Thread 717070997

>laughed at /v/ for getting mad at porn games getting banned
>laughed at bongs for having to verify their age on the internet
>just found out that i can‘t watch porn on twitter anymore
>apparently these stupid laws apply to all of europe too
I‘m sorry.

>>717070997 (OP)
>Watch porn on twitter
You was the retarded one all the way long

>>717071227
Twitter has some of the best porn thobeit

>>717070997 (OP)
Yeah, my account is 12 years old and I still can't see NSFW images on xitter anymore.
Apparently it's possible I made the twitter account and started following japanese gravure idols when I was less than 6 years old!

Boy am I glad I saved enough porn at some point but sheesh never coulda imagined it'd get that fucking bad either. No, there's no new laws about any of this happening in my country, it's just that everyone's being affected.

>First, they came for X and I said nothing
>Next, the came for Y and I said nothing
etc

>>717070997 (OP)
It's important to recognise that even though a lot of the conspiracy theorists are retarded and insane, that doesn't necessarily mean that they're wrong.

>>717070997 (OP)
>>717071735

There's a distinct possibility this is all going to take a deceptively dystopic turn where we don't have freedom of access to information.
The other day I saw that Wikipedia was getting harassed by this ban: part of Wikipedia's terms of service is an anonymous contributor system meant to protect the identity of people reporting in political compromised countries (think China or Iraq). This infringes on the new ID system for the UK/Europe.

>year 2030
>wake up, turn on pc
>pc can't start because the os is an online subscription feature now
>use phone to pay for the subscription
>phone can't start because the single use battery is empty
>it had a good run, lasted for almost 4 months
>go downtown in the ghetto to try and buy a new phone
at least the 1% get to have 95% of all wealth and enjoy life

>>717070997 (OP)
Good. Start using that rusty imagination of yours for once.

>>717072051
show black tities
pls

>>717071940
"muh slippery slope" isn't an argument against a specific thing, but it's always a possibility and a concern. Governments all over the world do want that level of power, however if they could just do it they would without the need for subversion or hiding the needle. We're not quite at doomsday yet.

>>717070997 (OP)
>hehe how are you fellow coomers
>gamers are coomers am I right?
>I'm totally not a jewish shill/degenerate npc

>>717070997 (OP)
Just change your location in the settings

>>717070997 (OP)
When regimens have to enact more totalitarian measures because they're losing against their primary adversaries, that means they're winning! NATO sisters, we did it!

>>717071274
it's true, since the tumblr purge it's hard to find curated porn

>>717071942
https://smarthome.steviep.xyz/
Uncomfortably not-outsude-the-realm-of-possibility satire adventure game with that premise.

>>717072290
Every time you use a VPN, a child dies.

>>717071940
>part of Wikipedia's terms of service is an anonymous contributor system meant to protect the identity of people reporting in political compromised countries (think China or Iraq). This infringes on the new ID system for the UK/Europe.
Good god

>>717072051
You don't happen to have the original do you brother?

>>717071940
>"As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century, free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny. The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism. Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. Commissioner Pravin Lal, 'U.N. Declaration of Rights' "

>>717071940
>deceptively
Brother they're basically putting that on billboards.

>>717070997 (OP)
stop using shitter you retarded traitor

I'm going to make porn accounts and start selling them and in 18 years i'm going to be rich

>Retard doesn't see the problem until it starts affecting him
classic

>>717072178
NTA but here https://files.catbox.moe/7e7n6j.mp4

>>717072386
>>717072178
It's healthier to keep some mystery running in your lifes.

>>717072664
maybe but they're some very nice titties >>717072660
thanks brother

>>717072331
Kill me, fuck xD

>>717072354
Immediately after passing the bans, lawmakers were like "Nuh uh, no VPNs too".

>>717071735
Imagine if 10 years ago I would tell you "don't keep a wifi router in your room, other people can use the wifi waves to map your body location and track your movements".
What do you honestly think would be the reaction of an average person to what I said?

>>717072660
weird ass nipple placement, 5/10

>>717070997 (OP)
Remember when the ideas of the future sounded like an amazing life?

>>717070997 (OP)
kys retard

>>717072241
I give you a better one. Even if we lived in this unrealistic hypothetical scenario where the amount of censorship stops at this line, once US and the EU pass their own versions of age verification all media will be dumbed down, and it's going to kill all but huge mainstream websites. I don't think people actually realize how awful the UK age verification is.

>>717071227
not him but chinese femboy twitter is something else man

>>717073841
>kill all but huge mainstream websites
This is a bad thing how exactly?

>>717073696
Look man, we just HAD to shoot that stupid gorilla.

>>717073938
It's monopoly by regulation. That's why big sites will probably put their muscle behind age verification laws - because they're big enough and often part of parent companies that can operate those sites as loss leaders and being propped up by investors while smaller sites will never take off or get crushed as they're unable to comply with the exorbitant costs of moderation and verification.

Like with Youtube wanting to "guess" your age and ask for ID if it thinks you're under 18. What's their incentive or accountability to make that system accurate in any way? You really don't think they'll make it as loosey goosey as possible to create a lot of false positives? That they won't ask your ID just as an excuse to sell your data to third-parties who probably complain about ads not being targeted as well as they could be for people who watch Youtube? ESPECIALLY those who use adblockers? That's what this is really about - it's their ace in the hole to get everyone to watch their stupid ads once and for all.

>>717072290
Didn't do shit for me, and I've tried with a few different countries outside of EU

>>717071940
yeah its starting. After Covid being a limitus test to see what governments can get away with and the tempermant of the people. They will start to get away with pure bullshit. Also due to the fact drones can keep a wider populace in check while protecting the rich they feel more confident pulling out Dystopian shit.

>Free and unregulated access to Internet leads to spreading gigatonnes of harmful propaganda and misinformation, often on crucial subjects
>Social media and dopamine blasting shit like tik-tok directly leads to decreasing the mental wellbeing and intelligence of humanity
>But on the other hand restricting or regulating access to the web gives way too much fucking power to the governments
I don't really know what to believe anymore in this clown-ass century

>whenever I watch porn it just makes me laugh because of how fake and shit it is
feels good not being an incel, the girls aren't even wet?!? I've had sex 5 times in the last two days btw

>>717073938
Are you asking me how it's bad that only sites like instagram or youtube will continue to exist?

>>717073841
Honestly my only faint hope is that the Internet will become so obnoxious to use and unappealing after this that its prevalence will decrease once more and people will largely return to offline forms of entertainment and information. It'd probably be healthier for humanity as a whole. But I can't say I really believe in such scenario

>>717074914
I haven't watched any live-action porn for years because literal drawings are more convincing than some talentless roastie trying to make some easy money.

>>717074823
None of this would be a problem if wireless internet didn't exist. We need to go back to cable-only internet and phones. You want access to the world's knowledge and information? You need to be at home in front of a computer, in the proper state of mind, not in the bus or whatever on phone half distracted doomscrolling. This will filter most normies who are susceptible to propaganda. (Although they were easily tricked just by TV anyway, so it makes no difference.)

>>717075215
You'll get the doomscroll of infinity on a sanitized Idiocracy level ad friendly website, not more offline. People will be more retarded for this. Onions may grow in popularity but the technical barrier, even if primitive, will stop normies from going in. Which could actually lead to a renaissance of the internet through the dark web in the far future once adoption will be higher because it will be used only by enthusiasts, like the internet used to be at the beginning.

>>717072331
Kafkaesque.

>>717075250
The difference is that while TV channels obviously still push some agenda, there's at least *some* degree of standards, integrity and information selection there (although even in there it's been going down the drain in last decade or two). Meanwhile on the Internet literally anyone can push even obviously deranged takes or blatantly fake information and with some luck and charisma they will probably find a group of retards who'll believe it and spread it further.

And as already said, with TV or newspapers at least everyone with half a brain knew journalists have some sort of political standing they're pushing. With Internet it became very easy to disguise propaganda as a grassroots thing with paid posts and bots.

But yeah, I definitely agree returning to stationary web only would be an immense improvement. But it's not like that's ever going to happen

>>717073427
Didnt batman do this like 20 years ago in that movie?

Is this what a Uma musume poster looks like ?