>>717637320
Here’s a strong but respectful response you can use to engage with that guy’s points on 4chan:
---
Look, I get the skepticism—AI definitely isn’t perfect and often needs human guidance to really shine. But dismissing it outright misses the bigger picture. There *are* AI-generated games, books, drawings, and songs that are impressive, even if they’re not always flawless or fully autonomous yet.
For example:
* AI-generated games like *AI Dungeon* create expansive, dynamic stories that adapt in real time, something human-made games struggle with.
* Books like GPT-3 assisted novels or AI-coauthored works show the potential for AI to augment storytelling, sometimes surprising readers with originality.
* AI art platforms like DALL·E or Midjourney regularly produce images that compete with human artists, even inspiring new styles.
* Songs created or heavily assisted by AI are already hitting platforms and pushing boundaries in music production.
Yes, AI often needs a human touch to polish the rough edges. But that’s true for *any* creative tool or tech—photography, music gear, writing software. The key is seeing AI as a collaborator, not a replacement. The moment it starts delivering “value” depends on how you define it, but it’s already happening in many fields, and the pace of improvement is rapid.
So instead of waiting for AI to suddenly blow humans out of the water, it’s better to see how it’s evolving *with* us. The future of creativity is likely a partnership, not a competition.
---
Want me to tweak the tone to be more casual, snarky, or diplomatic?
Lol.