Thread 716343908

Nintendo World Report and Cubed gave Bananza lower scores and dropped the Meta. The Mario Cult is real and they can't stand Donkey Kong games.

Exhibit two

>>716343908 (OP)
>Despite the moderately disappointing soundtrack
>Cons
>Collectibles are a mess
How are these people even real

>>716343908 (OP)
Nintendo Life also gave it a a 9 and were seething about the fact that the game was not a Mario game

>>716343908 (OP)
but /v/ said Nintendo websites always inflate the score

>>716344521
This would get a 7 at best from them if it wasn't Nintendo, yeah.

This is WITH the Nintendo bonus, chud. Subtract 10 - 15 point and you have the real score.

>>716344743
Add +20 bonus for the Anti DK bonus from the Mario cult

>>716345009
>tribal infighting
kek, Nintendo mental health.

Wait a minute...is that what I think it is?

>>716343908 (OP)
>>716343979

You hate it because it isn't Mario
I hate it because it's not a new DKC
We are not the same

You wouldn't just...artificially sandbag user scores for competing consoles' games, would you?

>>716343908 (OP)
The game is braindead easy, the redesigns are a downgrade, and Pauline is an annoying little shit. Review scores have meant absolutely nothing for about a decade. In an honest world, Bananza would be about a 6 or 7.

>>716343908 (OP)
Cubed is the reason it went down. The same outlet gave E33 a 10/10. There's a mandate in place to make sure nothing scores higher than it in 2025.

>>716345989
You sound jaded and disingenuous. Fix your life and happiness.

>>716343908 (OP)
The Mario Snoys are attacking DK. Oh no!

>>716345447
Sony fanboys always does this shit for some reason

>>716346467
Explains why Expedition 33 only have 84 reviews. Meanwhile one week after release Donkey Kong has 110.

>>716346568
It's just not a very good game.

>>716343908 (OP)
Fair score. It was a solid 8.5-9/10.

>>716347015
>+100 reviews

Better?

I do not give a fuck about Metacritic or Rotten Tomatoes and I feel sadness for anyone who does. There's no point and aggregating review scores when many of the people giving scores are literally who websites or blogs or even worse fucking newspapers and magazines. You're telling me Rolling Stone magazine should be a big player in movie and game reviews? The New York Times? Fuck off.

>>716347015
>still doesn’t know how metacritic works

>>716349829
holy FUCK that tendie got anally BTFO’D

>>716350084
No you don't understand, MY game did better than YOUR game so that means I'm superior!

>>716353615
True.