Thread 716254423

IT FIXES EVERYTHING

>>716254423 (OP)
>no BLU
why even live?

microLED or bust.

>OLED gets absolutely demolished in motion clarity by TN panels
LOL

Does it fix input lag?

>my LCD has Teamfight Tactics in it
fucking thing sucks

>>716254649
>TN panels gets absolutely demolished in motion clarity by CRT
LOL

>>716254423 (OP)
I don't care until they manage to create a monitor that I can look at any viewing angle, high color range, high refresh rate, high resolution and no blur

>>716254917
Too bad 1080p CRTs only go up to 90hz while 1080p TN goes up to 900hz now (2000hz panels already in R&D and probable release in 2yrs)

it looks fine on my screen, i don't see any blur at all

>burns in
Yawn. Wake me up when they restart SED development.

>>716254423 (OP)
Isn't QD-OLED the panel type that has lifted blacks if you have even a little bit of ambient lighting?

>>716255006
>240hz doesn't look even close to 60hz CRT, b-but im sure 900hz will surely help even though i cant render games at that framerate!

>>716254423 (OP)
>IT FIXES EVERYTHING
Yeah, including the picture permanently onto your screen

>>716255293
>>240hz doesn't look even close to 60hz CRT
the "any gaming monitor" in that comparison are 240hz IPS

not even 240hz TN, let alone 240hz TN with strobing/BFI, and ESPECIALLY not 900hz TN with strobing/BFI (which annihilates all other monitors in motion clarity)

you aren't understanding that motion clarity is mostly framerate, the "blur" you see in that pic is persistence (which is also important but in no universe does a low persistence 60hz monitor look less blurry than a mid persistence 900hz one)

>>716255347
KEK

>>716254917
Wrong some TN panels have better motion than CRT. Regardless CRT is still the best display technology so far

>Muh colors
OLEDcucks need to give 1 (one) good reason why they're using some burn-in prone shitbox when picrel exists.

>>716255761
Because picrel isn't manufactured anymore so acquiring it (in good condition) is almost impossible

>>716254649
Now show bfi oled retard
Have fun trying to do retarded amounts of gymnastics to make your "premium" tn panel match a generic oled in response times

>>716254649
retarded CRTroon
The blurbusters test means absolute fucking nothing and hasn't meant anything for 20 years since the way every modern screen works doesn't involve doing anywhere near close to CRT level overkill
Response times don't matter beyond matching the refresh rates of the screen

>>716255904
what
that's the current sony mastering monitor
you can get one for a cool 50k

Micro LED > Dual Cell LED > Mini LED > FALD > QD OLED > OLED > LED

>>716256356
lol

>>716256568
>>716256356
obviously for miniLED to be good you need a gajillion dimming zones

>>716256568
>comparing a cheap miniLED display to an expensive OLED
ngmi

>>716256568
>don't have oled
>birds on right do not glow

>>716256723
>yeah this new miniLED technology is actually cheap now

>>716256758
they blow out the brightness so you can see the difference on non-OLED

>>716256568
>can't see any difference 'cos viewing on shitty WXGA IPS from 2012

Just kidding, it's a shitty FHD AVHA from 2019

>>716254423 (OP)
>Buy 55 inch 4k tv for 180 bucks
>"noooooooooooooooooo you gotta spend 1000 on an oled TV! It's better!"
>how?
>"they make the color black look blacker than an lcd!"

Not today, schlomo

>>716257198
They only company who's made a decent miniLED is Sony, everyone else is costcutting and still selling them for a small fortune.

>>716256356
Vaporware cope
We're a decade off from anything obsoleting even an entry level 1440p 240hz oled

>>716258090
microLED is already available it's just not super affordable, it's OLED without burn in

>>716258090
Dual Cell LED was killed in the cradle by EU energy regulations. We would have it today if those faggots weren't trying to power an entire continent with windmills.

>>716256568
what it looks so good on the right... on my LED monitor
these comparisons are retarded, they prove that the blacks in the OLED photo look nice on LED screens
what you see on the right is what you get on LED, what you see on the left is just what cameras see which no one gives a shit because you're not going to be looking at your screens through cameras

>>716258306
I hate the European Union so much it's unreal.

>>716258293
Where? In fucking Taiwan where you steal it from a factory? In some shit TV kneecapped by 120hz?

>>716259093
samsung (and others) are selling it, the most common thing I've seen are small panels that you can stack together to make bigger screens, they're usually around 17" for like $15k lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P12_r-HWxRE

>>716254423 (OP)
OLED fixes everything! Except...
Inevitable burn in due to low pixel lifespan
Fucked up pixel layout
Aggressive ABL that ruins HDR
VRR flickering
Poor low luminance uniformity/banding
Black crush

>>716256568
>Cave details in shadow absolutely obliterated on basedled
Lol
Lmao

thought this was some sort of up-scrolling rhythm game

>>716259428
That literally makes it vaporware
There will be no reason to buy this shit over 4k 480hz next gen oled monitors
It'll take them forever to catch up

>>716254423 (OP)
Why is there BLU but no RED and GRN?
Is this why LCD looks so washed out?

>>716259846
eh to me vaporware is something that'll never come out but this is just clearly superiour technology, they always cash in by making rich people pay for absurdly priced TVs to start

Friendly reminder they will never make a "perfect" display technology because perfection isn't profitable.

>>716260170
Selling upgrades is profitable and that's what the panel technology advancements are about
We could all still be using 720p tn monitors but we're not

>>716254423 (OP)
When are we getting personal holographic displays?

>All of OLED's upsides with none of its downsides
NanoLED/QDEL can't come soon enough

>All of the upsides of OLED with none of its downsides
NanoLED/QDEL can't come soon enough.

>>716256017
>you can get one for a cool 50k

that's the real reason. If mastering monitors were available to the public at reasonable prices, I'm sure everyone would want them. The only private owners are gonna be people that can write them off as a business expense.

>>716254917
Can someone explain why we can't make a flat CRT TV yet? I don't mean a flat screen, I mean an overall flat TV.

>>716255347
underrated as fuck

>>716261769
they were making them before LCDs but it never got released

>>716260925
You can improve them obviously, but you can never perfect it. Gotta give people a reason to keep consooming

>>716255761
holy fuck

>>716255761
>120hz
fucking lol

>>716261085
it would be a huge meme
ar glasses exist and do that without being an annoying bitch with your gay futuristic projector

>>716261769
Explain how this could turned flat.

>>716262545
Oy vey goyjin, stop your kvetching and pay for the "using the product you already bought" license.

What are those particles in the red and green?

>>716255243
my 4k 144hz qd panel faces a window behind me and i dont see it at all, both movies and games look great
i have a lcd 4k side monitor and the blacks look amazing on the qd compared to it

>>716261769
>why we can't make a flat CRT TV yet?
physics, need anode and cathode which requires physical separation in distance, >>716264396
you could try to pipe this output to another direction and thereby have a "flat" screen but it be wider but why do that when other tech is cheaper better and easier and it'd have a lot of design problems

RGB Mini-LED is the next big that that will actually be affordable. Micro LED and anything of the sort will never be affordable or look good up close.

>>716255937
>Now show bfi oled retard
OLED is self-emissive meaning you cannot do BFI at 2x the native refresh rate. BFI *halves* the refresh rate of an OLED monitor. hence why they only support BFI/strobing at 60hz or 120hz while TN panels strobe at 600hz+

>built-in CRT filter
How did they do that?

>>716255243
It is but that shit needs to be unreasonably bright while the light is in front of the panel

>>716265051
>>716262545
Oy gevalt
Pay us what we fucking worth lmao
https://pro.sony/ue_US/products/broadcastpromonitors/bvm-hx3110

>>716256758
>>716257282
>maliciously edit competing technology to be more bright
>t-this is fine
kinda sickening but goys will fall for it

what does /v/ think of hd crts?

>>716254423 (OP)
I'm not buying a monitor that literally damages itself over time. No improvements in quality or convenience makes up for the constant, nibbling stress of that.