← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 716352990

80 posts 30 images /v/
Anonymous No.716352990 [Report] >>716353274 >>716353318 >>716354816 >>716354857 >>716355808 >>716355867 >>716358670 >>716363991 >>716364310 >>716364878 >>716370515 >>716370608 >>716371780 >>716372914 >>716373041 >>716375445
Lollipop Chainsaw "no DEI" marketing thing
1. Given what the remaster was like, the game will very likely suck & this is a ploy to gain sales.

2. It's good that shit like this is finally being said & seen as a profitable marketing statement in an industry environment where even "I hate toxic gamers but..."-minded devs have to admit they weren't allowed to design attractive women by higher-ups.

Both can be true at once.
Anonymous No.716353067 [Report] >>716353341 >>716353875 >>716354075 >>716356062 >>716357440 >>716377217
"Erm you gotta keep ALL politics OUT" you need some backlash after well over a decade of this shit I'm sorry.
Anonymous No.716353101 [Report] >>716353341
It's a red flag honestly. No good action game needs to virtue signal like that. Either just put titties in your game or not, don't wrap it up in political terms. Cringe
Anonymous No.716353170 [Report]
That's fine, Collective Shout will handle them.
Anonymous No.716353274 [Report] >>716353402
>>716352990 (OP)
>"known for its dark humor and graphic gore"
Yeah. That's what it's known for. Let's go with that.
Anonymous No.716353318 [Report] >>716353432
>>716352990 (OP)
This is the third same fucking thread in the last 18 hours. Can you stop already.
Anonymous No.716353341 [Report]
>>716353101
see
>>716353067

Years and years of Sega tweeting articles about how localizer input to make skirts longer is good or Capcom gloating about desexualization. Gotta have some balance.
Anonymous No.716353402 [Report] >>716353628 >>716353629
>>716353274
That whole article is saying they're going to preserve what they think is important - the dark humor. It makes no mention of the cute teenager in skimpy outfits. Just the dark humor. Again and again. That probably doesn't bode well.
Anonymous No.716353432 [Report]
>>716353318
no
Anonymous No.716353581 [Report] >>716353875
I've seen no indication that Dragami Games is a good developer and the original Lollipop Chainsaw by Grasshopper already wasn't anything special. This claim is pure grifting so that the intended audience will excuse it should it end up being a shitty game.
Anonymous No.716353628 [Report]
>>716353402
I don't care about a studio who couldn't even make a remaster play better than the old game on emulators, I just think the ideological shift is good. I don't want to play Stellar Blade either but shit like this means legit good games not made by people who think polygonal boobs cause rape are more likely to come out in the future.
Anonymous No.716353629 [Report]
>>716353402
I mean, the pretty girl helps. But it was still a fun game.
Anonymous No.716353875 [Report] >>716353961
>>716353581
Grifting from the other side still influenced shit like this >>716353067 being commonplace and had an impact on the industry for the past 13 years
Anonymous No.716353885 [Report] >>716354460
>buzzword used in marketing
tree found in forest
Anonymous No.716353961 [Report] >>716354282 >>716354650
>>716353875
Two wrongs don't make a right. The sooner everyone stops pretending this stuff has any relation to making a good game one way or the other, the better.
Anonymous No.716354075 [Report] >>716363973
>>716353067
>>>>>>>>>>>>>aura
Anonymous No.716354282 [Report]
>>716353961
It does, aesthetics matter and creative freedom matters. It can't save a bad game (and again I don't think this particular game will be good, just that the statement being seen as profitable sets a good precedent) but a good game is only better if it has appealing presentation. Plus it would only be equivalent if they bragged about censoring "degeneracy".
Anonymous No.716354460 [Report]
>>716353885
How many games not made by retarded "based" indie devs in the past 13 years used "no DEI" for marketing, and how many bragged about ESG/desexualization/progressiveness?
Anonymous No.716354650 [Report] >>716355153
>>716353961
Nah fuck off. I've tried to live by the mantra on LEAVE ME ALONE AND I WILL LEAVE YOU ALONE my entire life.
I didn't start this war.
I campaign for sharia law now just to ruin everything for the people who wouldn't leave me alone.
I support immigration charities and I help with campaigns to get criminals released from prison.

I will make life unfun and unsafe because you cunts did the same to me.
Anonymous No.716354816 [Report] >>716355085 >>716356065 >>716357481
>>716352990 (OP)
The remaster flopped (less than 1k players at its peak) and so will this one, nobody actually cares lol
Anonymous No.716354857 [Report]
>>716352990 (OP)
It reads like the intro to an NFT project that snapped up the IP, not a serious sequel
Anonymous No.716355085 [Report] >>716355337 >>716356474
>>716354816
>no one bought the censored demake
Wow, what a surprise
Anonymous No.716355153 [Report] >>716356357
>>716354650
That's deranged dude just call devs who do identity politics shit retarded
Anonymous No.716355337 [Report] >>716355675
>>716355085
Censorship didn't stop Onimusha 2's remaster from selling better than the first one though
Anonymous No.716355675 [Report]
>>716355337
That's another issue. The ammount of players that don't care or never hear about this shit has quickly outstipped those who do. Companies have no reason to stop because average sales will always outweight what they would lose for their bullshit.
ie, pay with your wallet will not work 90% of the time. We have to figure out some other way.
Anonymous No.716355797 [Report] >>716358291
The OP pic statement would only be equivalent to all the shit that's been going on since 2012 if they said "we will ban all gay characters from our games to counter the woke mind-virus and get with the current Trump-era times", not "we will just not be influenced by this trend". If all game companies said was "we will not be influenced by Christian conservative orgs" we wouldn't be in this situation.
Anonymous No.716355808 [Report] >>716356156 >>716357519
>>716352990 (OP)
It's an obvious attempt to get grifters to advertise the game for free because supporting the game is supposed to own the wokies.
Anonymous No.716355867 [Report] >>716365125
>>716352990 (OP)
The real test on if they're serious about this will be the LoveR Kiss remaster they're releasing this fall. That game's material is far more provocative than anything in Lollipop Chainsaw and they're likely going to run into issues with platform censorship (the original already got censored by Snoy, and both Steam and Nintendo now have similar policies). If they don't hold their ground there, you can safely write them off as flakes.
Anonymous No.716356062 [Report] >>716357219
>>716353067
He does make an interesting point about how all the black woman characters in these games look ugly as fuck.
>lol but niggers DO look like that
Yeah yeah I get it we're on 4chan, but still, there's a level of nuance separating how they look from, I dunno, Martha Jones or something.
Anonymous No.716356065 [Report] >>716357316 >>716357481
>>716354816
It sold 260,000 copies and the devs say it blew their expectations out of the water and thats why its getting a new game and anime you retard
Anonymous No.716356156 [Report] >>716364437
>>716355808
Yes but doesn't that statement being seen as profitable today mean the industry is moving away from the insane hivemind neuroticism of the past 10+ years? Is the industry objectively worse off with a "we won't be influenced by this" statement existing to counter the immense amount of statements like this?
Anonymous No.716356357 [Report] >>716356834
>>716355153
No.
I will give them everything they wanted.
Just not how they wanted it.
Anonymous No.716356474 [Report] >>716357385
>>716355085
You can turn the censorship on and off so I don't see what the big deal is. At least as far as that element goes. Also all the censorship was to lessen the blood and gore all the titty stuff was left as-is.
Anonymous No.716356834 [Report]
>>716356357
>I will give them everything they wanted.
>Just not how they wanted it.
Anonymous No.716357219 [Report] >>716357385
>>716356062
I was never a fan of either "epic irony" racism or 100% consciously earnest /pol/ racism beyond surreal obviously-ridiculous "closed pool due to nigra aids" stuff (and I think it's good to also make jokes about white people as a group to go along with it). I think part of the reason shit like that happens is the idea that "socially-accepted problematic white beauty standards" are defined by handsome celebrities and "PoC beauty" is defined by extremely average-looking non-whites when in reality there are plenty of ugly white ethnic features (just look at random brits for example) and in general attractiveness in all races is defined by a relative LACK of super-overt ethnic facial traits.

I don't have the link now but I remember a black artist (pretty skilled, sad he had this attitude) saying "you need to draw black features ACCURATELY" and when he drew a series of "X-Men characters in Yoshiaki Kawajiri style" pictures he made the white dudes handsome and made Bishop absolutely hideous. The idea that this shit is progressive is widespread and you see it all over once you acknowledge it. Also quite common with east-Asian characters in games https://www.quora.com/Why-arent-Asian-video-game-characters-like-Faith-from-Mirrors-Edge-received-well-in-Japan/answer/Richmond-L-Chaisiri

And yeah I know there's also a tendency to make white women look "non-sexist" but it's extra bad with nonwhite characters for a reason. nu-Star Wars' Rey is undeniably more traditionally attractive than Rose Tico and that's kind of the "socially conscious media" default.
Anonymous No.716357316 [Report] >>716357971
>>716356065
Those are pretty sad numbers desu.
And yes, yes (you) are.
Anonymous No.716357385 [Report] >>716357926
>>716357219
Why is the white lady the only normal looking character here, in a short that got embraced as "white people, this is NOT for you" culture war bait no less. What does that tell you.
>>716356474
>You can turn the censorship on and off
Wait so it's actually more akin to "naive angel mode" than a full-blown removal of content?
Anonymous No.716357440 [Report] >>716370520
>>716353067
Anonymous No.716357481 [Report]
>>716354816
>>716356065
>players peak
Do consoles even have stats like that? I only ever see them shared for Steam. Maybe the kinda people interested in it don't play on PC.
Anonymous No.716357519 [Report] >>716357690 >>716358025
>>716355808
The funniest part is that the grifters and their audience don't actually play shit, they're irrelevant when it comes to a game selling well or poorly.
Anonymous No.716357690 [Report] >>716358000
>>716357519
>lying on the internet
join the 41% asap
Anonymous No.716357926 [Report] >>716358035
>>716357385
Yeah. The remaster has other issues like bugs and wonky physics but you can play in either repop or original mode. The original mode keeps all the content the same, while repop only softens the amount of blood and gore. Though the cutscenes are a bit brighter than the original release but that's another issue entirely. I admit I didn't play the remaster myself so some of those issues might have been fixed with patches but the content was the same as the original right out the gate.
Anonymous No.716357958 [Report] >>716361935
>le grifter
>le conservatards
Why would a schizo attach itself to Lollipop Chainsaw of all things? This is Stellar Blade all over again.
Anonymous No.716357971 [Report]
>>716357316
that's literally 1/4th of what the original game sold
Anonymous No.716358000 [Report] >>716358291 >>716364314
>>716357690
They were whining about RePop being censored you dumb nigger, if anything that adds up to what I said. They don't influence anything and only like to take credit for shit they contributed nothing to, like Wukong and Stellar Blade selling well because chinks bought them.
Anonymous No.716358025 [Report]
>>716357519
Grummz and the people who keep bringing him up here to make some point about anti-censorship being bad need to Ashita no Joe cross-counter each other's heads off. I legitimately despise both of you.
Anonymous No.716358035 [Report]
>>716357926
Oh and the music was different for licensing reasons but that's not censorship that's corporate bullshit.
Anonymous No.716358291 [Report]
>>716358000
I don't care if Grummz followers buy something or not, he's not legitimately anti-censorship either he literally agrees with "opposite extreme" example here. >>716355797 Still glad it did well after all the accusations of the devs being chuds and even shit like "it only caught on because of problematic Chinese nationalism"
Anonymous No.716358670 [Report] >>716359184 >>716359194
>>716352990 (OP)
Are zoomers really so much goy cattle that they will say
>oh this corporation says their game is anti-dei? INSTANT BUY!
What the fuck is wrong with zoomoids
Anonymous No.716359184 [Report]
>>716358670
It's funny how a single sentence triggered you THIS much, ngl.
Anonymous No.716359194 [Report]
>>716358670
I think very few people will buy it if it sucks purely to trigger the libs, nowhere near numbers that would make it a success.
Anonymous No.716361935 [Report]
>>716357958
"Conservitards" (as if the word's spelling is "conservitive") is the weirdest to me & gives me a "barely functioning /leftypol/ autist" impression
Anonymous No.716363973 [Report]
>>716354075
yeah he's a twitter faggot but was still forced to admit there's a problem when he got harmed by it, that's the point
Anonymous No.716363991 [Report]
>>716352990 (OP)
they said no dei. therefore /v/ HAS to buy it, or you will be woke.
Anonymous No.716364238 [Report] >>716364437
Making your grand announcement for Lollipop Chainsaw's revival be a statement about no DEI and Woke instead of letting the game speak for itself tells you everything you need to know about it's existence. The remaster sucked and they still haven't fully fixed it. Hard pass.
Anonymous No.716364310 [Report]
>>716352990 (OP)
>rainbow font
FUCK. Now i cant buy this shit either. Legit fuck you motherfuckers. Fuck you.
Anonymous No.716364314 [Report]
>>716358000
>They were whining about RePop being censored
weird to frame a valid complaint as "whining". something tells me you're not "sick of the culture war" and you don't "just want to play games for god's sake" anon
Anonymous No.716364437 [Report]
>>716364238
one side's "grand statements" are this >>716356156 the other is a tiny handful of words in a piece of marketing text that's 90% not that
Anonymous No.716364878 [Report] >>716364978
>>716352990 (OP)
>without imposing excessive creatiev restrictions
do you even know how to read retard?
Anonymous No.716364978 [Report] >>716365136
>>716364878
you know what it means smartass
Anonymous No.716365125 [Report] >>716365530
>>716355867
They're using the DEI word as a buzzword to get Asmongold to push Lollipop Chainsaw, the game is not in any danger of being censored.
I've noticed they said nothing about LoveR not getting censored, it's marketing pure and simple and /v/ will call you le troon if you -aren't- falling for it.
Anonymous No.716365136 [Report]
>>716364978
that's a lot of copium when you look at how shit is fubar
Anonymous No.716365530 [Report] >>716366225
>>716365125
>the game is not in any danger of being censored
I get your lolifag worries but this is goofy given all the deeply neurotic changes made to so many games
Anonymous No.716366225 [Report] >>716366274
>>716365530
A Lollipop Chainsaw game being force censored is a hallucination to rile you up and do free marketing
These devs would have a better point if they were reviving Senran Kagura
That they're publishing LoveR (a game that has content that certainly will be censored) and aren't doing this epic anti censorship stance with it shows it's all fake
Anonymous No.716366274 [Report] >>716366456
>>716366225
do you really think only loli & really overtly stylized neotenous anime stuff gets censored
Anonymous No.716366456 [Report] >>716366556
>>716366274
These devs literally admitted not one platform had an issue with the already released LC remaster and the release was very smooth
Anonymous No.716366556 [Report] >>716367394
>>716366456
not to deny stuff like sony censorship in the past but it's often not the platforms, it's the devs themselves
Anonymous No.716367394 [Report] >>716368464
>>716366556
it's everyone not only one or the other
the pressure comes from several sides including self censorship
Anonymous No.716368464 [Report]
>>716367394
yeah platforms are assholes but often it really is just creators pussying out and I don't like the idea that "it's not censorship if the creators change their mind" or w/e. no one except /pol/ would be saying that if someone went "I decided to remove my gay characters to not upset people of abrahamic religions"
Anonymous No.716370515 [Report]
>>716352990 (OP)
Wonder if they'll try to get some other big-ish western writer as a substitute for James Gunn.
Anonymous No.716370520 [Report]
>>716357440
Anonymous No.716370608 [Report] >>716371172
>>716352990 (OP)
NMH should have gotten an anime instead of this…
Anonymous No.716371125 [Report]
I love tiddies and ass
idc if it's on a white or black lady
just give me sexy women
Anonymous No.716371172 [Report]
>>716370608
nah
Anonymous No.716371780 [Report]
>>716352990 (OP)
Juliette isn't a very appealing design. In general, and also wouldn't be that popular on places like 4chan if she released today.

I mean the bimbo looks with the high ponytails, not the revealing outfit.

I hope they do a new MC, maybe an Asian chick.
Anonymous No.716372914 [Report]
>>716352990 (OP)
The first time I saw this character, I thought she was a stripper.
Anonymous No.716373041 [Report] >>716375157
>>716352990 (OP)
Hope new protagonist based on futa vampire blossom-like and emo ganguro buttercup-like
Anonymous No.716375157 [Report]
>>716373041
futa fucking sucks. just jerk off to dudes like a normal person
Anonymous No.716375445 [Report]
>>716352990 (OP)
It is very funny to see American progressives, who have been pandered to endlessly in vidya for longer than a decade at this point, suddenly act like it's the greatest crime in the world for a dev to use a conservative buzzword in an announcement. That said, you're right that the game is probably going to fucking suck and this is just a desperate plea to get some eyes on it. Gunn and Suda being totally uninvolved likely means it won't be worth a buy. I'm certainly not going to buy it.
Anonymous No.716377217 [Report]
>>716353067
If he's giving them references of known people, especially without their permission to use, wouldn't that put them at risk of a lawsuit?
We saw Lindsey Lohan with a frivolous suit over GTA V's cover.