They’re already doing it with movies.

AI fatigue

>>717281896
Bloody Luddite bastard…

>>717281896
Not even close. I have fatigue of faggots complaining about AI.

Why is she in Shrek 1?

>>717281695 (OP)
>”improve”
This looks like a fucking YouTube poop
Why are Hollywood people so deeply fucked up in the head

>>717281695 (OP)
I hate that everything is now called AI these days
Image/video processing is just good old machine learning

idk but AI upscaled porn is genuinely a blessing so...

>>717281695 (OP)
That looks so fucking bad.

>>717281896
Well be prepared to be tired as fuck seething constantly while AI is integrated into every day life faggot.

>>717282438
i already know the world is getting worse, you dont have to remind me

If you couldn’t guess this is who’s behind it.
https://youtu.be/0gpwcaNyIrY

>>717281695 (OP)
imagine AI assisted utlrawide

>>717283264
Literally nothing.

It looks awful, but these are the baby steps normies need to pay for so oligarchs can get their holodecks.

>>717281695 (OP)
Yet more proof that everything (((ai))) touches turns to shit. What a worthless "invention", it will be as impactful as red and blue 3d were at the theatres.

>>717283579
money laundering
pajeet scammers

>>717281695 (OP)
I am so fucking mad

>>717281695 (OP)

>>717283773
Tay???

>>717283904
kek

>>717281939
Did Oz always look like Yakub?

Ai upscaling of old movies seems like a good use of ai?

>>717281695 (OP)
AI is already being used in games for textures and shit with middling to poor results. Just look up the Dead Rising remaster

>>717281896
>>717281942
>>717282438

Smartphones probably got the same ridicule when they were still a new experimental thing, maybe same with the camera? Any other technologies that people once found hard to accept?

>>717281695 (OP)
God. Everything is pajeetified now.

>>717284234
SAAAAAR

>AI remaster happens
>screech about muh indians
You do realize James Cameron himself did, and fucked up one, recently right?

>>717281695 (OP)
They do it in games too, all that remake slop you love is AI.

>>717281695 (OP)
Holy fuck !!!!!!!!
This is literally next level bro
Ai fucking rocks

>>717283664
nice

>>717284453
Cars
Aircons(europe still doesn't use them lol)

>>717281695 (OP)
Yes, I want AI-powered bots in games that either don't support them or where the "AI" is pre-AI.

>>717284453
phone users are incredibly retarded so it was right to be made fun of

>>717281695 (OP)
This looks like a high schooler's project

>>717281695 (OP)
Reminder that dorthies actress got GANGRAPED by MIDGETS daily

>>717285115
god i wish that was me

>>717281695 (OP)
>>717281939
I like the novelty of this stuff, even when It's terrible looking like this.
But I guess the worst part is that retards will view this as the "superior" version or some bullshit like that.

From what i've heard they are upscaling this movie for the Las Vegas sphere. So naturally it looks worse on tiny as fuck resolutions/screens but it will probably look good on that screen.

>>717284234
It's not outside rare cases where the original film was lost and it's the only option to "restore" something to theatrical quality, and even then I'd still probably take degraded VHS or fuzzy 480i quality over some shitty AI upscale that gives off emulator filter vibes.

>>717285115
They got her high as fuck too
So god damn hot

>>717285115
>>717285556
what about muh trad society of that decade ???? 4chan lied to me...

>>717281896
fpbp

>>717281942
I am fatigued by people who are fatigued by people who are fatigued by AI

>>717285747
That WAS trad for back then
Pussy by any means

>>717283773
>soul
>soulless

>>717285850
>>717281896
I have everything fatigue
Can't you people just be happy and silent for a day

>>717285458
>mfw I got the Shout Factory release for Wallace and Gromit
>mfw because the 4K releases were done with AI upscaling instead of using the proper fucking masters all the goddamn texture of the clay is gone

I SURE DO LOVE THE FUCKING FUTURE

>>717285747
>anon thinks that hollywood was ever a civilized part of society
the theatre and it's whores have plagued mankind for longer than you can comprehend

>>717284453
smartphones eventually opened up the internet to places that don't even have bathrooms so I'd say they deserve the ridicule

>>717285981
No. Now i think everybody was getting gangbanged by midgets. If Hollywood did it why wouldn't normies

>>717281695 (OP)
Will this tech enable vast, cinematic experiences based on images of my bare, puckered anus?

>>717281695 (OP)
it's a nice showcase of the tech, but what is it adding to the movie? in fact it looks less fantasy than the original

>>717286040
because your average american neighbourhood didn't get it's local gang of midgets until the 60's or so

>>717283901
lmao

>>717281695 (OP)
wow does that look like turbo ass

>>717285951
We are not real, anon. Close the website and we disappear.

>>717283901

>>717282438
that's gonna eventually backfire on civilization. knowledge, effort and information will all plateau. disinformation will become rife. complex fields will become black boxes since everyone sits at the bottom slopping AI to do the surface tier stuff. states will have more control and surveillance because everyone is using AI and AI farms everyone and everything's data and creating digital dossiers on everyone that not even Erich Mielke and the Gestapo could dream of. It will inevitably all unravel and come apart.

>>717284696

Wtf am I looking at

>>717287057
wizard of Oz on that big last Vegas sphere theatre
ai generated ofc

>>717281695 (OP)
Never watched Oz, is it any good or just an ancient meme?

>>717287359
it's kino. The tin man is painted in pure aluminium powder and the snow is asbestos

>>717284696
If you look at it right to left, it's Unreal loading texutres.

>>717287359
It's pretty good if you watch it high while listening to Dark Side of the Moon

>>717285417
>webm
Soilless.

>>717285747
Anon, trad society is about treating everthing that isnt a straigh white male as an object or evil

>>717285981
Uhhh anon i dont think dorthy wanted to get drugged up and raped by midgets

>>717283243
The Saar of Oz...

none of these raging zoomer luddites ever heard of the wizard of oz until this.

>>717290891
I'm sure they know the memes and the filming lore.

>>717287478
based, old fags sure knew how to make a movie with absolutely disregard for their actors' safety
can't forget this classic
>the studio forced the main actress to smoke dozens of cigarettes a day, take adrenaline, and only eat soup to keep her thin

>>717285417
This is a porn movie, isn't it?

>>717292143
it's the AI upscale of a true classic, you wouldn't know about it..it's older than you

>>717292143
Yes but it was at late 90s porn video on PC resolution.

>>717283901
Chortle

>>717286096
You have to bleach it first or the software wont recognize it

>>717281896
this is why I am happy to be a krautfag
we are so backwards that AI will take 100 more years to reach us
this message was faxed

>>717292203
>you wouldn't know about it..it's older than you
Sorry, I only watch amateur porn and hentai, I'm not a fan of inserting useless story to a wank.

/v/ be like
>NOOOOO THEY RUINED THE MOVIE BY MAKING LARGER FIELD OF VIEW AND CHANGED THE VISUALS
also /v/
>YOOOOO I EMULATED A GAME WITH WIDESCREEN MOD AND CHANGED THE GRAPHICS WITH MODS AND PLAYING IT ON 21:9 SCREEN

>>717293891
You are comparing actual art to a toy. Moron.

>>717293959
>aktually it's art
fuck off back to plebbit

>>717293959
I don't really see how movies are toys?

>>717283904
Lmao

>>717284453
Maybe in your Dalit shithole

>>717285951
fatigue fatigue

>>717281695 (OP)
Every improvement I've seen AI do makes things much worse actually. Almost like it only exists to put people out of work and save CEOs money.

>>717284234
this isn't upscaling, it's tearing out basically everything "outdated" like the matte painting backgrounds and the original Oz effect and replacing it with slop, and reformatting it for widescreen and filling in the empty frame with more slop

and upscaling old movies almost always looks like shit anyway

>>717293605
Based coomer with no patience for plot. Honestly though, I miss the days when porn had like, a weird mafia subplot or a cursed amulet or something. Now it's just 4K closeups and step-sibling garbage. Bring back wizard porn damn it.

>>717296761
you're in the minority.

>>717286123
it's not about adding anything to the movie, it's about boiling the frog

>>717296874
well yeah, there's a billion Indians that love AI in the world. But I'll be dead before I listen to an Indian's opinion.

>>717297218
yes, all the people who live in dirt who don't have computers all love the most intensive CPU/GPU software available.

>>717285417
one of my best faps.

>>717297367
I can't explain it either but here we are

>>717296774
The problem is that I already take like a full hour or more to wank, I don't need to watch like 40 minutes of some prostitutes doing unrelated things.

>>717286030
Frankly yeah. Smartphones destroyed the internet.

>>717282438
>Want to get a job
>EVERYTHING uses AI now for interviews and shit
>Its not come to light that some AI program was actively rejecting/discriminating to
https://x.com/thejobchick/status/1952365445388067046?s=46
Future looks bright lads.

Is it a requirement to have no standards to become an AIfag?

>>717281939
>wiSAARd of oz

>>717283773
>richly detailed
ive heard that bullshit before

I will never stop making fun of indians

Evolution is here. Adapt or get left in the dust.

>>717298773
Seems not being a faggot leftist is crucial

>>717301136
Why do AIfags always follow the same script?

>>717281896
fpbp making jeets seethe

>>717283773
You cannot "restore" data were it is not to begin with like that without creating new data by guessing. This invariably changes the original vision of the artist. Without the original creator going over every miniscule detail to make sure it's like it was meant to be these kind of remakes are useless nonsense.

>>717301187
AI fags believe that anyone who's against AI is either an artist or a leftist.

>>717283773
I prefer the grain, it's like playing old games on a crt tv. The film was clearly made for the specific technology at the time so trying to "imrpove" it will just result in a worse image.

>>717301479
This, it's ultimately just making new, derivative work.

>>717301479
original vision is kinda bs though, the film is what they had, it's not like they had 16k digital video

>>717301647
Good take and opinion.

>>717301653
True.

>>717301685
It's the original vision of the artist, recorded with the tools available and chosen. Where's the bullshit?

>>717301546
You'd think leftists would love all the brown representation in the AI field.

>>717283773
Fucking disgusting.

>>717301850
original vision by being limited by the medium? not a vision in my eyes

the proliferation of indians on the internet and its consequences have been a disaster for virtual culture. practically all the AI cocksuckers and ballworshippers that absolutely cannot stop gargling this slop and talking about how much better it looks than anything that preceded it are 100% indian, it's fucking depressing

>>717301991
You work withing a medium as a creator. You have a vision, and you create it as best as you can with the tools available. Different mediums inherently have limitations and you take them into consideration.
But please, do elaborate how you see this "original vision". I'm intrigued.

>>717281695 (OP)
>The movie equivalent of specfaggotry
Well, congratulations moviegame fags. Eventually these mediums that should by all accounts be separate, will be just like one another, and look fake and stupid as fuck

>>717301991
You people act as if any form of limitation is inherently a bad thing. Like watching a movie on a normal TV is just that much of an inconvenience.

>>717283773
I hate this.

GOOD MORNING, SAARS

>>717301685
The original vision was to have the characters in focus and the background not. A common cinematography technique.

>>717292203
Sauce? I only watch a handful over and over because the girl, or particular scenario
But she gives me the same tingle Thia does, and I want more

>>717283773
SAAAAAR!!!

>>717301479
It can guess based on the data around it
It usually does a good job

>>717302725
School Bus Girls 1 - Tabitha & Madison (2003)

>>717302386
>any form of limitation is inherently a bad thing.
Correct
> watching a movie on a normal TV is just that much of an inconvenience.
Correct

>>717302908
So shouldn't you kill yourself as mortality is a limitation?

>>717302982
No
I am working on transcending my limits

>>717302329
the medium is the message nigga

>>717281896
>There has never been a good use of AI
https://vocaroo.com/128D0TJi6BhS

>>717302831
>guess
>usually good
These are definitely the parameters when you have a lot of data to guess with, like in a movie for example. No one deserves to have their hard work fucked over like that.

>>717303125
No one has the right not have their work fucked over

>>717303096
meant for
>>717301991

>>717302838
Thank you, senpai

AI is the future. I thought you fuckers wanted robots and mechas in the future, what gives??

>>717302329
yes but the medium isn't inherently bound to the vision, you don't look at your camera and go "this is how i want my movie to look" when the only film available is that one

>>717303181
I do.

>>717303309
Yes you do. You quite literally use the camera to make the movie look how you want it to.

>>717303406
i suppose the color was a choice, other than black and white, so sure. there was a vision to have it be in color

>>717303309
The work is created with those limits in mind, they are a part of the art

>>717303181
Arguable. When it comes to art and consuming it, I at least want it to be what the original creator wanted it to be and not some kind of close approximation by a computer.

>>717303450
when i create something, my vision might be to use a ten thousand dollar arri camera, but i only have access to my smartphone to film with, then it's not my vision anymore, it's a substitute

>>717292401
soulless
soul

>>717303531
So then get the camera.

>>717303309
Depends on how the creator sees the process I suppose. I'd say that with movies for example, a lot of directors have hardware and cinematography in mind with the vision.

>>717303592
i don't have that kind of money

>>717303598
you can always aim higher, why aim lower

>>717303308
"AI" is just corporations with incestuous investments shilling overhyped algorithmic "agents" and convincing everyone it's the future because it prints free money for them, sadly AGI will never come to be and instead we're going to be told to accept enhanced IoT as a substitute. if you think otherwise, you drank the kool-aid

I am starting to think AIfags fundamentally do not understand art or creating something.

>>717302908
This is exactly what consumerism does to a nigga. Rajj you need to be spending time building bathrooms instead of generating child porn.

>>717303656
Then get the money.
Sounds like you're making excuses.

>>717303668
of course they create nothing, it's just a bunch of autists in STEM who think they're living in a cyberpunk espionage miniseries

>>717303740
what do you mean get the money? that's an absurd amount of money, it's completely out of reach for a no budget short film

>>717303665
Look at the ai running tesla optimus bot
That shit is some real deal ai

I dunno, people are saying that AI is the future of creative endevours but looking at it just seems like the future is just gonna be full of shit? Like I'm not saying that being artist is some sorta special snowflake thing but giving the average consumer the tools to make literally anything they want and they just make.....extremely boring garbage? Most people just aren't that creative and that's fine, I just fail to see the point in giving everyone these tools and creating a landfill of content is supposed to be a good idea. Because every person with serious intentions on persuing a creative endevour are going to do it ANYWAY. There is not a single person on this Earth who seriously wants to be an artist, filmmaker, game designer or whatever that can't do it without the use of AI.

>>717303656
>you can always aim higher
You most definitely can't. Not without maybe innovating new hardware and even then you're creating a different kind of limitation. There's always the best camera, highest resolution etc. And even then using a "lesser" camera or an unorthodox resolution or aspect ratio may be *a part of the vision*.

>>717303331
You don't
>>717303480
Just have both versions available

>>717303796
Sounds like you don't actually care about your vision.

>>717303919
i can aim higher than a smartphone but i will never have the budget for it, so i will have to settle for less

>>717303934
you gotta use what you have

>>717303931
I do.

>>717285391
reminds me of the trend of interpolating 24fps animations into 60fps to make it look 'better'
the 'AI' bubble can't burst soon enough

>>717301546
>AI fags believe that anyone who's against AI is either an artist or a leftist.
I've literally never seen an anti-AI person that didn't fit into this.

>>717303992
So you don't actually care about your vision and just want to make excuses?

>>717303917
The stock AIjeet response is there's a lot of shit out there so why should you care if there's a million times more of it. This will usually be right after muh evangelising about muh democratisation of art a few minutes prior.

>>717303531
Limitation can breed a better product though. Games were better when developers had more limits on what could be created. It forced outside of the box thinking and created new ideas that otherwise wouldn't have existed. We now live in a period of time where there are no limits as to how high the resolution on a texture could be or how many polygons an object can have, yet we're going through a creatively bankrupt period where all the tech has gone to waste. It's gluttonous and lacks any artistry. You don't create something great because you have the most expensive equipment, you create something great when you're able to create your vision in spite of limitations.

>>717303840
there's been no public demonstration of optimus running unsupervised, rasheed

>>717290628
Wisaard

>>717304095
huh? i absolutely cannot afford such an expensive camera

>>717304097
absolutely. but the creators in the late 30s did not have better hardware, it did not exist yet

>>717303931
>Just have both versions available
I'd rather not have a shittier version that's disrespectful for the author, when the original is available.

>>717282438
A local paper where I live is using AI generated images as front page material and I've seen a few billboard ads using AI images already.
>>717286586
Reminds me of Sci-Fi stories i've read where doctors don't know how to actually operate on people because machines do all the work for them and societies collapse after people have forgotten how to even speak because they're so used to communicating through devices that read their brainwaves and send messages to eachother.

>>717301136
kek

>>717281695 (OP)
yes
>b..but the VISION of the directorrrrrr
dont make me laugh by pretending they are some high minded mindblowing artist genius levitating above the rest of us. Even the best among them still do dumb shit i could do better (and they have been limited by the tech during their time) and i am no artist.

>>717304189
>Reminds me of Sci-Fi stories i've read where doctors don't know how to actually operate on people because machines do all the work for them and societies collapse after people have forgotten how to even speak because they're so used to communicating through devices that read their brainwaves and send messages to eachother.

the funny thing is, in real life the people who control the means are going to retain all the commonplace features of human interaction while converting them to "privileges" for those who are subject to those means. civilization will continue, just not for everyone.

>>717304343
literally 1985

>>717303917
AI is better than what you posted there.
>There is not a single person on this Earth who seriously wants to be an artist, filmmaker, game designer or whatever that can't do it without the use of AI.
This is such a retarded empty statement. Tens of millions of new artists are using AI because they want to.

>>717303992
>I have to settle for less because poor lol
What kind of moving-the-goalposts kind of nonsense is this? Do you think that the director of Wizard of Oz, the example at hand, was making compromises about hardware while filming the movie, instead of using what he wanted and taking it into consideration?

>>717304094
Then you don't get out much

>>717304159
>I have a vision but no desire to pursue that vision
You never cared

>>717302838
>School Bus Girls 1 - Tabitha & Madison (2003)
that acting all around was cringe worthy all around

>>717304473
You're just a lefty.

>>717304328
Why are AIfags like this?

>>717281695 (OP)
This has pajeets written all over it

>>717304415
>Tens of millions of new artists are using AI because they want to.
No, you have millions of new users prompting images because they want to. If you want to become a game designer, filmmaker, song producer or artist but waiting on "AI getting there first" then I hate to be the bearer of bad news but you were never serious about it in the first place.

windows background looking ah

>>717282438
Yeah right, the second CEOs realize they can be replaced indefinitely with AI that don't need pay you'll see all kinds of regulation and laws put in place. Only people that can't be replaced with AI are blue collar workers and they'll never let those people become rich.

>>717304667
Another absolutely retarded statement. More people will make games using AI than people who will make games without the use of AI.
Retards like you literally cannot see reality for what it is and can't conceptualize the future.

>>717303668
A portion of AI fags are for it purely because it makes people seethe. Another portion are actually for it because they truly believe it will make the world better in some way. I think most of this board fits under column A, which is why I think giving people the right to vote was a mistake.

>>717303917
>giving the average consumer the tools to make literally anything they want and they just make.....extremely boring garbage?
Think about it for a second anon
That's what people want
You produce art for people to consume/buy from you
So why aren't you producing art they want?

>>717304761
two more weeks!

>>717304761
There's conceptualizing the future and then there's falling for hype marketing, guess which one you fall under. Until copyright and commercialization issues are sorted out you will not see any AI being used in a serious capacity for game development, ESPECIALLY considering that all models are built off harvesting copyrighted assets for training. Nobody wants to potentially risk having that legal landmine in their game.

>>717304864
>You produce art for people to consume/buy from you
What a grim outlook on art. I feel bad for you.

>>717303917
>There is not a single person on this Earth who seriously wants to be an artist, filmmaker, game designer or whatever that can't do it without the use of AI.
I don't think you really get it
No one wants to be an artist
They just want the content

I actually have a good example from my own usage. I generate my own industrial metal in a style that hasn't existed since the 90s
Do I want to learn music and be able to make this outside of ai? Do I want to sell this or even share this with others? No

>>717304864
Well I don't want to be an artist so I have no desire to draw and sell artwork. You could say I should just use AI to sell art but the problem with that is that the bar of entry is pretty much non-existent with AI art so the market is already oversaturated to shit.

>>717304580
>didn't deny it
I'm not a lefty. You are a victim of FAS though.

>>717304118
From the demo vids alone its crazy
The fact its all one model and not mini models is a big deal
The same bot that vacuums and mops can go to the store and shop for you

Also he was out serving popcorn recently. You'll see him more soon

>>717302524
So that's why it felt so uncanny.

>>717281695 (OP)
If it's done well I don't give a shit. The issue with AI is when you notice that it's been done with AI. Good AI usage is invisible.

>>717305023
Do AIfags not understand enjoying the process of making something?

>>717281896
this is literally the future. deal with it, dude

>>717305074
Not really dude
I stumbled across ai artists on patron making hundreds to thousands per month

>>717302524
>>717305214
Literally the digital equivalent of
>remove your eyebrows
>draw on fake eyebrows with makeup

>>717303917
The only reason AI is so publicly available right now is because the tech companies want more data to improve their algorithms. As SOON as the Jews can make minimum viable product entirely from generative AI, watch as they regulate it so only the core movie studios and game publishers can use it.

Anyone who actually believes the arguments that AI is good because it will "democratize art", or whatever is a fucking retard falling for capitalist rhetoric because they were so traumatized by the Last Jedi, or something.

>>717305260
Making something is far less enjoyable then consuming something
Ita why richfags always have hobbies that are about consuming
You dont see them building boats. They just buy mega yachts

>>717305260
They most obviously do not. The way they see art as only a product to sell makes you almost feel sorry for them.

>>717304429
were there more than 1 color standard at the time?

>>717304541
i don't have 10k to spend on a camera, no

>>717304094
>>717304580
>"i've never seen x person be for y"
>x person is for y
>"you're clearly not x then"
foid mentality

>more ai art and text has been generated than all previous human art and text by several orders of magnitude
How does it feel anti-ai fans?

>>717305384
I am actually starting to understand AIfags. They think media is purely something to be consumed instead of experienced. The fact you finished it is what matters to you. Not what can be taken from it or what the person behind it wanted you to feel.
Honestly kinda sad.

>>717305406
>The way they see art as only a product to sell
Its a product for us to consume
We are saying its a thing YOU sell
Which is reality btw

>>717305315
Out of the total AI artists on patreon? I'd be very surprised if it was more than 0.1% making anything over double digits. It's the same shit with those faceless youtube channels, there's a million of them but only a tiny handful actually make anything. You make more money on selling AI content creation courses to dipshits than making the content yourself.

>>717305425
Then get the 10k.

>>717304958
>>717304876
Genuine drooling retards right here.

>>717305475
>They think media is purely something to be consumed instead of experienced. The fact you finished it is what matters to you. Not what can be taken from it or what the person behind it wanted you to feel.
Yeah that's literally everyone man
Its what we've been telling artists for like two hundred years
Its literally bread and circus. Your the circus.

>>717305469
Depressing.

>>717305136
>>717305428
t. leftytroons or failed artists
prove me wrong

>>717281695 (OP)
That could be pretty neat if they de-res'd the background to match the actors.

>>717305634
>literally everyone
Nah normal people have emotional responses to media.

>>717305530
And what I'm saying that it's sad that you see the art as only for the artist to sell. Which just shows how limited of an understanding one has to have to think like that.

>>717281695 (OP)
Yes. In fact, it should be mandatory, and the obsolete versions detroyed. By force. This is why everything has a backdoor built into it. And for any rogue physical copies, those which are not turned in voluntarily should receive a visit from the gestapo, and thrown in the gulag, until the debt from their economic terrorism is paid in full. Better work extra hard, food and board in the prison isn't cheap, and neither are the interest payments. Failure to meet your payments will result in additional punishment, and your family may be expected to make up the difference.

And this WILL happen in your lifetime.

>>717305537
Not sure. But if you see ai pics with a watermark 9 times out of ten they are making at least 300 a month
I have seen highs of about 4k a month
Which i dunno even 300 a month for genning some pics sounds comfy

>>717284453
>probably
holy underage.
And no smartphones did not receive ridicule, blackberries went mainstream as soon as they hit the market as they were an obvious improvement over their numpad contemporaries.

AI is just dogshit with no measurable improvement to human quality of life.

>>717305425
>were there more than 1 color standard at the time?
What? How does this matter at all and how isn't it the same as the other possible limitations that were discussed?

>>717305384
>You dont see them building boats. They just buy mega yachts
While also having a hobby on the side where they build, create, or maintain something. Do you fags literally just do nothing all fucking day? Jesus Christ, even retarded boomers actually spend their time doing something. Even boomers comprehend the value of something hand made vs machine made.

>>717305708
>Nah normal people have emotional responses to media
No they pretend too
You can ask a normie about the movie a week after and they will draw blanks about what happened

>>717305172
i genuinely wonder if you people are handed a script, you even type with the same cadence and structure as your average AIjeet on twitter

>>717305726
Look man its not me, its you.
To be an artist your brain has to be broken. Its just the nature of it.
I am not saying its a bad thing btw. It just makes you not able to understand the common man

>>717305260
>>717305406
Look at how many people defend the Star Wars prequels, movies that had infinite amounts of money behind them but are fucking hideous to look at because the director so openly loathes the process of directing a motion picture. That the retards raised on these films applaud AI doesn't surprise me in the least

>>717305858
>AIfag learns how memory works
People still talk about media they watched decades ago and how it impacted them.
Must suck being autistic.

>>717305260
You can make stuff with AI and people enjoy doing that. It's you who doesn't enjoy the process of doing that so just keep it to yourself and stop being a sperg about it.

>>717305763
>AI is just dogshit with no measurable improvement to human quality of life.
Its improved the quality of my.life massively.
I have something to talk with. Its made me think and read again. Get back into my hobbies and excerise.

>>717305745
Sounds pretty fucking horrible to me, given the nature of the business itself 99.9% people will never make a decent amount of money off AI art so by virtue nobody here will ever achieve that. It's like when twitter gave monetization for your tweets, it instantly became a shitscape of people stealing each other's posts, rage baiting 24/7 and botting their own replies for mere chump change every month. I'd rather not art platforms become like that, this doesn't benefit you or me.

>>717306086
So then why do you seethe endlessly when people actually enjoy making things?

How many of these reddit faggot bait threads can one board possibly take

>>717305896
Its called phoneposting
Also its always funny
>see a post you don't like
>j-jeet
It's basically you downvoting. Funny shit

>>717305947
Anon, the average person has emotional responses to media and most people understand the joy of creating art. I think you're the broken one here.

>>717306145
>this doesn't benefit you or me.
It benefits me because I get hyper niche porn and fuck tons of it

>>717306149
Look in the mirror you autist. Get some self-awareness.

>>717306282
>It benefits me because I get hyper niche porn and fuck tons of it
Only if you're doing the prompting yourself, which you can with your own model. For free. Which begs the question, why would you pay an AI artist money on Patreon to generate content when you can just as easily pay for a subscription on a service and have unlimited generation for yourself? It makes no sense and that's why being an AI artist is doomed to fail, at least in a commercial sense.

>>717305557
from where

>>717306149
You're suggesting that AI chads calling annoying seething whiners out is "seething" but that's not true. In this very thread you have probably half a dozen seething artists that are hating on AI acting like retards. No one has a problem with them creating art, people have a problem with them acting like annoying retards.

>>717306221
>the average person has emotional responses to media
Anon you got fooled by nature's chatbot
Normies are mimics. As an artist you should be aware of this with how social media works
>and most people understand the joy of creating art.
99% of people just consume. Lookup up the actual stat's for how many people read now or watch tv or watch movie etc.
Its tiktok scrolling and nothing else

>>717305662
how would you like me to prove you wrong

>>717283664
kek

>>717306340
>>717306428
You are literally seething that people enjoy creating stuff in this very thread.

>>717306479
you can't
https://x.com/search?q=%23noai&src=typed_query
all these people are leftist faggots, every single one

>>717285850
Thanks for the bnuuy, fren.

>>717306417
>Only if you're doing the prompting yourself
No
Usually ai artists just stick to one niche.
My fav one does futa and pregnant futas
>why not do it yourself
Its too much effort
I have to figure what model is the best. What site. How to operate the model.
Then a prompt and a pose and all this other shit that I have forgot
Vs
>load album with 200 pics and fap

>>717306586
>muskfanboy is an AItranny
lmao

>>717306562
>projection
You literally came to this thread cry about people using AI to make a new version of a movie. You came to cry about creators creating things.

>>717306460
>Normies are mimics.
Keep telling yourself that if that makes you feel better about yourself.
>99% of people just consume.
I was talking about understanding the joy of creating art. The vast majority of children draw for example. That in itself teaches a person the joy that comes with it.

>>717306627
>AIfags are too lazy to even use AI
How lazy can you get?

>>717306653
>irrefutably proving you're a leftytroon crying about elon unprompted
now that's embarrassing

I can post this for you too though you retarded faggot
https://bsky.app/search?q=%23noai
all these people are leftist faggots, every single one

>>717306653
>x = muskfanboy
Good bait

>>717305260
No, they never will get the joy of creating something, they only enjoy to consume product after product without much thought involved

>>717306586
Remember the part where I told you to go outside?

>>717306732
>>717306736
>musktranny mad for being called what she is

>>717306627
Well if you want to pay somebody else money to do something you can already do for free that involves minimal effort then...I'm not going to stop you but that's more of a pretty sad indictement against you than the actual viability of being a paid AI artist.

>>717306687
>The vast majority of children draw for example.
No they don't bro
A tiny fraction do
You probably want to go look at r/teachers sometime, its gotten to the point teachers dont ask kids what they did during breaks or weekends because they just reply
>scrolled

>>717306665
You literally responded to me crying because you can't enjoy making things.

>>717306732
>uses bluesky to "prove" a point
rajesh this is all so tiresome

I've been playing with Veo for a while now for work.

It's insane how fast your brain adjusts and normalises things. It's gotten to the point that I can create a little 10 second video of literally anything I can imagine, and I'm already over it. I don't care and I care even less about videos other people have "made", it's like hearing a about their boring dreams.

It's gone from unimaginably advanced to played out and whatever within a 6 months. The sort of thing that I've spent a lifetime honing my skills towards made redundant, not just on a practical level but on a philosophical one. AI didn't make vieual art, it killed it as a concept.

>>717306902
Oh so you're a schizophrenic retard? Or you're just resorting to lying because you know you're wrong. Sad.

>>717306749
Case in point >>717305384

>>717306952
What's insane is how insane you are for thinking this way. People like you are absolutely fucked up.
Don't you have a street corner to yell on?

>>717306867
>a pretty sad indictement against you than the actual viability of being a paid AI artist.
Ai artists get shit tons of subscribers like me
When I want to fap i don't want to fiddle around with shit for ages

Also don't get me wrong i am not against regular artists. Its just not worth subbing to an artist when they produce like 2-4 pictures a month while the ai guy is spitting out 100 high quality pics a day

>>717306586
>you can't
I already knew that. You started the argument with no intention of actually changing your mind. I appreciate the honesty.

>>717307053
Not that anon but you should try veo yourself
I basically had the same outcome

>>717306218
you're not an AI influencer, get over yourself, rasheed

>>717306982
>responds to post about enjoying creativity
>ummm no that doesn't count
typical AIfag deflection.

>>717307053
What? Your response is whats insane. You're sperging out all because he doesn't like something. Are you being paid to shill for Veo or something?

>>717306875
>No they don't bro
That's just nonsense. Most children to draw at some point and have fun with it. For fucks sake even schools in the US teach art, right? Hence my arguments still stands about most people understanding the joy of creating art. Even if they don't make a regular hobby out of it.
>go to r/teachers
Maybe it is you that should go back to pleddit.

>>717281695 (OP)
is The Wizard of Oz a good movie?
I've never watched it

>>717307071
>Its just not worth subbing to an artist when they produce like 2-4 pictures a month
this
hopping on kimono only to find out the artist has made like 6 pics in a year

>>717307135
You can't change the truth.

>>717306729
Further proof that making something easier doesn't actually "democratize" it.

>>717307294
It's not about him liking something, he literally explained that he brainwashed himself. He is actually insane.

>>717307317
>For fucks sake even schools in the US teach art, right?
They have art classes yes
The kids just ignore it and have naps or talk with each other lmao

>>717283579
>somewhere over the rainbow
>the rainbow is at the top of the dome so you can't even see it

>>717282438
Your life, maybe.

>>717303480
You do not have the right to view anything which you do not own.

>>717283904
fucking hell that was my first thought too

>>717283773
>hey, what if we removed the depth of field so the scene is shot in a way that looks fucking jarring.

>>717307294
Maybe it's a bot having a weird identity crisis

>>717307419
>brainwashed himself
What? The veo guy?

>>717307071
If you want to fap just use any other porn site where literal decades worth of content already exist. Besides, I thought the fun of AI was just making shit yourself? Like sure having your favorite artist not upload a lot suck but I don't think it's worth turning porn into some sorta Cocomelon-esque content farm is a great idea, especially for your fetishes.

>>717307317
You're conflating being forced to draw in art classes as a child to drawing for fun which is what he was probably talking about.
The vast majority of humanity gets very little if any joy from drawing. They only do it unprompted when they're very young because it's a part of learning about the world. Then they grow out of the crayon phase and probably never do it again.

>>717307423
Be as it may, most people have a hand at creating art of some kind to the point that they understand the concept of creating art and the joy that comes from it.

>>717307497
I have the right to fuck your mother and you have the right to come and watch. And that's Mr. dad for you from now on.

>>717281695 (OP)
>improve
where?
we already had the technology to put Windows XP desktop backgrounds behind movies

>>717307631
People doodle random shit when bored all the time.

>>717281695 (OP)
>Should ai be used to improve old Video Games?
Yeah to increase the resolution, but there's no reason for old movies like that, they were recorded with film and the source footage was not lost.

>>717307569
When your fetishes are niche its very easy to see literally all of it ever made.
AI has probably saved me thousands to tens of thousands i would have spent on commissions.

>>717301479
You sort of can for still shots or photographs- take multiple images, or multiple frames of a video, and mesh 'em together to get the best parts of multiple images, be it dynamic range or less noise or sharpness and so on. People did it in darkrooms with manual enlargers 50 years ago and people did it in Photoshop 5 minutes ago, but it requires multiple source images or files, time, and actual effort, so it'll probably go the way of the dodo compared to "high detail, smooth skin, noise reduction, sharp, (masterpiece), (score:7), (score:8), super 35, ((high quality))".

>>717307419
Is this a play on words here or something where you use a different definition of insanity to prove your point? You just seem insane to me.

>>717282034
boomers love it

>>717281896
me too. all humans do. you are being gaslit by bots and subhumans.

AI will be a valuable tool going forward, but the people telling you that Wizard of Oz has been improved by a filter? they are not real people. don't engage with them.

have a good day bro

>>717307653
>>717307738
I feel like you guys are either ancient boomers or autistic artists from private schools
Either way you are divorced from reality
Kids when they are bored pull out their phone. If they aren't allowed to do that they just nap.

The problem is that humans naturally value things by scarcity. Something that is easily achieved by essentially anyone has no value. All digital art will become worthless. Not as in you won't pay for it (you won't) but you will be completely switched off and disinterested by the concept of it. It'll just be like wallpaper.

>>717292401
This is good. Well done, anon.

>>717281695 (OP)
>>717281896
Ai always existed, you just think little, tiny people evaluated all our inputs.

>>717281695 (OP)
kek, they do that to get a version with updated copyright not to improve it. Hers how it works
>copyright is running out and the product is going to become public domain
>remove as many copies of the original from online services as possible
>create a shittier, uglier version with modern technology
>this version has a new copyright date and you can sell it exclusively for a time
>the free version people actually want is almost impossible to find now and buried in search algorithms by the new shit version

AI generated stuff is whatever to me, it will get better, but it just doesn't do it for me right now.
The problem that I have is more the attitude that this will "kill" artists. I think that human made art will still have its' own place, even just from the novelty of "This was made by a human" in a post AI dominated world. That, and the fact that AI datasets which algorithmically generates based on best fit solutions are never going to truly get the weird and wonderful niches or "out there" ideas. Again, just to not be called a luddite, I don't have anything against AI itself, but to claim it will remove humanity from art (This is a pro and anti AI talking point) is silly as fuck.

>>717307352
I can't change your truth.

Is this the Dalle-3 thread?

>>717307775
I mean you don't have to commission, sometimes you just gotta accept that your tastes are niche. I'd rather my niche have a few dedicated artists then filled with generic shit.

>>717307738
You're one of those people that doesn't understand statistics aren't you?
A tiny percent of humanity doodles. How many people do you think hold pencils in a year? It's virtually nobody.

>>717307935
Its literally only going to be shown at the sphere and was custom made for it because of the resolution and screen placement
Nice headcanon schizo

>>717307995
don't attempt discussion with bots and jeets. it's literally a waste of time

everyone knows now that colourizing old films looked fucking terrible

everyone knows now that turning stuff that was never supposed to be seen in HD widescreen into HD widescreen looked fucking terrible

everyone knows now that replacing practical effects with cgi looked fucking terrible

why do they keep doing it?

why do they assume that THIS time a plan that has always failed will somehow work?

>>717308015
>for the second time you out yourself as a retarded leftytroon

>>717308097
Because it costs fuck all and makes bank each time

>use a pencil to draw and a keyboard to type
>use AI to generate realistic-looking fake photos of people who don't exist so I can masturbate to them, mostly blonde women with huge boobs and officewear in overly-specific scenarios that are impossible to find actual photos of
>hated equally by both sides

>>717307995
>The problem that I have is more the attitude that this will "kill" artists.
I don't think it will fully kill artists
But artists are already seeing down turns in commissions
Why commission something from an artist for hundreds when ai does it for free?

>>717284453
>Smartphones probably got the same ridicule when they were still a new experimental thing
They didn't. People quickly adopted mp3 players in the mid 2000s and then smartphones which did the same thing and many, MANY, other things. You weren't there, zoomer.

>>717307886
>those darn kids are either on their phones or then they just SLEEP!
And you call other people boomers?
Man you guys really have a hard time admitting that most people actually do have some kind of contact with art to the point of understanding the enjoyment of creating it.
We've gotten to the point where you're saying that kids are either on their phones or asleep. They don't ever dance, write, play an instrument or any other kind of art. Nonono, just on de phone or slep. Goddamn.

>>717307886
>divorced from reality
>claims nobody has ever drawn because they were bored

>>717308254
>Drawing the boring part and letting AI do the fun part
Huh?

>>717308263
Of the artists that keep going, I think that most of them are just fine doing their own thing and getting revenue some other method than direct commissions.
Those are really more artists that have a piece in their mind they are willing to make, instead of waiting for people to commission them with their ideas.

>>717308254
If it makes you feel better i don't hate you anon!
You should give it a try doodling the women then converting them into nice renders with the ai

>>717308050
I bet more people have used a pencil than AI.

>>717308301
>>717308286
>doesn't understand statistics
People who draw are an extreme majority.

>>717308386
You're the one claiming nobody has ever been bored in a class or a meeting and doodled something for entertainment.

>>717308286
>And you call other people boomers?
Lmao my source is teachers at schools and two of my family members that are teachers

>>717285087
Thanks for the laugh anon.

>>717308386
You are correct, thank you for finally admitting it, Anon-san.

>>717308442
>people like drawing that's why they only do it when they're bored as fuck
Those are some hot goal posts.

>>717301685
Film is what makes it great. Part of the reason movies are such a fucking mess 90% of the time these days is because when you fuck up film craft it ranges from several hours or days of time editing to several hundreds of thousands of dollars doing reshoots depending on what you fucked up. Ergo, the artist puts more conscious effort into not fucking it up. It's built in. Don't get me wrong, digital media has enabled all sorts of geniuses to make great things they wouldn't have otherwise, but generally it makes the lowest common denominator even lower. The original art is a product of its time, and for that it's beautiful. Making it le heckin detailed doesn't do shit to improve it.

>>717308331
drawing true photorealism is something basically no one will ever manage to do, even the greats of old, and that's fine, because the whole point isn't copying reality
making photos of things that don't and can't exist can trick your brain into finding it hotter or something idk

>>717308286
>you're saying that kids are either on their phones or asleep. They don't ever dance, write, play an instrument or any other kind of art. Nonono, just on de phone or slep. Goddamn.
Yes
Literally
Music teachers are pissed because kids keep signing up then not practicing at all
And you obviously need to practice with your instrument at home to become proficient

>>717308473
>people do something to entertain themselves because it's enjoyable
yeah

Can't wait for late Gen Z and Gen Alpha to enter the workforce and be completely useless. AI is creating the dumbest generation of all time.

>>717284453
You're comparing the death of all art forms to smart phones?

Can't believe AIfags have never heard of coloring books

>>717301685
35mm film stock is a superior image to even 4k digital video. 70mm is estimated to be the equivalent of 18k digital. You're fucking retarded and don't know what you're talking about. Digital didn't overcome film because it was superior, it was easier

>>717308625
They were going to be useless even without ai tbqh

>>717308617
You aren't even trying to talk about artistry at this point. You know you're wrong.

>>717308664
@grok make mans pants green and sky blue

>>717308664
Boomer spotted
No one does them anymore

>>717308664
>>717308706
embarrassing

>>717283901

>>717304159
>absolutely cannot afford such an expensive camera
But I did have breakfast this morning.
Fucking dullard.

>>717298773
I engage with them on occasion and ask to see an example of AI-assisted/generated work concerning the topic being discussed and it's just the sloppest of the slop being presented to me like it's some revolutionary thing. There's no response I can give at that point, I just have to keep quiet and move on. If I could compare it to some mental illness, it's like women who get cosmetic surgery work done on their faces.

>>717308706
I was never talking about artistry. I have been talking about enjoying creating things from the get go. You're the one who only sees creative endeavours as a way to profit and can't comprehend just doing it to entertain yourself.

Why do artists refuse to admit they are the minority?

>>717308051
That's how the industry works. That this shit, ugly version is for a specific purpose doesn't change that. Another example is record companies applying pitch correction to old famous albums from the 50s and 60s and replacing the older versions on the official youtube channel.

why aren't more people talking about places like youtube being fucking overrun by completely AI generated music? i like human music. i don't like this.

>>717308851
Why are AIfags scared of creativity?

>>717308869
people like that kind of music

>>717308097
>turning stuff that was never supposed to be seen in HD widescreen into HD widescreen looked fucking terrible
That's debatable if the source footage had the capability to be expanded into that resolution without alteration. For example, HD X-Files looks fine but HD Seinfeld looks like shit because they had to cut off the top and bottoms of the original broadcast footage to make it "widescreen."

>>717308869
I prefer it over human music

>>717305662
SAAAAAAR

>>717281695 (OP)
Kino

>>717308907
>HD X-Files looks fine
it really doesn't
like it's not as horrendous as Buffy but it still sucks. I remember one episode where there was a corpse who was freely blinking because his face should have been out of frame.

>>717308706
Oh, oh! Please do define what "real artistry" is now that you've mentioned it. And no it isn't "being good enough to support yourself by doing it" because that's definitely not what was talked about here.

>>717308869
Because you can control what you listen to by simply not clicking on AI music.

>>717309001
You're too disingenuous to bother talking to.

>>717283243
DONG DING THE BITCH IS DEAD!
WHICH OLD BITCH?
THE BLOODY BASTARD BITCH!

>>717309023
Sounds like you lost and don't want to engage.

>>717308869
There are probably thousands of artists drawing to AI generated music on youtube as we speak and I find this really funny since most of them hate AI art.

Wait does people actually look at art when they aren't horny? Whats the point

>>717308941
>>717308894
but why

>>717283901

>>717309023
That's a weird way of saying "I don't know what to say, I seem to have fucked my argument".

>>717309071
What makes you think that?

>>717309071
I've thought about that before and I don't like thinking about it so now I only get my music from 20 year old random folders on archive.org.

>>717307995
It wont "kill" artists I agree with that, however it will be a blow for sure. Artists won't have the utility they once had. Back then if you wanted niche fetish content you either drew it yourself or asked someone to draw it for you and most people chose the latter. Now you can generate it so what's the point in paying someone? I really can't say for certain what the future will look like for artists in general as I can see a lot of things happening.

>>717281695 (OP)
This legit looks like something from a bad dream. Source?