Thread 717490760

Games were objectively better when characters were less sexualized. Now devs can put in a sexualized character just to bait coomers into playing a shit game.

>>717490760 (OP)
But if there were no sexualized characters then wouldn't the very first one bait every coomer even if the game were shit?

>>717490760 (OP)
basically all furslop games

"sexualized" characters didnt used to be a big deal. they can only bait you with your cock because youve been made into a marketing demographic. welcome to capitalism.

>>717490760 (OP)
>Games were objectively better when characters were less sexualized.
So you finally admit that Starfield is a masterpiece?

>>717491352
>woke game is bad so coomer games are suddenly good

>>717490760 (OP)
cato

>>717490760 (OP)
Bump

Litmus test for modern games. If your game doesn't have skimpy girls I'm not going to bother with it. I'm done with finding pozz after I already started playing. Either put fanservice on the cover or your game is dead to me.

>>717490760 (OP)
>in the past:
>we have a good game, but sales are low
>let's put some some waifu in for attention
>present day:
>we have a dogshit expensive mess of a game
>crank up the SEXO to max and hope it sells
There was a time when having beautiful women and fan-service in your game was actually a sign of quality (see; Soulcalibur). Now it makes me skeptical, just think of all the gacha slop.

>>717491186
saar

>>717490760 (OP)
100% correct. coomiers are jeets and/or trannies.
>>717494735
>we have a good game, but sales are low
>let's put some some waifu in for attention
examples?

>>717491182
The only reason to play some furfag games is sexy characters.

behead all phoneposters