Will they make the NSFW mods unavailable for UK chads without age verification?

the site is owned and hosted in the UK so they're fucked.

nexus has already been censoring and pushing far left politics, so they'll fit right in

>>716388843 (OP)
Why should I provide my personal information and have it linked to mpreg futa mods just because parents nowadays can't be arsed to monitor their children?

>>716389778
Yeah but coomer mods make up 80% of their visits so they haven't touched them, yet.

Why don't you have a NordVPN subscription, anon?

>>716389694
>Skyrim tiddie mods will be the first to go down in the site wide purges

>>716389986
Government regulation good, always good, if you disagree you CLEARLY want kids to be exposed to it because you are a pedo, don't overthink it

>>716389986
I don't get why the individual websites are the ones saddled with the responsibilty to require ID verification anyway. Why isn't that done through your ISP? It would only require a single verification through the company providing the connection in the first place, and they already have most of that information anyway since you're paying them.

>>716389986
Because the government and lazy parents decided that watching after children is the responsibility of the state, not the parents.

>>716390663
They can't take humongous tits from me. This is outrageous, I need them.

>>716390816
because they don't have any political pull

>>716390938
I mean, like, logistically it would be far more efficient to censor the ENTIRE INTERNET in affected regions outside of a specific whitelist, then require you verify your ID to the service provider who then allows your devices to connect to the wider internet freely, right? I mean, I know the intent is to inconvenience the sites they don't like into blocking everyone or otherwise shutting down. It was always about control. But did no one even suggest blocking the connection in the first place?

>>716391084
They need a symbolic way for them to not be blocked so it isn't officially a ban.

>>716391084
Its simple, the ISPs keep telling them fuck off can't (won't) do it, also the largest ISP in the country is state owned.

>>716391172
the ISPs can't tell the uk government to fuck off. They have no power in comparison

>bought a lifetime premium account before it was a subscription
lucked out, but fuck this site

make an alternate

>>716391310
lol, lmao even

Should I mod Skyrim just in case?

>>716391084
It becomes a lot easier to blackmail someone should the need arise if you have hard data on exactly what kind of embarrassing shit they've done beyond a shadow of a doubt since their personal ID is attached directly too it, rather than having to piece it together with user sign-in and cookies, which are a lot more flimsy.

>>716390816
The easiset and most logical thing is that people with children (and snowflakes) just automatically get the snowflake internet. The ISP just has to crosscheck with the goverment if the units have offspring. If not -> real internet, otherwise tardnet.

>>716389986
anon, children are just the scapegoat, so they can call out critics and accuse them of "wanting to show porn to minors"

>>716391441
You should always be modding skyrim, anon

>>716391627
I finished my modded skyrim project last year, got all the achievements then deleted it since it took up 500 gb. Maybe I could set a size limit for myself this time so I don't have just a Skyrim machine but have a nice looking game.

>>716391172
Easier to make ISPs just verify your age to even make use the internet, and then websites are blacklisted from there or not.

>>716394641
MY faggot ISP tries to block a bunch of websites by pretenting their security certificates expired.
you can just change your DNS setting to get around that so that's much easier than having to deal with than website trying to ID you.

>>716391172
BT isn't state-owned retard
>>716388843 (OP)
there's all sorts of arcane requirements and conditions based on things ilke user numbers, they may be able to slip through

>>716391627
A compelling argument