Thread 717080256

And I thought the tank was bad. What happened to Fallout 4's art style?

FO3's design artist passed away

>>717080256 (OP)
What the hell am I looking at? Are you telling me even the old Fallouts got the le 50s aesthetic done better?

>>717080256 (OP)
>the front
AAAAAYYY LMAO

>>717080342
>What the hell am I looking at?
Todd's turd obviously

>>717080342
An armored personal carrier.

>>717080342
first two fallouts were art deco specifically.

>>717080256 (OP)
where's the engine?

>>717080519
in the middle behind the drivers seat. like all apcs

>>717080573
name 5

>>717080256 (OP)
Show tank please. Don't remember any 3D Fallouts having tanks.

>>717080939
Alright, who put Arcanum in my Fallout?

>>717080939
>where the engine go?
>70 degrees of turret traversal
>2 underpowered cannons(twice the reloading)
>over-complicated treads and laughable suspension
>no MG for defending against infantry attacks
>built like an inbred Cromwell chucked into the microwave
only thing it has going for it is a low profile.

>>717080256 (OP)
They needed to make new things instead of ripping off old things.
So, you get to see the Bethesda care and attention they put into everything else represented in their new vehicle designs.

>>717080939
>>717080256 (OP)
What is frustrating is that you have so many drawings and blueprints of futuristic American tanks from the 1950's like the Chrysler TV-8 and the Yoh tanks that could could utilized as inspiration, but instead they made this trash. It is not just the vehicles, but everything about Fallout 4 looks bulky, the weapons, the Pip-Boy, and most importantly the T-60 Power Armour, which is the poster child of the game (And judging by the show, the series as a whole now). It is like the main aesthetic of this game is something that could only be called Bloatpunk, for a lack of a better term.

>>717081603
Power Armor is the only thing that works with the bulky aesthetic. Even to its own detriment sometimes. The T-series looks fine to me but what the fuck did they do to the APA design with the X-01?

>>717081603
>arrrghhhh don't make original designs (im mad)

>>717080256 (OP)
>Exellent visibility for the driver while keeping him safe
>Probably a variants equipped for tank hunting
>"B...but the height..."
How else are they gonna transport power armored divisions?
once again Todd won

He's here, thread over.

>>717081603
>the Yoh tanks

>>717081830
Don't make shit original designs. This >>717080939 piece of shit looks like a kindergartener's Tortoise knockoff. Or look at the APC in the OP. Tall, wheels at the centre of the vehicle, front viewing hatches obscured by the commander's viewing port which and that port has only 180 degrees of vision. And that's just from looking at the pic.