Wow this runs like shit

>>717751914 (OP)
Works fine on my machine :)

>>717751914 (OP)
It does. It uses 80% of my 12 core R9 5900X
WHAT THE FUCK IS IT CALCULATING?

>>717751914 (OP)
It's the anti-cheat and secure boot. Has the same performance impact as denuvo.

I complain about performance in every community forum, review, /v/ thread, etc.

I will determine whether it runs like shit or not. BRB.

>>717751914 (OP)
Upgrade your CPU if you want to play this trash.

>>717751986
yo btw ty for sending me the performance fix in DMs bro

>>717751914 (OP)
>Wow this runs like shit
It runs on a GTX1050Ti lol. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXm5hPwgcDc
Is your shitbox PC from the George W. Bush era?

>>717752185
I have an i9 and a 4080

>>717752268
>an i9
Vague, perhaps on purpose. Which i9?

I have no performance issues with an RTX 4070 and Ryzen 7 5700X

>>717751914 (OP)
The game is very CPU heavy and you'll hit a wall at a certain framerate if your CPU isn't strong enough. I can't go above 4k120fps even with an RTX4090 because my 5700X3D is bottlenecking.

Like every FPS with good graphics, it's more fun on low settings because you get to actually see people moving around.

>>717752731
Visibility is very poor. Everything looks so smudgy/blurry even at 1920x1080

>>717751914 (OP)
Runs fine on my ps5.

>>717752879
you have to enable DLSS, otherwise it looks blurrier, don't ask me how, games are broken without upscaling now

>>717751914 (OP)
Works on my 9800X3D 5090 machine

>>717752879
I have mine set to low and sharpness at 5(or 0), turn off film grain. This makes it easier to see everyone.

>>717751914 (OP)
works fine on my ps5 :)

>>717751914 (OP)
I've gotten this error a few times now. I'm trying to figure out why the game is freezing up. I might try turning off Nvidia Reflex or something. On a 5090 in case it isn't obvious. I don't have any issues with other games. Something about this beta is not working for me. It's completely random when it happens. I could play a match for 30 minutes but then i get this direct X error.

>>717752979
No I'm already using DLSS at highest setting (DLAA)

>>717752101
I cannot log in. I guess the beta is over. Welp!

>>717753078
5090 came out? lmao, you paypiggies

>>717753078
>playing with motion blur enabled
do retards really?
I hope you aren't using intel 13th or 14th gen

>>717751914 (OP)
i have a 7800x3d and a 4080, it runs well enough
just doesn't look very pretty for a 2025 $99 AAA game desu

>>717753201
this might be a framegen

>>717753201
don't 14th and 15th gen intel cpus melt

>>717753250
13th and 14th is the same thing with different name.
i7 and i9 just commit sudoku.
Intel will replace them under warranty.

>>717751914 (OP)
Works fine on my PlayStation 5™

The Finals runs better.

>>717752185
>40 FPS WITH FSR
L M A O RETARD

>>717751914 (OP)
Saar it is only a beta, they will fix all 3500 bugs in the database in the next 3 weeks before the game releases

>>717751914 (OP)
It's well optimized, it just isn't fun cause the maps are shit.

>>717751914 (OP)

500k peak on steamcharts when it's FREE to play the game. That doesn't sound like 100million players to me, or is that 100million supposed to be all the cheater accounts they sell in asia?

>>717753201
It's just the default settings, i hadn't gotten around to changing anything yet. And before i can even bother with that i still need to figure out why this error is happening. I've got a 9800X3D if you must know.

Maybe bothering with the Beta was a mistake and i should just wait for release or something.

>>717752879
>Everything looks so smudgy/blurry even at 1920x1080
Because you're playing at 1080p nigga. Imagine playing on 480p in 2010 and saying "wtf this looks pixelateed"

Runs fine on my PS5 Professional.

>>717754084
Yup, they're shipping games not even running at 100% internal resolution on pc

>>717751914 (OP)
I'm running it at 120-140 FPS on DLSS balanced at 4K, looks pretty gr8 if I do say so myself

>>717754197
No game is "shipped" with a set and unchangeable resolution. You can play modern games at 1080p native if you want, the reason it looks like shit is because 1080p is not enough for good image quality in graphically heavy games anymore no matter what you do.

>>717753532
1050ti is a 9 year old favela monkey tier gpu though. it's also well below minimum specs
and still runs bf6 just fine all things considered

>>717753527
The destruction is this good? I like the idea of the map being completely fucked up like this with little hidey holes

>>717754359
1080p is more than enough to display high fidelity graphics, 2k is the only thing that's not a compelte meme

the fact that consoles went straight to 4k is the tombstone of the industry

>>717754449
Virtually every TV sold is 4K nowadays, of course consoles went to 4K. They still render internally at 1440p and just upscale using FSR

>>717754494
You wish they rendered internally at 1440p. Maybe a 720p image stretched to 1440p then upscaled to 4k

>>717754557
Most PS5 games render internally at 1440p, you could have looked this up before embarrassing yourself you dumb spastic. Console games have always been far more optimized than PC games

>>717754638
what good is a 1440p size image if you lower the resolution to 25%

>>717754084
Bad Company 2 was crisp at 1920x1080

>>717751914 (OP)
Why the fuck is it when I sprint once and stop, every consecutive time i press w i sprint but default? I changed all the toggle/click settings regarding it and it is still fucking bullshit.

I will go prone behind cover and try to move forward and default into a sprint

What i have to do with to walk my weapon at the ready again is come to a complete stop and press shift firmly once or twice.

Maybe I am getting too old but this slop does not hold a candle to BFBC2

>>717754084
I played bfbc2 on a crt for like 5 years in middle/highschool and i loved it.

>>717754359
>anymore
gee i wonder that happened

>>717754449
>1080p is more than enough to display high fidelity graphics
No it isn't. I don't have the patience to explain this to you but playing at 1080p now is like trying to print two full pages of text on a single A4 paper. It'll always look bad unless you just go back to having only one page of text, or you get an A2/A3 paper.

>>717754954
>gee i wonder that happened
Graphics advanced. If you took a game built for 720p and played it on 240p it'd look like dogshit. Same way how playing games made for 1440p and putting it on a 720p monitor looks like shit. The only difference is that visual issues used to manifest from overpixelation and jaggies, now they manifest through blur.

>>717753078
Looks like i ain't the only person with the issue. Yeah it's giving up time if other people are getting it. Thanks DICE for a non functional Beta. I'm just gonna go play something else. Maybe I'll just pick up Killing Floor 3 instead.

https://steamcommunity.com/app/2807960/discussions/0/600786083349961087/

>>717753201
World Motion Blur and Weapon Motion blur are two different sliders, one looks like ass, the other hides garbage animations, and this game has tons of garbo animations.

>>717754427
yup, everything is destructible aside from the terrain and not just that but the rubble still remains as physical objects creating new pathways and cover and making the matches so chaotic. it's astounding that internet has been sleeping on this game for so long.

https://youtu.be/s7ndkVZMbKo?si=-jRCTxwU6R09W20s&t=2288

>>717755096
Look at the sides of his screenshot it's all blur.

>>717754957
>gaming is doing just fine at 1080p
>guys you need to do 2k in your fps games and 144p for 10ms advantage!
>nah I'm good
>do games look any better at 2k? no? you can download 4k textures into a 1080p game you say?
>we're going to 4k and it's going to be fake as fuck
>okay how are you going to accomplish that?
>we lower the resolution to 1080p or below and blow the image up
>doesn't that cause a lot of aliasing and jaggies?
>yeah but we cover it up with visual diarrhea so console players can't see it
wow, cutting edge

>>717755102
The reason the Finals is "slept on" is because it's zoomerpunk fakecheer corposlop atmosphere and presentation repels most people. I'm not going to play a game that has the "vibe" of rancid SSRIs. Also the 3v3v3v3 modes and the small player count isn't for me.

>>717755391
i think finals pulls that thing off better than others, the wacky skins are least slop-like i have seen on the market and the fakecheering makes me feel good (you even get to see yourself on the big screen if you do good in the match).

>>717751914 (OP)
Works fine on PS4

>>717755201
Nah DLSS4 at 4k is pretty close to indistinguishable from a native 4k image due to the AI upscaling, except requires half the GPU power. FSR4 on gaymd cards is pretty good too

tested the game at 1080p and it really doesn't look that bad wtf

Your 7900XTX?

>>717755102
Everyone sleeps on it because the game show gimmick sucks, and it's an arena comp shooter instead of a military sim.

>>717755817
>pretty close to indistinguishable
>ghosting with imperceptible smeared objects when you move the camera 1 degree

>>717756065
DLSS has come a long way since then m8, you're describing DLSS1, we're at version 4 now

>>717755651
Can I play with the cringe ass announcers off and not have to see whatever zoomer wacky skin the enemy team is using? If not, then fuck off with that slop.

The game runs butter smooth on an 7800x3d & 7800xt in 1440p ultra settings without any AI bullshit. The optimization is sadly the best thing about the game...

>100fps on base consoles
not my problem

>>717756097
They're never getting rid of ghosting as long as TAA is being used to cover up how horrible the game looks because it's begin upscaled

The only time you're not losing resolution and graphical fidelity using upscaling is when you're upscaling low resource intensive games from like 15 years ago into 4k

>>717756123
the announcers are your worst problem? even the wacky skins aren't a real issue since the matches are so fast paced that you barely even notice them.

>>717755964
i'm pretty sure the reason it's being slept on is that there is no marketing, the dev team is barely showing off the destruction system that they have created and i had no idea something like that was even possible before the kelski vid.

>>717756361
DLSS replaces TAA when you select it. It actually provides a better image quality than TAA, which is why they now just offer DLAA, which is DLSS without any upscaling

>>717753078
Do you run an OC or custom voltage curve? Might be unstable in that case.

>>717751914 (OP)
Of all the things to shit on the game for, why the fuck would you pick performance when it's the only AAA game in recent memory that doesn't run like absolute mega giga ultra ASS

>>717756442
Right they're the same thing, the system fundamentally breeds graphical infidelity. Upscaling is a meme for shitty niggersoles

>>717756442
DLSS runs worse on my machine than DLAA in this game. No idea what the fuck is going on.

>>717756065
>ghosting with imperceptible smeared objects when you move the camera 1 degree
Actually I get better motion clarity and less ghosting with DLSS, than you do without it.
>inb4 i play without aa
Yes I too enjoy when the screen looks like millions of ants are crawling all over it.

>>717756529
It sucks, but every game uses deferred rendering nowadays, so some kind of post-process AA has to be used and DLAA is the least worst. I still greatly prefer the sharper image of BF4, but what are you going to do

It feels like 80% of people that try to use 1440p don't actually have the hardware for it but they're so stuck in their ways that 1080p is deprecated that they'll torture themselves with shitty performance and blame the games for being unoptimized. This game runs at 120fps without any DLSS bullshit on a 3060 cause I'm running it at a resolution that makes sense for this card (1080p),

>>717756404
>i'm pretty sure the reason it's being slept on
Gook shooter for gooks only.

>>717756628
Now turn off TAA and run the game native and see what the game actually looks like without bullshit filters

>>717756767
it's made by ex-battlefield devs (which is why i brought it up in the first place, it is surprisingly similar).

>>717756628
With no TTA, it is just a bunch of shimmering, dancing pixels. That's actually why there's ghosting with TAA and DLSS, because it's repairing the already flawed game. Still looks better than without it, just like you're saying. DLSS is always better than TAA, and it's always better than no AA in modern games.
People are still talking about MSAA and SMAA as if it's actually anti-aliased a single thing in the past 15 years. RDR2 even having the MSAA option is a joke, it missed all foliage which is like 95% of the scene in RDR2.

>>717756942
Modern games aren't playable if they need visual bandaid filters for poorly running low res games

>>717756778
>Now turn off TAA and run the game native and see what the game actually looks like without bullshit filters
Games look disgustingly bad in motion without antialiasing nowadays because of the differences between frames. Only people who haven't booted up a game in the last decade wouldn't know this.

>>717757135
they look bad because (I'm coding illiterate) they're not rendering the game at a high enough resolution internally

they're straight up lying about the res of modern games

>>717756942
I hate deferred rendering so much it's unreal. I rather have more static lights in exchange for getting true transparency and old-school AA back.

>>717757228
That is full native 1080p resolution there. You can check it with nvidia profile inspector. Dunno what to tell you but 1080p looks like garbage no matter what in modern games because there's just too much stuff for 1920x1080 to handle, so it's either shimmering or blurring.

>>717757028
>>717757243
Yeah I'm not defending it either but it's the sad reality. I wish we could go back before deferred rendering and then keep working our way back up from there.

As far as BF6 performance, the graphics settings in Frostbite actually give performance back when you turn them down, unlike unreal engine slop. I suggest people on older hardware just set most things to low. It doesn't look that much worse and you can get 40+ FPS off that alone.

>>717757135
why does this happen? didnt use to be like this

>>717757309
there's differences between 1080p and 1080p internally. When they're actually rendering the game they can set whatever resolutino they actually want the game at and then scale it to whatever they like

modern games are turning down the resolution, especially in the background with dynamic resolution scaling. They're lying. They started this shit 7th gen

>>717757228
That's not the reason. It's TAA, it makes everything look blurry and low res. They're rendering at native resolution, it's just the awful AA solution which has become standard in this current era of games. DLAA is the answer but it isn't widespread yet

>>717757135
>constant shimmering vs blurring and omitting any detail
If only there was middle ground, right?

>>717751914 (OP)
Lies. Works perfectly fine on my machine. Maybe you're just retarded?

>>717757464
Lol no, anti aliasing is only used when they couldn't get the game to run at any higher resolution without massive technical drawbacks

Only now it's used because they're purposefully lowering the res of games so that they can run on shitsoles and to bypass their technical incompetency

>>717752185
Do thirdies unironically really?

>>717751914 (OP)
runs at 60fps 1440p on series S, lmao, compooter.

>>717757563
This is not the reason. You can literally disable dynamic resolution in BF6. TAA is forced on all games now because it cleans up the image and it's cheap as FXAA to run.

>>717757624
it cleans p the image because all games are now running at a lower resolution to run on shitsoles

they're sub 1080p upscaled to 1080p

>>717757746
it cleans up jaggies you fucking retard, look at this webm, this is what happens when you have no AA active >>717757135
They're not running sub-native resolution, they're forcing a cheap AA solution to clean up the jaggies

>>717756458
I do but I've put it back at stock. I've seen a few people online that mention the exact same issue I'm having.

https://www.reddit.com/r/pcgamingtechsupport/comments/1mk5vj2/
dxgi_error_device_removed_hung_crash_in/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/1mkuv0i/battlefield_6_directx_error_crash_fix/

https://steamcommunity.com/app/2807960/discussions/0/600786083349961087/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/1mjxtwp/crash_error_directx_function_m/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/1mjwhvk/battlefield_6_directx_constant_crashes/

And supposedly this is the apparent 'fix' to the solution. To turn mesh quality to low. I will have to test this out to see if this actually does anything. Someone suggests it has something to do with either player models being rendered in the menu OR it's the mesh quality causing instant crashes. I'm not sure who's right.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/1mk00me/directx_and_nvidia/

>>717757406
>why does this happen?
Pic related. To keep it short, graphical fidelity of ingame assets and in game visual effects has gone too far for our current resolutions, and developer laziness massively exacerbates the problem. There's just too information for each pixel to deal with, so
Playing at 1080p in 2010 was like trying to juggle with three balls, 1080p in 2025 is like trying to juggle eight at the same time. Either reduce the number of balls (downgrade the graphics) or grow more hands (increase your resolution) or do something else to make the magic happen - which means come up with better pixel sampling methods than we have now (DLSS is kinda that), or swap to clustered foward rendering which would probably be best.

>>717757814
jaggies, aliasing, that's caused by the internal resolution of the game being too low

what does anti aliasing do? it makes the image look higher res than it is

What is TAA/DLSS? It smears out the really really bad sub 1080p console resolution

>1050ti pajeets providing their expert opinion on modern graphics
nice thread faggots

>>717757746
There is no resolution reduction going on when you activate TAA man why are you so stubborn about this? TAA's issues just make the game look softer but it's still rendering natively.

>>717751914 (OP)
looks and runs amazing on my 4080 and i7-13k :)

I was thinking the guns sound like ass in this beta even with War Tapes on but then I went back to BF4 and BF4 sounds flat as fuck too. I think BC2 was the only Battlefield where War Tapes actually made a noticeable difference with explosions & gunfire but maybe I'm remembering wrong again. Maybe years of Insurgency spoiled me & DICE's sound team wasn't ever that great.

>>717757969
dude is baiting or mentally ill, no reason to respond further

>>717753078
nViDiA DrIvErS jUsT wErK bros! pay $3000 for the way it was meant to be played!
7900xtx and 9070 enjoyers keep winning this entire charade

>>717753374
>Intel will replace them under warranty
Just keep on submitting those warranty claims guys! You'll eventually get through ;^)
https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/Additional-Warranty-Updates-on-Intel-Core-13th-14th-Gen-Desktop/m-p/1620853

>>717757969
>There is no resolution reduction going on when you activate TAA
The games a pre-shipped with lower resolution than games used to have because the devs are worse at their jobs

>>717753527
>hero sloppa overwatch wanna be
better destruction not better game

>>717751914 (OP)
my poor old i7 4790k cant handle it...

>>717753798
it doesn't come out till October...

>>717752185
Sure, it runs... it runs like SHIT.

>>717757934
>jaggies, aliasing, that's caused by the internal resolution of the game being too low
No it isn't. You can have jaggies and aliasing at native resolutions and this has been happening for years at native resolutions. It's gotten worse lately for a number of reasons. I'll copypaste an old post of mine:

Imagine you're playing UT99 and you're looking at a tree in the far distance, just a single pixel in the treetop. Inside that pixel is a single green leaf and not much else. So it makes sense to blow up the color green to fill the entire pixel. Even after motion this pixel will still be in the treetop filled with nothing but green leaves, so even if the pixel catches a different part of the treetop it will still be green and it'll look correct.

Now you're playing a nu game with a fully modeled uncut 50MB tree asset clumsily dumped into the game by nudevs, a single pixel won't just hover over a leaf. It'll hover over brown branches, green leaves, and the blue sky will behind the tree as well. Suddenly the "uhh the dot at the centre landed on the leaf so let's blow up the color green to fill the pixel" tactic seems very limited, and it gets much worse once motion is introduced. Then the content of the pixel may change, maybe in the next frame the dot will land on blue sky, then the pixel must swap to blue. Then maybe it'll shift from blue to brown in the next one. And if you have 120fps imagine this rapid color shift can happen 120 times per second, and now also imagine gimmicks like real-time global illumination and reflections and shaders and transparencies also bombarding this one pixel with additional information. Now imagine that happening to the whole image.

This is why games shimmer and have jaggies even at native 1080p. Traditional pixel sampling can't average the subpixel detail, they can only extrapolate one piece of it. And stuff like TAA needs a lot more resolution than 1080p to keep up and work correctly.

>>717756628
I'm playing at 1080p, AA off, 200% scaling (4k internal) so there is no visible aliasing. This is the ideal way to play games until 24" 4k monitors are available (there's 1 but it's shit)

>>717755102
>>717755651
does this game have a regular TDM playlist or do i have to play the 3v3v3v3v3 mode?

>>717755836
Because you're standing still. In motion all the temporal stuff breaks down

>>717753527
Shame that has Malware (EpigOnlineSpyware.dll), so I'll never play it. It's apparently got the Frostbite engine developers on it compared to the other post-DICE exodus dev studios.

>>717758524
you guys don't understand how games are made

when devs make a game they set the resolution, the lower the resolution the more aliasing has. If you turn off TAA or DLSS and the game looks "like a bunch of ants running across the screen" they're running the game at like 25% resolution in order for consoles to run it

Devs have lowered the internal resolution of games in order for consoles to run fake smeary 4k

it IS shit austin

like fucking butter on my 5800x3d + 4090
tried not being fucking poor?
but seriously it runs great and looks great and you don't even need AA

>>717756778
it would look like dogshit? because games without anti-aliasing look like dogshit?

>>717751914 (OP)
Bro I can't get over that disgusting blue gray tint, where the fuck are the natural colors, you watch peoples streams and everone just blends in the dark backgrounds

>>717758551
>200% scaling (4k internal)
That is ideal but highly impractical and inefficient. Rendering 4x more pixels than your screen is capable of outputting just to fix image quality issues is a performance nightmare.

>>717758738
Games didn't used to need band aid solutions to cover up incompetent devs

>>717758434
Doesn't matter, BF betas are always the same as release.

>>717758434
You're playing the release build now, there will be no changes on the actual release. How many times do we have to go through this before you guys learn?

i genuinely don't believe anyone talking about anything looking smeared or blurry or ants or whatever the fuck
1440p, max settings DLSS quality with no AA and it looks fucking crispy

>>717756735
trvth nvke, i fear.

>>717758583
yes, there is regular TDM as well. but the 3v3v3 isn't too bad either.

>>717758668
your computer has always been infected with spyware and all your info has already been auctioned away to unknown 3rd parties.

>>717758434
First time?

>>717758971
>1440p, max settings DLSS quality with no AA and it looks fucking crispy
You can't play with no AA while using DLSS you dummy.

>>717758826
when? in the Counter Strike source days, when niggas were playing at 720p? lmao

>>717758971
DLSS is anti-aliasing, you goober. it's just half fake unless you set it to DLAA.

>>717758971
DLSS is inherently AA. if you remove the upscaling portion it degrades to DLAA (guess what that stands for?)

>>717759219
>degrades
you mean UPgrades

>>717759109
>>717759208
>>717759219
a lot of crying while i'm enjoying the graphics and performance

>>717758616
looks fine with dlaa

https://x.com/rileycs_/status/1954342878597242979
i went against this tranny faggot like 5 times yesterday and he's apparently not cheating
i'm too old for this shit man

>>717758616
All temporal stuff loses quality in motion but the hierarchy differs greatly. DLSS4 barely loses any quality in motion, FSR4 loses slightly bit more, DLSS2-3 loses almost as much as TAA, TAA loses a lot of quality, SMTXAA loses the most quality.

>small maps
>20 minute rounds
>women and minorities aplenty
>no soldier custom
>laggy ass anticheat and boot
>more women
>all maps feel like locker or metro
>instakill headshot cheaters already
>medics not medicing because COD
>COD Crouch sliding
Did i forget anything?
Its better than 2042 but if that beta taught us anything this is the full release
This is COD+ Hope you like your MODERN CURRENT YEAR Battlefield anons

>>717759825
Medics don't medic in every version of Battlefield. The average BF player is not smart, we all just have to deal with the consequences

>>717759574
There's some blur. Look at the grass it's not crisp

>>717759825
every shooter should include crouch sliding. there is straight up no reason to exclude that feature. it's just QoL.

>>717759978
If you want crisp details get higher resolution or increase sharpening (which isn't really detail, just cranking the neighbor contrast up, but it works for some people)

>>717759978
LOL nigga are you retarded
its not blurry it's just not oversharpened to fuck
literally go touch grass cause wtf are you expecting to see

I guess this is the BF6 thread. I'm 28 hours, completed all the challenges, and in and here are my thoughts.

GOOD
>audio
>visuals
>destruction
>no EA launcher
>player movements
>lots of customization options
>tank canons feel super punchy when shooting
>assault rifles, SMGs, carbines, and sniper rifles all feel satisfying to shot

BAD
>assault is too OP
>guns have fake names
>frame rate fluctuates widely
>machine guns feel unsatisfying, slow, and week
>open weapons is the default in all the game modes
>breakthrough needs better balance (attackers on Siege of Cairo almost never win)
>no server browser means...
>I get stuck playing the same map over and over and over and over
>no persistent servers means if you get a good, balanced game with lots of communication and teamwork, then you're SOL and rerolling next match
>PC players are stuck playing with console drones (PLEASE tell me PC players can turn this off in the full game)
>^^^this is really my biggest grief since console kiddies play like shit, don't read chat, can't use chat, and just instantly flee a point after taking it, meaning you lose it in a matter of moments, meaning you can't win a match of Breakthrough if you have too many console thirdies on your team

What I'd like to see changed/tweaked/make it into the final version
>server browser
>closed weapons by default
>turn down the TTK just a bit
>turn up recoil just a bit
>bigger maps with more verticality
>more vehicles, including ships and naval stuff
>option for PC users to turn off crossplay
>really hope the cosmetics don't shit the bed and begin to look too goofy and out of place - keep them grounded

Is Battlefield back? Frankly, it's about as back as can be expected in the current year, given the trends in gaming, corporate expectations, culture, etc. I'll probably play this game a ton, but it does feel like it lacks the absolute freedom and craziness of previous battlefield games I'll probably continue playing 4 and 1 in addition to 6.

>>717760139
>closed weapons by default
All modes are open by default which is a big giveaway what the developer's preference is, did you not realize they're not going to do this by now?

>>717759825
Even BF4 was trash at launch which is why many stayed with BF3, and those were made by the old DICE.

>>717760139
>guns have fake names
i hate that every game does this now. firearm manufacturers fucked everything up when they stopped letting people advertise their firearms for free by putting their real names in games.

>>717758131
But it doesn't have heroes.. it has classes and custom loadouts.

>>717760316
No it's entirely possible they left it on open by default to see what it'd do to balance. They've got literal decades of knowing what battlefield plays like with closed.

>>717757746
Most PC gamers have a machine that's weaker than a PS5.

>>717760764
I think it was probably just one or two manufacturers but then you're left with the awkward situation of half real names half fake names.

>>717760862
And? Those people aren't playing battlefield 6

>>717760316
>did you not realize they're not going to do this by now?
Obviously, but I can still want things and express that want on 4chan.

>>717760764
It would be awesome if we could just edit weapon names. That'd please everyone and be relatively easy to implement I'd think.

>>717760862
completely 100% verifiably false. The only reason the industry exists is because of consoles so the reason that we're having performance and graphical fidelity issues is because of consoles

instead of fixing the issues (bad devs, retarded companies) they jsut gve PC the same bullshot tools as consoles

>>717761061
>completely 100% verifiably false
damn you sure showed him

>>717761170
yup, nigger faggot

>>717760104
The Battlefield picture has the kind of faint blur you get when you take a picture, scale it to 90% and then back to 100% again. Such as what I've done with this GTA 4 screenshot. The original comes in the next post. Compare them at 100% zoom.

>>717761061
shut the fuck up faggot

https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/

>>717753078
Thanks for bringing attention to this. I was getting the crash too. The fix seems good. I thought it was something wrong with my deivce.

>>717761256
Now compare the crispness of the source.

>>717761269
what does it take for a video card to run a game at 720p these days? because that's all a console is

>>717760139
Oh, and scope glint needs to be reduced a lot and the shotgun needs to be nerfed a bit.

>>717761340
why are you moving the goalpost now?

>>717761383
Oh you're not aware consoles are 720p machines? So you replied to me without even knowing what your own argument is? you fucking worthless aspie

>>717757969
No there's definitely sub-native assets in modern games, this isn't new, but it used to be used for specific things like hairbor something like that.

I don't mean screen resolution or even uniform internal resolution, devs can lower the resolution of a specific asset.

I miss when even PS2 and PS3 level hardware could have good looking games.

>My 1050ti i3 laptop can't run this game, it's unoptimized

Retarded piece of shit

>>717761340
You couldn't make it more obvious you haven't owned a console since 2010 if you tried

>>717760139
The first phase of Cairo is difficult for attackers but I noticed that if you get past that they tend to win

>>717761496
consoles basically haven't improved since 2010

>>717761470
take you fucking meds you dumb brownoid

>>717761567
lazy b8

>>717753078
i have a 5090, have gotten that same issue once in bf6

i used to get the same thing in other games (always with a black screen for like 30 seconds) before updating to the new driver, now it still happens but very rarely. the 5000 series drivers are awful

>>717761595
>if I slap an AI filter on my 720p game it's actually 4k
no

>>717751914 (OP)
runs fine on my ryzen 5 5600 maybe get a good gpu? >>717760139
>assualt rifle is too good
the sniper rifle is dogshit because the maps are literally call of duty size.
>>717758510
performance isn't the problem its the gameplay that sucks. Feels like it should be f2p

>>717752632
Literally unplayable!!

>>717761475
I know what you are talking about but it's not what that anon is saying. The fact shadow resolution is some games might get cut down to 2048 or (512-1024 if you reduce the shadow quality in options) is one thing, but when a game says 1080p native it's STILL being rendered at 1080p on your monitor even if it's TAA. People just like to say TAA stops being native because they see its softening effect and don't really understand how or why that happens, so they say it's not native.

>>717761781
>when a game says 1080p native it's STILL being rendered at 1080p

>>717761508
Yeah, the first part is the trickiest. If you're playing with console drones, they can capture one point, but they always flee it. Even if you ask in chat for some people to hold it, they don't and then you lose the point and yeah, you just get stuck at the first phase for the whole game and lose. Also the match making is so bad, I have literally never played as defenders on that map. No idea what that's all about.

>>717761635
The sniper is a lot of fun on Liberation Peak. It's not at all fun on Siege of Cairo. It has it's moments on Iberian Offensive.

Runs great on my PlayStation 5 slim home video gaming unit, I’m having a blast!!!

>>717761882
this anon's blasting ova ere

>>717754359
Dark souls prepare to die is shipped at a set internal resolution

>>717761061
I know you're a disingenous shitposter, but just for reference to people that don't know a PS5 gpu is a rx 6700 with higher bandwith.

This anon alteady posted the steam survey to compare
>>717761269

>>717761843
Yes it is. No, retards on /v/ telling you otherwise is not an argument. Can you provide proof that your output resolution reduces itself when you activate TAA?

>>717761943
He doesn't understand that resolution is literally a dial that devs can turn up or down in order to get their games to run better. They're just cranking resolutions way down in order to maximize the retards that can play their unoptimized slop, and they're finally reaching the end of their technology

>>717761882
We're so back!

>>717752145
No problem bro. Glad I could help you with your secure boot problem too.

>>717761320
this is basically when consoles peaked

>just because i'm rendering the game at native 1080p doesn't mean that the devs haven't coded the ladder on the side of a building to render at 360p
what fucking sense does this make? for what purpose, even, would you do this? lol

>>717762097
We are winning!!! I love my m4 with 1.5x optic, I like to blow up tanks with my engineer!!! Can’t wait to play again next weekend on my PlayStation slim home video gaming unit, I still have to unlock the “I can see you sticker”!!! Oh yeah, and I play on 1080p full hd on my 60hz 40in favorite television as it’s my favorite resolution!!!

>>717761781
True, forced TAA is more of a symptom rather than the cause.

It's just like DLSS being introduced to offset the cost of Raytracing, but now being included in system requirements, because fuck optimizing.

>>717762353
dynamic resolution has been a thing on consoles since gen 7, everything past like 50 feet is a different lower resolution and turns into mud

>>717762353
Performance.

>>717762169
I'm so happy I picked one of these little shitters up for $250 before they became a joke price. Just werks.

>>717759825
>COD Crouch sliding
this is a lie. You don't crouch slide, you crouch and run a little faster. I've yet to perform any COD crouch sliding

>>717762584
surely they have m&kb support right? I mean it is 2025

>>717759825
>>717762713
>you crouch and run a little faster.
it's really more like ducking

>>717761475
>>717762353
A model or texture having less than 1920x1080 resolution or less than 1080 polygons does not mean your game is rendering "fake" 1080p nigga. Do you really think that before the 7th gen every single visual asset on your screen rendered at exactly your screen resolution, that a ladder is magically a 1080p asset because you're rendering at 1089p? Lol this never ever happened. Rendering at 1080p doesn't mean every object on your screen should be 1080p, all it means your display is outputting the simulation it has at a 1080p resolution.

>>717762713
you can lay down on your back and shoot while crawling, I saw a guy head glitch a staircase this way.

>>717762789
>aspie trying to convince people dynamic resolution doesn't exist and it was create solely because consoles suck eggs

>>717753078

>>717751914 (OP)
my gtx 1070 runs it

>>717762860
Dynamic resolution exists. Games DON'T force dynamic resolution onto you or lower the resolution of your screen while pretending they're a fixed resolution. Whenever that happens without warning the player in advance, the developers get eviscerated online for it. The Wuchang Fallen Feathers game tried to trick players like that and got a massive shitstorm for it.

>>717762967
>Games DON'T force dynamic resolution onto you or lower the resolution of your screen while pretending they're a fixed resolution
all consoles force resolution downscaling even what running their "pro mode" or whatever

>>717751914 (OP)
This is your concern? Not the even further codified gameplay and low TTK?

>>717762803
>you can lay down on your back and shoot while crawling
which Battlefield did before COD

>>717762734
Yes BF6 has m&kb support on Xbox.

>>717763074
Consoles are consoles. On PC when you set your game resolution to 1080p, it's 1080p and doesn't stop being 1080p even when TAA blurs it. As long as you don't enable upscaling or supersampling or dynamic resolution scaling, it's 1080p and there isn't some kind of secretly installed rat on your SSD that is sneakily lowering your resolution behind your back.

>>717751914 (OP)
My buddy is playing this with a 1070ti and a 9700k. What fucking dinosaur are you trying to play on?

>>717763203
Do I have to draw you a picture? 1080p is just how big the image is, it has nothing to do with the internal resolution set by the devs

as the industry has been flooded with lower and lower IQ people they've actually been lowering the internal resolutions while claiming it's native and just stretching it to fit 4k screens

>>717763401
do you have 60 IQ?

>>717763558
Do you not understand that the way consuls achieve 4k is by downscaling the game to 720p, stretching to 1080 and then upscaling it to 4k with AI filters?

>>717763401
Why do I have to share a website with such simpletons man

>>717753118
>>717752101
Had to download it on the EA launcher instead. It runs great, OP. No idea what you're crying about.

1080p is my favorite resolution and 720p is my second favorite. Anything more than 1080p looks like crap, 1080p is the best looking.

>>717757974
>4080 and i7-13k :)
This is a lie. This game can't even keep consistent 100 fps with this hardware, especially on the dogshit city maps.

>they are drip feeding content in a fucking beta

>>717763401
>they've actually been lowering the internal resolutions while claiming it's native

literally name 1 game

The Battlefield community asked, and DICE listened. This is a return to form!

>>717764232
all of them, go into cyberpunk/RDR2 and turn of TAA and tell me that looks like a game that came out ever

>>717764432
you dumb brownoid learn to fucking read, where are they claiming:
>they've actually been lowering the internal resolutions while claiming it's native

where are they claiming that?

>>717764535
Every dev ever is doing this, modern games aren't running at 1080p internally, they're like 720p stretched to 1080p

that's why they started putting resolution sliders in games

>>717763203
you can have the console experience if you want

>>717761634
but enough about dlss/fsr

Does MFG help when cpu bound? My 11600k is almost always pegged at 100% playing this and I get quite frequent dips down into the 50s

>>717764984
Yes but I don't know if I'd use FG in a PvP shooter game unless I already have 100+fps before FG.

>>717765068
I'm a controller fag so I can tolerate a little input lag if that helps

>>717764652
you are actually retarded, just stop posting

>>717764984
Lowering graphic settings also improves CPU performance in this game.
Also
>11600k
oof

>>717764652
>Every dev ever is doing this, modern games aren't running at 1080p internally, they're like 720p stretched to 1080p
That's upscaling you dumb nigger. When you play a game at 1080p TAA or 1080p no AA and you don't turn on upscaling or supersampling in your graphics menu, you're running it at real 1080p on your monitor. It's still 1080p no matter how much you cope it isn't, developers cannot force your game to render differently from what is written in the graphics menu (if they do, this gets found out quickly because it's easily detectable through 3rd party tools and they get eviscerated for it)
This is the last time I'm trying to explain this to you, you have a subhumanoid brain.

>>717765179
Anybody that's ever turned off anti aliasing in a modern game knows the games are running at a lower resolution

>>717765189
Yea I know my 11600k is getting outdated now, but it still runs pretty much everything great, this is the first game I've played desu where it's struggling for me

>>717765226
There's not some magical system that turns every game at 1080p the same internal resolution

that's why some games benefit from AA more than others, because they're lower res while being 1080p

why come it looks worse than BF3

>>717765226
this retard thinks if you turn off AA its not 1080p anymore, its over hes probably some brown tech illiterate kid

>>717765438
he says, while displaying he's an illiterate nigger

>>717765329
You're stupid and brown. If you're not brown that's even worse, because you have the soul and brain of someone brown.

>>717765524
>I don't understand simple concepts
okay run along now tonto

>>717765568
the simple concept that turning of AA lowers your resolution? tell me more

>>717765630
>if I say something retarded maybe I'll win
okay

>>717765568
Please explain the simple concept of how turning TAA on or off changes your resolution.

>>717765737
why do you keep saying that, are you a nigger?

>>717765404
Why come you no read your English level 1 textbook?

>>717765767
are you going full schizo now? >>717765248

>>717766045
I would literally need to draw you a picture to get you to understand something like this, you're worse than boomers

stop getting baited by the retard

>>717766107
>retarded nigger dunning kruger chiming in
shat ap yah goddamn monkeh

>>717751914 (OP)
>play pic rel demo
>cant do shit
>weird mouse input feeling
>constantly get instagibbed
>thisisit2old4thisshit
>cant play shooters anymore
>uninstall demo
>install bf3
>40/4 K/D
picrel

>>717766107
its not bait he actually thinks that

>>717766451
>he still can't contemplate that the reason aliasing exists is because there's a resolution that players have no control over called "internal resolution"

>Yes, aliasing, particularly in the context of computer graphics and images, is directly related to resolution and sampling limitations.

>>717766545
>the reason aliasing exists is because there's a resolution that players have no control over called "internal resolution"
you keep saying this with 0 proof. show me any reputable tech source writing about how all games are secretly rendering themselves at lower internal resolutions than they tell players. you can't, because there aren't any, because your theory is dogshit because you don't understand how spatial or temporal aliasing happens and you don't understand it can happen even when you're playing true native

>>717760139
>guns have fake names
what the heck

>>717766545
your right bro i was playing at native 1440p (DLSS off) but i disabled AA and now my games runs at 480p

>>717766713
if a videogame is a car engine the torque created is the resolution of the game, if you build a shitty engine you get less torque and so you get more aliasing

>>717753078
Install on C:/

>>717766791
dogshit analogy. a videogame is a car that lets you drive at 50km/h, and if you're driving at 50km/h the car manufacturer can't magically secretly make your car actually drive at 45km/h.

>>717766935
If you get sold a car and they tell you it gets 500 ft/lbs of torque but it has a weedeater engine you have yourself a modern game

>>717755102
That's VERY unreal, you cant tear down a reinforced concrete pillar with a hammer like that. I dont play fantasy games. Next thing will be flying soldiers with laser gunz.

>>717767050
dogshit analogy again. if you take a tool to test how well the car does and shows it's 500ft/lbs then it's 500ft/lbs, i'm not going to believe you when you say "well actually it's 350ft/lbs modern car devs are just making all your instruments lie to you even the ones they have 0 control over"

>>717767228
>a car with 500 ft/lbs of torque is the same as every other vehicle with 500ft/lbs of torque
so you don't understand silicon or steel

Is it just me or is sliding glitched? Sometimes it starts bleeding whatever speed it started at right away and sometimes you shoot forward at 100kph even though you were barely moving beforehand. Maybe there's something I'm missing but it seems fucked.

>>717767415
I saw a guy's jeep blow up and disappear and slide across the ground at like 50 mph

>>717767397
>You can get a theoretically infinite amount of torque from a 1 horsepower (HP) engine if you could apply all the mechanical advantages imaginable
average console

>>717753078
Use DDU and install the latest drivers. For the 50xx series, you want to be on the latest version every time because they messed up their drivers, and the older you stay, the more bugs you will have.

>>717753527
isnt that like 8 playes on a tiny map?

>>717756404
>no marketing
nigga it at 250k CCU at launch on steam, there was plenty of marketing
>>717755102
the great destruction is the one good ingredient in an otherwise mediocre slopstew

>>717751914 (OP)
This fixed my problems on a ryzen 5 3600, recommended
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HelHBi6-hI
Thread.ProcessorCount 8
Thread.MaxProcessorCount 8
Thread.MinFreeProcessorCount 0
Thread.JobThreadPriority 0
GstRender.Thread.MaxProcessorCount 16

>>717767415
Sliding is so inconsistent I don't even bother. Barely see anyone using it after day one.

>>717759672
>he's apparently not cheating
I don't even need to look, he's cheating. Trannies and hacks go together like peanut butter and jam. Just like people who cheat on tests or kids who use ChatGPT for school assignments. People who try to cheat in one area of life try to cheat in all of them and that's a fact.

>>717759672
It is cheating, just like shround cheats

>>717767867
trannies are definitely bot tier skill level but the people he's fighting in that webm are worse than bots

>mfw want to play but i've delayed getting a new pc for 2 years now
is it worth it anons?

>>717768105
>janky BF4 with no unlocks on horrible maps
>is it worth it

>>717752084
Secure boot has absolutely no impact on performance, it just prevents anything loading during boot sequence of your pc.

>>717768146
these threads are full of jeets crying about secure boot, barely any gameplay
how am I supposed to know whether it's shit or not

>>717768253
just watch gameplay, it's horribly unbalanced janky, bad hit reg on bad maps

yeah... I am indeed a gamer

Reminder that unless you have the following:
>1440p or higher resoution monitor
>RTX3080/7800XT, equivalent or stronger graphics card
>Ryzen 5800/7600, equivalent or stronger processor
>at least one (1) SSD in your system
your opinions on graphics/hardware/optimizations are irrelevant, because your frustration and denial over having lacklustre hardware is affecting your judgement.

Especially you dumbasses trying to play new graphically heavy games at 1080p and complaining. That's a resolution over two decades old now, you're the equivalent of people still riding carriages screeching in the street about how internal combustion engines and electricity are jewish schemes that don't work.

>>717752030
One of the jeet devs slipped a Bitcoin miner into the code.

I thought trannies didn't play military shooters

>>717768253
just download it, it's free for now and set it to low settings, that's what I do.

>>717768448
fags play anything that gets them attention and makes them feel powerful (they're the most common spawn campers)

>>717768105
It's decent but it's not worth building a new PC for.

>>717768320
>>717768532
>>717768628
thanks anons, I've looked up the gameplay and the first thing I heard was 5 women screaming over each other
next game will be the one

>>717768786
I'd still wait to see the full release and look at the maps. The main problem with battlefield games are the maps

>>717768105
You're willing to spend a couple thousand to play a single game? Are you fucking stupid?

>>717752185
That runs surprisingly well on such shit hardware

>>717768353
t. techlet retard
get on /g/ any time and be utterly btfo

>>717769348
>/g/
Sorry I don't participate in brand war shill schizo warfare, /pcbg/ is utter dogshit.

>>717768961
not just for this, my rig is old and the precious 1660s of mine is no longer keeping up

>>717751914 (OP)
Works great on my Xbox Series X, though it is a top line gaming machine.

>>717768353
BF1 came out in October 21, 2016, mogs this game graphically and requires less
your cope?

>>717769696
I was trying to find low FPS gameplay footage of youtube to make fun of you but I can't find any because youtube is displaying nothing but "how to fix fps in your games" videos which don't work

>>717769782
BF1 has much better atmosphere and art style, but BF1's lighting is really flat. BF6's lighting is much better.

>>717751914 (OP)
If anyone is having really shit performance and none of the settings are effecting fps TURN OFF FRAME RATE LIMITER what a piece of shit it cuts the frames in half from what you set it at.

>>717751914 (OP)
i get 100 fps but my mouse feels like its dragging through mud

>>717760764
It stopped because the media was faggots about it after some Burger shot up a school again

>>717757587
Yup
I'm running it on my laptop with 4gb 3050

>>717753532
hey if you're running a GTX1050ti you are a beggar and do NOT get to be a chooser
being able to play Battlefield 6 at 1080p above 30fps at all with a 1050ti is a miracle

>>717751914 (OP)
Perfect 60fps on my Xbox. Get an actual high quality gaming device, retard. PCs are for work.

frostbite games always run well on my machine I don't know what you guys are complaining about

>>717769984
>but I can't find any

>>717751914 (OP)
9070XT and a 5800X3D run it maxed out just fine

>>717755102
the presentation makes me think esports streamer slop so i always ignored it

>>717751914 (OP)
Works fine on Xbox :)

>>717759672
>https://x.com/rileycs_/status/1954342878597242979
power of SBMM everyone
how come server browsers never have this issue?

I can run it at like 90 fps but honestly cant say it looks much better than bfv/bf1/battlefront 2 which all run locked 165 for me

works on my machine, I'm on a 4070.

I had one really shitty game and got mad enough to uninstall the beta. Feels like the beta was fun yesterday cause it was new to mostly everyone but by the second day the tryhard atmosphere set in, meta's were formed, people realized there was a sliding function and started using it & some of the cheaters broke through the anticheat stopgaps making their presence known.

>>717752185
>1080p in 2025
just say the game doesnt work and move on

all these videos of people from here playing just makes it clear you're all dog shit at video games and why you all have the opinions you have

If youre gonna attack BF6 at least do it with something that makes sense. This runs on my 1070 PC even.

>>717778647
Are those glitches caused by FG or just low bitrate?

>>717768002
i mean the trannoid streams with a handcam and it's consistent so maybe not

>>717755651
>>717755102
>>717759010
This looks so aggressively shit

>>717778647
Why is your shit all wobbly

>>717756404
>>717755102
Holy fucking cope, everyone was raving on about this turd for a month and then they dropped it because its just that shit