>>717553608 (OP)
can incels tell what good romance is?
personally as someone who gets bleached every now and then the best romance I can think of is FFX
I was shellshocked for the entire day when I played this at 10 years old, and when I went to bed that night I cried for hours. Nothing hit like this did since.
i don't think i've played a game with romancing in it that I would say the romancing is good.
Bioware is by far the worst tho
playing dos2 recently was a weird experience bc i had read a lot of anons say it has good romances but it's literally just pick a companion to fug when you move on to act 4, then it barely gets mentioned again. Like fucking what? Good game but man people have low standards for coomer content
>>717554735
also i just realized i formatted this post really stupidly so before some autist replies yes i'm fucking aware dos2 is not a bioware game i was just spitballing
I'm less concerned about romance being well written, and more concerned about how much interactions you have with npcs after you've romanced them. A lot of games tend to not give you much if any further interactions with npcs after you've slept with them. Gotta make it feel like you're actually a couple and not just fuck buddies.
>>717555209
I am pretty sure Xana sees the PC as much more than just a friend. Maybe in the very beginning she would have liked that, but by the end she is definitely in love.
>>717553608 (OP)
well, you can eliminate everything that lets you choose from multiple romances. so that mostly leaves you with the few RPGs with pre-written characters (not self insert MCs). and those tend to not focus on the characters or the romance enough to make them work. so i can only think of maybe Trails in the Sky, but i haven't finished SC so i'm not sure how the romance actually holds up.
