Thread 717085854

With TotK, the sky was the limit. Now with Bananza, the ground is the limit. I think Nintendo is running out of spatial regions to develop games and this is a problem.

>>717085854 (OP)
ToTK also had its own underground world.

>>717085854 (OP)
Yeah no shit anyone who bought the console is a retard

>>717086048
My point exactly.

>>717085854 (OP)
splatoon raiders will have underwater exploration

I was gonna say give it a few years and they'll make a Mario game where you shrink down and explore someone's body like in Fantastic Voyage, but then I remembered they already did that in one of the Mario & Luigi games

>>717085854 (OP)
In the next Nintendo game, you'll be able to go left to the limit

>>717087440
Yeah they already did that in Bowser's Inside Story, which also let you play as Bowser for a majority of the time.

>>717087627
Please no political discussion in my video game thread.

>>717085854 (OP)
for zelda they'll use the dark world again

>>717085854 (OP)
If they really wanted, they could totally just hyperfixate on special landmasses for an entire game. I've personally always wanted to see Ice Climbers reimagined as a 3D adventure title where you and a partner spend the entire game climbing a massive mountain, making campfires, and fending off against Mother Nature.

>>717085854 (OP)
I see these locations more as framing devices if anything, so it's not a bad thing if they wind up reusing the concept for other games. Don't forget that Nintendo did a Dark World/Evil version of reality like 8 times, and half of those were just for Zelda.

we need an underwater game

>>717088081
peak

>>717085854 (OP)
We'll get multiversal shenanigans

>>717085854 (OP)
We'll always have [spoiler/]your anus