>>717570256
this is pretty much the situation. the guy posting makes an excuse whenever asked to prove it's him. >>717570340
yeah but this doesn't prove anything since that facebook profile only has the one single pic of "him" ever.
>>717571463 >'ick on 'eck was harmless
Only until 'ecker revealed his 'ecker VPN for ban evading and giving access to anyone who sends the 'ecker of pic of their 'ick