← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 716293753

14 posts 10 images /v/
Anonymous No.716293753 >>716294885 >>716294936 >>716295343 >>716296927 >>716298306 >>716298575 >>716298587 >>716299223
What do you think about steam reviews, anon?
Do you think it's reddit?
Anonymous No.716294885 >>716296927
>>716293753 (OP)
They're fine for getting the gist of a game but not for whether or not it suits your taste. Reviews will tell you if a game has performance issues, if a multiplayer game is dead, or if it's abandoned by its developers.
Anonymous No.716294936 >>716295305
>>716293753 (OP)
I only read negative reviews
Anonymous No.716295140 >>716295253 >>716296927
Just remember that all clown badges you receive should be considered badges of honor because it essentially just means you BTFO of someone enough to get THEM to give YOU a reward form blowing them the fuck out with your opinion.
Anonymous No.716295253
>>716295140
It can go both ways imo. A review getting clown awards are usually at the top or bottom of the IQ bell curve.
Like a lot of the time it's just some faggot crying about the game being too hard for them.
Anonymous No.716295305
>>716294936
This. I usually just read the best rated, top 3 negative reviews. If those are just shizo babble from someone with 3k hours, nitpicks or some filtered noobs it's a buy.
Anonymous No.716295343 >>716296927
>>716293753 (OP)
They're pretty useful but could be so much better. Hardware info should be included, and meme reviewers need to be shot on sight.
Anonymous No.716295941
I leave a good review if I enjoy an indie game
Anonymous No.716296927
>>716293753 (OP)
>>716294885
>>716295140
>>716295343
>steam reviews
>look inside
>misinformation
>unfunny garbage
>low effort reviews
>"time played: 2 hours"
reviews on any site will never have any value unless they're heavily moderated, gatekept, and restricted to people with many hours of gameplay. watching a gameplay video or a stream is infinitely better than watching a review, because nowadays the people who make reviews don't care about being informative.
>inb4 "muh freedums" or "muh right to an opinion"
reviews used to be sacred and anyone using those excuses to justify making their shitty reviews deserves to be publicly executed
Anonymous No.716298306
>>716293753 (OP)
I looks for reviews from players with over 1000 hours. I will know immediately if the game is worth playing or not.
Anonymous No.716298420
>Do you think it's reddit?
No, it's steam.
Anonymous No.716298575
>>716293753 (OP)
Steam reviews are begging for some sort of technical issue filter.
I don't care if there were problems at launch that are solved now or about braindead fags who are incapable of looking up a simple solution on PCgamingwiki.
What about, you know, the fucking game itself?
Anonymous No.716298587
>>716293753 (OP)
they're useful for getting a message to the devs
when Resident Evil 2make got its forced DX12 patch (in which they also fucked up the basic lighting in favor of letting raytracing handle it) the reviews were calling bullshit all over the place, especially as capcom had just had the game on a big sale and saw a good amount of new W7 users
Anonymous No.716299223
>>716293753 (OP)
This boss didn't enjoy the steam reviews at all.