>>716382093 >This isn't an argument. Neither is >>716381657 At no point in OP's post is it specified that only western release dates count. At no point. Moving the goalpost (a logical fallacy), by definition.
>>716383346 why do ppl like you always have difficulty accepting that you're dumb?
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 8:34:27 AM No.716383453
>>716383380 Where, in the OP's image, does it clearly state that the game needed to be released WORLDWIDE in 2009 for it to qualify? I'll wait. If you can find it there, I shall concede.
>>716383628 Still not showing OP's criteria for a FULLY ENGLISH OPTION GAME to be released worldwide. If anything, original release dates should mean more than global ones.
>>716383707 You are simply a moron who does not know what the word "infer" means. You lost from the start. A completely and utterly hopeless little idiot.
>>716381657 A video game's release date is based on the first region it was released in. "North American release date only" is retarded, especially when you consider games that have not released outside of Japan. Do you think they just don't have a release date?
>>716383730 Perhaps OP's image inferred something different to you than it did to me. When I think "2010 games" I don't think "2009 game's sloppy seconds release date"
>>716378654 (OP) >story has to be ghostbusters. it's is widely acclaimed to be the unofficial third part of the movie franchise. I dont know about the babe and woman games thou, i:E all the console shit
Anonymous
7/25/2025, 9:00:32 AM No.716384627
What did /v/ think of Brutal Legend? I remember that game was talked about a lot on gaming sites, yet it seems to have been completely forgotten.