I have a GTX 1070 8GB

I have a 5070Ti, build a new PC this year

4080 Super. I use it to play Morrowind, Supreme Commander, and emulators.

>>717421830 (OP)
1080ti

After 6 years I think its dying but I can't tell for sure

>>717421830 (OP)
I have a dying 970 :( I don't want to upgrade bros, all that money for literally zero graphics

>>717421830 (OP)
RX470

only cuckolds buy white pc parts

I swear microshart updates have fucked my pc in the last few weeks. They're trying to get me to upgrade but they don't know I'm switching to Linux

4090.
I use a 4k/120 panel so I don't even get to take full advantage most of the time
But running local language models is fun sometimes, looking forward to a future where we don't need a billion server farms for this kind of stuff.

4070 Ti.

>>717422710
did you have ro get the gayest model possible

>>717422826
ru ro raggy

9070xt

>>717422375
Heh, 570 here. But I'll soon be upgrading to a 3060 ti.

rtx 2060 6GB

6700XT. Thinking about upgrading to a 9070XT soon and jump to 1440p.

5070 Ti. Hate myself for buying this shitty gen but I needed a replacement for my old PC ASAP.

2060 with a likelihood of upgrading sometime before 2028. Hopefully the GPU market unfucks itself by then.

>>717422826
what special kind of gay are you that sees faggotry in a graphics card

r9 380 2gb

>>717421830 (OP)
GTX 1080 ti. Fucking thing is a beast, even with newer-ish games I have set at 1440p. It runs slightly-older games at 4K and barely flinches ffs. I'll get a new GPU when this one finally shits the bed.

9070... non xt....

9070 Pulse.
>>717423127
I was 1440p gaming on my 6700XT and was still mostly fine with it, but moved up to the 9070 to comfortably wait until UDNA2.
But if you can get the XT for within 11% more than the non-XT then you might as well. Unfortunately for me when I was buying, the XT was still way overpriced.

>>717423178
t. tuf gamer

>>717422981
Me too, exacly the same thing

rtx 3060

i don't even know why i bought it, there aren't any good games that require it.

>>717421830 (OP)
RTX 4070
It's actually pretty good for the price I got it at. Unfortunately every better GPU out there is double that price

>>717422091
Same, love that card, just hoping it doesn’t get out scaled in 3 years

5080 Mobile

>>717421830 (OP)
4070ti Super, built it around last October.

>>717424210
holy fk how do cool that shit

datamining thread

>>717421830 (OP)
RTX 3060 with a dying PSU and CPU

>>717425219
>tendiefags when the other nintendo adults are on the same switch 1.5 as they are

>>717425326
PSUs arent that expensive doggie boy, get a new one. CPUs are a bit pricier but at least it's not your GPU that's dying.. those are quite a heavy investment

>>717425326
How do you diagnose a dying psu?
Dual 3090s work fine but if I disable eco mode and run with pbo on my 3900x (and a gt 710), I get random tab/application crashes and sometimes blue screen. A faulty cpu would more catastrophic right? And memory's good.

>>717428297
NTA but hwinfo64 can give you a clue. the 12v rail sensor should be consistent. if the range vdroops too much its a sign of a bad PSU

>>717421830 (OP)
2080 Super

>>717424027
It will, any HW will...

>>717421830 (OP)
RTX 3050
You really dont need more to play good games nowadays.

7900xtx, maybe I'll a 11900xtx or whatever if they're done fucking around with AI by then.

>>717428536
It's weird because I hven't noticed any anomalies in hwinfo. All the minidumps tell me is that ntoskrnl is crashing.

>>717428536
Also the psu is barely a few months old.

>>717421830 (OP)
I have a 7800XT with a 27" 1440p monitor. Love it. Works fantastic. It's not 4k, which is obviously better, but to make that upgrade would require me to buy
>New MB
>New PS
>New Card
>4k monitor
It will be a while

>>717428841
you have to manually adjust the hwinfo64 polling rate to something crazy or it wont track it. remember the 12v rail is operating at the speed of electricity. you probably wont even catch it in hwinfo64 unless you invest in a oscilioscope.

>>717421830 (OP)
Arc580, 12g vram it gets the job done for 1080p, some 1440p games

if i want to game at 1440p with ultra settings at 120hz what gpu should I get

>>717429000
... so hwinfo is basically useless for that then?

>>717429106
>Intel GPU
SUUUUUUUUUSSSSS AF DUDE

>>717429106
7800XT is a decent buy for the price. That's I what I use as mentioned >>717428980
I get over 100 frames at 1440. It'll dip down a bit with some slop games but mostly I'm at 100+

>>717429106
Adding on to this, is it possible to do so with only a 8 pin gpu?

>>717429190
you have to plot the 12vrail which hwinfo64 can do. an oscilioscope can do it too. ones software,the others hardware. how accurate do you want it ?

>>717421830 (OP)
7900XTX

I got gifted a 5080 last week. Damn shame became I was waiting for the super variants but whatevs. Can't really complain about a $1500 gift.

>>717429498
Idk, I was looking at it using the graphs/ max min at 100ms before. Everything ran fine when I did synthetic stress tests max loading the cpu and 3090 for two hours. It's a 1300w from gigabyte (not one of the ones that explode). It's only when I leave it idling overnight that I wake up to find it's restarted. Or if I'm watching youtube sometimes the tab will crash.

5090 i play league and skyrim

>>717429906
who does that

>>717422710
>12 gb

>>717421830 (OP)
4090, but it's because my 1070 was dying. It was either that or a 7900XTX, and I'm happy with the 4090, especially given how shit the 5000 series is. Hasn't burned my house down yet, at least.

>>717429920
If you're getting ntoskrnl bsods while watching YouTube but not under full load it sounds like a driver issue to be honest. Everything is hw accelerated these days aka using your GPU. If you disable it in your browser it will force it to your CPU. This should stop crashing on the GPU driver side but if it still happens then its related to CPU/RAM/SSD.

>>717430148
My mommy gave me 3000 to spend on my second computer

>>717430383
Nvidia drivers have been shutting the bed lately. I sold my 5070ti cuz I couldn't stand it anymore... :/

>>717430148
My wife. She's trying to keep it a secret cause my birthday is coming up but it's like, we share the same bank account so I know when money goes out.

>>717421830 (OP)
RTX 3060 Ti
I'm still on 1080p and I mostly play older games anyway so the 8GB VRAM doesn't bother me that much

>>717422981
>>717423706
Friendly tip: Stay away from the 3060 ti, in fact, stay far far far away from any 8gb card, nowadays they're a complete meme and it's an insult that AMD and Nvidia still shit out those.
If you're really hell bent on a 3060, get the 12gb variant of the non-ti version, but if you want a decent upgrade, a 16gb gpu should be seen as the bare minimum for quality 1080p pc gaming nowadays, so either go 5060ti 16gb version or rx 9060xt 16gb version.
Sources:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6qZwJsp5X4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LAH5vh-Cpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdZoa6Gzl6s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MG9mFS7lMzU
This and Gamers Nexus are the best channels if you wanna know which GPUs to buy

>>717429906
Whose cock do I need to suck for that 5080.

6700 XT
>>717423127
m8 I've been playing 1440p on my 6700XT with no problems

>>717430383
>driver issue
Yeah that's what I thought too when I saw the minidumps. Chkdsk/scannow. Full reinstall of windows. Windows 10. Windows 11. Windows 10 iot ltsc. Debian. Installing on sata even. Updating nvidia drivers... ddu downgrading nvidia drivers. Bios up and down. Rebuilding the entire computer in case something didn't connect properly. The only thing that helped was the eco mode and turning off pbo. Is it perhaps the modtherboard that's fucky? Borrowing a 5500 didn't exhibit the same problems, so that's why I'm thinking it's a power problem.

>>717430542
Quite jelly, but happy marriage anon.

GTX 1650 TI and so far i can play everything without problems, granted i don't play many new games

>>717430542
>shares same bank account as his wife
ISHYGDDT
Fucks sake anon....

>>717430638
Hop over to grindr and look for the oldest fags you can find.

>>717430681
>m8 I've been playing 1440p on my 6700XT with no problems
Really? I'll be damned. How do newer games fare? Honestly the only reason I never went to 1440p with this card is because I just didn't wanna have to buy 2 new monitors until I build a brand new rig from the ground up.

>>717430638
I saw a 5080 in Best Buy the other day. I was tempted, but the card is kinda shit. It was also priced at $1500 which is $500 above MSRP. If it was at $1000 maybe I would have pulled the trigger.

>>717431004
>cocksucking Griffiiiiith
also literally. What a fag

>>717421830 (OP)
2080 Ti

>>717430636
3060 12gb is 400 used and 450-500 new where I live. 3060 ti I'm buying for 300. I don't plan on doing heavy gaming (fuck, I'm living off a 570 right now). By the time 8gb is too small I think I'll have enough money to get some random used 12gb card.

5070 Ti

>>717422970
that magnetic backplate is pretty nifty

>>717421830 (OP)
3080. I wish I had a reason to upgrade but I simply can't care

>>717422826
>grey and metallics are gay now
Is there nothing us straights can use anymore? Everything is gay, it seems.

>>717431286
Yeah 3080 seems perfectly fine for all stuff at 1440p and maybe even 4k
Honestly the only reason to upgrade is if you reaaally wanna go deep into VR gaming or wanna get into AI shit

>>717431028
Okay well in all fairness I haven't bothered much with the newest titles in a long while, so I couldn't say how well it runs Expedition 33 or Doom TDA or KCD2 or the newest AssCreed for example. But dunno, I've played RDR2, Oblivion Remaster, The Ascent, Elden Ring, Far Cry 5, Lies of P at 1440p and it was fine at 60 fps
It does get very hot and loud with the most demanding games, but it does run them

>7900xt
>no fsr4

>>717430996
Been together for 20 years, since high school. She's fine.

>>717421830 (OP)
2080Ti
Can't wait for the driver support to end next year
Will maybe move to an RTX 5070 Super or something, but honestly I see no reason to upgrade

>>717421830 (OP)
5070 ti, and yes, i only play 20 year old games.

Should I get 9070XT or 5070? 9070XT is 800$ here and 5070 is 680$

>>717431663
Wow, that's honestly impressive, especially considering how cheap that card is nowadays.

Picrel. Kinda disappointed in the 4k performance for how much this big bitch cost me, but at least it obliterates everything at 1440p. Here's hoping the idea of GPUs is still a thing in 6 years when I upgrade again.

>>717421830 (OP)
RTX 5070 TI
Panic bought it because of "tariffs", but don't regret it, even tho it got cheaper like the following week

Are nShitia shills as bad as iSheep and Tendies? Will brand loyalists ever win?

>>717421830 (OP)
RX 570. Still does its work after all these years, but I do think of getting an RX 9070 XT soon.

6600XT

It shits itself in new UE5 games

>>717432020
I got it for €420 (tax included) back in the day, which was cheaper than the basically equal in power 3060 Ti
Right now I don't see any reason to upgrade it, but I probably will early next year cause I feel like trying VR for racing games and flight sims

>>717432092
Honestly baffling that we have GPUs that cost $1000+ and yet they still struggle with 4k in many cases if you don't use some kind of upscaler feature.

>>717432191
I'd love to jump ship, like I kid you not, I hate Nvidia with a passion, they're the single worst company out there, they make Nintendo seem as benevolent as my granny, but then again... AMD refuses to launch an actual good product so...

>>717432415
Ain't the GPU's fault that developers don't even pretend to give a shit about optimization anymore

>>717432467
AMD makes good products if you realize you don't need a $2000 monster GPU like nvidia brainwashed you into thinking

4070 ti super bought during last year's cyber monday

Fuck off with your $1k+ gpus

>>717431949
9070 non-XT ties/beats 5070 non-TI...

>>717432626
Bit of both imo. We should have ALOT more vram than what's available, especially since a lot of this upscaler technology taxes vram anyway. 5050 should be 10 gigs at least. 5070 should be 16 and the 5080 should've been at least 20. Amd isn't much better. Then lazy devs just use ray tracing by default because they expect you to just turn on frame gen and DLSS. Industry is kind of shitty all around.

>>717432701
Nvidia gpus hardly make sense anymore. Overpriced. driver issues worse than RX VEGA AMD era, lacking in vram capacity, poor build quality by partners compared to AMD, etc.

Anyone else excited about the 9060 non-XT? I know it'll be dogshit compared to the 9070XT and 5070, but the super low-end underdog cards are scrappy and full of character. I'm also looking forward to the Lisuan G107, but that seems to be targeting the upper mid-range.

>>717432701
And if I want to work on AI tasks or edit videos or run complicated blender setups, what then? AMD is so much weaker in those areas.

worth every penny

9070 XT steel legend white.
I wanted the black model but doesn't seem to be for sale in the US despite being on their website. Has been great with no real issues. Wish I could use AI without any hassle but it's all nvidia based and getting it to run on AMD seems like a pain in the ass so might get a 5070/5070 super for AI generations

Going to be upgrading my gpu and cpu soon. Is a 9700x more than enough to pair with a 9070xt at 1440p or should I just go for the 9800x3D?

>>717433942
more than enough
i have a 9070xt and a 7600x cpu and no problem whatsoever

>>717433942
9700x is more than enough. X3D is overkill unless you're doing stuff like blender or video editing. If you want more frames then use FSR4

>>717433942
9800x3d is honestly overkill. just get a 7800x3d and save yourself a hundred bucks

>>717432092
>5080 sucks at 4k boohoo
wtf man, who are you trying to fool here? the 5080 is only slightly behind the 4090 (minus vram), and the 4090 can handle everything at 4k perfectly fine at 60-140fps depending if UE5 or other unoptimised trash.
Your 5080 should handle everything fine at 4k

>>717434046
>>717434112
>>717434126
Sounds good to me. Thanks for the advice fellas.

>>717434227
Sure, I can with dlss balanced lmao. Granted, 4k is perfectly achievable with the games I usually play, but it's still disappointing to not be able to get decent fps at 4k without DLSS in heavier games.

>>717422826
I got this faggot ass looking card and I couldn't care less

>>717421830 (OP)
2070 Super.
I plan to get a new PC soon. I'm aiming for 5070ti.

>>717434496
This can be said about all cards anon, even the "beast" of a 4090.
Blame the cocksucking pajeet monkey devs (it's a real thing, even japanese games are infested with poojeets)

>>717421830 (OP)
RTX 3070
Not the best thing here, but it's useful for some AI stuff and I wasn't even intending to use it for that.

>data mining thread

>>717434621
I always wondered if all these RGB LGTBTQBBQ lights actually consumed a decent amount of extra electricity or if it's too tiny a difference to care about

Im riding my 3060 TI until it catches one fire.
Just finished Wuchang earlier this week with 0 issues.
As long as i can play any shit i want at medium/high @1080p i see no reason to upgrade.

>>717431252
>placing magnets inside the PC

recently got an RX6750XT for free
used to run with a gtx1070ti and the only difference is that unreal engine games run better, but look almost exactly the same

>>717432467
I've had AMD cards for years and I've never had any major issues at all. Where do you get your information (that's not an attack either)?
nVidia marketing is powerful as fuck and they've done an amazing job of convincing everyone they are "the best" and no one else comes close... The same mind "control" that Apple wields.

So going by this thread and skimming a bit around pcbg it seems the 5070TI is widely accepted as the best bang for your buck at its current price?

>>717421830 (OP)
Rtx 5060
Used to have a 1070
As for why I went for non ti
It was due to 5060ti with 16gb vram being 50 percent more expensive(turkey)
Rest is R7 5700x and 32gbs of ram

>>717421830 (OP)
I have a GTX970 era PC.

I don't even know what I"m going to do. Need to upgrade just about everything.

>>717433719
These seem to be going down ever so slightly in price now.
I could pick a decent model for 690€ right now, if it ends up getting to 660 or so i might just pick one despite not really needing it right now to play anything.

>>717435129
Depends.
5070 TI is about 2X performance for 2X price of 5060 TI. If the 9070 XT / 9060 XT drops more in price they might be valid options but if you want to combine gaming with other things CUDA is king.
Just look at your regional pricing.

These are your best options.

5070 TI
5060 TI (16GB)
9070 XT
9060 XT (16GB)

>>717435165
To add the very reason why I bought a wholesale new pc in the first place was
Combined with an nvme SSD it became so expensive to upgrade the pc I had at the time it made more sense to buy a new one from scratch instead(R5 3600 16gb)

>>717435298
>970
no shit sherlock, that's ANCIENT technology at this point man.
Either get a PS5 and call it a day (it's powerful enough without being super expensive), or if you want things the easy way just get a new prebuilt PC and call it a day

>>717435748
Hello nShitia marketing team. How much do you get paid to lie and shill shitty products?

>>717435298
since that other anon was just pissing on your chips
do you want some advice on building/picking pc parts now or were you just venting?
both are ok choices imo
If you want help, can you post the rest of your pc?

>>717435982
Where's the lie faggot? Every time I try to download and try out some new cool tech it requires CUDA. I really wish AMD or even Intel could release a proper card and keep supporting ZLUDA but it just didn't happen yet.

>>717435748
5070ti is around 65-75% more powerful than the 5060ti.
Not twice.

9070 xt for 600 usd, love it, shockingly good at RT too

>>717436253
Did you take that from userbenchmark? I actually bought the card and compared numerous sources from direct comparisons and noticed in a variety of tests it's about twice as fast.

EVGA 3090 FTW 3

i love it

>>717424027
how will it get scaled in 3 years?

dont forget to wash your GPU!

>>717436361
What's a better site/alternative than userbenchmarks in your opinion anon? Id like something reliable for comparisons

I just spent 900 euros on a used 4090 strix oc (+150 on a new PSU), came from a 970 3.5GB meme card.
This better last me a decade.

>>717421830 (OP)
I have a GeForce 636, 750, and 2060. They're all in their boxes, waiting the day I need them again.

>>717436569
>washes a 4090
>5873 likes
unngggg....almost had a stroke there, phew.
How many retards do you think this asshat actually fooled ?

>>717434126
You need the best X3D for VR or if you're planning to get VR

>>717436608
Review sites
Tech/Gaming YouTube direct comparisons
Niche benchmarks of specific architecture you're benchmarking like RT, CUDA cores, try to figure out if the game was optimized for specifically LmoAMD or Ngreedia with some contract they had with the devs and take those benchmarks with a grain of salt. Look at pure compute workload intensive benchmarks.

tl;dr Take a look at many different sources and compare like you would before you buy something

how long would a 5070ti last if you was to buy it this year and only use 1080p 60fps? 5-8 years? im still on a gtx 1070

>>717436978
Wait for the ti super with more vram

>>717436978
at this rate, about 3 months

I finally replaced my RX 580 8GB a couple of months ago with an RX 9060 XT 16GB

>>717436978
Depending on how lazy devs are, can be anywhere from 6 months to a decade. UE5 slop and poor optimization makes me think the former.

>>717436569
not connected = safe
but the dust will stick to it with the water, the fans lubricant will wash off and youre gonna have to make sure you dry its up or one droplet will fuck it up after connecting it

>>717436392
Same here, my EVGA 3090 has given me both a great gaming experience and crippling brain damage from all the AI porn.

>>717437062
ti has 16gb VRAM

>>717437086
how so?

>>717437128
so what would you do if you was me with a gtx1070? wait another year? i mainly want to get it for poe2 and other triple A slop

>>717437159
In other words, disassemble completely to clean because the ICs don't need to be cleaned but the heatsink and fans do

>>717436978
at 1080 60fps it would last you for so long that you would end up requiring to upgrade from other components
At the rate games are advancing easily on that timeframe of 5+ years you posted, easily.
you should look for a 1440p monitor not only for the resolution but for the higher refresh, a 5070TI will move it with the same effort as 1080 and its a considerable jump in visual quality

>>717436978
Ive had a gtx1080 for EIGHT years, playing 1080p/60fps and still going strong.
Why the FUCK wouldnt a gpu last 6-10 years? we're not in the crypto mining era are we?

>>717421830 (OP)
6700 XT unfortunately. I might as well sell it and get a console at the rate GPU prices are going.

>>717437245
>how so?
New hardware becomes obsolete faster and faster.

Who here has the oldest/most anemic CPU?

>>717437245
>how so?
nta, but games literally run worse, and look worse by the week now. it didn't even take a year from games to go from
>dlss makes your game run better on older cards!
to
>dlss is REQUIRED to run the game with a jittery frame rate
a year after that we got
>dlss and framegen are REQUIRED to run the game with a jittery frame rate, and a whole entire second of input lag

>>717437245
>>717437245
>i mainly want to get it for poe2 and other triple A slop
i had a 1070 and upgraded but the 1070 is still fine but if you want to play latest A slop then mesh shaders and other things will hold the 1070 back because it doesn't support those if you don't play games that require those the 1070 rips through any other title at 1080p medium/high

>>717437245
>ti has 16gb VRAM
there are rumors of an upcoming 5070TI Super with 24gb
But rumors dont power windmills

7800 xt

>>717437369
>4 cores, 4 threads Athlon
I kneel...

>>717437245
>1070
I would upgrade. Shame about GPU prices though.

>>717437425
4 threads assuming you aren't doing anything FPU intensive. Then it acts more like a dual core.

>>717421830 (OP)
I have a GTX 1060 6GB

>>717436978
>still on a 1070
yeah so? the ONLY good reason to upgrade is if you really want 1440p or VR gaming.
Otherwise whatever, your card can handle 1080p and 40-60fps on most things cant it. Just avoid UE5 games and you're good

>>717437735
Let me guess. You need more?

My prediction is either gaming with consoles or AI workloads will move the needle for more VRAM within the next 2-3 years. Like putting entire scenes into GPU memory for direct raytracing. Running entire destructable physics sims. Lazy devs using up entire 4K textures for a barrel.

VRAM for consumer home AI setups because of Intel/AMD competition NVIDIA will finally have to move up the VRAM some more too because it'll be a battle of devs opting for and changing their code to be GPU-agnostic for more VRAM.

Amd Radeon rx 7600. Plays battlefield 5, ac mirage, battlefront 2, Halo... Probably not the newer games after that but they all play just fine so far. Fuck battlefield 6 I don't want niggas somersaulting on me anyway. Or buy 2.

im debating trading in my 7900xtx for a 9070xt on newegg. i would get a free gpu basically + $50 credit.

>>717437926
Not yet, but considering getting a RX 9060 XT
>I have a Switch 2 now

>>717421830 (OP)
I don't, i just use a VT-100 terminal to access serial output of my computer.

>>717434708
That's my card too

>3060ti Eagle

It's rough on thermals, but it's smaller size actually fits my setup and does good for my needs

>>717421830 (OP)
3070 w/ a 12th gen i9 - no overheating issues, but I got the lil' cpu brace.

I want that upcoming Intel GPU thats like 2 of the last ones they released sandwiched together.

>>717438032
you answered your own question

>>717438142
my old msi 3060 ti dual fan could go at 100% load and not even hit 75 degrees. i keep the little nigga on my shelf to display his powerful girth. if nvidia made it a 12gb card, it would have been the 1080 ti 2, which is exactly why they gave it 8.

>>717438557
i hear horror stories about neweggs trade in program so i hestitate.

>>717438632
oh right then i would probably not then just to be safe

>>717437369
I remember you. Why haven't you upgraded already? Loyalty? Old i7s+motherboard are like $30.

will this explode?

>>717438995
I never heard of this brand of PSU, so probably.

>>717438995
No lol

t. 5700G + 5060TI + 450W PSU

>>717439137
>5700G
For what purpose?

I basically will never upgrade until we get a brand like EVGA again

>>717438995
One thing, I'd get a higher wattage power supply for future upgrades. If you have a specific budget I'd take 16gb of ram for now and put the money into that. For a second video card later or something the PSU and 16gb ram works fine rn with almost if not every game, especially ddr5

>>717439265
I like having a iGPU for easier GPU passthrough and I'm on AM4

>>717438995
send pcpartpicker link please

Being poor is a never ending struggle.
Every computer i have had has been built going strictly for what is the best bang for my money, i could deviate from that a 5% as max before i would decide against whatever other choice.
I would like for my next build to be able to spend a couple hundred € more on it just on shit that might not be the most optimal but might be slightly more powerful, slightly better temps, etc
But my caveman brain doesn't allow me to do that. Every build i have made has been the most spartan min maxed mid range build you can think of.
Thanks for reading my blog anons.

>>717424027
guess you should have bought the 9070xt then

>>717422091
>Build new PC
>Get 5070Ti
>Monitor constantly flickers when changing windows
>Find out it's a driver issue they've had for months
>Gets fixed literally the same week
And ever since I've had literally no issues and can run basically whatever I want, she's a beaut.

>>717434621
>gamercock

>>717421830 (OP)
had a 180Ti upgraded to a 5090

>>717437953
based retard
nvidia give less VRAM because they use upscaling, the image is smaller and you dumbasses think it looks good so why spend more money on ram chips? you'll pay $800 for 12gb vram when amd offer 24gb for the same price because you are an idiot haha

>4060ti
>on 1440p monitor

>>717431670
There's only like 25 games that support FSR4, so don't sweat it. My brother settled for a new 7900XT back when finding a 9070XT seemed hopeless, and that thing is a monster. He got a killer deal on it too, so it ended up being cheaper than the 9070s that were eventually in stock.

>>717440057
As a former poorfag to a sizable disposable incomefag, the grass isnt much greener in terms of vidya. Fidelity improvements aren't that crazy, hitting above 60fps on a high hz monitor ain't that crazy(fps stability most important).
The only thing REALLY shitty about min-maxed poorfag rigs is when you encounter cpu scalability issues for a poorly optimized new title and the games run badly, gpu's are way more scalable and generally not a big issue. I swear the cpu issues are more common nowadays

>>717421830 (OP)
still managing to survive with a rog strix 5700xt

4090, will upgrade to the first gpu that has 2x raster performance without using meme tech like dlss of frame gen

rx6600xt, very solid 1080p card but its starting to show its age, FSR4 seems like a really good improvement over FSR3 so I might bite the bullet and get a 9060xt (16 gigs of course).

Will 16Gb cards be enough for the foreseeable future? Any card bigger than that is ridiculously priced, but I'd like to build a PC that's going to last me another ten years just like my current one.
Or do you think future-proofing like that is getting harder and harder regardless?

>>717443182
i dont think amd will get any better than the 9070xt
if you had the 6800xt you could still use that for 1440p as it runs everything at over 120fps lol the 9070xt is about the same with better gaytracing

>>717437385
>>dlss makes your game run better on older cards!
This was never ever the premise of DLSS and I despise poorfags for trying to hijack it for this use. DLSS was always advertised as a way to tank the hit of RT on high end GPUs on higher resolutions.

RTX 3090.

>>717443649
I would love to get the 9070xt but thats way over my current budget, I also have a 23 inch 1080p monitor so getting a 1440p card its a waste.

MSI 4070ti 12gb

>>717443609
despite what some tech youtuber faggots say, even 8gigs is "enough" for today (at 1080p), 16 gigs is rising and will become the norm for years to come.

>>717441457
Any game with DLSS has FSR4 though, thanks to optiscaler. Barring games with anti cheat, but do you really need upscaling in compfag games?

>>717432092
Playing in 4K is exactly why I swerved out the way of the 5080 and broke the bank for the 5090, hopefully it lasts for a good few years but I'm happy with the performance. UE5 slop doesn't seem to play nice with it tho

>4080 Super (16GB)
>7800X3D
>32GB RAM

>>717440451
>had a 180Ti
What did he mean by this

>>717444085
>8gb is enough for 1080p
yeah, if you run mid/low textures. you can turn on steams bloated overlay which shows vram usage and watch pretty much any modern game use 10-12gb vram on high texture settings.

>>717444410
NTA, but i also have a 1080 and it ran almost every dang game i threw at it just fine even at higher textures.
The only fucking BS games that maxed out 8gb VRAM are those RE Engine games like RE8 and RE4 Remake that keep blurring textures wth the lower vram.
Everything else? no issue... fuck RE Engine

Didn't realise so much of /v/ were third-worlders

>>717445070
>suddenly

>>717440317
Nice. Happy for you bro. I just wish it wasn't as expensive, but I guess since I write off half of the cost from taxes it isn't too bad

>>717421830 (OP)
4070TiS
I play in VR occasionally.

wtf gpu do i buy? something that will give me no issues

>>717421830 (OP)
A 4090

>>717422970
I would rather die than use the meme connector.

Happy with my 3090 but I'd like to upgrade within the next year.

>>717446059
9070xt is the only gpu that works on windows, linux, freebsd, and mac.

>>717444214
There's only one game I used optiscaler for (expedition 33) to get FSR4 and it broke all the cutscenes so basically the game is unplayable.

>>717421830 (OP)
Rx 7800 xt. Works great, can play all my shit in 1440p above 70-80 fps.

>>717421830 (OP)
6750xt, it's good for me, won't upgrade until 2030 2bh.

>>717446059
Simple. You wanna mess around with local AI pics/vids? or you need raytracing? get Nvidia
You dont wanna do that? then maybe what this anon said (get AMD) : >>717446361

>>717446059
5070Ti and 9070(+XT) are the only cards that make sense in current year.

>>717421830 (OP)
GTX 750 ti in my htpc
GTX 1080 ti in my backup pc
RTX 3080 in my main pc
GTX 1080 in storage as a backup
Also about 6 years ago I found a sealed unused 6600 GT in a charity shop for £1.50. The old woman running the place obviously didn't know what it was and put in on sale among the kid's toy cars and board games, and I couldn't resist buying it for some retro rig I might build one day.

>>717421830 (OP)

>amd RX 9060 xt

Should I get 1440p or 144hz /1080p display? What do think is higher fps or pixels more important?

>>717422479
just use DISM then SFC saaaar (unironically, ask Google)

>>717447087
1440p and 144hz if you can.

>>717446770
>5070Ti
Why go for this instead of 5080? is it just a matter of pricing being too much for what 5080's worth?

4090

>>717447232
5080 is fucking dog shit for its price point

>>717447232
It's way too expensive and if you're going balls to the wall then just get a 5090. The card is a waste of silicon.

>>717446894
>16gb RAM
Come on now... this isnt 2015 anymore or 2010.

>>717447232
5080 is pretty terrible price to performance. It's even less impressive when you consider that they're releasing a 5080 super soon(ish) with 24gb. Unless you can get it for 200+ dollars below rrp, don't even entertain the idea of buying one.

>>717447319
>>717447367
I see, yeah I suppose that makes sense. Personally id just wait for a 6080 or 7080 down the line anyway

i snagged a refurbished 4090 for $1400 last year mostly for AI

>>717447087
you want a 1440p thats beyond any question, you dont buy a 1080p screen on 2026.
You will want one that capts at 180hz or so, that way you can get it to 144hz easily
/pcbg/ has a couple recommended screens on the 200-300€ range

3080
need 2 upgrade

i bought a 3060 ti from a friend for 150 bucks

>>717421830 (OP)
5070
I'm cpu limited in almost everything at 1440p and I didn't buy into vram hysteria so I think I'm good for awhile.
I'm also convinced that this will still be more powerful than a ps6 + rtx ai texture niggery will save me.

>>717421830 (OP)
amd vega vii

>>717421830 (OP)
5070ti
7800x3d
mini led 4k screen

I only play 15+ year old games

>>717448215
5060ti
I also do AI stuff and mostly just play e-sport or older games and didn't want to pay more for the 5070ti but still needed the vram

>>717447232
15% faster while being 40% more expensive
both of the having the same amount of vram just for that extra fuck you from NVIDIA.

nah, I will take a 5070ti over it.

>>717446361
>linux
4% of pc users. Basically nobody gives a shit.
>mac
lmao

>>717446770
5060ti, 5070, 9060xt?

why so many AI dweebs itt spinning their wheels over fotm bullshit?

>>717448215
5070 here at 1080p though

got a pc with 1660 ti, 2tb nve ssd +1tb hdd, ryzen 5 3600cpu, 16 gigs of RAM for 300$ and im enjoying peak gaming rn. sure most of the UE5 shitfest games run at low-medium graphics, but to be fair, most of the games made in that engine are ass. If the game is reallly unnoptimized i just run FSRand get like 50-60 fps.

Also anyone here playin Tainted Grail Fall of Avalon?

>>717423127
Just did exactly that, my old gear was a 1060 6b with a 1080p monitor. I've finally seen the light.

>>717448935
windows 11 is still much slower than linux tho

>>717449052
5070 is a stupid middle of the road option and the rest are just poorfag versions of what I've stated before, excluding the dogshit 8gb variants of course

5070ti is the best

>>717449859
>stupid middle of the road
If you don't need/care about the vram it's $200+ of savings for like 90%+ of the performance at 1080p and usually less than 20% at 1440p
>poorfag versions
poorfags want to play video games too.

>>717450143
>>717450330
yeah miss me with that 5070shit

>>717450440
>AMD
You've already lost

>>717450330
>usually less than 20% at 1440p
less than 20% lost at 1440p

Will I regret buying a 9070XT?
Havent owned AMD since ATI

>>717450440
What N64 game is that?

>>717450440
why are they running benchmarks on OW2? a fucking toaster can run that game on ultra

>>717446484
yeah thats good and all but can you play a game without lagging?

i have 5080, its content

>>717451556
>paying $1500 for a gpu that barely out performs a 4090

>>717451025
you will not

>>717451946
> barely out performs a 4090

I thought it was way slower.

>>717421830 (OP)
Just upgraded on Saturday

4090

>>717421830 (OP)
5090
The drivers fucking suck.

>>717451946
the place where i bought my pc from didnt have the 4090,

>>717421830 (OP)
4070
kinda wanna get something new since it cant really hit high fps in some newer games but gpus are so expensive now...

I have a 7900XTX. I bought a 5080 for memetracing but only used it for a few weeks before putting the XTX back in because the drivers were fucked. Should probably check if they've fixed them yet, been a while now.

>>717451946
>out performs a 4090
the virgin 5080 literally gets shit on by the Chad 4090

>>717438995
FSP is a good brand
used to get those before getting a Seasonic

If you bought Nvidia's 5000 series cards you're part of the problem. Thanks for ruining prices for another generation assfucks.

>>717452783
What the fuck is his problem?
>>717451946
A heavily overclocked 5080 maybe gets to just a little bit slower than a stock 4090

>>717421830 (OP)
3060 RTX

the bland woman of GPUs, you know she is not really listening when you speak, but she gives amazing head and is ok with having 3 kids

is it true you can overclock the vram on 5000 series

>>717453326
+3000 minimum on the 5070 and 5070ti
Usually still at least +3000 on the 5080 but not always

3060Ti but I barely use it.

literally what card can run at 1440p ultra with ray tracing?

>>717453561
Native? For regular lighter rt everything from like a 3090 or 4070 super or something onward can do it.
Pathtracing you'd need a 5090 and literally nothing else comes close to working
With dlss 5070/4070 super you're good to go with even path tracing.

>>717452963
He's offended at Nvidia's scalper-tier prices, which frankly he has every right to. Nvidia is taking advantage of nearly being a monopoly to price gouge.

>>717421830 (OP)
3080

rx 590

>>717450482
>cuts off the axes
>"the numbers are bigger bruh don't ask what they mean"
Obvious propaganda is obvious. The 9070XT is basically a 5070Ti with worse RT performance and a lower price.

>>717455104
Not true AT ALL.

>>717455276
Any suggestion otherwise is Green Team propaganda, shill

>>717455104
how much better is the RT on a 5070Ti?

>>717452236
Explain what you mean.

>>717455461
Depends on the game but there's not a single one where the 9070 XT will beat it

>>717443696
>Advertised with death stranding
>ds does not have ray tracing
fucking retard.

>>717457535
Battlefield V and FFXV were ad games for DLSS1. Control was the ad game for DLSS2. All had RT. Faggot fuck retard liar kill yourself subhuman cum licker PIG FUCK.

>>717422345
GTX 1080 ti are like 130 dollars second hand

>7900 XTX

>>717455104
Its feature set is worse in nearly every way. DLSS4 is superior and widely adopted. Frame generation is superior. AI work is superior.
FSR4 is almost non existent and its adoption rate is at a snails pace. It took half a fucking year to get it in cyberpunk for example.
>muh optiscaler
It is not acceptable. AMD fansboys would be having a field day if a mod was required to use DLSS.

You pay more for having actual features. The performance increase is also nice. Pretending that ray tracing doesn't matter is sour grapes cope.

>>717455461
Anywhere from 10-25% depending on the game. Don't even bother trying to use path tracing on an AMD card.

>>717454030
The 9070xt is still over $100 over MSRP. AMD fucks you in the ass raw and with a wide grin you proclaim "At least I didn't buy NVIDIA"

5090 from a 2080

>>717459601
>Its feature set is worse in nearly every way. DLSS4 is superior and widely adopted. Frame generation is superior. AI work is superior.
>FSR4 is almost non existent and its adoption rate is at a snails pace. It took half a fucking year to get it in cyberpunk for example.
>muh optiscaler
>It is not acceptable. AMD fansboys would be having a field day if a mod was required to use DLSS.
You're not wrong about AMD featureset being weaker but I don't agree with the Optiscaler part - we are PC users. Taking 2 minutes to download a program and enable it and tick a box before turning on your game should not be difficult for any PC user with an IQ above 80. If some normogroids are too stupid to do this then it's their problem.

>>717446059
Let me narrow it down for you.
If you're okay with buying used hardware, get it from NewEgg or Amazon. Those are the only two marketplaces that offer warranties with used GPUs. If you insist on buying a new GPU, get something that released this year. Stick with RTX50/RX9000, because previous-gen stock is ridiculously overpriced at the moment.

Went from a 2080 with an i7-9700k to a 5090 with a 9800X3D, glad I didn't listen to all the youtubers and redditors shilling AMD cards

>>717460648
What driver are you on?

My 1080 has served me well, it's finally time to upgrade

5080 FE. Thanks best buy

I'm still on a gtx 970. I'm still on 1080p and pretty much every game I'm interested in is 5+ years old so I haven't thought about upgrading yet.

>>717421830 (OP)
Built my pc last summer with a 3060 with 12vram enough to run GPT4all, silent unless under pressure, suffice to play literally anything, cost me 250 eurobucks

>>717460794
the latest, no issues so far though I've mostly been playing BG3 this past week

>>717461012
THERE'S A NIGGER ABOUT TO STEAL YOUR COMPUTER ANON

>>717421830 (OP)

GTX 5800. So far handles everything in 4K maxed out that I’ve played, including some new titles. If a new game releases and it doesn’t work as well maybe I’ll spring for the 5090.

>>717431213
you're getting scammed, I got a 3080 for 250€

just ditched my 2060 last week for a 3080

>>717451556
yes I can play pretty much everything I want except for the newest FOTM sloppa or whatever. sorry for the late reply, was busy fucking ur mum.

I got used RX6600 from some crypto miner for 110euros.
When i get a stable job i want to buy PC for like 3-5k PC from logicalincrements (part picker has shit UI )

>>717421830 (OP)
i have an 8800 GT 512MB as god intended

>>717462913
based and 5 FPS on crysis 1 pilled

>>717462494
shes a good lay isnt she?

>>717421830 (OP)
6600. I hate this piece of shit. I am irate I got baited into buying it by /g/tards
>Nvidia shill
No this card just sucks ass because AMD doesn't know how to make fucking drivers. I get crashes for the most inane bullshit

>>717437385
its why i just dont give a shit about triple A anymore. why on earth should i buy your game that runs like shit even on 2000 dollar GPUs when i can just play something like rimworld instead.

>>717421830 (OP)
4060m because I wanted something small and cute. It's overpowered for what i need.

>>717463251
I wish Njudea were any better, neither company can make drivers worth shit anymore
I unironically might buy an intel GPU

>>717461161
Kek. Like casually passing by but...

>>717463251
switch to linux you will have a better experience. i have no problems after switching and i use LACT to undervolt it and raise the power limits without issue

if I have a GTX 1060 6GB is it time to upgrade?

>>717464417
Well do you want to play new shit and see all the new toys then sure if no then i guess buy some better used one.

>>717464417
No. Just avoid anything running on UE5 or developed by Remedy and Square Enix.

>tfw got a 5060ti 16g
>had a 6750xt

As much as I like AMD's value, I no longer want to kill myself every time I use Lightroom, Premier or any other Adobe program.