Thread 716480847

>"Online stores with no age verification should not be selling porn."

>/v/: "I hate you. Your actions are genuinely hurtful to me. I want you to die."

Why is vee like this?

We're sad fucks in real life so we cope by consuming loads of porn.

kill yourself

Porn exploits men for money.

>>716480847 (OP)
I can't believe I'd see a time where /v/ is unironically agreeing with SJWs who had the same talking point about porn and nudity 8 years ago

Except steam has age verification?
Sure it isn't worth shit, but it does have it

>>716481573
i have never had to submit id

>>716481593
your parents have given you access to the internet
your parents are responsible for peddling porn to you, not steam, unless you want to be institutionalized and have your free will taken from you steam isn't responsible for it

>>716480847 (OP)
>Make Psn account in the UK
>Sony is now asking for my ID, a selfie or mobile number for age verification, or else youre stuck with a child account.

This isnt about porn
I think disks still work, but as for digital newly created psn accounts will be unable to buy games like gta 6 unless they give this data to sony

And I think the mobile number way of verifying won't last long under the new UK law before the only option is to give them your identity.

Funnily enough the very same day the government made a law saying that you have to give your id to websites, some unrelated womens website called tea got hacked revealing everyones IDs to the internet

>>716481412
Aren't these people actually like religious Conservacucks larping as feminists? I will never give my ID for this bullshit.
Its so obvious this has nothing to do with "saving the kids" and trying to use payment processors to censor shit under a sjw banner

The current age verification method has worked perfectly fine for the past 2-3 decades

>>716482051
>Aren't these people actually like religious Conservacucks larping as feminists?
Pretty much, they're just trying to get their agenda from the 90s through.

>>716480847 (OP)
>protect muh children
If it doesn’t work you’ll fake a terrorist attack, right?

>>716480847 (OP)
Why do they have to go out of their way to inconvenience me when I have done nothing wrong to begin with? I am perfectly justified in hating them and wishing them harm. I was minding my own fucking business, in my fucking RV, out in the boonies, away from everyone, and they came to ME and started shit.

>>716482414
did your keyboard break anon

I don't care what the issue is, feminists should never be given what they want no matter what it is.

>>716482423
Sorry anon, no more loli for you because fuck you. You will have to make do with Cuties.

>>716482051
>Aren't these people actually like religious Conservacucks larping as feminists?
No, the are genuine terfs that have allied themselves with christians. A classic bapist and bootlegger alliance.

>>716482480
I don't consume loli. I fap to hambeasts.
WHY ARE THEY TAKING AWAY MY LANDWHALES!

i thought the alt-right cared about children? how could you be against this

>>716482051
>Aren't these people actually like religious Conservacucks larping as feminists?
They're both. It's not consistent it's schizophrenic but that's how it is. Not the first time it happened either, lots of suffragettes were also big on prohibition supposedly for religious reasons (in the US) and tended to support mainline conservatives(outside of US)

>>716480847 (OP)
Its amazing how much gaslighting there is to this movement on the boards. Collective Shout are actively trying to censor artistic works that don't hurt anyone. Naturally, it follows people who enjoy those have a bone to pick. Fair enough if they were taking their issue to the streets and actively helping women in real life but this is digital media. CS are objectively in the wrong and I'd be interested to know where they get their funding from, as there's obviously foul-play either from spiteful western game devs or from the usual suspects.

>>716482051
Christians are by and large feminists, it doesn’t matter what the Bible says in real life they are feminists and spearheaded things like raising the age of consent

>>716482624
lmao cope

>>716482726
conservatives lowered the age of consent to 14 and the feminists said nothing.

>>716482615
Oh I mean like full on not even in agreement with actual feminists, leftys or terfs. I swear I saw some hard-core feminist sources even shitheads like Ankita and Zoe Quinn saying this is a blatant psyop.

>there's a supposed patriarchy and women are supposedly oppressed, so they claim
>they have the power to make payment processors bend the knee and thus circumvent the law, potentially ruin people's lives by cutting off their income and decide what others can consume or not when it's about stuff that's not against the law nor it is proven that it "harms real women and children"
>everyone else still doesn't give a shit cause it doesn't affect them, until it eventually does when it will be too late and the drip-feed will have already made them used to the change

>>716482051
Horseshoe theory is reality, nazi-commie-consevatards are coming for us all.

>>716480847 (OP)
>>"Online stores with no age verification should not be selling porn."
Agreed, but the stores you're targeting have age verification.

>>716482813
Where
In US it was 10 and raised to 16->18

>>716482726
Depends on the branch, some 'universal' churches try to catch everyone and so delve into feminist territory as its considered progressive. Though a lot of local churches are staunchly against feminism and prefer traditional roles. Go to any baptist church and ask them if they are feminist.

>>716482929
Absolutely everywhere. You may think it's 18, but it isn't and hasn't been for 10 years.

>>716480847 (OP)
Because if you don't stop taking cunts now they will never stop taking later do you think this ends with porn games?

>>716480847 (OP)
We literally just saw that womens-only Tea app get its user data blown out to such an extent that it's become a national security risk because many of the women were in the military, and you still think requiring digital government ID checks is a good idea? The internet is not a place for your real details, and never has been.

>>716482624
the vtubers recently confirmed that one of their main companies that just imploded was buying shitposts against their competitors over on /vt/. the same thing has been going on in /v/ for years with companies paying pennies to Indians to sit here all day making retarded arguments. it feels like it's gotten really bad over the last few years.

>>716480847 (OP)
>we are going to see that GTA6 is banned before its release
Imagine the carnage that would unfold.

>>716480847 (OP)
>”Anything that gives me the ick shouldn’t be sold, period.”
ftfy

>>716483379
That would be for the best as it would wake up the normalfags.

>>716480847 (OP)
I have yet to be told by anyone why it's a bad thing that kids may be able to see porn. They all just say it's bad and just assume everyone will agree.

>>716480847 (OP)
>"Online stores with no age verification should not be selling porn."
Except they do?

>>716480847 (OP)
You're conflating Visa/Mastercard shutting down incest games on Steam/Itch.io, and the UK's recent age verification system.

Both are bad, by the way.

>>716482051
They are. The leader of the group follows your usual conservative right-wing guys and corpos. I haven't met a single, NOT A SINGLE ONE, leftist who is okay with this shit. It's all been just right-wing saying how based it is and how porn is bad etc.
And you can see from how anons here jumps in to defend censorship, banks, and corpos all around. It's fucking disgusting but you could see it with SKG. Some at least spite voted because PirateSoftware is an embarrassing retard who deserves all shit that comes his way, but still anons went "Yeah but it's kinda bad to regulate companies... I don't want to be leftis/commie/sjw" at the same time.

I have never been this disgusted with /v/. Honestly the amount of anons genuinely defending censorship of any NSFW stuff is the biggest sign how far this has fallen if the idpol shit poltards etc. have been pushing for 10+ years wasn't bad enough.
I have no faith in /v/ ever recovering.

>>716483537
well only illegal things give me the ick, so I think everyone would be cool with your idea

>>716483640
They're not just getting rid of incest games, they're getting rid of any game that is even remotely suggestive.

>>716480847 (OP)
>with no age verification
Having a visa or a mastercard is already age verification you bad faoth faggot

Man I hope they come for Stellar Blade. Just to see what happens. I don't even play the game or care to.

>>716481412
not the same /v/

>>716482051
>>716481412
These people are zoomers who grew up during the #MeToo movement, but learned being a numale gets you mocked. So they created a new personality where they're "zased" and "trad." Common symptoms include obsessing over Rome, the Crusades, or even Dragon Ball Z. Anything traditionally masculine that they can use as a shield to hide that they're sexually repressed and get afraid at seeing boobs.

>>716481593
Steam quite literally asks you on any mature+ rated game what your age is. The only time that doesn't happen is for adult games when you've already selected on an of age account that you wish to see that type of content.

>>716481412
This is no longer /v/

>>716480847 (OP)
>"Surrender all forms of your privacy or I'm calling you a pedo! Jump through these hoops or Im calling you a pedo!"

Parents again blaming something else for not disciplining their child. What the hell is your child doing on the internet in the first place? Because a parent is bad, everyone else has to suffer for it?

>>716483379
We can only hope the jews get cocky enough to massacre the normalfag holy cow and cause unprecedented amounts of noticing.

>>716483728
>go after Eve causing her kurwa husbando to go nuclear
>get GTA6 banned outright after it has just been delayed
>will be never be able to set foot in a 3rd country without an armed convoy to back them up
What a time to be alive

>but muh children!! pedos want children to see porn!!
Trying to put your opponent in an unarguable position is so blantantly disingenous, especially when it's one part of the greater "these services are all laughably incompetent and lie out their asses so giving them my information is begging to get doxxed" issue. Also the answer is still that parents need to do more than chuck an iphone at their shit gremlins for it to be called 'parenting' but apparently the grown adults aren't ready for that discussion yet

>>716482874
Girls also have higher social mobility potential, where they have preferential treatment for scholarships and careers. They also usually have a higher chance at picking a shitty major and end up having their prospects being an HR Karen

>>716480847 (OP)
Children should be doing chores or homework, the internet is for adults.

>>716483642
If I can't have the internet I grew up with I want everything to be torn down to the ground

>>716481689
The UK law will 100% get repealed, not only is it overwhelming unpopular for obvious reasons (petition to repel it is closing in on 200k signatures) but it's also a completely unenforceable joke that's already backfiring hilariously

>>716481412
It seems 4chan finally has become a board for pussies and cucks.In greater old days Collective Shout would be already under DDoS, no to mention IRL campaigns like Project Chanology.

It's incredible how Christcucks learned nothing from their faggotry in the mid-late 2000s when they were trying to get the likes of San Andreas and Mass Effect banned, and people called them a bunch of lame queers. The pendulum swung so leftists got into positions of power in the gaming industry and media in the early 2010s, who then proceeded to do the same kind of shit but instead argued "muh representation" over religion, and again people hated them for it. So I think it takes a special kind of retard for you to then repeat the same dipshit mistake when the pendulum is swinging back in your favor. You'll have all the success in the world if you just don't fuck with people's entertainment.

>>716482726
true. a lot of christians seethe about paul.

>>716484441
But how will they feel in power if they can't make people miserable for no reason?

>>716484327
They will just get more heavy handed at enforcing it, internet will have borders in next 5 years.

>>716480847 (OP)
parents should do their jobs and actually supervise their children instead of pushing the burden on everyone else. it's not our fault they put a tablet in front of their 3 year old so they grow up terminally online.

Gachachinks.

>>716484327
>The UK law will 100% get repealed
lol no it won't, what you think UK is an actual democracy?