Do not forget what EA did when we raised our voices against the historical inaccuracies of BFV. They doubled down and mocked you at its launch event (refer to image).

If you buy Battlefield 6, understand that you are forfeiting your freedom to criticize any move EA does in the future, because you are funding and therefore enabling their business practices that care only for what is in your wallets, and not what interests you have in their games.

>>717174154 (OP)
Sure sure. Im simply not gonna buy it because its 100% gonna be pajeet wageslave trash.

>>717174154 (OP)
Preordered just to own the chuds.

You are no more than a pawn in their game. Purchasing Battlefield 6 means you are agreeing to be represented as part of a number to promote a political agenda you do not agree with. One created by billionaires who only partake in feigned political stances to come off as liberal while committing to actions that oppress your right to express your thoughts and opinions.

Source: https://www.ea.com/news/our-commitment-to-gender-equality

>>717174406
The funny thing is that your statement isn't even an exaggeration. EA got hit hard by the lack of people going for Battlefield 2042 and became very aware how they needed immediate change and tone down their political agendas publicly. Of course, they won't admit that to those who they conduct their business with, as you can read on their site >>717174667.

Don't be fooled, they have licked their wounds and are playing this one safe. They were eventually FORCED to listen to their community and create this ugly BF3-clone so they can get back on top. And once they are, they'll still be the same old company that told you to go fuck yourself if you disagreed with their views back when BFV was up for release.

Christ it's just a video game you big fucking baby, either play it or don't nobody cares about your rantings armchair guevara.

>>717175506
>How dare someone discuss a video game on a video game board dedicated to talking about video games

Kill yourself faggot

>>717174154 (OP)
I haven't played for bought a battlefield game since BF3 on the PS3 back in like 2012, why the fuck would I start again now?

>>717175506
That's a good consumer. Not only complicit in the practices of multi-billion dollar corporation with zero interest for their consumers, but actively chooses to parade a stance against those seeking to highlight the predatory practices of these corporations. Good boy. You'll be an excellent propaganda mouth piece for when Battlefield spearheads subscriptions as a standard for multiplayer games. And then, we will wonder what went wrong along the way to have allowed us to be so passive and defeatist in our stance against this sort of thing.

>>717174154 (OP)
see you in-game day 1

>>717174154 (OP)
True they doubled down on V, then the sales numbers came in and they did a complete 180 and started begging players to come back

>L-l-look we have male soldiers doing realistic things... and and a new front! Isn't it cool?
And nobody fucking cared

Then they quadrupled down on 2042 and made the biggest fucking flop ever and instead of going back they kept adding shit retarded skins and abilities like it was fucking Apex Legends and the game is still a fucking dumpster fire.

Maybe the retarded EA executives finally stopped chasing the infinite money dragon.. or more likely they realized that Battlefield is a niche but established franchise that shouldn't be chasing trends. I doubt it though, give it 6 months and they'll be selling a Rick & Morty bundle

>>717175658
I applaud your efforts. There are better games out there that cost much less and are made by companies who actually listen to their community.

It has two open beta weekends, why would you preorder it at this point when you can see for yourself how shit it's going to be?

>>717175658
Think about the investors you selfish fuck.. how are they going to be paid dividends?

What about the CEO? Huh? Where will his multi-million end of fiscal year bonus come from? You selfish cunt. Buy the slop

>>717174493
>>717175828
>>717175506
>100% bot/Indian inorganic comments

>>717175828
Not happening. Not buying a BF2042 re-skin for €70.

>>717174406
>>717174667
>>717175270
>>717175797
>>717176009
>100% bot/Indian inorganic comments

>poopjeet feels called out

Shouldn't you be raping your sister or shitting on the sidewalk or something?

>>717174154 (OP)
>Refuse to buy Battlefield 6
way ahead of ya buddy

>>717174154 (OP)

>>717175646
The way the thread started it was just OP famefagging himself with long-winded posts like a shitty PSA post. He even replied to my post with a long winded reply using /pol/ jargon, he's a retard that revels in the politics of video games, not video games themselves.

>>717176363
>I cant discuss something on a discussion board
>im doing the exact same thing OP is doing, but since it agrees with my own viewpoint its OK

Kill yourself faggot

>>717176363
Yeah, famefagging while anonymous is a real great idea.

>>717174154 (OP)
>>717174667
dont care, nerd.

>>717176361
>file.png

Indian bots cant even bother to make quality memes

>>717176509
You're thread is ass and unappreciated, the only audience you have is me and 3 other anons calling you names, scroll back on top and go to the bottom. You suck ass at making threads go back to lurking, queer.

>>717174154 (OP)
The other battlefield games weren't historically accurate either though.
I think what people want in a BF game is just a good game that is fun to play and doesn't have any predatory monetization systems,

>>717176956
Compare BFV to BF2 and explain to me how forcing crippled, blacks and women into a WW2 game is equal to a game in a modern setting that plays as a realistic shooter (for the time).

>>717176781
>me and 3 other anons
How can you possibly know that? Unless you're in a smelly Indian office with 3 other jeets making false engagement posts so you can afford a shit covered bowl of curry?

>>717174154 (OP)
I was a huge Battlefield fan, I made the retarded decision to buy 2042 even after that fucked up beta that they lied about and says was way behind. Never again, DICE is dead. Also I just don't want to turn on secure boot, it fucks with my linux install too much. BF1 was the last BF game I truly enjoyed, and the people that made that great went on to work at Embark. DICE is dead.

>>717174154 (OP)
I played BF3 yesterday for the first time in 10 years and it looks exactly the same

>>717177251
Yikes, I don't really understand the mindset of buying BF2042 after that beta but to each their own ig. Hope you sincerely learned your lesson.

>bought and played the game anyway
don't forget what anon did after he raised his voice against the historical inaccuracies of BFV

>>717177251
>and the people that made that great went on to work at Embark
The people that made BF1 quit. Hence why we got BFV that sucked and had the whole "don't like it, don't buy it fiasco". Those same people then left after BFV flopped and they made Embark.

The CEO of Embark, Patrick Söderlund, is the very same guy who said stupid shit like "we are on the right side of history", "Battlefield is female", "If you don't like it, don't buy it", etc.

>>717175918
>>717176009
I don't know why I would ever buy any newer BF games when all I read is how much worse they get them the last one. Its not like 13+ years of spiralling out is going to somehow make a good game

>>717177332
BFV flopped and a bunch of retards got scammed when they suddenly dropped all updates/content early to work on 2042. Go home Indian shill, your mother is outside prostituting herself

>>717177540
Not him but yeah, I remember Patrick Söderlund. I mean the CEO may be different at EA now but with companies like this it doesn't make much of a difference in their core philosophies. The ones who replace the position of CEO is the previous CEO's asskisser, meaning they'll continue the same extreme left agenda as the last one as to not risk their position. All of this shit is driven by self-interest, and to secure a future for the company itself they resort to going back in time just to keep an ounce of their integrity. They are desperate af, rn. They're playing it so safe that even sites like Kotaku are claiming that dragging your teammates is the "best part" of BF6 lmao. Imagine that.

>>717177603
The funny thing is I've yet to see a single article or spokesperson say anything about tending to the mistakes of the last few iterations to really make something like BF3/4. Also graphics-wise and looking at things like the destruction, it looks like the game is stuck in last-gen. I fail to see anything new or exciting, just looks like new age shooterslop. The company seems so out of touch with its history and the community that I'd be surprised if they were even aware of these issues. Honestly, expecting anything besides a BF2042 clone is just delusional.

>>717177051
Jetpacks in WW2 is accurate but female soldiers aren't?

>>717178723
They're literally just throwing money around to draw up hype. Didn't they just have some event were they invited out like 100 content creators to play and stream the game?

>>717178987
>comparing a secret item/easter egg to a prominent feature
Why are Indian shills so retarded

No 2143, no buy

>>717179216
They do that for every Battlefield in recent memory, I distinctly remember them doing the same thing for BF1.

>>717179258
>>comparing a secret item/easter egg
It's literally available in every map of secret weapons of WW2 DLC

>>717179216
The game is coming out in a couple months, thats usually when they start advertising. They know the parasocial streamers have better ROI's than traditional advertising, especially since some of them do it for free

>>717179320
Read that sentence you just typed out one more time pajeet

>>717177051
No, you wanted to talk about historic accuracy.
>modern setting that plays as a realistic shooter
It's not realistic

>>717176781
>You're thread
Stopped reading here

>>717179540
Your reading comprehension must be pretty garbage if you thought that was the initial subject anyway. I'd advise you to read the OP again but ig there's no point if you literally can't understand the topic.

This is the worst """Battlefield"" thread I've read all week. The open beta can't come soon enough so we can shut the naysayers or goodgoyers up for good cause this bickering before every BF release is obnoxious.

>>717180380
>nuh-uh

Good rebuttal.
Literally the first sentence is about historical accuracy so I really don't know what you're trying to say.

>>717180578
Seems you stopped reading at the first sentence too, that would also explain your inability to understand the intent.

>>717180546
Let's be honest, its going to just be a mediocre release but the BF fans are so desperate and thirsty that even mediocre comes out as a refreshing breath of fresh air. There's literally NOTHING of significance from BF3/BF4 but since the last couple games were back to back dogshit, doing literally nothing new is a miracle

>>717174667
he looks like a demon

>>717174493
Are the chuds in the room with us right now?

>>717180804
You could just say what your point is instead of trying to call me stupid in the most faggiest way possible

>>717180815
Tragically, I think you're correct. I think that everything that tried to be what players wanted EA Games failed to create (World War 3 and other games from other companies) all failed to lure in those looking for the modern setting. And because it has now been so long, I think either way this is just a safe and easy win for EA. And I also think you're right on what BF6 will essentially be: mediocre (at best). At worst, it will be just what the others have said, a BF2042 clone with a BF3 re-skin.

Even if I just get one person to reconsider their purchase of BF6 I'll take that as a win, though. My only objective is to rob EA of as much funding for their shit-machine as possible; and to remind people what EA is.

>>717180815
You are correct that literally copying BF3 with minor improvements is all it took to win back a select amount of fans. The success of BF6 is almost entirely dependent on if EA decides to keep the trend of keeping the game grounded to reality, or if they still plan to introduce things like hero skins, confetti particles & rainbow dash gun skins to the game post-launch that will accomplish nothing but killing all the goodwill they earned back with BF6's initial release.

>>717174154 (OP)
EA and then-executives ate shit as a result of that as well as the pisspoor reception of BF2042 afterwards
BF6 is meant to be return to form, hence you dont see this brainrot left, right and center

I’ve been thinking about not buying it.
I mean 3 games in a row is fucking hilariously bad.you don’t get to make 3 flops in a row and get away with it. These faggots who make these games don’t even play video games, they are just copying old code and adding women and niggers. I have enough games to play

>>717181085
Okay, idiot. I was leading with a clear example of a controversial point in EA's history. One where they were blatantly attacking their playerbase and then had to pay the price for it. This lead to their stocks crashing hard, and continuing down that slope when BF2042 turned out to be dogshit. What I'm trying to do here is prevent people from giving their money to a company that actively despises them for how they think, as if it's a company's business to decide what others think and feel. I'm doing it for us at that point in time. There has been so much passion for the earlier BF games and all we got for it was a slap in the face.

>>717174154 (OP)
>tfw the last bf game I boughted was 3 when it was in a humble bundle
>tfw I'll never give them a penny again since they actively block ganoo lunix users from playing their games
Won't be me, dood.

>>717181291
That's what they want you to believe but if you don't believe that that's just a very thin veil covering the fact that they're still the same company with the same views, then you're the kind of ignorant dumbass they want you to be.

>>717181394
And that's the example you picked? lmao

How about Battlefront 2 where they announced "hey players, this game won't have DLCs :^)" and then it was a battlepass/lootbox infested piece of shit. They made it look like they were doing the players a favor.
Like the actual game is good but the monetization system was complete dogshit.
There, it's an example of a shitty business practice.

>>717181701
Companies going back on their word isn't something new or something that isn't common. Certainly game companies in particular are doing this wherever you look. To use a recent example: the devs of Ready or Not has clearly stated in the past that they wouldn't censor their game and they ended up censoring their whole game as well as down-grading graphics.

I think launching a game with the background mocking your playerbase is more controversial, though I know I won't make you see this with your dumbass logic.

I'm autistic so believe me when I say I can hold a grudge, I didn't forget.

>>717174154 (OP)
Does anyone have all screenshots of that event

>>717182092
They're probably out there somewhere but even finding that pic took me a sec. Wouldn't be surprised if EA went out of their way to find the places where these were posted/spread and had them taken down; you'd be surprised how bad this type of image is for a company. Even small controversies can cost them a lot of money.

>>717181536
as far as im concerned it was the wokeshit that was a thin veil and they are just a corporation that wants money
they just listened to the wrong gaggle of consultant firms and other deranged retards at the time

>>717182227
old /v/ archives probably has it if someone finds the thread

>>717181963
You literally made a thread to remind people what a dogshit company EA is? Everyone knows that.
And the example you picked isn't really good either. It even distracts from the "actual" point you were trying to make. You want to stay with shitty business practices and EA? Use examples of EAs shitty business practices. There are more than enough
The worst part is that they probably got better than the past. At least they're not suing smaller publishers/developers anymore just to fuck with them and/or buy them out.
Nowadays they just prey on kids with shit like Ultimate team. Which they've been doing for like 20 years now

>>717174154 (OP)
>historical inaccuracies of BFV.
because the battlefield serie was always at the forefront of historical accuracy.

>>717182342
https://www.ea.com/news/our-commitment-to-gender-equality

You're not wrong, money is what they want. However, the crime of attacking their customers just to appease to woke culture should not be forgotten. And it's a lesson they have not learned, just read up on how far they're going to continue to push their shit. Meaning essentially that they would still attack their customers if it didn't lose them money.

Besides all that, there's the controversies of microtransactions/loot chests getting worse in Battlefield and others titles, like Battlefront. And time and time again they have insulted the community around their games instead of listening to what people want. They're figuratively shitting us all in the face and expecting us to lick their asshole clean.

>>717182510
I don't see how BF1942, Vietnam, BF2 or BF3 (or hell even BF4) strays from that. If you're going to attack the main subject, at least come with something concrete to prove your point. DICE was once a company making games to provide fun at a decent price in certain settings and allowing people to maybe extent the borders a bit by playing what felt more natural/fun than going down the road of being a milsim. Does that mean they're not realistic? I don't see how that would be the case.

>>717182510
BFV marketing said it was historically accurate, it wasn't the players saying it retard. The players said it wasn't historically accurate then the CEO said "don't like it? Don't buy it" and told the players who do want historical accuracy to go fuck themselves because of feministic ideology

>>717174154 (OP)
Is BF6 really going to include female soldiers? I seriously can't stand their screeching mid gameplay.

>>717182882
battlefields are as realistic as titanfall 2 is.

>>717182882
>BF1942
You mean the game with jetpacks?

>remove server browser for one game (which happens to crash and burn horribly and permanently damage your franchise's reputation
>now asking people why they even want a server browser in the first place
How do women like this even get this kind of job if they need someone to explain to them that a very basic feature is important to your game? This is like asking "what is it about drinking water that makes it so important for you to live?"

>>717176136
>any dissent isn't organic, it's all bots!
Still not buying BF6

>>717184304
>now asking people why they even want a server browser in the first place
it's part of her job to form fake engagement with the player base that's why she posted that stupid shite, she's clueless either way and women should stay the fuck away from male dominated hobbies

>>717174154 (OP)
It looks like an nucod + nubattlefield cheap knock off abomination

>>717181071
he's a super rich fag they would gladly sacrifice and torture babies on an altar to get ahead in life

>>717176136
>shilling for a company that hates you
Yeah, mhm, sure, pedro

>>717184304
>do you guys even want a server browser?
>do you guys even want a scoreboard?
>do you guys even want soldiers?

DICE is being lead by genuine retards

>>717174154 (OP)
Already pre-ordered the digital version anon
Sorry you're a poor

>>717174154 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgC20UtzoCU

Shut the fuck up, I am not buying it because it is trash and not because of your gay and retarded reasons

>>717187285
The king of /v/.

>>717174154 (OP)
I wasn't going to buy it to begin with, but now I have another reason to shit on EA.

>>717175506
From a dev team that has an entire Sensitivity team on it? If I hate the game and the people who make it enough, I'll do a LOT more than not buy it.

>>717181291
Oh please. They've taken the foot off the accelerator, but I guarantee their hiring on this game prioritized racial statistics over people who served as active duty combat vets and it shows.

And it's not like we have a shortage of them with the mid east wars.

>>717175506
>Don't buy [product] because my feefees got hurt by [company]
Is not a discussion about [product]
That's you trying to rally a mob

>>717182227
They did a number of unusual tricks like claiming their own trailer is age restricted, which limits it's reach to bots..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fb1MR85XFOc

>>717187838
Pointing out the track record of, not even the whole of EA but the exact same franchise just a game or two ago is COMPLETELY fair game. This is literally shit from their PR campaign.

However, I'd like to note that Patrick Soderlund left EA after BF5, and the lesson that EA got was to go even farther in what pissed off the knuckledraggers in 2042.

>>717188935
You're pointing out nothing though.
You make it sound like the issue with BF V or EA was the historical inaccuracy when it just was a shit game.
Then you try to talk about how this is proof for their sleazy business practices when EA has been known for that. Like you point at something completely different and think it's the same issue

The alpha test was promising other than the extremely OP perks and unlocked class weapons. Apparently they fixed the perks and there is a mode with class locked weapons so going to see how it is in the "beta" test in a week. If it is exceptional I might preorder it. We'll see.

>>717180546
But it WILL be different this time!
What you think they are going to shit the bed for the fifth time in a row ?

>>717189680
LOL. I'm a different anon than OP. I don't mind historical inaccuracy, but also keep in mind that that their very public defense, of which we have multiple articles from the PR team to Sonderland himself WAS that it was historical accuracy. It was yasuke all over again. Changing the norwegian strike team to all women.

And it wasn't JUST a shit game. It was a shit game where the people who literally made the game told us to fuck off. As in you can trace the GDC and industry things where they actively try to get 4chan debanked and deplatformed. They were partially successful there. .

So, get to the point. What is the deal? It's not like we're even covering every single grievance against EA here or throwing in shit like the Veilguard. DICE's track record is 100 percent relevant. You might not like it, but maybe I should start including it in every battlefield thread until you get fucking used to it then..

>>717189952
Get us webems from the beta if you get in.

>>717190917
>Get us webems from the beta if you get in.
I'm automatically in since I'm already a labs member and was in the last two alphas. I'll be in all 3 of the next waves. And why not.

>>717190194
Did they fire whoever fucked up 2042?

>>717190984
Considering they'd have to fire the entire company, I doubt it.

Everything looks fine to me except for the in-game battle chatter. Every voice and line sounds so sterile and boring compared to BF3, 4, 1, and Bad Company.

>>717193001
Do the soldiers not yell they're getting fucked up the ass in BF6? It's cause there's women soldiers isn't it.
>I'M GETTING MISGENDERED OVER HERE

BF3 was the last time (((DICE))) scammed me, not falling for their tricks ever again.