← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 717556128

19 posts 8 images /v/
Anonymous No.717556128 >>717556238 >>717556293 >>717556495 >>717556531 >>717556541
Why does he want to kill games so badly?
Anonymous No.717556219 >>717556428 >>717556625
He worked at Blizzard.
Anonymous No.717556238
>>717556128 (OP)
Why does he want me to eat his entire ass?
Anonymous No.717556248
Because his family earned its wealth off of live service games. His dad is a founding member of Blizzard, and he himself worked at Blizzard during the Cata and Diablo 3 years.
Anonymous No.717556293 >>717556405 >>717556493
>>717556128 (OP)
Why does he hate the letter "m" so much ?
Anonymous No.717556361 >>717556434
>Implying SKG is saving games
Anonymous No.717556384 >>717556683
Why do you want to gossip about ecelebs so badly?
Anonymous No.717556405
>>717556293
its the hotkey for (M)ANA GEM
Anonymous No.717556428 >>717556625
>>717556219
He worked there as the first second generation employee
Anonymous No.717556434
>>717556361
giving the eu more power has surely never backfired
Anonymous No.717556454
Does anyone care about SKG anymore? I thought everybody already moved onto the payment processor shit.
Anonymous No.717556493
>>717556293
>336 hour timeout
That's crazy
Anonymous No.717556495
>>717556128 (OP)
Because he uses retards like you to stay relevant, same goes for a lot of failing "content creators"
Anonymous No.717556531 >>717556671
>>717556128 (OP)
I have seen this fag face a lot lately, can i have a qrd on why is everyone obssesed with him this week?
Anonymous No.717556541
>>717556128 (OP)
Video games deserve to die. Go back to work you lazy NEETs.
Anonymous No.717556543
Anyone else notice that once their eceleb drama died down the anti SKG posters made better arguments than the SKG shills?
Anonymous No.717556625
>>717556219
>>717556428
How would you know this when he never talks about it?
Anonymous No.717556671
>>717556531
He fucked up and doubled down on his fuck up and refused to accept he fucked up. That's basically it. Also, he worked at Blizzard, which he constantly brings up.
Anonymous No.717556683
>>717556384
Well in this case it's an eceleb advocating against legislation that would affect vidya as a whole