>>717073316 (OP)
I always found it odd how the people who are supposedly most concerned with perpetuating humanity (wanting high birth rates, caring about legacy, etc.) are the least concerned with the environment. Yet the more free-spirited people who couldn't care less about raising kids or cherishing their legacy are the ones who care the most about stopping pollution.
I feel like the IDGAF mentality about the environment should be most at home with the left.
>>717074475
"Left" and "Right" are just tribal affiliations at this point and signify what kind of people you enjoy being around. There's no undergirding logic or principles to either side for most people. There's no intrinsic reason conservatism should be incompatible with environmentalism - a lot of conservative thought in the 19th and early 20th century was anti-industrial and pro-environmentalist. But big corporations shilled the Republican Party and now it's a major part of the conservative "identity". Similarly, there used to be a strong pro-life contingent on the left that is now dead.
>fat and or jewish guy with a big number on a screen tells you to build him a cool thing >he cant do it, only you can build cool thing >instead of building cool thing for yourself to enjoy you build it for fat jew man to enjoy >he gives you a really small number as payment >you are ok with this and continue doing this until you die
??? accelerate
Its rare enough to see someone actually take issue with the luxury vehicles of the mega-rich instead of just being upset the common man is allowed a car
I don't think I've ever seen anyone gripe about the private jets the richfags all take to their big summits about deciding how to 'improve' society
If you wanted to be a real sook you could say Steam itself is bad because of all the emissionz generated by people playing their games
>>717073316 (OP)
I'd rather support a fat guy buying yachts with the money the company he created makes than shareholders of a public company getting richer when they didn't even have anything to do with the company's success.
>actually creates good things >respects his consumers >fan of his own product
Gabe can swim in a pool on a small yacht floating inside a lake contained inside a giant yacht and I will still support him. This is the one time capitalism isn't rewarding some shitcunt MBA who hates his company, hates his product, and hates consumers, enshittifying a once good product into trash.
If the deckard is $5000 on release, I'll still buy one just to give that man more money.
>>717076826
This. Gabe may be the only rich guy in gaming who actually cares about gaming and knows what his fanbase want. Valve will become like EA or Ubishit if he dies.
