Thread 717714486

Any fun warship games where I control one ship and not a whole fleet?

I showed you Essex, please respond.

From The Depths if you're ready to spend 1000 hours to actually make a good single battleship

>>717714486 (OP)
sure

>>717720029
No PC?

play Warship Gunner 1 and 2 nigga
I Hope you like CAD because you'll be spending a lot of time in the shop builder

>>717716974
i miss RTS CVs

>>717714486 (OP)
>>717716974
This game torpedoed itself by adding subs, it was quite literally against their entire design philosophy for the game yet they wanted more money.

>>717721558
It's a buck on Steam

>>717722330
nta but nice just got it

From the depths is pretty fun if you have the levels of autism needed to play it.

>>717722752
Battlestations pacific is the better version of this game with free form skirmish matches and a map editor as well btw

>>717723275
Uh oh.

>>717719559
Came here to recommend this. It's probably not what OP is looking for, but if you have the tism required to learn this game, it is so great.

>>717719559
>>717722939
>>717723807
I could never figure out how to make ballistic cannons work right and it haunts me to this day

>>717724680
theyre easy, like really easy
Hard one is actually optimized CRAM cannons
Dual cannon, 3D tetris stuff

>>717724790
To clarify I could build them but I couldn't get them to actually be effective no matter what shell components I used.

that battleship game you got out of a cereal box

>>717714486 (OP)
Battlestations pacific, although you can also control planes and submarines. Think about it as better singleplayer WoWs

>>717720029
Also this

If any games need remasters it's niche titles of late 2000s from the 'box

>>717724790
CRAM cannons are a massive waste of time for how big and complicated they are.

Controversial Opinion: A boat battle game where said boat can get upgraded with weapons, systems and paint like Armored Core with the arcade combat and strangereal of Ace Combat.

I showed you this lewd plant, please respond.

>>717728353
That's not a controversial opinion to me anon, it's what I've always wanted. That and also the same thing with tanks.

>>717724972
Banzai!

>>717729576
>with tanks
That just makes me want Chromehounds back with decent netcode.

>>717723804
>The japanese campaign needs you to win literally every battles without any serious lost
>Even then the best result is US concede Hawaii and that is it

The game was great though
But I don't like the fact that they remove the planes need to go back to the carrier thing for gameplay purposes

>>717728353
please refer to >>717721647

You also got this

I never finished the game because for the PT mission I can never hit the sub to continue

It was kinda cool that you can head straight for the German battleship and look at how big it is from your tiny PT

>saturday night
>taking a break from grinding expert sailors
>feel like pissing someone off
>swap to ijn
>load up the Mk23 M1s
>time to fire every weapon I have in the first 30 seconds of the game and still get most of the kills
I want to go back.

>>717730675
Oops

Forgot the image

>>717728216
They arent if you arent autistically interested in maxing out the efficiency of it why are you playing the game if you are not?
CRAM is cheap and can absolutely fuck your enemy depending on what youre shooting at, also CRAM doesnt blow up if destroyed so its better for smaller ships that dont want to spare the space for APS mag ejectors
APS is more reliable but will cost you, but you can pretty much build a ship with nothing but APS on it and it will be really great
The only problem i have with CRAM is how you cant change the velocity of the rounds fired to create some really accurate big huge cannons
I feel like the biggest that APS can offer is not big enough for huge ships and CRAM cant get accurate enough to be a realiable main gun

>>717732224
>>717728216
they arent complicated*

>>717732224
Maybe things have changed in the past few years but the last time I played CRAM was physically incapable of hitting most faction ships that weren't DG or OW.

>>717719559
>>717722939
Did they ever buff countermeasures? I stopped playing after I spent 3 hours on a cargo ship decked out with laser and ballistic counter systems only to discover most shells and missiles are so tanky they're almost impossible to efficiently shoot down.

>>717728353
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1633370/Boat_Crew/

>>717714486 (OP)
war thunder

>>717714486 (OP)
Foxhole
Not really a warship game, more like a war simulator game.

You aren't just one ship, you al literally one guy on a ship, and you operate it with 30 other players.

Navy in foxhole is super cool and the most skill intensive part of the game, but the massive cost of large ships and the high number of players you need to field them does mean you'll probably only be on a ship like 3 times per week at most.

And last patch made navy way weaker by buffing the massive fuck off cannons both sides have to cause large holes in large ships, which cannot be repaired fully, and thus always end an operation if you're hit by them because you now have to go back to dry dock to repair.

>>717714486 (OP)
>Any fun warship games
Not this one. Game already had issues, but the 2023 forking killed it.
I miss my Jean Bart