They say in their own terms of service that they do indeed censor things viewed as damaging to the brand.

>>717073204 (OP)
>>>/biz/

>(((they))) lie
shocking

>>717073204 (OP)

>>717073204 (OP)
>censor things viewed as damaging to the brand
So they do what every other company would do in their shoes?

>>717073204 (OP)
Yeah, we know.

>>717073204 (OP)
>le megacorp le lies?!!
K, and?
They are literally above the law

>>717073335
Yes the energy companies are known to shut down electricity to a building if they're aware someone is watching porn in it. They have to protect their brand

>>717073258
>>717073454
They recently put out a statement on xitter saying they only censor illegal things, only to get clowned on in the community notes. Someone should update the community notes with this.

>>717073335
Except very few people care what some esoteric middleman's opinion on pornography is.

I stand with censorship because I stand with conservatism. Ban video games.

Just kidding fuck these people, someone stop this shit

>>717073538
The would if they could, give it few years.

the question is how are such TOS allowed for a payment processor duopoly and why are no fucking politicians anywhere legislating it out of existence.
but I'm also a retard so there's probably some obvious reason

Jews lying? Who the fuck saw that one coming..

>Lacks serious artistic value
I hate it when these Terms of Service have subjective bullshit when it comes to user level services, let alone when it comes to business level shit.

>>717073731

A lot of politicians either agree with it or don't want to appear to support the type of content they are censoring.

>>717073731
Never was considered before but there are some bills in the works to get payment processors to be neutral parties.

>>717073204 (OP)
In other words: everyone just has found new outrage fuel to use to keep calling them?

>>717073204 (OP)
A company is interested in profit and being a known distributor of harmful or dubiously moral content could damage their reputation, thus hampering their profits.
Its not rocket science.

>>717073538
Those days aren't far off in muttlandia
This entire fiasco will only lead to protections against LGBTQIPEDO shit and the rest will continue getting choked

>>717073204 (OP)
They don't censor anything. They just refuse to do business with them.

>>717073335
Not how it works. The phone company can't take my service away because I said things they don't like over the phone. Same principle applies here. And before you start falling on your sword for the poor megacorp, payment processing is about as essential for online business as phone service is today. Two companies should not get to arbitrarily decide who gets to have a successful online business. In a world where kikes didn't control our politicians, this blatant dual monopoly would've been pointed out and punished already.
>how are such TOS allowed for a payment processor duopoly and why are no fucking politicians anywhere legislating it out of existence.
Your politicans are pedophiles that are blackmailed into submission by a (((certain someone)))

>>717073807
If they are going to hide behind "serious artistic value", then we just need to compile a list of things that aren't made to be artistic but instead are shitposts.

>>717073774
This.
Will be interesting to see what happens when the banking cartel goes after normie shit so people can go after them and not look like pedo protectors.

>>717073846
Sounds like there needs to be some serious consequences for censorship then

>>717073787

I don't see that getting passed though.

Both parties push for feminism/conservatism.

Oooh, it's in the TOS! That means they are in the right :)

>>717073862
That's censorship when the service has a monopoly

>>717073731
>why aren't politicians committing political suicide by championing normalfag repellent topics
Truly a fucking mystery.
The only reason people are getting up in arms right now is vocal tranny left coomerbrains that got cuddled into relevancy and it is affecting normalfag pastures of youtube and spotify.

>>717073959
>normalfag repellent topics
What world do you live in where porn isn't normal? Being anti-porn is not normal

>>717073204 (OP)
Who gives a fuck about credit card brand? the only people that care are the ones who use applepay or some shit

>>717073204 (OP)
>brand damaging
I think limiting people's ability to purchase legal things is pretty brand damaging.

>>717073862
>We're not saying you can't speak, we're just not gonna let you use the microphone.
I'm so glad the world is turning on jews/israel. The more people begin to associate pilpul like this to its rightful peddlers, the better.

Has there been cases of people actually blaming the payment processors instead of the buyer or seller? Only other times I've heard about it is when the payment processors are banning people for other shit before now.
If anything, the payment processors would be a good honeypot for this shit, being people who have records of actually illegal shit they can hand over to authorities when need be.
For a company that cares about "brand image", they don't do much promoting nor do they seem to give a shit about the consequences of the few actions they do take.

>>717073863

Depends on where you operate and what you sell.

In sweden most people have "Swish" and similar solution exists in other countries.

Credit cards are also horribly insecure for payments unless your bank require manual approval for every single transaction.

>>717073863
>Your politicans are pedophiles that are blackmailed into submission by a (((certain someone)))
How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you end your posts with nonsense like this?
Consider for a moment that maybe politicians ignored the duopoly because it wasn't causing any problems and if they begin to overstep their position then the public and politicians will step in to regulate them or break them up.
Now, whether removing taboo porn games from certain online stores counts as "overstepping their position" is up to debate, since I would imagine that most politicians at least don't see it as a pressing consumer rights issue.

STOP KILLING GAMES!

>>717074154
He might sound like a schizo, but that's basically confirmed info.

>>717074154
>up to debate
up for* debate

OGINO my 黒友人

>>717073731
They are: Fair Access to Banking Act
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/987/cosponsors