← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 717245408

19 posts 6 images /v/
Anonymous No.717245408 >>717245707 >>717246201 >>717246212 >>717246745 >>717246867
Call of Juarez > Red Dead Redemption 2
How did red dead win?
Call of Juarez:
> play as pissed off priest wearing breastplate armor
> blast through everyone with a Bible in his other hand
> Better whip mechanics by miles
> Billy's cool too
Red dead redemption 2:
> play as a really really sad faggot
> boring characters nobody cares about
> boring story nobody cares about
> ruins the flow of the action by forcing you to herd sheep and hunt animals
Anonymous No.717245515
why is juarez calling me?
Anonymous No.717245585
Normies will eat up literally anything Rockstar make due to herd mentality
Anonymous No.717245707
>>717245408 (OP)
Techland is too busy making dying light zombie slop to make more cowboy kino :( it sucks, id trade all their zombie slop for 1 more COJ game.
Anonymous No.717245738
Bound is blood is pretty good. Never played the first. Funny that Ray is pretty much just a seething cuckhold though with context on bound
Anonymous No.717245840 >>717246485
Is this one good?
Anonymous No.717246201 >>717246336
>>717245408 (OP)
I've only ever played Gunslinger. How do the others compare?
Anonymous No.717246212 >>717246336 >>717246648 >>717246867
>>717245408 (OP)
Call of Juarez released 4 games over 7 years of middling quality (with one, The Cartel, being a complete piece of shit), whereas Red Dead Revolver didn't get a sequel for 6 years, then that didn't get a sequel for 8 years, and both were very graphically intensive and immersive games for the time

I enjoyed CoJ Bound in Blood just fine, but to say it's the same level of quality as RDR is just make-believe

also CoJ was made by Techland, who have a habit of making games with quite poor quality, compared to RDR and RDR2 who were made by Rockstar, one of the most prolific develoipers in the industry
Anonymous No.717246336
>>717246201
The first one and bound in blood are good. The cartel is shit but kinda funny.
>>717246212
But CoJ kept me interested when red dead put me to sleep. I mean red dead 1 is okay but 2 is complete garbage. I was sad when gunslinger ended, I was happy when I uninstalled and refunded red dead.
Anonymous No.717246485
>>717245840
Nah, all the others are worth maybe playing through. Just not that one, the cartel is truly terrible.
Anonymous No.717246648
>>717246212
Their games may be jank but they use their own engine when most other devs would shit out 20 dying light and CoJ live service unreal 5 games. Rockstar has pretty much been the raped after gta 4.
Anonymous No.717246745
>>717245408 (OP)
apples and oranges. one is a fun little shooter and doesn't try to be anything more than that, the other is the most advanced living breathing open world in a video game.
Anonymous No.717246867 >>717246952
>>717245408 (OP)
>doesn't mention gunslinger which utterly rapes RDR2
>>717246212
Are you retarded?
>DURR RDR2 BETTER BECAUSE ROCKSTAR BIG AND HAVE MONEY
No, Call of Juarez is better because the devs actually wanted to show their love for westerns instead of trying to educate chuds.
Anonymous No.717246909
I loved first two games as a kid/teen, I played Gunslinger few years back and didnt enjoy. Especially first game was so sick with using bow as Billy or slaughtering natives as mad priest.
Anonymous No.717246952
>>717246867
Gunslinger is kino but I played the first a lot when I was younger, I remember it more. I should play gunslinger again.
Anonymous No.717247154 >>717247193 >>717247868 >>717250762
Never played these games but had Gunslinger on Steam for awhile now when they gave it out for free. How is it?
Anonymous No.717247193
>>717247154
fun for a few hours.
Anonymous No.717247868
>>717247154
it's a hidden gem. a really fun fps with amazing presentation. definitely try it out, you can beat it in an afternoon. ending is absolute kino.
Anonymous No.717250762
>>717247154
https://youtu.be/shdLk0tHJWo
Kino