>>716431434
>I mean the 60s-80s justices retards. Porn used to be banned until those justices removed it after more than 150 years of precedent of it allowing to be banned.
Because the precedent back then was bullshit. "Muh jesus" doesn't actually hold up as a legal ruling in any modern court of law because we're supposed to separate the religion from the state.
But if you go back and read every. single. one of these obscenity laws from the 1800s, they all invoke "muh jesus", sky daddy, and what your local pastor thinks about what you do inside of your pants. Just look at this one:
>Comstock Act, federal statute passed by the U.S. Congress in 1873 as an “Act of the Suppression of Trade in, and Circulation of, Obscene Literature and Articles of Immoral Use.”
This is obviously unconstitutional as fuck. How do you even define these things? Who decides obscene literature and immoral use? Oh right, your pastor and jebus. Christcucks fucked up a good system of law for 200 years and the judges of a more sane era simply undid the damage. Now current-day christcucks are scrambling to redo it but don't have any ground to stand on so they just demand people listen to them.
Btw you're wrong and lying saying it was common before then. This shit only started in the mid 1800s. So it was only 100 years of christcucks being retards. When the country was founded: literally everybody agreed it was between you and God what you did on your own property on your own time.
