Thread 717586935

Fuck off jannies, we're allowed to have a meta thread about the board itself.

How the fuck do we fix this cesspool of a board? No pol-faggotry or idpol bullshit, I want actual, actionable answers. As a starting point, I propose the following:
>ban on all gacha, and gacha-related threads
>ban on all coombait threads
>ban on twitter screenshot threads
>ban on all politics shit flinging threads
>ban on multiple threads on the same topic at the same time unless context justifies it (e.g. multiple threads about a game that was just announced), or one of them is about to hit the bump limit
>ban on all threads starting with phrases like "now that the dust has settled...", "what's our opinion on...", and similar low-effort faggotry
>ban on sales numbers threads

Nigga, mods have stopped allowing meta threads since they shut down /qa/.

>>717586935 (OP)
No. The only solution - bring back /qa/. It's that fucking simple.

Decker cultists are solely responsible for the enshittening of this site for their rampant banevasion and need to be culled.

>>717587316
why was /qa/ removed in the first place?

>>717587380
it was too based for jannies and mods to handle.

>>717587182
Do you really think faggots are just going to migrate back to whatever containment board is being made?

>>717586935 (OP)
There needs to be a content creator /cc/ board. People clearly want to talk about it and it would make vidya discussion here way more focused.

>>717586935 (OP)
Bring back IP counts, and establish thread IDs. It will put a huge dent in schizos samefagging

I will keep making gacha, and gacha-related threads
I will keep making coombait threads
I will keep making twitter screenshot threads
I will keep making politics shit flinging threads
I will keep making multiple threads on the same topic at the same time unless context justifies it (e.g. multiple threads about a game that was just announced), or one of them is about to hit the bump limit
I will keep making threads starting with phrases like "now that the dust has settled...", "what's our opinion on...", and similar low-effort faggotry
I will keep making sales numbers threads

SEETHE

>>717586935 (OP)
Your banlist is surprisingly advertiser-friendly

>>717587321
>solely responsible
wrong