← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 717233487

18 posts 4 images /v/
Anonymous No.717233487 >>717233645 >>717233857 >>717234445 >>717235290 >>717235682
Donkey Kong 64 vs Donkey Kong Bananza
Which Way
Anonymous No.717233557 >>717234379
New Kong looks grotesque.
Anonymous No.717233628 >>717234046 >>717235291
watch /v/jeets unironically pick 64 out of sheer butthurt contrarianism
Anonymous No.717233645 >>717235564
>>717233487 (OP)
This comparison is so forced. Why are there so many DK64 "fans" suddenly appearing?
Anonymous No.717233857
>>717233487 (OP)
>tedious
vs
>dull
yeah thats a tough choice alright, I'd rather be bored than annoyed I guess so Bananza
Anonymous No.717234046
>>717233628
I shan't be buying wokey kong. Sorry.
Anonymous No.717234118
Aesthetics: 64
Gameplay: Bananza

I'm right.
Anonymous No.717234379
>>717233557
No but he looks generic, like he should be a boss or something not the player character
Anonymous No.717234445
>>717233487 (OP)
Bananza. Sexy redesign
Anonymous No.717235038
Oh Banana!
Anonymous No.717235258
here's hoping they make a sequel with more kongs
Anonymous No.717235290
>>717233487 (OP)
bananza might be the one time where a sequel to a 64 game is objectively better.
Anonymous No.717235291 >>717237193
>>717233628
Tendies will literally disown the entirety of Nintendo's past legacies only to dunk on their "enemies"
Anonymous No.717235564 >>717237115
>>717233645
could it possibly be because there is a new 3d dk game for the first time since dk64..? no, it can't be..
Anonymous No.717235682
>>717233487 (OP)
tedious but fun vs goty
Anonymous No.717237115
>>717235564
its so old it shouldn't even be part of the conversation. They are wildly different games in content and quality.
Anonymous No.717237193
>>717235291
you lost and got raped, much like sony
Anonymous No.717237241