>>717436003
>what no those are the guys that unironically work 60+ hours per week
Anon, they tell you they work 60+ hours per week, but they consider "work" to be going to a business lunch at a fancy restaurant with a CEO from another company to discuss a very fucking obvious collaboration that anyone below them in the company could have figured out for a fraction of the salary, and then they both claim it back from the company as "business expenses" despite the fact it could have been a phone call or video meeting,
You know those videos of people posting "my day at work at google/microsoft" and half the video is them doing fucking nothing like "replying to emails" then taking 2 hour lunch breaks? CEO's are like that x100, they THINK they are working because they've never actually WORKED a day in their life
People these days have some weird fucking idolatry for the rich, where they have this old-fashioned view of "the self-made man" that is actually one in a million (at best) in the modern age, but they think that everyone who is rich MUST be better than them, because they're rich, so they must have done something right! Except the only thing they did right was be lucky enough to be born into the genetic lineage of someone who was that "self-made man" once upon a time (like 100 years ago)
Ever since I started paying attention to business like 20 years ago, I've watched CEO's make the most retarded decisions imaginable, burn a company to the ground, but then get a golden parachute from their rich friends (or just the government bailing them out of their own failure, which feels especially egregious that public funds are going to the fuckups of the rich); investors are to blame as well, but I feel like we only got here from retarded CEO's promising them the world and setting an expectation that can't ever be met, because the CEO was too intent on making short-term profit and didn't think of the long-term sustasinability of that plan
