← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 717575804

28 posts 14 images /v/
Anonymous No.717575804 >>717575957 >>717576131 >>717576280 >>717576417 >>717576454
Well, this explains a lot about the layoffs at Microsoft.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9tdlNFABJQ
Anonymous No.717575957 >>717576505
>>717575804 (OP)
>this thread again
These videos are ads to try to convince potential employees that the workspace isn't going to be miserable (it is).
Anonymous No.717575990
>P-please goyim, go back into office! Working from home means we don't have power over you anymore, think of the poor middle managers. How about a pizza party?
Anonymous No.717576020 >>717576191 >>717576417
Anonymous No.717576072
>he thinks it's culture war slop about da roooooasties (that won't have sex with me btw)
>not because the Big Tech bubble of the 2010s absorbed so much capital investment all the huge corporations overhired to an insane degree because on paper it was more cost effective to hire any "specialist" to add "value" to your evaluation by paying them 200k to do 3 hours of work weekly than having them hired by a rival company or possibly do something benefiting society
Same shit is coming for the AI bubble
Anonymous No.717576116 >>717576280
Anonymous No.717576131
>>717575804 (OP)
Btw, the DEI hires weren't fired. The only ones who got fired were artists and programmers who got replaced by jeets.
Anyone who was valuable and did any honest work, was fired and replaced by AI and jeets.
Anonymous No.717576142 >>717576187
Modern ""work"" is just daycare for women to make sure they don't have children
Anonymous No.717576187 >>717576224 >>717576304 >>717576324 >>717576381
>>717576142
I agree on the "daycare for adults" part, but why women?
Capitalists wants lots of babies. More babies = Bigger work pool = Lower wages.
Having less available workforce is their nightmare.
Anonymous No.717576191
>>717576020
Faaaaaaattttt
Anonymous No.717576196 >>717576280 >>717576407 >>717576417
If it's the same person form the last threads, I looked up her Linkedin and she's a Project Manager, ie one of those boss types.
Anonymous No.717576224 >>717576350 >>717576352
>>717576187
Something something jews hate white people, don't bother touching /pol/nigs. Every fucking government worldwide is throwing shit at the wall to raise birthrates these days.
Anonymous No.717576280
>>717575804 (OP)
how much does she get paid though?
>>717576196
>one of those boss types
oh, so she gets paid a shit-ton
>>717576116
>most men are too insecure to date a surgeon
*inhales* wrong
she's a 42-year-old hag with no fertility. that's the real reason why men aren't interested in her.
Anonymous No.717576304 >>717576473
>>717576187
Different trends going in direction. There's a tendency for people with more simplistic viewpoints to see everything as a top down pyramid, where everything is mandated from elite bosses who gives orders down the line. It means everything is perfectly planned out. Meanwhile in reality, it's a chaotic system where everyone is attempting to achieve their self interest.

Here, once you become urbanized and educated, children become a cost rather than free labor. No one has a single solution to this, and immigration was meant to be a stop gap measure, where you fill in economic holes as needed. But then what happens if you have to replace what amounts to the entire population every few generations since the birth rates are below replacement?

What if every single country modernizes, and has dropping birth rates?

Where do the people come from?

NO ONE HAS ANY ANSWERS TO THIS since no one has thought this far along the system. The actors in the system are just trying to keep it going a few more years.
Anonymous No.717576324 >>717576368
>>717576187
>Capitalists wants lots of babies.
Immigrants are making enough babies already
Billionaires want a subservient population they can easily control and pay smaller wages to, White people aren't that
Anonymous No.717576350 >>717576374
>>717576224
>Every fucking government worldwide is throwing shit at the wall to raise birthrates these days.
Yeah, they're doing everything except addressing the actual issue (feminism)
Anonymous No.717576352
>>717576224
so is white people becoming minorities on our own countries or not?
Anonymous No.717576368
>>717576324
>Immigrants are making enough babies already
That's capitalism for you. No countries but economic zones, some are specialized in different forms of production, so it's normal that some countries will be specialized in making the human capital, they're all interchangeable workers after all.
Anonymous No.717576374 >>717576398
>>717576350
You're retarded if you think that
Anonymous No.717576381
>>717576187
capitalists want a bigger workforce NOW. while they're alive and profiting from it. not in 20 years from now when babies have grown up. they don't care about what happens after they die, or what happens outside of their very high income neighborhood. thats why they import infinity indians.
Anonymous No.717576398 >>717576468
>>717576374
Okay, smartass
If feminism isn't the cause of collapsing birth rates, what is?
Anonymous No.717576407
>>717576196
Obviously
The code critical people are guys locked up in the basement with no amenities and walls of protection from accessing the same floor as her.
Anonymous No.717576417
>>717575804 (OP)
>>717576020
>>717576196
Only jobs these thots need to have is pleasing cocks of their husbands.
Anonymous No.717576454
>>717575804 (OP)
>fake
>and
>gay
Thanks for playing.
Anonymous No.717576468
>>717576398
Lack of space, because housing is unaffordable.
Lack of money, because wages don't keep up with everything else.
Lack of time, because people never worked more than today.

It's not because of a few overweight blue-haired hamplanets that people aren't making babies, it's because they are lacking the essentials : Time, money, and space.
Anonymous No.717576473
>>717576304
Birth rates will fix themselves
Modernism will die, Leftism will die, Europe / USA will have proper civil wars
Then new nations will emerge, where women have zero rights and everyone is conservative
Anonymous No.717576480
Anonymous No.717576505
>>717575957
if that's the case, Why are they using women for this? They are more interested in hiring men.