← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 717771676

53 posts 20 images /v/
Anonymous No.717771676 >>717771989 >>717772089 >>717772259 >>717772481 >>717774064 >>717774328 >>717775189 >>717775256 >>717775441 >>717776679
Why was Shartfailed such a piece of shit?
Anonymous No.717771778
Watch out anon, the 5 people who spam Fartfield threads on here are gonna be mad and go after you
Anonymous No.717771880 >>717771972 >>717772574
epic samefag
you brownoids are unironically more obsessed with this game than the people who actually played it
Anonymous No.717771972
>>717771880
It's a serious discussion, people entering the game industry MUST and I mean MUST study the failure of Starfield.
Anonymous No.717771989 >>717772095 >>717773240
>>717771676 (OP)
not to defend that shitstain Starfield but io is covered in sulfur ices. all of that yellow/orange etc is frost and ice and from the surface it wouldn't be that colourful. The pools of lava themselves are hot but the moon has no real atmosphere so heat is only through conduction which is very poor through the crust. You'll have rock covered in ice thats -200c beside 2000c pools
Anonymous No.717772070 >>717776359
we just don't have the technology to make good games anymore
it has nothing to do with the greed and sloth of AAA publishers who live on brand recognition
Anonymous No.717772087
Todd is a chronic liar and hired jeets thanks to Microsoft.
Anonymous No.717772089
>>717771676 (OP)
because these kinds of space travel games are very ambitious and in practice they always end up being barren boring slogs, see starbound and no man's sky
someone will probably pull it off eventually but it sure as fuck won't be bethesda
and no i don't care about le epic wholesome seanerino murray and how he "redeemed himself", no man's sky is still boring dog shit
Anonymous No.717772095
>>717771989
Why do you basedentists lie so much?
Anonymous No.717772259
>>717771676 (OP)
I'd buy Starfield if I could get 60 fps native 1080p on my rx 6600 card
Anonymous No.717772307 >>717772598
Bethesda makes me happy that my favorite studio didn't end up like it and still has their dignity in tacked. lmao.
Anonymous No.717772384
TES V is going to make all of you ashamed of your words and deeds
Anonymous No.717772391 >>717772903
Bethesda have been hacks ever since skyrims success taught them not to try too hard
Anonymous No.717772481
>>717771676 (OP)
It will stop being bad when it releases in the pee ass 5.
Anonymous No.717772574
>>717771880
Yeah that's a weird thing, I played it 2 years ago, then I moved on, the people who hated it have been spamming their bullshit ever since, the worst part is you can tell most of them just played 10 minutes of it.
Anonymous No.717772598
>>717772307
>in tacked
"intact" you bumblefuck
Anonymous No.717772605
saaars please do the needful and redeem starfield
Anonymous No.717772710
This thread stinks
Anonymous No.717772903 >>717774726
>>717772391
Yup.
People have a more forgiving attitude towards Fallout (since it's a beloved series predating Bethesda) and TES (since it's a beloved series that Bethesda actually cared about once), but Starfield was an entirely new thing and they couldn't rely on fans. But they still treated it like it was a Fallout/TES game, filling it with shitty gameplay, idiotic plot, bugs, huge shallow world, etc.
Why would they try hard? Surely the game would be received as well as their other titles, right?
Anonymous No.717772952
Because Todd Howard was busy with that Indiana Jones game.
Anonymous No.717772997 >>717773351 >>717774068
Starfield should have not gone with 'nasa punk' and instead just doubled down on retro sci fi. A lot of other issues besides that, though
Anonymous No.717773023
Being a Bethesda game.
Their fans are a Star Citizen tier cult that always brainwashed people into thinking Bethesda games are incredible and you MUST buy their games, then when their shilling quietens down people realize they paid for a shit game but Todd already made millions of dollars so get fucked
Anonymous No.717773120 >>717773842
i-is this the power.. of bethesda's new coders!?
Anonymous No.717773240 >>717773870
>>717771989
There is no ice on Io.
>from the surface it wouldn't be that colourful
Nigger. I can see what fucking colour it is. It's not going to be white.
>the moon has no real atmosphere
THEN WHY DID SHARTFAILED PORTRAY IT AS SUCH.
Anonymous No.717773351 >>717774068
>>717772997
Seems like they barely got into the "NASApunk" stuff at all. The game is a total mishmash of different classic sci-fi aesthetics.
Anonymous No.717773463 >>717773574
>empty garbage, but yellow
Jupiter looks way too small in Starfield though
Anonymous No.717773574
>>717773463
imagine the smell...
Anonymous No.717773724 >>717773835 >>717773882 >>717773924 >>717774313 >>717774801 >>717774906 >>717775507
How do you design something like this and go "yeah, this looks like a great club, can really feel the energy"?
Anonymous No.717773835
>>717773724
You design the environment and then 8 months later see the biggest crowd the engine can handle.
Anonymous No.717773842
>>717773120
Anonymous No.717773870
>>717773240
>there is no ice on io
Its literally covered in frozen sulfur dioxide from the eruptions
Anonymous No.717773882
>>717773724
i can assure you the person who designed this never stepped foot in a real strip club
Anonymous No.717773924
>>717773724
hint: a bunch of women designed it all
Anonymous No.717774064 >>717774146
>>717771676 (OP)
Starfield is more of a "I HECKIN LOVE SCIENCE" redditslop than anything even vaguely scientifc.
Anonymous No.717774068 >>717775424
>>717772997
>>717773351
Starfield is 70-80s retrofuturism
"NASApunk" was their poor marketing choice for a term that would seem cool but it didn't
It should have been something like "Late Cold War retrofuturism" if they wanted to seem cool
Anonymous No.717774146
>>717774064
Nigger
Anonymous No.717774313 >>717775586
>>717773724
It's an accurate representation of what """strip""" clubs in the future would look like based on how faggy people are nowadays. Probably the second most realistic thing about Starfield. The first being that G-Drive is magic space-time time travel alien tech that we will never have so we're stuck on Earth for the rest of human history.
Anonymous No.717774328
>>717771676 (OP)
Why are you still seething over a nearly two year old game that you never played and never will play?
Anonymous No.717774726
>>717772903
>but Starfield was an entirely new thing and they couldn't rely on fans
and yet they still tried to play on nostalgia with Adoring Fan
Anonymous No.717774801
>>717773724
is supposed to be strip club, or just a night club?
Anonymous No.717774906
>>717773724
"lounge" font looks indian
Anonymous No.717775184
>shartfailed
>this is what brownoids consider peak humor
Anonymous No.717775189
>>717771676 (OP)
A single man is fixing Shartfield and turning into something greater.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqqvD6OoRsc
Anonymous No.717775256 >>717775453
>>717771676 (OP)
It was made by browns.
Anonymous No.717775424
>>717774068
The term you are looking for is cassette futurism and Starfield is NOT cassette futurism. It may have β€˜le wholesome heckin chonky computers’ and whatnot but overall it’s a bland mishmash of soulless hard sci-fi design from the past 20 years (heckin interstellar!). I could see the devs tried to go for a used/utilitarian aesthetic but the game has a universe so sterile and β€˜safe’ it wouldn’t make sense aesthetically.
Anonymous No.717775441 >>717776119
>>717771676 (OP)
saar pls stop the antisemitic indiaphobia saar
do the needful and redeem 5 copies of saarfield saar
Anonymous No.717775453
>>717775256
as is every game made by AAA companies these days
The jeets didn't write the story
The jeets didn't come up with the gameplay that is ass
The jeets didn't write the dialogue
it's just you trying to make excuses for Bethesda when the truth is: They are incompetent.
Anonymous No.717775507
>>717773724
This is why I don't care about this game. It's just boring nonsense from boring people.
Anonymous No.717775586
>>717774313
Given the absolute state of humanity, it's probably for the best.
Anonymous No.717776119
>>717775441
Rent free
Anonymous No.717776359
>>717772070
Anonymous No.717776679
>>717771676 (OP)
No sex mods.
All the cringe and cancer from the Fallout 4 modding community is worse with Starfield (partially due to the creation club crap).
Anonymous No.717776749
>mfw i realize elder scrolls 6 is undoubtedly being made right now with this level of incompetency