Thread 717284206

This leak has been floating around for a while, but it's looking closer to being all but confirmed. A few indicators:

-The preexisting discussion around Jason possibly being a cop, and Lucia strictly watched with an ankle monitor could be setting pretext as to why their killing of civilians would be unlikely/unavailable.

-In RDR2, some of the more realistic aspects of deaths were removed from RDR1, such as characters grabbing on to environmental items as they die and fall. This would be in keeping with this general trend away from gratuitious murder.

-Another precedent was set by Rockstar when they published LA Noire, where NPCs would jump quickly away from cars intending to hit them, and it was another title wherein killing was sometimes expected while being prohibited against civilians. Bully also restricted violence against certain NPCs like younger students or authority figures to maintain a specific tone and avoid excessive controversy.

-Given the advances in realism, Rockstar has no desire to see YouTube compilations of the murder of hyperrealistic black folks or similar.

So on May 26, 2026, be ready to be able to shoot cops & robbers as usual, but also expect this new evolution of the Rockstar formula.

>>717284206 (OP)
Woke Theft Woko

OP here again, my sources just informed me that GTA 6 will feature a fullly interactive sex scene with Obama

Amount of people fooled: 0

>>717284206 (OP)
Why is so much effort on /v/ trying to de-hype GTA 6 when the next time a trailer drops the board will be flooded with threads for weeks on end?

>>717284487
People are desperate for the next thing to be mad at.

>>717284487
I didn't see any "hype" over the last trailer, just a lot of complaining about the overabundance of niggers in it.

>GTAV2 finally comes out
>everyone in the world buys it for $100
>everyone watches the 2-3 hours long and pretty intro cutscene
>actual game is baby shit no fun allowed
>sorry, you watched i mean played for over 2 hours
>that means no refunds :^)
>rockstar gets away with billions
a ruined image and not even covering half of dev costs

>>717284640
>a lot of complaining about the overabundance of niggers in it.
and as we all know no gta before has ever focused on them

most shitskinned, underage thread I've seen in a coon's age

>>717284459
While watching Game Grumps?

>>717284640
That's not true, people really liked Mud Girl.

>>717284206 (OP)
Thanks for the info anon, I will cancel my preorder
>>717284459
Nevermind

It kind of seems like a lot of people are mixing up their actual stance, "I don't want this to be true, even though it likely is" with the unsupported "This isn't true".

Insider here, I can confirm. You will also not be able to steal cars. You will be able to buy them, but you'll be locked out of the good ending if you decide to buy a petrol car instead of a hybrid

>>717284487
Still not playing it

>>717285358
I corroborate the fellow insider's story. Instead of stealing cars you will respectfully yet firmly ask them to stop the vehicle and use public transport yet to help combat co2 emissions -with extra rewards given if the citizen is convinced to write to the local representative to help make the city more walkable.

>>717285358
If you get a petrol car then the ending is that sea levels rise and flood the planet like in waterworld. The rest of the ending is Al Gore giving you a five hour lecture on Global Warming.

>>717284206 (OP)
Maybe they shouldn't make the game about immoral criminals if they want to not spread degenerate behavior, but I guess it's ok as long as you just kill police officers to rob a bank.

>>717284206 (OP)
Based. Even the world's top minds agree that this is reprehensible behavior.

>>717284206 (OP)
At this point it's not even possible to publish a game that's anti woke. Even if it gets published and it gets successful, platforms will just ban it. Repressive regime.

>>717285661
Once you get older you'll get it anon. Musk is a retard but I actually share his opinion here, I can't play these games anymore, it's not fun to be evil.

>>717285661
His buddy killed a guy and police didn't bother to jail him. Police is working for them.

>>717284875
There's a difference between focusing on hood niggers, which there are actually a lot of and artificially inflating the number of niggers in what would be a predominantly white area.

>>717285795
I don’t go out of my way to kill civilians, at least brutally, for fun in GTA V because it’s realistic. It’s fun to push them around or shove them into the street, and any actual death is because I happened to one-hit punch them to death or I crash into their car, or I lose control with my car and hit them. Unlike San Andreas, I think it’s funny to go on rampages against the NPCs because their ragdoll, manner of speaking, and overall cartooniness is just funnier. I go out of my way to run over NPCs with a motorcycle in San Andreas because I like seeing them stiffly launch into the air and crash down dead. In GTA V, the realism makes me not want to do that.

>>717284206 (OP)
>You won't be able to kill cops
>In gta
Sure thing bud. But R* isn't retarded

It's gonna be 20 minutes of car rides and conversations on the way to a 10 minute long Mission before another 20 minute long car ride and conversation.

>-In RDR2, some of the more realistic aspects of deaths were removed from RDR1, such as characters grabbing on to environmental items as they die and fall. This would be in keeping with this general trend away from gratuitious murder.
also added the ability to let your gun become degraded and then shoot someone and watch them violently bleed out. or you can decapitate them with a shotgun and they scream and die slowly

>>717286045
You WILL be able to shoot at police, and opposing criminals during missions, as in "armed people shooting at you". You can shoot back. Just not civilians/innocent bystanders, as I said.

>>717286276
Idiotic.

>>717286186
>also added the ability to let your gun become degraded and then shoot someone and watch them violently bleed out. or you can decapitate them with a shotgun and they scream and die slowly

I'm not sure how "your gun degrades" is an increase in violence, but as to the killing in RDR2, it was obviously more cartoonish cowboy violence, with, as I said, more realistic aspects REMOVED that were present in RDR1.

>>717284487
it's the just the usual ninpedo shitskin crowd and their pajeet janny shitting up the catalog 24/7
brown "people" for some reason seethe and fume the most about "wokeness"

>>717285362
it's not like you can afford to, poojeet

>>717284206 (OP)
You're so fucking retarded and schizophrenic, holy shit

Every time you try and shoot a civilian, the screen will freeze, and some generic black actor will walk in and tell you why violence isn't ok.

>>717285795
I disagree. Being evil is fun but rockstar sandbox fucking sucks

>>717284206 (OP)
source

>>717286276
Sure thing, running over civilians is literally a core pillar of the series

>>717285749
I don't want a game that's "anti-woke" any more than I want a woke one thoughever.

>>717286461
>realistic aspects REMOVED that were present in RDR1
Such as??

>>717285795
What a pussy
I am 35 and I still enjoy being mercilessly evil in games you never get too old for evil
You must have the video game equivalent of troll remorse which is even more pathetic

>>717284206 (OP)
Why do people feel the need to make shit up online for us to already know none of its true?

>>717284206 (OP)
So true sirs

>>717286767
My uncle works at Rockstar and he said it's true

>>717286767
Because it's something to talk about.

>>717286767
How dare you not believe the claim that you can’t kill pedestrians in GTA6. You must believe this leak and you MUST be outraged over it

>>717286752
For example, like I said (could you just read the post?), characters grabbing on to environmental items as they die and fall. You can look at youtube comparisons of the difference/removed realism.

>>717285919
>predominantly white area
Miami is 70% spic

>>717287096
>How dare you not believe the claim that you can’t kill pedestrians in GTA6. You must believe this leak and you MUST be outraged over it

I don't care if you're "outraged", it's well supported in the OP but if you have any evidence to the contrary (you don't) then feel free to post it

>>717287117
That is down to RockStar not using the Euphoria animation system anymore, those things mostly disappeared in GTA V too.

>>717284206 (OP)
literally no one cares about gta except brown thirdies

>>717287159
Is it mostly Hispanic or old people these days?

I guess the answer would be old Hispanic people.

>>717287287
I think GTA 5 actually does use Euphoria, but it uses some cutdown version of it. They had to do this to make the map as big as they did in GTA 5. The reason GTA 4 is a more advanced game in many aspects is because GTA 4 is smaller. GTA 5 is the worst GTA by far. They had to make the map bigger, because one of the common idiotic complaints was that GTA 4 was too small.

>>717287117
I think rdr 2 is more realistic
because if you spent anytime on rekt or war threads you'd realise people don't act NPCs from gta 4 or rdr2, they simply pass out and die 90% of the time

>>717284206 (OP)
>may 2026
Lol this trashfire is never coming out.

>>717287417
That's right. No one cares about GTA, the last one just being the second best selling game in the world. Retard

>>717286497
>game where you drive around like a nigger listening to nigger music and commit nigger crimes
No, I actually think it's the other way around, you are the nigger. Wokeism started with how popular being a nigger was with people like you.

>>717284487
The negative threads are exactly because of all the shill spam. So sick of new game getting spammed because mod got paid. /tv/ is just as bad. /ck/ has a few 24/7 spam threads. It's fucking annoying these assholes come to constantly disrupt conversation and I can't wait for everyone involved to be put in ovens.

>>717284859
Places on earth that matter require refunds for 30 days after purchase.

>>717287747
If you spent less time on rekt and war threads, which select for situations where people die, you might have been aware of the statistic that a considerable majority of non-suicide gunshot victims survive being shot

>>717284487
This board is incredibly disingenuous

>>717288049
"Shill"? Do you seriously think someone is "paying mods" for threads to say unpopular news about a game with a $2 billion dollar budget? Who do you think is paying for that? Nintendo? You paranoid retard lol

>>717288160
Well they are definitely not getting shot 3 times in chest like your average NPCs,
But I'll be honest
gta4 has cops running away after getting shot in the leg
But in rdr2 they just crawl and die, so I'll give you that.

>>717287417
Yet you and the rest of this board will buy it. Need proof? The sales records of GTAV and RDR2

>>717284206 (OP)
Not too surprised.
GTA online is making far too much money that higher ups are going to put their hands all over things now unfortunately.
They'll want to avoid some of the older kind of news stories they sued to get about their games on the big news channels like CNN and Fox.

>>717284487
>Why is so much effort on /v/ trying to de-hype GTA 6 when the next time a trailer drops the board will be flooded with threads for weeks on end?

If it doesn't make sense to lie about, perhaps you could entertain the fact that it's real info?

what is the purpose of making this thread multiple times?

>>717287837
>>717288391
t.

>>717284640
You are literally talking about the first trailer. You rage-bait thirdies are impossible to have a conversation with because your ignorance is breathtaking.

>>717284206 (OP)
>Rockstar has no desire to see YouTube compilations of the murder of hyperrealistic black folks or similar.
>be ready to be able to shoot robbers as usual
???
So you can kill blacks.

>>717285809
We talking about trump having epstein murdered to keep him silent or did another of Musk's friends murder someone?

>>717289370
The rumor goes that Peter thiel murdered a lover and no one bat an eye. I doubt Trump offed epstein.

>>717285661
Would the world's top mind get caught cheating and boosting in PoE?

>>717289772
No. It's strange a level 67 item is good enough for him. Strange, what's this item doing in my inventory? Since when did I equip such a lame item (best in the game)?

OP here, I'm a giant faggot.

>>717286703
You don't want a game that's normal?

>>717284206 (OP)
Then in GTA VII your only weapon will be a feather duster which you go around tickling people with.

good
because the game would be more fun if the repercussions for going on a mass shooting were to be harsher and more realistic.

>>717284206 (OP)
Am I the only one who thinks that year after year no one gives a shit about GTA? I often hear that this will be another revolution, a game for the next 10 years, but I don't feel it. I didn't feel it with the 5th part either, and the 6th has even more marketing support and... no one gives a shit. Well, it will come out, we'll play it. But overall, who cares.

>>717290935
GTA SA was the last good GTA game and the best in the series

>>717290865
Fetish

>>717287240
What part if "well supported"? The fact a game not developed by rockstar and in no way related to gta does not let you kill civilians? Or the fact that rdr2 is less violent because npc cant grab shit when they die even though you can pin down women and repeatedly stab them or blow their heads clean off with a shotgun?

This game is just going to be THE examples put before everyone of what future society is going to be like. It's like the the UK government made a game. It's going to be the most babylonian gaym you've ever seen. I will never buy it on principle, because it's implications are actually a rollout of something greater and a declaration of your endorsement and permission given to them to do greater and worse things.

>>717290935
Yeah it's your and your contrarian friend, everyone in the normie and normie gamer sphere talked about buying this game

>>717284206 (OP)
imagine if they only let you kill white civilians though. I feel like this is somehow a possible outcome under our current zeitgeist

>>717290935
Sort of. I think the biggest and most revolutionary thing about it will be that it's the first live service game that will require an ID from you and will likely be made with the intimate involvement of the militariy industrial complex. This will be THE GAME of the "you will own nothing and you will be happy" hegemony. I know that sounds schizo.

>>717294610
No, it's too heavy handed. I don't see that happenning.

Gta 6 buck broke v before the release
>Cuck fanfic
>Retarded leaks
>Cuck theories
>New world order
>Anti Fem protag spammer
>Doomers

>>717284487
A mixture of contrarianism and autism.

>>717284206 (OP)
>You will NOT be able to kill civilians in GTA VI

The developer will not do that. It doesn't matter what "evidence" there is. The Grand Theft Auto series has always let the player kill civilians, and GTA 6 will be no different.

>game is literally named after a crime
>"wtf you do crime in this game???"

Bare in mind, the hijacking of hype. The manufacturing of it, ideas and excitement floating about, and then what happens when the anticipated day, when the people are met with a surprise, an unforseen request made of them, forcing upon them a dilemma, accompanied by temptation. This is emotional alchemy. So I don't know what will happen, I don't know if it will happen, I'm just saying the scenario is not in the realm of impossibility or insanity. It's a real technology.