You know Yamauchi, in 2001 he predicted all that's happening right now

>>717518567 (OP)
basado

He predicted Nintendo would become a Family Game machine?

Who did what?

>>717518567 (OP)
This guy was so tied to the yakuza that they had to put a random programmer nerd in as president just to get the government off their tail

>>717518567 (OP)
>MBA, Japan
fuck him
if he was in charge these days he would be pushing diversity

>>717519321
No, he predicted that Sony would be BTFO

>>717520432
Blessed quote

>>717520432
>>717520547
Movie games are very profitable though

>>717521075
no they aren't lmao which is exactly why sony have stopped making them and have spent the entire ps5 gen trying to fruitlessly get their own fortnite

>>717521441
When will Nintendo get back to making real games for serious gamers?

>>717521758
>get back to
>back to
?

>>717519321
Don't tell this guy how the NES got named in japan

>>717521943
Get back to making

>>717521758
2014, when they specifically said they were done with casual Wii era titles and haven't pandered to that market since

>>717521979
The ching chong ding dong?

>>717520432
Jesus fuck, it's spot on.
>"AAA" game devs are hyperfixated on MUH GRAFIX and making "epic" movie games that end up being interactive movies
>very little innovation, most games are just re-treading an existing formula for safe, guaranteed profits
>huge devs spending hundreds of millions and 7+ years developing a single game, when back in the 80s a team of 20-30 people could make a masterpiece in 1 year

I think graphics aren't there yet to be taken seriously as interactive movies.

Even CGI was seen as a fad up until the late 90s and early 2000s. This is especially the case with 3d animated movies.

If devs actually learn how to optimize the next Generation will finally give us decent graphics. Lighting,materials, physics etc...

>>717522195
Graphical fidelity plateaued like a decade ago. Ever since then they've just been stacking on more and more stupid gimmick shit like ray-tracing and shadows and lighting effects.

>>717518567 (OP)
He was right

Videogames need to focus on being videogames, not b-tier interactive movies

>>717519321
the NES is called famicom in japan retard (family computer)

>>717520432
>we're supposed to be making games, and not movies
Sony never recovered from this

>>717522375
Because unreal engine 5 is an unfinished engine meant to be used by the most advanced graphics cards.

It happens every generation as well.

Unreal engine 3 looked amazing on PS4/Xbox one hardware but most devs decided it was too much work so they moved on to unreal engine 4.

Ue4 looks and runs amazing on PS5/series x but everyone moved on to ue5.

If there's any glimmer of hope I've heard UE6 will just be UE5+

>>717521758
They won’t, anon. Nintendo’s idea of a “real game” is making you waggle a Joy-Con to feed Kirby a digital donut while a pop remix of the Wii Shop Channel theme plays in the background. Anyone holding out for the return of F-Zero or a gritty Metroid sequel that isn’t made by the interns at MercurySteam is coping harder than a Sony investor post-Helldivers patch notes.

>>717523724
>Nintendo’s idea of a “real game” is making you waggle a Joy-Con to feed Kirby a digital donut while a pop remix of the Wii Shop Channel theme plays in the background.
How dare the videogame makers to give a videogame its main purpose amirite?

>>717523724
A fun videogame is better than a movie game with deep story, fun games move the videogame medium forward, while movies games will always be a cop out for people who can't make movies or their own animated shows.

I think if Xbox, PlayStation, and Sega joined forces they would destroy Nintendo.

Xbox needs to make the hardware and software. PlayStation and Sega make the games.

Sure they'll allow Xbox to make one dog shit game every once in a while but that's it.

>>717527092
sega garbage sells like shit.