>>717425520
>a man with nothing to lose and every reason to snap, like Corvo
Yet he didn't snap, did he? As the ending itself puts it, "You watched and listened when other men would have shouted in rage. You held back instead of striking". If he was able to do it, why couldn't others? Why is the point of Daud's DLCs that "I've learned that our choices always matter to someone, somewhere. And sooner or later, in ways we can't always fathom, the consequences come back to us"?
>you gotta look at the people he is doing these favors for
People that seem interesting. An ambitious killer, a mistreated baker's apprentice, a betrayed bodyguard. Hell, he Marked the Lonely Rat Boy. Doesn't sound like someone with major social or political power to me.
>My point is that you can't claim to be neutral when you support people with an agenda
But no one tells Corvo to get Emily back by slaughtering the entirety of Dunwall, nor did the Outsider tell Delilah to become a witch or Emily to get her throne back by drowning Karnaca in blood. We just see the character differently, because I see the Outsider as a True Neutral entity with no ulterior motives nor goals he fights towards or puts his weight behind. Save the Empire in Low Chaos or bring about its downfall by getting Emily killed in the highest of High Chaos: he doesn't care.