← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 717332949

23 posts 8 images /v/
Anonymous No.717332949 >>717333332 >>717333552 >>717334492
Ys
First 120fps switch 2 game btw
https://youtu.be/sYTxWslyJA0?si=Y26S6d77vqvmmlcn
Anonymous No.717333332 >>717333427 >>717333434 >>717333768 >>717339774
>>717332949 (OP)
Dem some sweet ass Ps2 textures
Anonymous No.717333427 >>717333480 >>717333787 >>717333865
>>717333332
It's a portable system. For ages it was acceptable for portable systems to have games that were behind on tech but now people expect PS5 graphics from a tablet?
Anonymous No.717333434
>>717333332
PS2 graphics is all you need.
Anonymous No.717333480
>>717333427
>there's no middle ground between 2001 graphics and 2020 home console graphics
Retard.
Anonymous No.717333540
>tfw have all ys games on steam but won't touch X because it's TOO EXPENSIVE AND IT SUCKS
Anonymous No.717333552
>>717332949 (OP)
>All that aliasing
>Not bothering to conceal the popping from non-existence to suddenly appearing
What is that? 720p upscaled to 4k? Meh. And I was debating on bothering with a 144 Hz monitor myself solely to one up the Switch 2.
Anonymous No.717333590
>game runs at 120fps
>screen response time means you can't see it anyway
Anonymous No.717333647
ys x suxx
Anonymous No.717333768 >>717334654
>>717333332
PS2 slim was like $99, how much is the switch 2?
Anonymous No.717333787 >>717339781
>>717333427
I didn't ask Nintendo to go all-in on shitty handhelds. I want a console with Nintendo IPs that can produce games that run at modern expectations, not Bananza looking like a Switch game and running at 1080p, 60 with heavy dips despite Nintendo directly advertising that their console is capable of 4K/60 or 1440/120 when they can't even achieve that with first party offerings.
Anonymous No.717333865
>>717333427
>It's a portable system.
No it isn't shut the fuck up. It replaced their actual handhelds and is far too big to be carried around
Anonymous No.717334492
>>717332949 (OP)
Often drops sub 100
Anonymous No.717334654 >>717335389 >>717335617
>>717333768
The PS2 was $299 when it launched, which in today's money is $541.91. Oopsie.
Anonymous No.717335389 >>717338107
>>717334654
>had to bring up the launch PS2 in a slim PS2 convo to damage control for daddy Nintendo
Another $50 increase for the 8 year old Switch, Nintendo knows you'll defend them no matter what!
Anonymous No.717335617
>>717334654
>people would buy depreciated hardware for that much
>MEANWHILE ON EBAY
Anonymous No.717336015
Why bother putting "Ys" at the subject field?
This is clearly a nintendo thread.
Anonymous No.717338107
>>717335389
>>PS2 slim was like $99, how much is the switch 2?
>switch 2
>comparing the Switch 2, which just released, with the PS2 slim, which was released 4 years after the original
>The $99 pricing was years after that
Snoys can't catch a break. Nintendo really won.
Anonymous No.717338242 >>717339646
The Switch 2 probably can't even do this.
Anonymous No.717339646 >>717341224
>>717338242
>4k
lmao
Anonymous No.717339774
>>717333332
*Falcom textures
Anonymous No.717339781
>>717333787
im sure once they get all the "a-actually this was a switch 1 game at one point" games out the way we'll get games that are actually optimized for the switch 2
Anonymous No.717341224
>>717339646
>mentions a chinese leader for no reason