← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 717630531

59 posts 32 images /v/
Anonymous No.717630531 >>717630774 >>717630879 >>717630932 >>717631521 >>717632871 >>717632925 >>717633034 >>717633683 >>717633958
One Step Closer
Google just created a new ai that lets you prompt 720p walking simulators.

It accepts a prompt and creates a fully modeled 3d world that you can explore in first or third person lol.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PDKhUknuQDg
Anonymous No.717630739
Wow, it's like going outside, huh.
Anonymous No.717630774 >>717632632
>>717630531 (OP)
>walking simulators

Kojima invented that with MGS1
Anonymous No.717630879 >>717634049 >>717635457 >>717636440
>>717630531 (OP)
NO. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. I AM AN ARTIST AND I WILL NOT LET YOU REPLACE ME. FUCK ALL YOU SLOP FREAKS!
Anonymous No.717630932
>>717630531 (OP)
>One Step Closer
to what? endless trash? digital microplastics?
Anonymous No.717631521 >>717632791
>>717630531 (OP)
did they train the model on sony games?
Anonymous No.717631629 >>717632038
We already have AI generated content irl, it's called anime and Japanese entertainment for manchild otakus. All anime and nip games in general are just power fantasies for losers, AI generated games and movies will be the same shit. Japan will be devastated by this
Anonymous No.717632038
>>717631629
lurk for 10 years before posting
Anonymous No.717632438
The nightmare of this "AI generated" shit (and it's not "artificial intelligence" as much as it's just algorithms) is that everything it will produce is filtered through built in censorship.
So nothing created by this shit will have artistic intentions that aren't allowed by the program - nothing bold, nothing transgressive, nothing new. Everything safe, sterile, kosher, and politically correct.
No commentary on politics that is truly critical of the state, nothing critical of the status quo, nothing forbidden by ignorant minds - even if the ideas forbidden by the algorithm are the necessary ideas to bring about the only positive changes that would make life worth living.
Anonymous No.717632632 >>717633557
>>717630774
> MGS1
What the fuck are you babbling on about retard?
Anonymous No.717632728 >>717633328
https://deepmind.google/api/blob/website/media/genie_environmental_consistency_4_gIb3IbS.mp4

https://deepmind.google/api/blob/website/media/genie_environmental_consistency_5_OCdIbx8.mp4

Lol.
Anonymous No.717632791
>>717631521
Lol.
Anonymous No.717632871
>>717630531 (OP)

I can think of a few uses for this and it seems that complexity is a matter of time. Could probably even cheat some aspects related to consistency with that memory gimmick.

Would need to see a real pro go at it to see what degree of control over style is possible though.
Anonymous No.717632884 >>717636138
Anonymous No.717632925
>>717630531 (OP)
What take years for game devs to make AI shits it out in minutes. It's looking grim for anything that has to do with entertainment. The era of never-ending infinite slop is about to begin.
Anonymous No.717633034 >>717633210 >>717633308
>>717630531 (OP)
So they basically made what exactly, some RNG map generator for a walking simulator? Why is this so impressive? If you can spit out data to make an image or a video out of a prompt I'm sure you can train some shit to spit out a game map too.
Anonymous No.717633210 >>717633371 >>717636138
>>717633034
Just look at it tho.
This shit is crazy and you can even intreact to a limited extent, like opening doors and painting on walls, and you can even prompt real time changes to the environment like adding characters to the scene lol.
Anonymous No.717633274 >>717633415 >>717641159
why does every "lol" in these pro AI poster's posts feel sinister
Anonymous No.717633308 >>717636138
>>717633034
It looks really good, you can prompt an entire game world like this using just text lol.
Anonymous No.717633328 >>717633432
>>717632728
if there are supposed to be environmental differences in those examples my IQ isn't high enough to spot them and I assume that will be the case for most people
Anonymous No.717633371 >>717634656
>>717633210
There's no point trying to reason with people as dumb as that guy is. Mouth breather would be a compliment for him.
But to his credit at least he understands the gravity of future AIs that will make 3D assets.
Anonymous No.717633387
SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARS?
Anonymous No.717633415 >>717633527
>>717633274
https://deepmind.google/api/blob/website/media/genie_environmental_consistency_1_iNVUBuv.mp4

It has a memory of about 2 minutes before it starts to forget previous actions, but until then it stays consistent.

Lol.
Anonymous No.717633432
>>717633328
Unfortunately you are correct.
Anonymous No.717633502 >>717633578 >>717633810
Nothing AI creates is art. Art is language and conveys ideas. Think of a book, which is the most brute way you can convey ideas. AI does not have ideas, it does not think or convey a message in the way a human does.

Would you read an AI fiction book? No? Then don't support AI slop "art."
Anonymous No.717633527
>>717633415
this one is really crazy when he looks down
that's some sparks of AGI shit
Anonymous No.717633557
>>717632632
The game is roughly about 45 minutes of gameplay outside of the 6 hours or so of backtracking, walking around doing fuck all and waiting for the next cutscene or codec call to tell you shit

There's a reason he said MGS is a movie. It has about an hour of gameplay at most unless you suck but the rest is 'cinematic'
Anonymous No.717633578
>>717633502
>AI can write books
>books can convey ideas
you didn't think that one out very well huh
Anonymous No.717633683
>>717630531 (OP)
>lets you prompt 720p walking simulators.
VIDEOGAMES DAMNIT. WE WANT VIDEOGAMES!!!!
Anonymous No.717633739
Anonymous No.717633810
>>717633502
Is a school math book art?

No, no reasonable person would say so, yet educational books are clearly the pinnacle of function of "idea" conveyance given that is their entire role.

Art is just entertainment.
Anonymous No.717633958
>>717630531 (OP)
EVERYTHING YOU SAY TO MAYYYYYYY
Anonymous No.717634049 >>717634298 >>717634521
>>717630879
That post is entirely correct though.
Anonymous No.717634232 >>717635610
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnkbJ-H4r5k
Anonymous No.717634298
>>717634049
Except I can answer his last question
>What's the point of a souless world without art? Without music?
Gooning to premium, algorithm self enhancing AI slop while AI beats pulse through my veins.
Anonymous No.717634521
>>717634049
It's an opinion piece that's false. He hates AI, calls it slop. That's his retarded salty opinion.

People will choose AI and he will cope about it.
Anonymous No.717634656 >>717634760
>>717633371
>future AIs that will make 3D assets
This will put a bunch of pajeets out of the job. Nearly all coding for games is still done by the actual studios while asset creation is what gets farmed out.
Anonymous No.717634760
>>717634656
It will overwhelmingly put whites out of jobs because you still need the prompters and those people will be Chinese and Indian mainly.
Anonymous No.717635457
>>717630879
Not necessarily wrong but in classic reddit style, he put it in the most obnoxious way possible.
Anonymous No.717635610
>>717634232
Act 1 was so much better than Act 2
Anonymous No.717636138 >>717636665 >>717636809 >>717638506
>>717632884
>>717633210
>>717633308
this is neat but there's no game and you can't make game out of it
it's like going on google earth on 2005 and walking down a random road somewhere. It's cool, but it's only fun for about 5 minutes
even worse, it can only maintain a persistent world for like 60 seconds. You can't actually make a persistent world, no matter how much they scale up the timeline. With a supercomputer you could maybe simulate a persistent world for what, days? weeks? You can't make a game like that because you need consistency. Even if this system could do something as extreme as simulating a whole world, with stats and game mechanics and npcs and whatever, who cares if it can't store all the information perpetually. Maybe in many years from now it'll be able to simulate an elden ring world with combat and stats and whatever, but if it can't keep the stats and mechanics and geography consistent then it will never work as a game. A real game needs rigidity that generative AI will never have.
Anonymous No.717636440 >>717636670
>>717630879
>take this fags film, book or art
>feed it into the AI
>turn all characters into hot anime girls
>yep, it's high art time
Best I can do
Anonymous No.717636665 >>717636797 >>717636809 >>717636852
>>717636138
>and you can't make game out of it
retard
Anonymous No.717636670
>>717636440
you know there's porn on the internet right?
Anonymous No.717636797 >>717637162
>>717636665
name 1 game made by AI
Anonymous No.717636809
>>717636138
>>717636665
It's already more of a game than the Sony Movie Games. Lol.
Anonymous No.717636852 >>717637162
>>717636665
>generate walking simulator slop
>practically everything about it needs to be replaced in order to make the game you actually want
If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?
Anonymous No.717637162 >>717637320
>>717636797
You're so fucking retarded lol.

>>717636852
>>generate walking simulator
>that mean it can't generate anything else
>tech will never improve or change EVER
Anonymous No.717637320 >>717637457 >>717637570
>>717637162
name 1 game generated by AI
name 1 book written by AI that's better than what humans write
name 1 drawing made by AI that's better than what humans draw
name 1 song made by AI that's better than what humans make
etc.
AI can be a useful tool for things like coding. But vibe coding proves that AI can't even code right without fucking important shit up
it's shit, without a ton of human editing everything AI makes is shit. Let me know when AI generates literally anything of value ever.
Anonymous No.717637457
>>717637320
Anonymous No.717637546
>ai is trained on real games
>nobody makes real games anymore
>ai is trained on ai games
Anonymous No.717637570
>>717637320
Here’s a strong but respectful response you can use to engage with that guy’s points on 4chan:

---

Look, I get the skepticism—AI definitely isn’t perfect and often needs human guidance to really shine. But dismissing it outright misses the bigger picture. There *are* AI-generated games, books, drawings, and songs that are impressive, even if they’re not always flawless or fully autonomous yet.

For example:

* AI-generated games like *AI Dungeon* create expansive, dynamic stories that adapt in real time, something human-made games struggle with.
* Books like GPT-3 assisted novels or AI-coauthored works show the potential for AI to augment storytelling, sometimes surprising readers with originality.
* AI art platforms like DALL·E or Midjourney regularly produce images that compete with human artists, even inspiring new styles.
* Songs created or heavily assisted by AI are already hitting platforms and pushing boundaries in music production.

Yes, AI often needs a human touch to polish the rough edges. But that’s true for *any* creative tool or tech—photography, music gear, writing software. The key is seeing AI as a collaborator, not a replacement. The moment it starts delivering “value” depends on how you define it, but it’s already happening in many fields, and the pace of improvement is rapid.

So instead of waiting for AI to suddenly blow humans out of the water, it’s better to see how it’s evolving *with* us. The future of creativity is likely a partnership, not a competition.

---

Want me to tweak the tone to be more casual, snarky, or diplomatic?
Lol.
Anonymous No.717637854
In this case it's not possible for this to run on consumer hardware, they're using it to understand AI instead.
Anonymous No.717638506 >>717638691
>>717636138
I think the actual use for this tech will be to replace render engines.
>build gameworld with 'tagged' placeholder art
>render graphics with AI
>minimizes persistency issues and hardware requirements
Anonymous No.717638691 >>717639291
>>717638506
I still don't see how that makes sense than just making render engines easier to manage and populate with game stuff.
Your idea is just an alternative that presumably has more interfacing issues, less control.
Anonymous No.717639291 >>717639437
>>717638691
There would be no difference between an empty desert map and a lush jungle with a million plants and shadows in terms of performance. Destructive environments and fluid dynamics would also become basic features in every game with no cost to performance. It would open up a lot of possibilities in game/world design.
Anonymous No.717639437
>>717639291
Oh you were just talking about visuals, yeah that makes sense. I thought you meant the whole engine with everything.
Yeah I think AI will handle a lot of generic things like that, kind of like shaders 2.0.
Anonymous No.717641098
Dalle-3 losers brigading this thread
Anonymous No.717641159
>>717633274
They're seething and feel like feigning aloofness will disguise it. Even though it has the opposite effect. Typical retarded zoomer mentality.