← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 717051751

23 posts 8 images /v/
Anonymous No.717051751 >>717051942 >>717052094 >>717054694 >>717056292 >>717056563 >>717058245 >>717058943 >>717059196 >>717059686
https://x.com/ModernWarzone/status/1951029329682636965
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1vYGnzeEZ8/

Genre standards changed from 20 years ago. Battlefield is just adapting. When people buy a new casual FPS game in the current era they expect:
- Strafing
- Crouch spam
- Jump peeking
- Sliding
- Back proning
- Dolphin diving
- Customizable weapons
- Fast TTK

If you don't like them there are other games for your taste, such as movelet aimslop games(Siege, Valorant, CS GO) or full on milisims such as Arma Reforger and Squad. Battlefield was always an arcade militaristic shooter and it will play similar to other arcade militaristic shooters.
Anonymous No.717051885
If I can't airrape in jets and helicopters, then this game is trash. Might as well play CoD
Anonymous No.717051942 >>717052142
>>717051751 (OP)
This is that game that homos say is better than Cod because it's more realistic?
Anonymous No.717052094
>>717051751 (OP)
>Zoomer
>list a bunch of shit that has been in FPSs since their inception
You need to know how to strafe if to come even close to the par time for missions in GoldenEye.
Anonymous No.717052142
>>717051942
Battlefield was no more realistic than CoD even back when they went full gritty and serious with BF3. Only realistic element was bullets being projectiles instead of them being hitscan but even then that's the standard for arcade FPS games now, Apex and Warzone has projectiles.
Anonymous No.717053027
can you rape people? good FPS games can
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7wpKso97H4
Anonymous No.717054452
>twitter thread by some market droid?
Yawn
Anonymous No.717054694 >>717055820 >>717056293
>>717051751 (OP)
Removing the slide will literally solve all the problems. This slide feature singlehandedly ruined all modern shooters.
Anonymous No.717055820 >>717056739 >>717059854
>>717054694
>This slide feature singlehandedly ruined all modern shooters
BF1 was a better game when it had a working slide.
BFV has a great slide and has the best movement in any BF to this day(maybe 6 is better, probably worse)
2042 slide is more used by AI bots than players because it's so mid

Ruin some other games. This isn't Tarkov. BF6 slide doesn't even look OP, it looks like a worse version of BFV slide, maybe slightly better than 2042 slide.
Anonymous No.717056292
>>717051751 (OP)
>If you don't like them then don't play.
Done
Anonymous No.717056293
>>717054694
The slide didn't ruin anything, poorly implemented slides did. BFV had the best movement system in the franchise and the slide was a core part of that. The issue is when every dev tries to shoehorn in CoD-style movement without thinking how it fits into the flow of the game. Sliding is fine when itโ€™s contextual, has momentum, and isnโ€™t abusable for crouch-spam ADAD hitbox chicanery. Removing it outright would just make things feel stiff and clunky like BF3/4 again. The fix isnโ€™t deleting mechanics-itโ€™s implementing them properly.
Anonymous No.717056563
>>717051751 (OP)
I can do almost all of that in Blood.
Anonymous No.717056739
>>717055820
BFV's slide is too good, there's literally no downside to doing it at all. Shit's frictionless, there is no loss of momentum and you can even do it up stairs.
Anonymous No.717057081 >>717058898
>bilibili

Fuck off
Anonymous No.717058245
>>717051751 (OP)
>If you don't like it don't play it
Ok.
Anonymous No.717058898
>>717057081
Like it or not, the Chinese are the most reliable source for playtest leaks prior to the public reveal. Western sources were constantly dodging copyright bots and trying not to lose their access, so they had to do all sorts of shit to their clips that completely fucked up the clarity. The Chinese don't give a fuck, so their footage is crystal clear.
Anonymous No.717058943
>>717051751 (OP)
we will be playing arma as usual. hows those battlefield player numbers after one by the way
Anonymous No.717059196 >>717059449
>>717051751 (OP)
>there are only two FPS games: ARMA and Call of Duty
>Battlefield isn't ARMA
>therefore Battlefield must be Call of Duty
How many hits to the head do I need to take before this logic starts making sense?
Anonymous No.717059449
>>717059196
Battlefield always played closer to Call of Duty. Straight from Mr. Battlefield himself:
https://youtu.be/E2S0G16IPOI
Anonymous No.717059686
>>717051751 (OP)
Battlefield was never slow.
It was always very similar to COD but spread out over a larger map. Very fast paced with low TTK.
It was set apart because you could do trickshots out of a jet. Not because it played measurably differently from other console FPS games.
Anonymous No.717059854
>>717055820
>BF1
was a shit game
>BFV
was a shit game
>2042
was a shit game
Wow battlefield is 0 for 3 on games with sliding in them, must be a pattern
Anonymous No.717061438 >>717061491
These are the people asking for Battlefield to be milisim with PTFO and teamwork btw. They will play 20 hours before uninstalling the game.
Anonymous No.717061491
>>717061438
40 hours in BFV, impressive, still not as impressive as people who actually play the game because they like maps, movement, gunplay etc. AUTh0rity is Battlenonsense btw.