grow up completely oblivious to the very basic, primal knowledge of sex. You'd probably be some dude who gets off to tiles on the floor instead of women had you been raised that way, or worse yet, some asexual freak or a faggot.

Jews only want to ban porn they can't control, everything from Japan pretty much. No one wants to talk about how OnlyFans does more damage to children than Sailor Moon porn and the amount of BLACKED that you can find without a paywall.
All of these is because they need american white men to fight their wars. Either die for Israel or live off tranny bbc cuck porn for the rest of your life.

>>716251161
Why didn't Epstein just say he wasn't on the list, is he stupid?

>>716250074 (OP)
>>716251203
Is this porn? Do they fuck?

>>716259784
>REQUIRE

>>716268074
Yes, required. You need to know about sex and reproduction, otherwise you're gonna get raped

>>716268257
>otherwise you're gonna get raped
How does the rapist know if their victim is retarded in that regard?

>>716268498
It's easier to rape a retard

>>716267075
Wait, zoomies look at Onlyfans? I thought it was boomers with failing marriages.

>>716267898
Nothing overtly graphic, but yeah multiple intercourse scene. The manga sets in a isekai world of gender-role reversal where females are the sexually aggressive side. The male MC (introduced half-way) whores himself to his classmates for money

nothing, you useless fucks don't contribute anything and actively poison every online space you touch

>>716268074
>REQUIRE
It's not even about necessity anymore, it's about turning basic human biology and psychology into a weaponized taboo. Kids eventually figure it out one way or another, so trying to gatekeep it behind puritan firewalls just ensures they learn from TikTok sex therapists or whatever deranged fanfiction Reddit is churning out that week.

>>716250074 (OP)
How come that the first generation ever (kinda) with absolutely unlimited access to any kind of pornographic content, be it 2D or 3D is also the most prude one?

>>716270049
All the knowledge also leads them to discovering what evil whores women are, and it turns them off from all of it.

>>716267898
The manga is technically not porn, but it is based on a hentai doujin.

>>716270049
They grew up under cancel culture and #MeToo and it's made them fearful of overt expressions of straight male sexuality.

>>716250074 (OP)
Some of them support censorship for moral reasons, unironically
Others are literally funding the "ring" industry and are afraid of competition

>>716270049
Projection and regret.
Like a /v/ user that can't stop thinking about a trans person.

>>716261561
most porn site are already illegal anyway, and this is probably "their" whole plan with this shit, there is no way jew would just remove massive part of their consumer if not to get rid of opponent by forcing the hand of government to protect those poor children

>>716270330
Whenever someone goes on a moral crusade, it's always because they are guilty of holding skeletons in their closets. None of my co workers ever out of the blue went off about cunny and anime, they just don't have it on their mind. These boomers and millennials probably fucked kids and are trying to desperately overcompensate for their sins

>>716270049
They're not lol nobody is voting for this shit

>>716270621
no shit sherlock, no one ever voted for anything since the born of democracy

>>716270621
>>716270730
I'm sure your parents and normies understand why you're protesting your need to jerk it to incest porn.

>>716270907
Normalfags are the ones who watch the most incest porn.

>>716270907
not an argument

>>716271080
I'm not making an argument. I'm just stating a fact.

>>716270049
i guess they just think
>no one before me had this much access to porn, this probably isn't right, it's frying my brain
but as someone who didn't have that easy private internet access until i was a teen, literally no actual difference, they say the average age of exposure to porn is 11 now, but i sneaked porn mags at the same age. no difference there.
if anything i wish i had more access to porn back then instead of having to jerk it to those late night women's exercise infomercials sometimes.

>>716250074 (OP)
>Some bible-thumping pedo from Methtucky says porn should be banned because Jesus
>Some pink-haired, tattooed neo-puritan cunt from Hobofornia says that porn should be banned because it demeans women or whatever other thing they're crying about this week
Same shit, different day. Everyone in power, or with ambitions to be in power, are authoritarians. This is an inherent flaw in humanity. People who are not authoritarians do not seek power, and do not interfere with authoritarians.

>>716250074 (OP)
Thanks Australians

>>716270392
It's not projection trannies have made women in western games ugly so they are a real cancer and a major reason for western games being shit (feminists being the other). I don't hate japanese trannies because at least the characters are cute so it is entirely their fault for being obnoxious pieces of shit.

>>716251161
>he wasn't on the list
he is

t. knower

>>716250074 (OP)
absolutely everyone is well aware that >muh chilrunz, >muh terrism, >muh wymmenz, etc. are just the excuses they're using
I'd ask how to get the masses to see through their lies and boycott their ulterior motives (i.e. powergrabs, the trampling of the 1st amendment, deplatforming and debanking of people they dislike)

>>716250074 (OP)
in my opinion the topic of porn should be included with "the talk" more specific the what is it, the industry behind it, long term effects when abused, etc.

trying to censor or restrict it is useless and only breeds ignorance

>>716274846
I'm actually just black pilled with that theory of most of humanity are just empty shells devoid of souls, because there are not enough souls to go about in the universe. Leaving only a few people to actually do important work while the rest move and obey as directed. Of course I might be one of those same automatons but still.
Don't think we can wake people up, there's just too many.
Maybe that's why those NewWorldOrder stonehenge shit only said to keep 500 million humans on earth

>>716250074 (OP)
Porn exposure is bad but unrestricted social media access is many times worse. People should go after that instead.

If I were rich enough, I would just move far away from everyone. Ultra seclusion. People are exhausting to be around.

>>716250074 (OP)
I'm actually kinda surprised because there's 0 stance from female whom against it, isn't female supposed to be horny as male does?, i still remember my sister sneak into GTA Clubs and play Newground adult Point & Click games

>>716278589
Because smut for females (aka romance literature) will never be under any kind of scrutiny, let alone be attacked

>>716250074 (OP)
Are you a child?

>>716278892
Who's asking, a tranny? A boomer? A faggot? None of your kind actually attack the argument but instead go for strawman, then complain about being hit by a strawman back.

>>716273220
itch got hit

Luigi... Execute Visajeet and MasterCuck

>>716253080
Fight the good fight mate. Im too tired to jump in but you're doing good measured work on this godless mongolian rice cooking forum. I enjoyed reading your posts at least.

>>716250074 (OP)
Why are things getting MORE censored under Trump?

>>716267898
>take straight-to-the-point porn doujin about some manwhore, with a unique artstyle
>make it a drawn out SFW manga
>gets some rando to draw it
>change the mc to a prudish girl
astonishingly gay

>>716280967
What are you on about? You haven't even read it. Both of them are in the world

>>716280547
>Why are things getting worse under jewish puppet?
>Why are things getting worse under jewish puppet?
>Why are things getting worse under jewish puppet?
you are here
>Why are things getting worse under jewish puppet?
>Why are things getting worse under jewish puppet?

>>716278691
There was a woman who wrote loli rape fiction that got arrested by the FBI. Look up Red Rose Stories.