Steam should make it that when you post a review the hardware you have at the time of review is listed so we can filter turdies. Nothing worse then trying to see if a games good and its just poor people crying their 14 year old PC can't play it
It also needs to add game credits to reviews.
Frankly, you should not be able to buy games your computer cannot run well. At least get a warning of some kind. But that's a different issue altogether and one that not even the retarded third-worlders will agree to. Steam, devs and publishers won't sign off on it either for obvious reasons.
>>716393026It would just mean every jeet would flood free games with reviews for credits. that would make the already bad issues with reviews worse
theres a reason professional reviews often come with the pc specs, It is pretty pointless to see a "not recommended because it doesnt run well on my pc" and not see the specs.
However you cant expect average person to want their specs be public, specially if its low end
As an Optional feature, sure who cares why not.
>>716393383if they don't want them public don't post a review
>>716393491steam having visible user reviews is noteworthy advantage of the platform
blocking people from posting reviews of games they bought would be bad
>>716392765 (OP)>Nothing worse then trying to see if a games good and its just poor people crying their 14 year old PC can't play itNo, the worst are retards defending shitty games that run like crap on anything, like for example MHWilds.
>>716393383When you see more than a handful of those reviews that tells you all you need to know about the shit performance on all hardware.
>muh turdies my AAA DLSS slop is perfect!
If you have 5090 why do you care about turdies and their specs? Or user reviews at all? You have IGN.
>>716393652not really
for example theres a ""controversy"" about chink souls like where the recommended specs are like 1060 min, 2070 recommended and loads of chinks who bought it with those specs say the game runs poorly while everyone with <5y old gpu can run it okay
>>716393527its not blocking them its making it so jeets with a gtx750 can't say a games shit in the review because its poorly optimised when the minimum spec is something like a RTX 2050. It would add legitimacy to reviews being able to see the persons specs in the reviews
>>716392765 (OP)Actually a good idea, surprisingly. A 'very positive ' game has less of a chance to reach you when it's down to 'mostly positive' because of Indians trying to run it on their Chinese laptops
>>716393762 you need to buy the game first so that limits most abuse
>>716393625Lmao brokie still got a 5 year old GPU.
Stop wasting time here and get some money you poorfag
>>716393751If it runs like shit on a 1060 it'll run like shit on everything.
>>716393657I have a 3060 12GB. I don't even have a high end rig and I want the review system to have the persons GPU listed in the review.
>>716393941the 1060 came out in 2016 what are you smoking?. That card hasn't been relevant in the first world for at least 5 years
>>716393814Case in point, I paid for top on the line hardware and expect the top of the line performance, the fact performance in that game is what I would expect from 3060 make me feel poor and I don't like it, because that should be reserved to broke ass niggers like that projecting retard.
>>7163941165 years? When nvidia stopped offering improvements and only started offering price hikes? If you bought a card in the last 5 years you are cattle.
>>716394557stop being so fucking poor holy shit
>>716392765 (OP)Good start
>>716393383Then ban every shit-eating curryjeet off the platform
>>716392765 (OP)No point, and people like you is why.
It would only invite similar dumbshit idiots who constantly mislabel 3 year old hardware for 14 year old hardware, while themselves actually playing on 8 year old hardware.
>>716392765 (OP)It should add "CHINK" in bright letters under Chinese reviews
