>>716412384 (OP)
you gotta admit, they had a fucking great run though. even though everything else in pokemon was consistently low-effort trash, the character designs for all the girls were incredibly good for like 7 generations straight
>>716412714
WHO CREATES SOMETHING THEY DONT WANT TO FUCK
do you think they created lopunny and didn't think they wanted it to be real so they could fuck it?
all of them
whenever you want to create something you do it in a way it appeals to you, it's inevitable
>>716415580
Let's find out together, shall we. Let's see what happens when you take away a harmless outlet for something that will continue to exist once it's gone.
>>716415837
You've got the wrong of that, but whatever helps you sleep at night when those statistics start shooting up after this type of thing is done being banned.
>>716415837 >sexualizing fictional children literally leads to real life ones being sexualized
I always thought it was odd that people claim this yet to my knowledge absolutely no peer reviewed study has ever been conducted on this subject. The UK has banned loli for 16 years now, you'd think enough time had passed to get some statistics on whether or not banning it affects things one way or the other.
>>716418526
I remember downloading this movie because some anon said every single character in it was fuckable, and holy shit they were right. There are some real degenerates at the Pokemon company, even some of the boys in this look breedable.
>>716417916
People don’t realize how ridiculous it is to be fine with a child roaming the Pokemon world by themselves but the thought of them getting fucked is somehow more immoral in comparison
