So, whats the /v/edict?

I like cute asian girls.

This year I started playing CS2 and I think it ruined all other FPS for me.

In CS2 I can feel every single bullet that I fire. Enemies can't kill me from halfway across the map not because of some cheesy damage falloff that ultimately does not matter, but because bullets are hard to control at long distances. There is spread and recoil.

In Battlefield 6 my assault rifle feels like it is a laser. It barely has recoil. Everyone is killing each other from halfway across the map.

There is also SO MUCH SMOKE in this game clouding visibility.

the verdict is that i need to build a new computer first. the game still looked great on all Low but it ran at like 10 fps lmao.

>>717802812 (OP)
3/10

>>717803242
Nah, it's cause Battlefield is about mobility and cover, and gives the feeling of actual warefare better. I see tons of idiots just standing out in the middle of open and trying to score kills, and getting upset when they get gunned down. All they need to do is use cover and mobility and they can survive way better.

>>717802812 (OP)
It's as good as CoD 2019 ground war. Not really a battlefield game at all.

>>717803789
That doesn't stop the guns being death lasers.

they should release it now

why does it need 2 more months to bake?

seems pretty finished to me

>>717803953
Yes it does. I'm watching shroud and he just guns down people out in the open no problem, but when they're behind cover he has trouble killing them and often times he doesn't.

>>717802812 (OP)
Pay me $100 in Steam or PS bux and I'll tell you my honest opinion Ramjeet Sukdeep

>>717802812 (OP)
the fact that it's in such a good state in open beta is promising. i want to believe they'll actually take all the feedback on things that can be fixed prior to launch into account and it will release in a good state. the one thing i think will absolutely tank the steam reviews upon release is the performance. it's abyssal already on maps that are really not that big.

>>717802812 (OP)
It’s fun, it’s hilarious how many boomers are getting filtered cause they can’t keep up even though they grew up way more fast paced arena shooters

>>717802812 (OP)
Didn't play it, but I did get a whole lotta enjoyment from laughing at people who are too dumb to turn on secure boot.

>>717804306
I think the game is literally cod garbage but I haven't had any performance problems whatsoever

>>717804318
Awe "you're poor" doesn't work anymore so now we're at "you're old" with an irrelevant white baby girl bobs and vagene picture streetshitter

>>717804190
No, it doesn't. The guns have no recoil. Staying in cover makes you safe from them but it doesn't mean they have recoil. They need more recoil. Even the devs agree, which is why they're adding more.

>>717802812 (OP)
>"modern warfare"
>no trenches
>no drones
>no artillery or glide bombs

Frog, judgemental.jpeg

dunno it runs like shit on my computer
seems fun though

>>717802812 (OP)
Its quite literally CoD

>>717802812 (OP)
Solid foundation, but things like shitty map designs + SBMM + bad balancing + piss poor netcode will likely end up ruining it.

Not to mention that they'll ditch the normal MP in a heartbeat if the Battle Royale version takes off.

>>717804318
I don't want to keep up with all this fast-paced infantry nonsense. I just want my classic slow-paced Battlefield game. You'll understand when you get older.

>>717802812 (OP)
Fun but broken and if they release it like this it'll die in under a month. I'll buy it if they fix the netcode before release.

>>717804557
Most people like the game and it’s gonna sell well, cope harder sweetie :^)

>>717802812 (OP)
fantastic but yeah they shouldn't have added women

Played it.

Still not fuckin dying for Israel.

>>717802812 (OP)
I'm already bored of the maps.
Iberia and Cairo play the same.
Tajikistan has that point on the hill which is a waste of time when you can get 3 on the other side.

>>717804807
Well luckily for you, there’s a lot of games on the market like Arma Reforger, Squad and Hell Let Loose that fill that niche

>PS3 graphics
>Named soldiers
>Less maps than BF4 (2013 PS3 game)
>Less weapons than BF4
>Maps are small as shit
>No recoil
>Weapons don't sound like weapons
>Soldiers move like crazy even tho they have like 100 kg of gear on them
>No server browser
>Aim assist
>Battlepass
>Bots in servers
>Female soldiers
>No artillery
>Worse destruction than BFBC2 (2010 PS3 game)

>>717802812 (OP)
I like it but unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be much focus on vehicles, and vehicles are pretty much the point of a Battlefield game.

>>717802812 (OP)
give me a "woke content" rundown please

>>717805016
Fuck vehicles

>>717804190
No it doesn't. Anon is talking about recoil, you're talking about positioning.

You can beam people in the head from 500meters in the 6 beta. There is NO RECOIL beyond one gun/starter and you can even tweak that with like 2-3 weapon levels into having no recoil/beaming people like the later guns.

It's insane. What the fuck was the point of "Labs" if nobody caught that?

>>717805084
they already said a recoil balance pass has happened, it just didnt make it into the beta.

>>717804504
i'm running at 3440 x 1440 on a 4070ti and i know my processor isn't bottlenecking. i have to have frame gen and ultra-performance DLSS to get 120 frames at max settings. i think i actually bumped down the resolution scaling to 90% to get to 120 on the large-scale maps. to me, that's abysmal. if games aren't hitting 144+ with frame gen and quality-mode DLSS, there's a huge problem.

>>717804972
That's nice, but I want to play Battlefield, not simulation games. The developer who made the original game is most likely gone, so there's no hope of getting a game like 1942 again, but I can wish.

>>717805053
Go play a different game. The Battlefield series has always been mainly about vehicle warfare. Infantry combat is just something that people outside of vehicles do until another vehicle spawns.

>>717805084
You are making shit up

>>717803242
>There is also SO MUCH SMOKE in this game clouding visibility.
It’s kino
For once smoke actually helps skin to real life

>>717805410
>akin*

>>717805220
do the servers for bf1942 even work anymore? is it possible to get a community game going? i still have the game

>>717805084
You don't know what you're talking about.

>>717805519
No, but there's still people playing in a community patch thing: https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Battlefield_1942#Online_play_support

>>717804807
God, I miss Battlefield 1942 so much
Wonder, if there are still servers with people playing it?
Would love to play it again, even for a bit...

>>717805641
welp, guess that answers it then... >>717805581
thanks

do i just pirate it from somewhere?

>>717805683
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2721068159

>>717805027
no

>>717805860
oh come on. you're telling me there's no forced messages? nothing out of place? i assume it at least have "body types"?

>>717805778
cheers

now i wanna replay cod 1 and 2 too, fuck i miss those too...

Toujane... home...

>>717805195
>didn't make it into the beta
This is why it should be illegal to call it a beta. It's not a beta it's a demo. If it was a true beta those changes would have been merged into the beta build but they aren't because internally it's a completely different branch called DEMO. They can't update the "beta"

>>717806078
In before the beta is actually an 8 month old version of the game

>>717806078
A real beta would also have all the guns/maps instead of just a handful of them, for that matter.

>>717805220
>>717805641
>mfw that intro
>mfw the theme song starts playing in my head

>>717806470
Come home, white man: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZjzM10iOro. Play the real Battlefield game. There's still people playing. https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Battlefield_1942#Online_play_support and https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2721068159

>>717803242
Bro, CS2 isn't a game, it's a competition that's been fine tuned for decades. Not to mention you have to know exactly what to do in every small map or die and wait. BF games are just a fun run around.

>>717803242
CS2 is low TTK soulless trash with no art direction, fuck off zoomie

>>717804807
>>717805641
>>717805220
Just play BF5 which has huge maps that come close to the old style BF games and aren't like this COD type BF6 beta.

>>717803789

>>717804190
Username?

>>717802812 (OP)
It's acceptable. Better than anything we've had since... Hotline? I was sure DICE was done for after 2042, at least in terms of ever making good games again, but I guess it was a hard enough kick in the dick that even they had to reverse course. Just having proper classes back feels great, and being nameless soldiers again. I'm sure that'll be ruined down the line with mtx skins, but for the moment I am enjoying my BC2 style LMG medic.

>>717802812 (OP)
It’s provides the very base level of fun but is nowhere near $70. Congratulations on not shitting themselves like the last 2 installments but it still has a long way to go to become a legitimate successor. It’s obvious this game is going to be a heavily watered down 3/4. The beta needed more content to show but unfortunately that’s probably half the game already. Given how long it takes DICE to make new content like maps the game will inevitably die after a month. Placing it before and not after Bo7 is also incredibly retarded.

>>717802812 (OP)
Let me know when they add Metro Conquest 24/7 servers

>>717807178
I actually like BF5, but its just not the same as 1942

>>717807520
>Just having proper classes back feels great
It's the same system 2042 used after updates.
You like 2042.
How does that feel?

it's a bf3 remake but they don't have the decency to say it
game got the same spaghetti code as 2042

i'll stick with bf1, thank you

>>717805641
ever heard of easy red 2?

>>717803242
I'm sure it makes a lot of sense in your head to compare counter strike to battlefield lmao

>>717804846
That's what people said about Hardline, 2042 and V though, and they were just as smug back then as you are now

>>717802812 (OP)
I really enjoyed it, wish we had some more traditional battlefield scale maps in the beta but the ones we had were fine. hope reddit's bitching doesn't lead to the game being made worse

>>717808187
Terrible take, this game is Call of Duty Ground War. This game is not going to sell well.
I have a feeling people are playing the Beta LARPing like it’s a F2P game, getting as many hours in and then won’t bother with it at launch.

I haven’t played that many Beta builds for video games but I’ve never seen so many people say they’re bored of it and don’t care about it anymore. I’m ~30 hours into the beta and I don’t want to play it anymore. Which is about the same amount of hours I spent in MWII (2022) but I actually bought it.

I reinstalled BF4 and I was like "wow, aiming actually feels smooth again"
they need to fix the input lag

>>717802812 (OP)
Imagine if you made a game and then ten years later you made it again and didn't improve it in any shape or form, thats BF6.

>>717805931
females in battle positions

>>717808763
>people are playing the Beta LARPing like it’s a F2P game, getting as many hours in and then won’t bother with it at launch.

>>717805027
>>717805931
Black Sniper, Female Engineer.

>>717802812 (OP)
It's alright. Been playing with a friend squad and put like 12 hours in. We dig it, but the game has some pretty serious slowdowns here and there, or a memory leak or sometthing, and it ends up feeling like a laggy mess before long. Beyond that, the gameplay is ok but nothing mindblowing. It doesn't really feel like a battlefield game, feels more like generic chinese shooter #65487

We are going to skip buying it and buy BFV/BF1 instead, since they are 90% off.

>>717808134
It's not, though. No wingsuits or grapple hooks or magic splitter grenades or a fuckass shield guy that I tbag every time i kill.

>>717802812 (OP)
might be good but it really hinges on the large maps that aren't in the beta
it's disappointing that there's only going to be like 2-3 large maps at launch

>>717809209
That's not a problem with classes though, it's a problem with certain gadgets.

>>717809378
no one wants to play on a fucking 20 mile map where you don't see anyone for 2 minutes, in prone with an LMG pointing it at the same checkpoint for 10 minutes.

>>717802812 (OP)
all the maps were dogshit and I doubt the Indians making the maps are capable of making something good.
It's over.

>>717802812 (OP)
as someone who never played these games. Its fun. But im done playing it after an hour or so or if I have a shit game where I'm dying every ten seconds. I like a big map with different objectives and being able to flank and find a good position. But if i keep getting killed too fast to do any of that I very quickly lose interest. Vehicles are fun, different clases are nice and simple, destructability is fun, graphics are fine but not crazy.
But at the end of it all, I still would rather play doom eternal or dark ages. I like feeling powerful and cool and shooting stuff with punchy feedback. Battlefield often makes me feel weak and stupid and I'm not shooting enough dudes.

>>717808763
>Terrible take, this game is Call of Duty Ground War. This game is not going to sell well.
It's going to sell amazingly well because it's Call of Duty Ground War right when CoDfags are mad at CoD. The last time something even close to this happened was BF1, the highest selling BF of all time.
BF6 is garbage and it's going to print money.

8.5/10
>haven't played an fps in a decade
>install on my ps5
>get shit on
>rage and install on my pc
>boot thing fucks me and doesn't work
>rage and uninstall from my pc
>try PS5 again this time with m&kb
>im somehow worse
>go back to the controller
>either mmr is wood league or i get my sea legs back
>force using the DMR for a day
>today, finally get a hang of aiming again, start lasering people with an ar
Its just a solid, no frills, well made FPS. The environment destruction is done well. I also had to find MY mode, king of the hill, to enjoy the game. I hope that the fix the accuracy or something, its so weird that an ar can beat a DMR at range.

>>717809432
True, zoomer games nowadays die and can't wait 3 seconds for a revive before holding space to respawn

overall fun but plays way too much like CoD and lacks a lot of the charm of pre-BF1 era BF
I'll still buy it because I'm very good at it and I just want to play a serviceable casual shooter with my bros, but I'm not going to sink hundreds of hours into it

>assault
>ar
>both noob tubes
>frag nade

I kinda hate Breakthrough. It's a downgrade from Rush. It's way, way too easy for the defenders. Defenders being able to retake capture points is a terrible decision. Also the fact that the last point necessitates spawn-camping the defenders for the attackers to win is really stupid.

>DMR is a three headshot kill
It's a bad game balanced by pajeets

>>717809881
>>717810173
DMR was my training weights. (who i love dearly)

>>717810173
I don't understand the shit modern game devs have for nerfing headshots. Like they did that shit in bo6 where now headshots are basically worthless. Is it controller faggots? AA doesn't go for headshots so they have to nerf mkb players that can actually aim at the head?

>>717810164
Truth Nuke

>>717810238
No wonder you were getting destroyed. Weapon fucking sucks.

>>717810173
The M39 is awful. But the other DMR in the game is a two shot kill anywhere and it kicks ass. I'm not sure why I don't see anyone else using it. It kills so fast that you can usually straight up win against assault rifles in a fair fight, or hipfire people to death in scramble situations.

>>717810258
Competency Crisis. You'd think something like the DMR would have access to the ammo that multiplies the headshot damage, like other weapons do, but nope.

>>717802812 (OP)
It's like a 5/10 for me. ">Just the beta" and it's already infuriatingly unbalanced with netcode that genuinely insults my intillegence with how dogshit it is when anything more than a mild gunfight is active.

>>717810332
Dmr already kills in 2 body shots, having access to that ammo wouldn't make much of a difference

>>717810531
Not the first one

>>717810556
Why are you using that one though

>>717810173
the DMRs are hot dogshit that feel like they're in the wrong game but all the other weapons feel pretty balanced

>>717810590
Cause it's the only option and you have to use it for quite a while before unlocking the other one.

>>717810602
The first DMR sucks. The second DMR is godlike. Why are people sleeping on it?

>>717810616
You unlock the other by level, not by using the first dmr

>>717810687
Your point being?
>just play six hours before DMRs become good bro

>>717802812 (OP)
women screaming non-stop, it's shit.

>>717810725
>I'll use this crap gun and state that all dmrs suck

>>717802812 (OP)
Honestly dont know why they'd spend 3 months hyping people up with Battlefront 2 memes only to release yet another generic modern warfare Battlefield game no-one asked for.
Its been 8 years since BF2, why not give us a 3rd one?
Or make Battlefield 6 WWII themed or Vietname or something.

I'm really sick of modern tactical shooter slop. Its been 15 years of this shit and I want something new.

>>717808763
>I have a feeling people are playing the Beta LARPing like it’s a F2P game, getting as many hours in and then won’t bother with it at launch.
literlaly me
might eventually buy it in 3-4 years when its like 5 euro on steam like every other bfield, but fuck paying 80 euros for this shit on launch lmao

>>717810679
Probably didnt level enough for it. I was still level 8 by the end.

How the fuck do you see your experience to the next level? The main screen UI is incredibly shit when I tried to look for shit

>>717810679
>try the first DMR
>it's ass
>go back to using ARs
>by the time you unlock the second DMR you already have all the recoil reducing attachments for your AR that turn it into a laserbeam
Why pick a DMR ever again?

>>717810825
every shooter in the last 10 years was ww2 slop, what the hell are you on about?

>>717810825
>Its been 15 years of this shit and I want something new.
They did that with Battlefield One being WW1 and they still fucked it up by making it just WW1 in name only.

7/10
improvement over 2042 still shit

>>717810825
>another generic modern warfare Battlefield game no-one asked for.
the entire fanbase was asking for exactly this you stupid faggot

>>717802812 (OP)
I don't know, feels like shit.
I distinctly remember playing BF4 and being able to run around, and not instantly die.
Also, visual clarity seems fucked. everything blends together.

shotgun feels nice.

>>717810679
I used the second one, it's far from godlike at all

Smaller maps, with lower TTK. It's COD with tanks. I'm also completely disinterested in the modern military look. No buy.

>>717802901
Dedicated cute asian girls healslutting their white daddy’s tank

>>717802812 (OP)
Better than the last 3 games, fun with friends but at the same time not a game I would actually play solo. It's not close to bc2 is play bc2 every free moment. This the second the boys call it a day I'm out. I'll probably buy it play for a month then never touch again. Actually enjoyed battlebit more but that games dead.

>>717810258
It's shitters in general. Doesn't matter what platform you're on, it's not like the majority of people on PC can aim well either.
The default modifier is insanely low though, yeah. If your gun doesn't have an upgrade that gives at least double damage on headshots then don't even bother.

>>717811128
CoD is better because it's at least designed around the CQB gameplay.

This feels like shit because it feels like it's missing something, a bigger map, backline support like artillery, something

>>717811226
>missing something
It’s missing the BATTLE FIELD experience for sure, this game feels like a CQB Airsoft match.

Battlefield 6 feels more like a military training exercise than a fully fledged out world war 3 scenario. Fucking boring.

>>717809397
The classes are the gadgets, though. At least the problems with the classes in 2042. Technically the classes could be said to be in line with any past Battlefield simply by being sectioned off into categories, but that's hardly a fair assessment and clearly not a proper indicator for whether or not someone likes the class system in 2042.

>>717802812 (OP)
>queue for game
>instantly join some shitter match where "my" team is losing by an unrecoverable margin
0/10

>>717808763
>This game is not going to sell well.
Anon, I’m sorry but you’re gonna get BTFO

>>717811903
>join match
>peak
>half of my team are pretending to be billy goats humping the mountain and dying on loop
>all objectives captured by enemy
>see teammate get into jeep thing and drive it straight into a wall
>all within 30 seconds of joining
>mfw

Battlefield gameplay always feels laggy and unresponsive when compared to COD to me, and the fact that the maps are smaller and more like COD now only goes to highlight that sensation.

Battlefield feels like shit to play, no joke.

>>717811903
Imagine playing a game with 64 players and demanding you have some significant impact on the outcome

>>717812029
Sounds like the average Battlefield experience to me

The game director was the one for Modern Warfare 2019 which explains a lot

>>717812031
the netcode is genuinely just bad, raise your ping and you can see the difference between cod and battlefield where battlefield you're stuttering on movement and cod you can't even tell the ping is high until you start shooting

>>717812031
CoD feels like plastic

>>717812115
Imagine playing a game with 64 players and you get put on the team where 31 of them can't see a motion sensor placed in the middle of a doorway they are funneling through to death on repeat.

>>717812183
it feels like snappy, responsive plastic.

>>717812208
And that’s why it’s for children, so BF6 should be right up your alley

>>717812243
Anon, are you 10, why are you acting like this.

>>717812267
that's what no pussy does to a motherfucker, don't be like anon

just another cod

>>717807042
Wait, zoomoids now think low TTK is bad?

>>717812341
does fortnite have a high ttk?

>>717812341
Low TTK is bad when the map isn't designed for it.
It feels like shit, when a bullet can come from anywhere, and fights aren't funneled into kill zones.

>>717812483
I wouldn't know.

I only ever played some of Battlefield Hardlines multiplayer for the lols but like as a franchise ignorant regular ass millenial adult gamertm who played Call of Duty alot back in college (07-11) I like the game alot and I am actually considering getting it.

I wanna play this game but I have a fucking ancient potato PC and an OG Xbone. Should I get the latest Xbox, a PS5, or a moderately priced (lol) gaming PC?

>>717804972
Which one of these is most like BFBC2? I loved that game.

>>717812772
Consoles can be had for like 350 whereas a whole gpu build is gonna likely end up over 1000 no matter how hard you try to save

>>717812772
why the fuck would you ever consider buying an xbox lol
they literally put all their games on pc and now even ps5, just get a ps5 or pc

>>717812772
The experience of these games is vastly different on PC.

I could never really find "enjoyment", playing with a mouse and keyboard. So I play on console, but this obviously limits your gameplay alot and auto aim is there.

PC is for sure the true experience. But the game rocks on the coach with a big screen also.

How does it fare against bf4 or bf3? I can't decide which one to play.

I bought BF1 because it was three dollars and I'm having fun on that game :)

>>717812772
The gane supports Dualsense features, if that's something you would be into.

Is it too much to ask for an incremental battlefield. I know a lot of vets leaving post 1/V is a bit of a setback but still.

My ideal battlefield 6 you ask? Destruction from 1, building from 5, occasional weather events from 2042, a shit ton of gadgets, probably some new classes beyond the og four. I don’t play battlefield that much so I can’t say much off the top of my head. Overall I’m looking for a plethora of gameplay interactions.

Also regular vehicles from hardline that allow people to fuck around on top of some of map specific vehicles like a crane or an excavator. It would be cool to have sedans again. They can be made of paper mache, just let people do crazy stuff.

i fucking hate modern warfare

i just want a GOOD fucking WW2 battlefield game...

>>717814229
remember 1943? that was pretty fun

It's amazing how shit everyone in this thread is. Game is a solid 8/10, COD is cooked.

>>717814284
not really, i never owned a console, played shiploads of 1942 tho

Pretty sure all the toxic positivity people that are apparently angry at people calling this cod haven’t played 3/4/1/V in years if at all. Obviously it’s different and not merely nostalgia based, although I’ll say the biggest part of that is because Cairo is literally built like a COD map. In a normal battlefield game the rooftops would be accessible on top of there being underground tunnels.

I dont like the maps, at least that are in the current beta

Well, the hilly one was okay(Peak?), the spanish one is eh, but i fucking HATE the egyptian one, it feels like playing shittier CoD with a tank here or there

>>717802812 (OP)
Same shit, but sliding mechanic implemented. At this point they should have just made a futuristic BattleField, but that would just be Star Wars BattleFront.

>>717814285
englais?

>>717805323
Bf has always been about combined arms, not just vehicles.

>>717802812 (OP)
Boring

will it have vehicle customization because I didn't see it in the beta

>>717812140
can you source this? i couldn't find this info with google

>>717803242
Insane take, it's completely the opposite case for these games.

>>717812140
>the one for Modern Warfare 2019
Well, thats good, if true, since that was the only good CoD in the last like 15 years and ironically enough, its Ground War mode(or whatever it was called) was probably the best Battlefield in a while too

>>717815005
No I saw it in a reddit comment earlier today

>>717812485
But anon, you have complained in previous threads how every map is just two or three killzones. Quite the contradiction.

>>717815170
This.

>>717814229
for 12 years there was nothing but ww2 slop being released, why are you still crying

>>717815170
your dogshit taste is obvious

>>717815005
I know Vince Zampella is leading the battlefield development team and he helped make some of the old cod games along with Titanfall 1 and 2.

>>717809697
Yeah, too bad every map here was smaller than all the COD Ground War maps.

>>717810825
BF5 was WW2 and BF2042 was future and BC2 had Vietnam DLC. People didn't care about any of them. So it's back to the most relatable thing, more or less current day shooter.

Still waiting for 2143

>dude corridors and killboxes lmao
This is like if every map in Call of Duty was Shipment. Wait, they actually did that for the first time this year and it was the most hated, least player retained game in the franchise's history.

I dont care. Im not enabling secure boot
I will buy black ops 4 deluxe and play zombies instead

>>717815593
Yeah don’t forget he’s also the retard who thought a souls-like Star Wars Jedi game was a good idea.

>>717816008
>People didn't care about any of them. So it's back to the most relatable thing

>>717814229
BF5 was just a few years ago anon

>>717802812 (OP)
BF4 reskin.

Which is fine. I preordered it after I played it for 20 hrs.

Fuck haters

>>717804318
>even though they grew up way more fast paced arena shooters

Boomers who played BF2-4 weren’t into UT99, Quake or TRribes.

>>717809046
YOU COULD PLAY AS A NIBBER SINCE BF2, RETARD

>>717803789
>people running around in enfilade like headless chicken
>feeling of actual warfare
okay buddy

>>717804318
40 here top 5 on the team all weekend. top squad constantly. it's hilarious to watch your zoomer adhd riddled low attention span minds get impatient and slide into the room i'm in just get blasted in the dome real quick. the zoomer brain can't handle the mental fortitude needed for BF games

>>717805027
your mom in an easter egg on liberation. she got a sex change. she's daddy now, this is how you find out

>>717816490
>it was fine when bf4 did it

>>717816541
Yeah looks like you’re going to be “beta” testing it for a year or two until I get it at a discount.
Thank you beta tester.

maps are too small. You don't have that huge feeling and you don't really discover the map since it's pretty much a corridor
Maps are not really inspired, nothing epic or beautiful about them, they feel like COD maps
BC2, BF2, BF3, BF Vietnam, BF 1943, hell even BF4 that I didn't like that much had fun maps that were huge
Destruction feel like another step backward.
Snipers are overpowered. Too much of them. If you play breakthrough in attack you're 70% sure of losing because half of your team is staying in the back trying to make 4 kills during the whole game.

>>717802812 (OP)
This neither feels nor plays like battlefield, the thing that i always liked playing BF is the freedom to do whatever you wanted, run around the map play the way you wanted, you could follow the wave of people capturing the points, duel with another rando with a tank sniping each other from the other side of the map, do the same with a sniper, if you got bored you could just do something else defending a strategic roof with some teammates, go around the map laying some mines in stupid places and see if someone would fall for it, mess around with your friends. Challenge yourself by reaching first place just by playing support, taking a MAV, and blowing people up with claymores and mines. And this is just a couple of the hundreds of things that an old battlefield lets me do. Now the maps are so small it never creates areas of conflict, everyone comes from everywhere because the spawn points are shit like B point on Iberian Offensive. You never have a break from a random guy just coming from one of the 100th alleys. You can't trust your positioning or your cover. There is no tactic, and there is no freedom in this game. They just want to shoot each other ad infinitum.

>>717815573
what fps would be of good taste?

>>717804318
The "fast paced arena shooters" were all a joke.
Hitboxes were giant cubes/cylinders.
Your primary weapons were fucking rocket launchers and railguns with perfect accuracy.
The "speed" was primarily moving in a nearly-straight, easily predictable path.

Modern shooters have far more erratic movement, hitboxes that are tight to the character model, and weapons that need you to be dead-on accurate for multiple shots in succession while also managing various forms of inaccuracy. Even while aiming down sights, the smallest movements you make while just walking are enough to get out of the line of fire during a shootout, requiring rapid, constant adjustments.

>>717802812 (OP)
it's fun aside from hackers, I don't understand the complaint about it becoming COD though
I can frag and topped the leaderboard just fine

>>717802812 (OP)
After all the hype they drummed up for destruction playing the beta and finding out this is another game where you can only blow up walls that already have doors and windows in them and small sheds finally convinced me that when they said they didn't understand what people liked about Bad Company they were serious.

>>717817182
I can frag and top the scoreboard too. Doesn't change the fact the game isn't fun because of the ADHD spastic gameplay and low TTK.

last bf i played was 2142, but all the maps here fell really constricted

like no freedom of movement
also, what usually happens if i hold some position and kill a few people is that 4 people spawn behind you

bf6 is marketed to be it's like bf3&4 but it's not, the guns sound weak feel weak and the maps are badly designed. 70$ plus battlepasses yeah no fuck that i guess it's back to bf4

>>717814229
And what's wrong with BF5 then, go play that for WW2.

>>717814483
I've played every BF game and this one felt the most COD like since 3/4/1/5 had much bigger maps and more vehicles. Now 6 is promising the smallest maps ever and infantry only maps.

ADHD spastic gameplay and chaotic infrantry maps are based.

Nobody actually likes big open maps other than tourists, most of the time you are just dying to some faggot sniping or some helicopter/lav deleting you on those maps anyways

5/10
remove females
add option to disable player shouts in game
we already have option to disable announcer

do this and the game will bump up to 8/10

>>717817349
also, THERE IS TOO MUCH SHIT ON THE SCREEN

constantly like 7 floating indicators in whichever direction you look
enemies appearing on minimap without anyone calling it out

what is this casual bullshit

>>717817182
The 8v8 mode plays almost exactly like CoD. The only thing stopping the other modes being the same is the map size and thats smaller than ever

the movement is fucking horrendous. I couldnt find if but waas there an autosprint button like in quake? it was fucking annoying as fuck having to spam shift to fucking do anything. and it doesnt even matter if you sprint in this shit game since you can reload while sprinting lmao. there's no reason to walk ever.

>>717817689
>Nobody actually likes big open maps other than tourists
>t. post bc2 faggotron

The BF6 beta was the first Battlefield game I played, enjoyed it enough, I see all Battlefield games are on sale on steam rn, which one is good to hold me over? Looking between V and 1.

>>717817958
Take the 2042 pill

>>717816008
2042 was barely future but also it was hero slop that was put together in like 4 months with the pieces of a failed BR game.

>>717802812 (OP)
It's rough around the edges but has the potential to be something good
>Insane TTD/TTK
>Vehicle vs vehicle balance is fucked
>Vehicle vs infantry balance is fucked
>Shotguns are broken
>Snipers are broken, remove the fucking sweet spot
>Recon perks are broken, remove auto spotting
>Remove auto spotting from every class in fact baby ass game design
>Movement is fine but they need to reduce sway
>Gunplay is actually pretty trash, it needs either higher recoil or higher spread, I never felt the need to full auto, basic gunplay wouldn't be such an issue but combined with basic movement and insanely fast TTK you won't be able to have skill gap in this game

>>717818110
>I never felt the need to burst or tap fire
Fixed

>>717818110
Incredibly based and valid opinion

>>717816110
Bo6 is not the most hated game not by a longshot. People hate MW2022 more and even that isn't the worst one. People hate bo6 because of the cosmetic slop not the actual gameplay unless they're the arma rejects that keep begging for every game to turn into corner camping simulators.

>>717818179
>arma
>corner camping

>>717802812 (OP)
Gunplay felt good but I'm not a fan of how you can turn nearly every gun into a laser beam with the right grip and muzzle attachment.

Sometimes it would feel like it takes more shots to kill a guy than he would need to kill me even though we're both using the same guns. Leads to perceived inconsistencies with TTK/TTD.

Cairo was probably the best map in the beta.
The Iberian map is okay but there are no battlelines because you have so many routes to move through it.
Sniper Glint Peak I thought was pretty bad. It's not fun on Breakthrough and it's somewhat tolerable in Conquest. Unironically it would benefit from a sniper limit like you had in BF4 on custom servers.
I got sick of the maps by the end. Next week we're getting that NY map I think.

Tanks feel extremely difficult to kill when they have an engineer or two for repairs and are completely fucked when they don't have that. Maybe buff them a bit and reduce repair speed from engineers.

Game is pretty and runs surprisingly well but seeing people is a pain in the ass because of all the smoke and particle effects.

UI is a mess. Too many clicks to get where you want to go in the menus, too easy to accidentally click shit that takes you where you don't want to go.
Also, the minimap lacks a north indicator which is extremely fucking retarded. 2042 had the same issue.
IDK what Dice's UI design team is smoking but they should stop.

>>717810283
The SVK is pretty good as long as you have cover and don't try to go close quarters. It's a 2-bodyshot kill at all ranges and because it deals only 50 dmg people will sometimes stand their ground to fight you making the followup shot easy.

>>717817119
I want to add an example.I have chosen the most basic map.I added the most basic stuff that people do when playing Siege of Shanghai. There is plenty of stuff to do in different areas and engaging against different players. And this without your input, just by following the flow of the game.

MOBA: the fps. Don't forget to press 6 to ult!

>>717802812 (OP)
Ever since BF5 I am playing BF3/BF4 whenever a new EA abomination is scheduled to release. It always ends the se: I am banned for using vehicles (especially the hets and helis).

Something broke in 2016, the playerbase turned into inept mutists who'd rather get farmed playing solo, than have a proper match playing as a team. I barely keep up with new releases and frankly don't have to, to know that DICE is "balancing" vehicles by neutering them.

>>717803242
CS2 is a garbage "game" made for autists.
Congratulation, you found your "game".

>>717802812 (OP)
7/10

If they removed the black females and chinksectoid women 9/10

>>717817958
V and 1 are a break from the old Battlefield formula.
Just look at BFBC2, BF 3 and BF 4 and they're much closer to 6 than V and 1

>>717803242
Completely reasonable statement about weapon recoil. Idk why anons can't comprehend this post.

BF6 is fun but I don't like how easy it is to handle the guns. Just full auto all the time and you'll hit all your shots easy peasy. There's little to no skill in weapon handling. I think gitting gud in BF6 is mostly about game-sense and map knowledge. Which is okay i guess.

>>717818264
>kamikaze assault
hey, you remembered me, thanks bro

>>717802812 (OP)
Decent fun. They'll ruin it with fomo battlepass bullshit and balance patches nobody asked for, but for a beta where you just hop on and shoot shit for a couple hours, it was nice.
Honestly, the most fun I've had with CoD and BF games in the last 10 years was during beta weekends, when server pop was high, and stats didn't matter.

Shotgun was fun to abuse but it’s also cancer to play against. You just shouldn’t be able to run around with a primary weapon and a fucking shotgun as well. But I have a feeling DICE isn’t going to change this at all.

>>717802812 (OP)
Too arcadey
It needs to be competitive to be worth playing

>>717816874
I don’t really care what you’ll get, since I had a ton of fun in the beta. Good luck dropping in fresh when the game is full of 360-no-scope snipers and heli/jet pilots mowing you down with their machine guns, plus ex-CoD zoomers running full loadouts and level-100 characters while you’re trying to survive with a base gun and a basic loadout. lmao

>>717818259
>Tanks feel extremely difficult to kill when they have an engineer or two
need to reach critical mass of engineers with rpgs. 1-2 rpgs can be out-healed. But when there are 3-4 rpgs the tank will have to pull back or die.

>>717818478
it was only ever a problem in tight buildings. I feel like it'll be more of a problem at launch, but for the beta where half of players don't know what they're doing, crosshair placement instinct and not blind rushing around corners in building was enough.

>>717818259
Tanks are the same as in every BF. They seem ridiculous until you realize a coordinated squad can melt one in seconds if they know what they're doing.
Hell, in some games, a single player with all the meta tankbusting gadgets can take one out easily.

>>717817958
Depends if you like weird bizarre maps and guns of WW1 or more down to earth epic maps and guns of WW2.

>>717818259
>Cairo was probably the best map in the beta
Jesus fucking Christ

>>717818427
i forgot people trying to bring vehicles with the elevators or just c4ing them on top of the roof.

>>717802812 (OP)
I sure do love my vehicles controlling like total dogshit!
I also love visibility and clarity so poor that I'm shooting in the general direction of orange diamonds instead of knowingly at whatever the fuck is below said diamonds!
Oh and my favourite part of that is simply dragging my reticle over an area to find enemies through the effects spam as they get automatically marked for me! Or that happening to me! I sure do love having no ability to hide in this game and knowing where enemies are at basically all times!
And seeing lens glare so bright it's as if the enemy is shining a stage light on me!

>>717818110
>auto spot
It's been like that for the past few games which is fine as it's annoying to have to press a button constantly whenever you see an enemy.

>>717818382
>V and 1 are a break from the old Battlefield formula.
Ironic. V is closer to 2 than 3 and 4 ever could hope to.

>>717802812 (OP)
So is this another one of those 3-4 bodyshot kill with 1.25 headshot multiplier games?

It's like just a remaster of bf3, some details that I liked in bf1 are gone, dynamic weather, all sorts of additional animations like the way you climb onto a tank, the animations of how you change your place in the vehicle, the way you reload artillery, the way the map zooms in/out, elite classes like juggernaut, behemoths, why did they refuse to develop these ideas? It's so sad to see just a minor changes...
weapons and movement don't feel as good as in bf1/5, everything is kind of jerky, it doesn't feel smooth, maybe it's because of the fast pace of the game To be honest, I expected more from Zampella...

>>717818110
TTK's godawful on the starter guns for sure.
It shouldn't take 7 shots to kill someone at midrange with the starter AR.
The m4 and nvo are decent though. SMGs too, if you're committed to the zoomer run and gun playstyle.

>>717818552
>360 no scope snipers
Not too far removed from what I was already doing; quick scoping with ease.
>heli jets mowing you down
Yeah if the pilots can survive for more than literally one or two minutes after spawning. Considering the fact that Engineers can carry RPGs and Stingers at the same time, I don’t know.
> plus ex-CoD zoomers running full loadouts and level-100 characters while you’re trying to survive with a base gun and a basic loadout.
Ironic because the best overall best AR/Carbine in the beta are the starter ones (MPX, M433). No one even bothers with the other weapons because they’re fucking trash.

>>717818869
There's attachments that boost headshot damage to 1.7 that you want to unlock asap, but otherwise, yeah, it's a battlefield game. TTK's going to need to be higher than average.

>>717818869
Damage falloff puts it more like 4-7 shot bodyshot kill with 1.3 headshot multiplier (can be boosted to 1.7 on some guns with warcrime ammo)

>>717818874
Indeed, noticed the return to instant exit/entry of vehicles, bet some impatient CODsters said it was annoying so now it's gone. Was amazed when I first saw that in BF5 which I think is a rare detail that even realistic games like Arma don't bother with.

>>717802812 (OP)
Shit because it's not Battlefield 2142. I want my titans and mechs and commander mode.

>>717818910
>Ironic because the best overall best AR/Carbine in the beta are the starter ones (MPX, M433). No one even bothers with the other weapons because they’re fucking trash.

Yeah because they’re totally not going to rebalance these guns on release + G36 is locked behind 15-20 hrs of gameplay. If you’d unlock it you would know how meta this gun is for assault class in Beta

>>717817958
1 and V both still have decent player numbers still.
Most people liked 1 more, but personally I found the gunplay of V better. Plus V has crouch sprinting like 6, which I just think feels natural.

last battlefield I play was 1 and that was a decent game
no clue what in the actual fuck I was playing this weekend, nothing felt like battlefield
the maps needs to be triple to quadruple the size and everything needs to be slowed down
guns also needs to be completely rebalanced

>>717819037
Either way the entire game feels like a cheap imitation of what Battlefield was. Enjoy the slop.

>>717818910
Also you just don’t have good pilots on jets\helis YET

Here’s an example of what you’re up to in every BF game since BF2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHZEbMtnzUQ

>>717807042
>low TTK
only when you’re bad lol

>>717819148
yeah yeah "stop having fun" etc

>>717818908
>It shouldn't take 7 shots to kill someone at midrange with the starter AR.
433 is at max 5 BTK lmao. 4 in close range. Issue is it's 4BTK TTK is faster than BF3's M16A3. Every weapon needs 1 more BTK.

>>717818767
>I also love visibility and clarity so poor that I'm shooting in the general direction of orange diamonds instead of knowingly at whatever the fuck is below said diamonds!
3D spotting is a retarded mechanic, bad visibility or not.

>>717802812 (OP)
0/10.
No preorder, not even a buy.
Hopefully 83' isn't far off release.

To be honest, I'm actually excited for the final release. Didn't think this was possible.

Some observations:
- TTK is kinda between classic BF and COD. Felt right to me.
- It's far more fast paced, but at the same time more arcadey. So if you know what you're doing, take cover, move around etc. you shouldn't have a problem with being deleted from halfway across the map.
- Assault rifles are perfect atm. Kill fast, but they aren't 'death lasers' as some people ITT put it. Shotguns are definitely better at close range, while snipers are OP over long ranges (as it should be).
- Kinda on the fence about this whole signature weapon thing. As an oldfag I'd rather have each class be restricted to their specific weapons.
- Gunplay is god tier. They actually sound like real guns, and feel 'weighty' enough to carry the illusion.
- Apparently, after 20 years, they finally fixed the netcode. Never had any 'die after turning a corner' moments.

Some worries:
- Eventually they implement bright pink Fortnite skinslop.
- Battlepasses (they WILL happen, no way around it)
- Vehiclefags crying long and loud enough about muh balance until we get 50-0 jetniggers again
- Why aren't there any dedicated servers

Also, 'BF1 was the best BF' kids ought to be stuck in WW1 assault rifle red-dot sight crates and lit on fire.

>>717818787
>It's been like that for the past few games
???
BFV had no 3D spotting unless you use recon or support
2042 has standard Q spotting

Issue is in BF6 the moment you look at an enemy they are 3D spotted for you and your team

>>717819275
Close range is hilarious, yeah. Hipfiring with the M4 clears entire squads in tight rooms if you catch people by surprise.
I'd be fine with them increasing TTK at close range, while reducing it for mid-long, because the damage falloff after 20m is way too aggressive.

>>717819332
>83
Why did you even bother playing a nuBattlefield game and then you mention this?

When I played BFV for the first time I thought it felt like nothing, and then I played it more and grew to appreciate the unique mechanics.

2042 felt like nothing but it had new shit like the extremely high playercounts.

6 just feels like nothing. The maps feel nothing like Battlefield. Bad gun selection. Mechanics feel haphazardly thrown together from a mixture of BFV, MW 2019 and trying to appeal to a Battlefield fanbase that doesn't really know what it wants anymore other than to feel like they're playing 4 again. None of the "DICE magic" is here. I've seen people VERY resistant to criticizing this game, but I've already been seeing some cracks forming where beyond the fact that this game is a casual sandbox shooter and they haven't gotten a competent one in a few years, most of what this game does isn't very unique or particularly interesting or good compared to older battlefields.

>>717819363
>Apparently, after 20 years, they finally fixed the netcode. Never had any 'die after turning a corner' moments.
This is a straight up lie. People were constantly getting killed around corners and by "super bullets". If anything it's just as bad as the dogshit 3 and 4 netcode.

>>717819456
Anti Matter games stuff like Rising Storm 2 and Red Orchestra 2 are basically just OG Battlefield imo

>>717819532
>People were constantly getting killed around corners and by "super bullets".
Have you tried moving out of Zimbabwe?

>>717819542
What? In what world? They're pseudo realism bullshit just like Squad. If anything then Reforger feels more like 1942/2 albeit with very limited vehicle pool. Red Orchestra games were never even close to Refractor Battlefields.

>>717819631
>nuh uh its your connection
So what's your reaction time you can't even see getting blatantly killed around corners? Or super bullets and the absolutely fucked TTD for that matter. 1500 ms?

>>717802812 (OP)
If theres no youtube video about "Random acts of ownage" in about 4 months then it's shit

>>717819097
You should buy BF5 while it's still $5 then as it has tons of huge maps.

>>717819151
Um, of all the times I died in BF5, maybe only 5% was due to air power. Making it a rare annoyance.

I feel like I’m being gaslit when it comes to compliments about graphics and destruction

The graphics are ugly, putrid, and low quality browns and greys. Looks worse than launch ps4 games. And the destruction is literally only allowable in the same exact spots in the same exact way every single match. This shit is not at all close to dynamic, and it’s insulting how limited it is, from indestructible and immovable cars littering the streets, to the buildings that have so many walls you can’t destroy. It feels insulting when we get obviously gimmicked and placebo destruction moments because a grenade launcher will blow up one type of wall but leave a neighboring one untouched. Regardless if you shoot 1 or 100 rockets at it.

Presentation wise, this is a ps3 game

>>717819710
Yes comrade. I too have problem with netcode. Cyka blyat, why stupid HATO developers cannot into making good video game? Why is no Russia in game? I want to play as glorious Russian army. Game is of bad optimizations. I cannot run on my toaster. Two more weeks.

>>717805027
Nato recon is the darkest shitskin you'll see. Both supports look normal in the menu but they get kinda brown in game. I applaud the use of face masks but the black guy wears this silly hat so you know it's him. I don't mind the female engi but you might. I found the accented commander voice more annoying.

Game loves to give "aim block" to the "I'm black" guy because he's poor.

>>717819882
Bombers could still be really obnoxious in BFV but there were multiple periods during that game's life cycle where AA was extremely strong

BV5 was really autistic. All they needed to do was take COD:WAW and make it Battlefield. Instead they did the western front again and put a paraplegic woman on the cover.

>>717803242
>In CS2 I can feel every single bullet that I fire
Not with that "sub tick" bullshit that hasn't worked since the Source 2 update

>>717819882
>BF5
There’s your problem. Now try that in BF2-4 with 1-2 competent jet\heli players. They were annoying as FUCK sniping you with jet main guns from above and they were able to avoid stingers easily

>>717819923
I'm glad you could admit you're retarded so fast at the very least.

>>717819363
>Battlepasses
Meh, who cares since I always ignore them, don't care about skins, never bother even looking at them.
>Why aren't there any dedicated servers
BF2042 didn't have server browser and looks like this one won't either.

>>717805323
This hasn't been the case since Battlefield 3 (actually since Bad Company 2)

It's better than the last few imo but the last few were abysmal

>>717802812 (OP)
call the ea weapon expert

>>717812483
if you are playing non-build? fuck no, the shift from full shields + full hp into death, depending on the season, is a fucking blink away

>>717819652
>They're pseudo realism bullshit just like Squad
Not really? they're the in between games. Anti Matter have always made that their sort of marketing slogan of 'accessible realism'. They're not mil sim, or one step in between mil sim because they don't go for all out realism. I don't get how you don't feel like Rising Storm 2 really feels like BF Vietnam.

>>717802812 (OP)
Chaotic and confusing in a frustrating way. People respawn way too fast, too close, you can respawn in too many places, the maps are too small, the entire spotting/showing enemies on radar makes cover and hiding completely useless and it's unimmersive.

>>717819958
Netcode has never been an issue in countries that matter, my dear thirdie friend.

>>717820409
>sub 30 ms with a stable connection is third world
Get your eyes checked mystery meat

Play the finals instead, it's a much better game.

>>717802812 (OP)
>vehicles are once again capable of fucking everything up provided you have a couple of engineer buddies with you
>the maps themselves are so small it takes no time for you to cross it and defend chokepoints
It's not balanced properly. Every map is essentially tehran, bazaar, flood zone etc
Maps like caspian border offered a decent trade between distance and vehicle firepower but it's nowhere to be found now
Air faggots will own everything again and LAVs are still better than tanks since they can easily deal with both tanks and infantry.

>>717820024
>BF2042 didn't have server browser and looks like this one won't either.
Because Dice have been screwing us over ever since V. I wish the gay match making had been the biggest issue of the Beta on the other hand.

This was their last chance to make up for all their mistakes and they blew it.

>>717820481
Works on my machine.

>>717817563
Battle passes are for cosmetics only

>>717820547
>It's not balanced properly.
I mean, that's what the open beta is for, is it not? Getting feedback and fixing stuff.
>Maps like caspian border offered a decent trade between distance and vehicle firepower but it's nowhere to be found now
Caspian Border was fucking shit because 10/64 people would camp the vehicles while the rest had to run around for 10 minutes with zero cover, basically being killmeat for vehiclewhores.
>Air faggots will own everything again and LAVs are still better than tanks since they can easily deal with both tanks and infantry.
This was always an issue, and I'm afraid it just won't ever go away. Only solution would be to make tanks multi-crew like IRL, I guess.

>>717816541
>preordered it
why? I kinda like it myself, but why would you preorder?

I-I-I don’t even know what to say

>>717820585
>You spawn, you get shot at, you die, repeat.
Do these mouthbreathers ever consider getting into cover?

>>717820893
Nah Siege is a good map. It's more fun before the levolution happens though. The fight on top of that skyscraper has held many great memories for me. Including doing stupid tacticool shit with helicopters. Good stuff.

>>717816578
>30 year old boomers never played UT99

>>717820826
>10/64 people would camp the vehicles while
That's how you deal with vehicles. The whole point is that you can get fucked from any direction so it's a tradeoff of sorts. Now it's just a bunch of lines for you to drive through and mop everything in your path. Have 2 engineers in your squad in raidcall and it can literally be over before it even begins. The only counter to this is Air and it's a can of worms in and of itself like I said. Attack helis still fuck shit up, take zero time to restock and repair by flying back to base and do another run. That mountain map was by far the worst to play as infantry. Cairo is okay I guess but it's really just a yellow and somewhat bigger version of bazaar with its straight lines and alley ways.

>>717820360
I once respawned directly next to an enemy sniper in a Cairo conquest. Like, free knife kill if I just turned and hit the button.

Give us boomers a server browser.
Not that Portal shit

>>717803242
If it wasnt for its autistic recoil patterns, counter strike would be just an average arcade tact shooter. I know you like having your weapons behave like an erect penis in the morning that pisses all over the toilet seat, but i dont.

>>717821042
Exactly my point

>>717820893
Siege of Shanghai was heli paradise which is why everyone voted for it all the time. It sucked hard ass like any other map they made after BC2.
>Metro
Only played because you could rank up fast.
>Operation Locker
More like Operation Bypod.
>Caspian Border
Vehiclewhores deserve the rope.
>Golmund Railway
Vehiclewhores deserve the rope.
>Zavod
Have fun getting sniped from everywhere.
>That one Final Assault map with the mountain base
Have fun getting sniped from everywhere.

>>717820585
Hope someone told them you can adjust the map zoom in the menu and that they should not spawn on squad if they're in the middle of an attack.

>>717820516
Least organic shill campaign i've seen to date, a game from 2 years ago that lost 80% of it's players, with a peak of 20k on PC on weekends, all of the sudden multiple threads each day and all those harping on battlefield of all things? I'm sure it's all coincidence that the major is in one month and they're paying youtubers to make videos about it and shilling it

>>717820893
The battlefield subreddit should protect itself by locking newcomers out. That place notoriously shits on the franchise and last week was all “no preorders!”. Now all of a sudden there’s a bunch of people getting uppity over basic criticisms.

>>717802812 (OP)
>So, whats the /v/edict?
/v/eddit hates fun
/v/eddit hates BF6
BF6 is fun

>>717821106
Hope someone told them that after 5000 hours played, anything will get old and that having friends to play with won't save it. Or maybe it wasn't good to begin with? Either way, hope they know you can stay with a friend squad and don't have to bother with randoms.

>>717804980
>Bots in servers
Are there any single player modes with full bots or just for tutorial missions?

>>717821264
It's possibly the least fun I've had in a battlefield game to date.

>>717821164
trvuke, people don't like to hear this but a lot of BF maps suck ass, especially for infantry. Golmund always struck me as one of the worst maps to play as infantry. BF1 is held back a lot by it's fucking atrocious maps.

>>717821164
>>Metro
>Only played because you could rank up fast.
This here is the answer to why maps are small now, people play them for easy farming of their precious skin and other shit unlocks.

>>717805323
Vehicles have been total shit and gimmicky since bad company 2.

>>717821214
Yes it's being pushed as all games are
I don't care because it's good and you should support it instead of something that carries the highest ambition of "be a mediocre game from over a decade ago"

>>717821042
Siege sucked. Helifags gooning all match, everyone focused on the tower, leaving all other flags to be captured again and again and again. Not that you could even defend them in the first place, as there were too many ways to get around the map unbothered. There was no real frontline. Also the towerfags were basically camping there all day long.
>We've got C and the opponent has A, B, D and E? Let's just stay here
Also, it was always fun to destroy the tower and hear the entire server seethe

>>717821374
I have 1k hours in it. Would never reccomend anyone playing it, especially now. If you didn't play during the closed betas/release, you literally missed out.

>>717810825
>Or make Battlefield 6 WWII themed or Vietname or something.
keep yourself safe

>>717821264
I can't have fun if it's crashing.
And i don't know how i can further upgrade my system from an rtx 5090. I don't think that's possible right now. Nor do i think i should have anything beyond a 9800x3D for a CPU.

>>717821264
It’s neither fun nor anti fun. It has the luxury of being the most baseline battlefield experience but that’s where it stops, at the baseline. There’s nothing impressive about it. It’s one step forward 2 steps backwards. That is if the step forward is returning to a spot that shouldn’t have been left in the first place. The 2 steps backwards is reinventing/abandoning stuff from the previous entries.

>>717821264
It's possibly the most fun I've had in a battlefield game to date.

>wahh wahh it's not boring like bf2 or slow enough for my old ass to compete
I have 2k hours in BF3 and this shit is a BF3 remake. BF4 is for faggots
BFV is for the oldheads

>>717821668
BF3 was more balanced and slower paced. This shit is Metro 24/7 all the time.

Anyway, what is it with BF1 fags? This game sucked so hard I don't even know where to begin.
Yes, the atmosphere was cool in places, but they fucked that up too by introducing anachronistic 700 RPM assault rifles.
Operations sucked, the unlock system sucked, every gun felt the same, niggers in the German army, tedious respawning ("hold space for 30 seconds"), absolutely USELESS semi-autos, vehicles were not OP for once but actually sucked (wonder how they managed to do that), annoying gas mechanic that didn't do anything except force you to press yet another button, etc. pp.

So basically they just redid the formula of
>all flags close together
>can see all flags from every other flag
>no 'fronts' where you know what direction enemy is coming from
>action is constant and 360

>>717821098
Yeah the game is just adhd deluxe, everything feels designed around that it should be constant action, if you don't see an enemy within 5 seconds of spawning something must be wrong.

>>717821724
>BF3 was more balanced and slower paced
No. Half the maps in Aftermath and especially the market maps were meat grinders. You died in two seconds, not to mention Ziba. The issue the game has right now is that all it's maps are small as shit and that's catering to the CoD gameplay. Make some large shit and these issues disappear, and then old men can walk around aimlessly for their 5 minute lifespans again

>>717803242
Counterstrike is purposefully stiff and robotic in the gunplay and movement and I'll never understand how people enjoy it so much. It feels so fucking bad to me. If that's what ruined other FPS for you then you have to have some kind of defect.

BC2 was the best BF ever. All other opinions can be discarded.

It's fun but like others have said, it does cater to ADHD shit. This is mostly down to the map size. I said it in another thread, the 64 player maps in BF6 would be the size of a 32 or 16 player map in older Battlefields.

>>717821869
>No. Half the maps in Aftermath and especially the market maps were meat grinders.
Nigga what, Talah Market is BIGGER than Cairo.

>>717820826
>I mean, that's what the open beta is for, is it not?
lol
lmao

>>717822124
>hitting wookies with tracer darts and lobbing rpgs at them
never got old ever.

>>717821095
>That's how you deal with vehicles. The whole point is that you can get fucked from any direction so it's a tradeoff of sorts.
Ah yes, I sure loved 'dealing' with the tank that camped on a hill half a mile away taking potshots at single infantry all day long.

>>717822124
BC2 is the the biggest babbies first in the entire gaming industry. Seriously only people who played it first and then got offended when BF3 added jets, prone, and larger maps back to the series can still defend BC2's horrible decisions.

>>717820893
All Frostbite engine maps which weren't lifted from the first two games are bad to average. I don't understand what's so shocking here.

>>717802812 (OP)
I had fun but the game is fucking miserable until you unlock laser sights and fix the hipfire.

>>717822326
>individual games in a series can't be enjoyed for their own merits
absolute zero IQ take.

>>717822180
I like the small maps. Nothing worse than wondering an empty 2042 map.

>>717822326
>Nnnooo why can't I go prone, how am I supposed to be le epic sniper on top of a hill
>Nnooo why are there no jets, I want to be in my own sphere dogfighting other jets and contributing nothung to the team the entire match
I mean at thus point, why can't you jetniggers go play War Thunder or something?

>>717821513
Didn't crash once on a 2080 with i9

>>717821246
>Now all of a sudden there’s a bunch of people getting uppity over basic criticisms.
Typical nigger behavior. Can't say anything bad about the game, the game is perfectly fine! Just wait til release bro! I swear if I knew one of those retards IRL I would knock their lights out

>>717822326
Bad Company 2 can be excused to some degree for bringing back BF Vietnam in an expansion. The last we'll ever see of it because Dice are gay now.

>>717822351
I just use my monitrors build in crosshair.

So basically all critizism right now comes from
- corpses too old for FPS
- people who enjoy running for 5 minutes and then getting sniped
- sniper kiddies who can't do their epic long distance kills anymore (10:4 lmao)
- vehiclefags who can't 50:0 any longer
- mortar pussies who can't get any free kills anymore (4:3 lmao)
- Third World subhumans who can't afford a decent ISP

>>717802812 (OP)
It's fun. Reminds me alot of BF3 and BF4, because anything else that came after these games was shyt. The gunplay feels good, mostly, but lmg's need a nerf to mobility. Won't be judging the map sizes because it's a beta and they want to stress test. Still not going no preorder, but am cautiously optimistic.

>>717822535
that may help for visual clarity but it wont stop your gun from feeling like a loose water hose.
especially with the maps being small most encounters are at close range.

>>717819363
>They actually sound like real guns, and feel 'weighty' enough to carry the illusion.
I don't know how you can say this, to me they feel like nerf guns. The shotgun in particular has almost 0 punch to it.

Also, forgot to add, the rpg splash damage is weird. You can get a shot right into a group of 3-4 people bunched together and no one dies, not even scratch. It does feel good tho when you catch a sniper directly in the face with that thing.

>>717822829
25 years later and counterstrike still has the best take on weapons.

>>717819892
I agree, the graphics look muddy as hell even on 1440p

>>717822792
I know, but it helps with setting up your gun for the best handling. The default smg for engie has an attachement that allows you to fire while sprinting - you just need to balance your points accordingly, and using ironsights will give you that option.

>>717822652
>- people who enjoy running for 5 minutes and then getting sniped
Yes, I want dying to mean SOMETHING, You have so many ways to spawn into a good position. Spawn beacon, spawn on any squad mate, spawn on the IFV. If I get a squad wipe or kill some lone wolf flanker and the enemy doesn't revive I should be rewarded for it.

>>717822475
Well it's just surprising that a 5090 of all cards is struggling to even get this to work. I've never usually experienced such a poor beta from Dice in the past, but i never played 2042 either.

Just from this Beta alone they lost me, and i was excited for the game. Since i bet BF4 playerbase is at an all time high right now then that's what I'm going back to.

>>717804807
>>717805220
Just wait for '83.
RO2 is also getting an rs2 engine port/mod.

>>717822978
>Yes, I want dying to mean SOMETHING,
Join the army.

>>717822936
Nigger CS guns didn't even have the bullet ejector on the right side until GO. Go kill yourself.

>>717822978
Exactly, make each death count. I don't want to be back in combat 5 seconds after dying, it's ridiculous.

>>717822301
Well now it's gonna be blowing your shit up sitting right in front of your face with a trillion torch faggots backing it up.

>>717822994
>Well it's just surprising that a 5090 of all cards is struggling to even get this to work
That's bullshit. I have a 5080 paired with a 5800x3d and the game ran fine, defaulted automatically to ultra on 4k. With that being said, I still turned down everything to low for visual clarity, lol.

>>717822978
Let me guess, you were the faggot sitting in a tank sniping single infantry half a mile away the entire match on Golmund Railway.

>>717823058
Not after the betas unless there's a weekly mission or something. Also even if so, soflam and javelin will shit on them.

I also think a lot of people are not using the anti-armor rounds in tanks

>>717823106
You can see my error message mentions that my card is a 5090.

>>717802812 (OP)
Its modern garbage, how would I know? I don't play that shit.

>>717823157
I don't care. That's a (You) problem if you can't read error codes properly.

>>717822694
>it's a beta
It's 2 months from release. This is not a beta. This is an advertisement.

>>717822994
are you playing with uncapped framerates?

>>717823119
I've never particularly liked driving tanks, I much prefer using the commander seat. I also believe driving and main gun should be decoupled in tanks to at least force teamplay a little bit or have the consequence of being a stationary target when seat switching solo.

>>717802812 (OP)
I think all these nu-shooters are so fucking trash. Why can you spawn on everybody in your squad? Such a shit tier mechanic. Why can everybody revive? Shit tier mechanic again. And the games UI is probably the worst thing I've ever seen complete vomit.

Fps is literally the only genre where every single game past the 90 and early 2000 is a regression. They don't have more mechanics, they don't play better. Literally made for underage zoomers.

>>717823218
Happened on older drivers too. And no, this card has not replicated this error on any other newer releases. There's no fix, it's isolated to this game.

>>717802812 (OP)
The game feels like absolute shit compared to bf3. Maps are too small or too wide, weird end of battle summaries, UI overloaded with shit. How can they fuck up a game that is a nobrainer this bad? I seriously don't understand. You have to be intentional about making it worse and that is quite an achievement. I just wait a few months until this piece of shit has BF2024 players and then not buy it, but try it out in the gamepass.

>>717822326
Battlefield hasn't moved past BC2 in any way whatsoever. They are still fucking about with destruction that is worse than BC2 and touting it as innovative, they are still making new game modes that are just shitty ripoffs of rush, they are still using the same general class structure that was in BC2 but it's always shittier and more confused. I would agree with you if the series actually moved to something truly unique or innovative but it didn't, Battlefield after bad company is just watered down, unfocused bad company.

>>717818402
>Completely reasonable statement about weapon recoil. Idk why anons can't comprehend this post.
It's factually wrong though. People can't kill each other from long range in CS2 because all of the guns other than the sniper rifles have hideously inaccurate even when standing perfectly still. For eg, shooting from bottom of long to goose with an AK is approx a 30% chance to score a hit with the crosshairs perfectly centered on the head. It's the biggest skeleton in the closet of CS that no one will ever acknowledge. All of the guns are literally less accurate than IRL Civil-War era muskets.

>>717818110
>higher spread
Actual dogshit opinion. The game already has waaaaay too much when ADS'd. An offputting and comical amount, like I'm watching bullets come out of my gun in line with the ring on a holosight while rapidly tapping on an AR, and that's what, a 68 MOA ring? Spread while ADS'd is a dogshit mechanic. Just add more recoil instead of making it an RNG slot machine to decide who wins a fight.

>>717823358
Dividing the roles in a vehicle so nobody is having any fun is not an improvement. Teamwork for its own sake is not a good game design goal.

>>717804651
>>717804980
It's about time we get a game that depicts modern warfare
>drones
>artillery
>trenches
>tunnels
>mines
>motorbikes
etc. The Ukraine and Gaza footage is so insane how can you ignore all that and release this boring COD shit in 2025?

>>717821106
aw shit I miss old gameservers. I played cracked cod4 and after a while you knew the gamertags of the others and who is good so you want to beat them etc. was really fun

>>717804846
retarded drone

>>717804318
SEX with DASHA's tummy

>>717804959
>Iberia
Blue filter
>Cairo
Piss filter

How is it so hard for people to comprehend that when I click the quickplay button that I don't want to be put into a server with a BFG 8 stack from the wrong region? If you want to form a community go form a community, you're not going to do that on DICE OFFICIAL CONQUEST #314012487. Want a specific map or mode go find a community server running it.

If you can't comprehend this and still whine and cry about a server browser you should be sterilized.

>one of the main factions is NATO
I'm thinking it's GOTY

>>717823815
>I'm watching bullets come out of my gun in line with the ring on a holosight while rapidly tapping on an AR
nta but post the fucking proof you nigger, I literally counter-sniper on peak by using AR's in semi-auto without grips, and they basically have no recoil without 25~ meters

>>717823332
>are you playing with uncapped framerates?
No, i had a set a cap at 237. But my screen is 240hz so my framerate is in that ballpark of running very high.

trash. shit. consolefied abomination with aimbot. bf 1942 is 1000x better game

The minimalist BF1/V UI hit the nail on the head. They should’ve just stuck with that.

>>717802812 (OP)
here is my verdict. you play faggot games hence nigga you gay

>>717823157
>>717823412
I got same code (DXGI_ERROR_DEVICE_REMOVED) during the Sunday, repeatedly triggered by trying to change loadout in the shooting range.
I managed to fix it by setting all graphic options to low. (Surprisingly, the game looked nearly the same).
During the Saturday, I had no problems.

>>717824303
you're either a shill or genuinely mentally handicapped if you can't see what's in front of your face.

>>717824569
How did you manage to fuck it up that bad? I literally rapid-tap AR's in semi auto out to farther ranges than that and can actually kill snipers. Actual skill issue or whatever the fuck you did to cause that.

>>717824569
Do you understand the distance to the back of the shooting range? Do you feel that you should be able to hold down the trigger and hit whatever you're aiming at if you can counteract the recoil? If you want to do this equip and LMG with a bipod and mount on wall edges or whatever

>>717824564
> managed to fix it by setting all graphic options to low
I'll see if setting it all to low on next beta fixes it, i only did the big ones like mesh quality to low and screen space reflections AO to off and that combination of lowering didn't work. But i think it's just completely random to be honest. This thing likes to play up when it wants to work or not. Every one will have figured out some magical combination of where it's going well for them, then to later have the game crash again.

>>717824729
the problem isn't the recoil you fucking nigger, because there isn't any. the issue is the retarded rng bloom that you have no control over and that the bullets do not go where the scope is pointing

>>717802812 (OP)
malware/10

>>717824825
>the problem is this thing that's been in every single battlefield game to date to punsih long spraying
newfag
I remember using the gun range and I couldn't even replicate whatever that is if I wanted to, and I sprayed down the long range targets. Bullets always went where the gun was pointing but the recoil made the fight to get on target very hard.

>>717823012
>RO2 is also getting an rs2 engine port/mod.
is this an official development or some community stuff?

I’m not turning on secureboot to play a video game

>>717824949
what rootkits are you running?

>>717819332
>>717824564
Try disabling just AO and see if that fixes it.

>>717824825
>No recoil while his crosshair drifts halfway across the room
>claims to be rapidly tapping on an AR when this problem is happening yet submits a webm of one on auto maybe is too dumb to realize that he can change fire modes and thinks tapping on full auto should be the same as tapping on single fire?
You do have control of the bloom if you don't hold down the trigger in full auto :)

>>717825006
>you don't use a seatbelt?
>that must mean you're a retard like me and would crash into a ravine if there weren't guard rails and a co-driver stopping me

>>717802812 (OP)
Movement too fast
Ttk too fast
Sliding and diving is gay
Lacks personality
Women
Looks good, runs good
Gunplay is good
Weapon customization is good
Vehicles are good enough
This is imo after ~4 matches of rush or whatever they call it.

>>717825006
This argument makes no sense considering how many cheaters are in the game. There were aimbots on day 2. Why should I have to give EA a rootkit into my computer if it doesn’t actually stop cheating?

>>717802812 (OP)
It's fun, albeit a bit unbalanced (shotguncucks get the rope) and lacking in map variety.
Going to play more next weekend.
Not sure if I'll buy it though, depends on how many of my friends are getting it.

>>717825129
Rush is still a mode in the game coming in the next playtest later this week. This new mode is just a gay derivative of rush.

>>717825195
>chudcelbros…

>download demo
>launch demo
>please activate secureboot to play this demo here’s a link on how to do it
>feel soul leaving my body
>uninstall demo

SteamOS is looking more attractive every day.

>>717820409
you're either retarded or double retarded. I have 17ping and I have people with 200+ in my games killing me in 0.1 second. how is that not a problem?

>>717825326
Because you are in a quickplay match. Create a server and enforce ping limits if you want.

>>717825201
What is the difference between the rush and the breakthrough?

>>717825039
Yeah i tried AO, nothing. Still crashes. There's no real solution to it, it's either DICE recognize it officially as an issue or i ain't buying their game. Mesh and AO are what some people believe to be the root cause of the issue, and it's none of them. It's got nothing to do with anything you change, nor is it do with memory or anything like that otherwise it would be in the message. It's just a random error and the game fucking up regardless of the circumstances.

>>717821869
>BF3, to this day the last BF game in which you couldnt hipfire an LMG with 90%acc
Fkn COD Rambo wanabees.
MG4 was such bullshit.

>>717822180
>This
BF3 had the best maps, no butts
Somehow they also managed to please every part of the community.
Sim autists got aftermath with hardcore savenger.
COD kiddies with close quaters gun master.
The vehicle whores with armored kill.
And of course me, with engame CTF.

>Ram motorcycle with c4 into tank
>shoot c4 with Magnum
>kill tank and myself
>tank driver scream cheater in sidechat
>"HOW CAN YOU KILL TANK WITH PISTOL"
>noice.gif

>>717822403
Problem are the maps not the size,
stop playing bad games.

>see sniper glint
>my EYESS
>around 200m distance
>single fire tap shot
>only 1 shot lands
>get rekt
are sniper glints and bulletdrop fucked for anyone else or do I just suck?

>>717825621
sweet spot mechanic if you're sniping

>>717825431
You get to aim at one specific spot in rush so it's even more brainless than breakthrough

Empire State being infantry only, is it a Metro-like or a Nuketown-like?

>>717825431
Breakthrough is capturing the point/both points simultaneously to move onto the next area. The points can be taken back by the defenders.

Rush is destroying the objectives to continue to the next area by planting bombs and defending them until they go off. Functionally it's about the same thing but can be more drawn out by stragglers. Unfortunately with the way the game is unbalanced the spotting mechanic ruins a lot of the core aspects that make Rush even possible.

>>717825748
forgot to mention I'm trying to use an AR to fight snipers, but at reasonable distance

>>717825186
so palantir gets your data even faster you dumb nazi dog.

>>717822792
NTA, but I find it helps keep your aim focused, when the ingame crosshair spazzes all over the fucking place. Even with bloom, as long as I kept my monitor crosshair centered, shots usually hit.

>>717819652
>They're pseudo realism bullshit just like Squad
You've never played RS2/RO2

>>717825827
every single AR has ADS bloom up the fucking ass
every AR sucks ass besides the M4 which makes up for it by shitting out enough bullets before the bloom can catch up

the balance is completely fucked because an AR does less damage with more recoil vs and smg at range
try spraying someone down using one of the two smgs and you'll see the difference so far

>>717825827
You're not supposed to be directly fighting snipers with AR's especially at that range. Suppression is worthless now so you can't even just harass them properly. You just sort of plink at them if you are feeling ballsy and don't think they can headshot you, and they back off if you hit them too much or show you are ready for them to peak from their cover.

>>717826007
skill issue

I probably won't play it because giving EA a second of my time is morally indefensible, but did they put modern slop like power sliding and other adhd garbage?

>>717825827
AK-205 is the closest anti-sniper AR (or carbine, whatever) because of its extreme precision stat and even then you can't expect kills, just to get them to take cover, and it's still a gamble that you won't just have your head blown off.

>>717826076
smgs do more damage than the AR and DMR at distance

>>717826183
You know that's not true at least for AR's. DMR's have way too much recoil for follow up shots tho.

No proximity chat. Destructability doesn't really feel impactful or meaningful. Boring cod gameplay.

Just a massive fomo/shill campaign driving this game right now, literally going to die out after the free weekend

>>717826007
>>717826032
>>717826145
>AR ads bloom sux
>Suppression sux
>Use or Carbine or AK-205
I see thanks. It just felt weird because in older BFs I usually had a decent shot at fighting snipers at the same distance. Even in BFV, the Sten could rekt em at like 100m distance.

>>717826032
I imagine there is going to be perks associated with supression where if you want to do it you have to actually be dedicated to doing it, and not just have it happen with everyone no matter the class like in BF3 and 4 where that shit was fucking annoying. I just throw smoke everywhere. Finally games are realizing that if players can just turn down the graphics to see through smoke and its just a tiny little cloud noone is going to use it, they actually got it right here, its like fucking silent hill some times with how much there is.

>>717802812 (OP)
legitimately feels like cod mw2019: 2
ended up not even playing yesterday, zero lasting power

>>717803859
This its fine its just not battlefield.

>>717826448
The ADS bloom that guy is talking about is exaggerated heavily. I've never experienced anything like that in game either by going full auto or semi-auto. He's probably doing something that caused it via spaghetti code, I do know that for some reason impromptu mounting your weapon without a bipod to anything dramatically increases recoil for some reason, so if you're fighting snipers just set it to semi-auto (there's a toggle) and don't mount anything without a bipod. I've literally sniped snipers by going semi-auto.

>>717802812 (OP)
I had fun
at first I was grinding out the engineer and the MPX feels like ass so I felt I was doing bad, then I moved onto assault and the 2nd AR and the AK Carbine both felt fantastic

>>717823012
>Just wait for '83.
Anti Matter are going to save the year for FPS. I've got my hopes up high. Sky high.
>>717824215
There's already a NATO faction in it. Therefore Dice can go fuck themselves.

>>717826335
>No proximity chat
Meme mechanic. 99 % of players don't have a mic on. And if they do, they're either loud as fuck or so quiet you can't hear them over all the explosions anyway. Also, so you WANT to constantly run into niggers neglecting their kids in the background?

>Destructability doesn't really feel impactful or meaningful.
Straight up lie. Best destruction since BC2.

>Boring cod gameplay.
"It's too fast but also too boring."

>literally going to die out after the free weekend
We will see. We will also see wether your mom is still sore from last night.

>>717802812 (OP)
Really enjoyed it. It's smaller in scale and the game-/gunplay is much faster than older titles. Still once you get used to it, it all comes together and feels good. It felt like I was playing Battlefield (albeit a different one) and I was having a lot of fun. In the end that's all that matter to me.

Actually valid point. Just compare Grand Bazaar to Iberian Assault. In BF6 you truly have no decently safe position where you could try to hold a point for a minute. You're at a threat of getting flanked from five angles at every second no matter where you are, which leads to this spastic CoD gameplay of always having to be on the move.

>>717802812 (OP)
fun, but won't be worth $70, if it was a $40 game i'd pick it up on launch

>>717808763
>not going to sell well
>its been top selling since the multiplayer reveal
not sure if stupid or dumb

>>717826335
>one of the first things I tried to do in game was blow open a wall with C4 that a random enemy was camping behind
>2 placed down
>detonate
>pull out gun to shoot just incase
>no kill
>ADS in preparation to shoot once the dust clears
>wall unscathed
>"oh come on man" voice chat my friend who's watching me stream the game in a d*scord call
>someone else saw the earlier marker on map too and rushed in to kill him while I was in shock

>>717810164
Its for the casuals. You camp or go in one possible direction, literally retard proof.

Answer me God damn it. Is there faggot power sliding?

>>717827056
Yes

>>717810295
Maybe at longer range but in mid to close range youd be dead before you fire the 2nd shot. Luckily BF is still no sbmm so you can use whatever the fuck you want as 90% of the players on both teams are bots.

>>717827073
Easy pass then. Thanks.

>>717825948

>>717802812 (OP)
I liked it. I consider betas demos for the real game and I was happy with what I played, surprisingly. Id want to see how the full game handles the amount of weapons, customization and maps though, I know they said these were the infantry focused maps and the larger ones are this weekend, but thats just taking them at their word and they havent show what the customization is yet, we know its there, you unlock skins in the beta and the armours were all leaked, but that leak also didnt show that one of the unlockable skins is a guy without a helmet, so they are almost certainly going to start adding stupid shit like that flying black woman with nose piercings and a fro alongside an old white woman from 2042. I dont need to have that shit in my games DICE, I dont care If I have choice not to pick it, running around seeing it in the game looks fucking stupid. Just keep everyone wearing masks of some sort.

>>717826713

>>717827056
People don't actually do it very much but it exists and you can smell the faggotry through your screen in the 1,000,000 chance you see someone do it.

>they will fuck it up
>they will flee to the finals
>they will be my free kills

>>717826713
Grand Bazaar was shit too.

>>717827160
cringe game
cringier meme

>>717826559
Really? I find the smokes in 6 to be ass compared to 2042. 2042 you can lay next to an ammo crate and throw down a smoke and be permanently obscured but 6 smoke seems to vary wildly in density sometimes

>>717827129
>2 (two) city blocks wide
>so small it's hard to even call them city blocks
I know the right spawn is stupidly easy to get spawncamped in.

>>717826713
Good. I fucking hated when people camped the outskirts of the map between two objectives to farm vehicle/sniper kills.

>>717827195
>

>>717827292
why post your selfie here?

Why do they get mad if you mention Arc Raiders?

Also BO7 free on Gamepass, Day 1.

>>717827404
>they
who?
>Arc Raiders
who?
>trash free on gamepass
more breaking news at 11

>>717827129
now compare how many corridors and enterable buildings each had

>>717827292
average finals player

>>717827450
COD is a better COD than your gay little shitty clone, retard.

All you guys did was make a shitty Korean fps Battlefield.

>>717802812 (OP)
Battlefield 6 will unironically be better than Battlefield 3 and 4 separately.

t. Battlefield 2 vet

>>717802812 (OP)
It's a game, it's fun, but I'm not buying until after it comes out. I need to know what DICE is hiding. They aren't just gonna fold on what people want, I need to see what bullshit politics they force in the game. V had such potential and they fagged it up so I'm waiting.

>>717827584
>shitty Korean fps Battlefield
That probably already exists.
I still don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

>>717827592
This what happens when you shill your game using AI.

>>717827631
Same here.

>>717827662
Why would you? You think Battlefield 6 is good, you probably had a blast in 2042 too, huh? Fucking scam artist.

>>717826713
>Metrofag seething he can't nadespam the escalators anymore
Any change that makes nadefags and bypodniggers mad is a good change.

>>717803953
you say that in favor of a game that is liveaction point&click game

>>717827631
They've already secretly prepped the game for skin bullshit. Ever notice how the end screen shows other players close up? Always the best players on your team? The ones who are probably better at the game and might be more likely to buy something like cosmetics? Wow if it's you, look how badass you are and everyone on the team can see it!
But... what if it's not you? Look how badass they look. Don't you want to be l33t like them? Look how boring and basic your squad is after looking at the top scorers. Lame.

And how all the guns say "FACTORY" under their name... almost like a CS:GO skin...

What could be going on there?

>>717827675
Nah, having thought about it further than nostalgic feelings go, it's actually a good game. People have a lot of nostalgia for those games but the truth is people played as toxic-ly back then as they do now. There could still be more open maps with more vehicles to capture the classic battlefield feel, but honestly those maps tended to create camp-spots for snipers and vehicles and that's one thing I don't miss, at all.

I'm interested to see more of the gadgets, I think they will add more to the dynamic of gameplay. Liberation Peak still fucking sucks ass, though. Whoever thought adding a jet to a map that's the size of one turn with the jet is retarded. Excuse the structuring of this post, I just cba rn.

>>717826713
>Operation Locker
>faggot bypod user spraying a doorway
>can't do anything because there's no chance to flank

>BF6
>bypod faggot trying his shit here
>blast away his cover with my trusty noobtube
>bypodfag seething

I think I'll preorder right now.

90% of positive discussion on the Web surrounding this game is AI generated marketing content.

90% of youtubers hyping this game are paid for by EA.

It's much worse than 2042 this time around, you WILL regret spending money on this. The game is a fucking scam.

>old fat bald crusty bf2 era stepdadgamers reads about how new battlefield is good
>gets btfo because no natural skills, no game training and delusional nostalgia thinking he was good vs 15fps pentium office pc kids playing their first fps
WHAT THE FUCK EVERYBODY IS HACKING

>>717802812 (OP)
It's not Battlefield
Battlefield is dead

>>717825621
You know what grinds my gears?
You have sniper glint while using a sniper rifle NO MATTER the sight you are using.
Yes this includes iron sights, iron sights and holo's have scope glint

>>717827160
if it wasn't for the shit character designs and weird stadion maps Finals would be a great game.
Also lacks a (T)DM gamemode so I'm not forced into teamplay.

>>717828139
This is not Battlefield. This is CoD.

>>717827942
All of the maps are small. The biggest map is unironically going to be the Firestorm brought back to be in a 3rd game. Peak is stupidly cramped and unserviceable as a vehicle map in general with a ridiculous amount of indestructible clutter

>>717828307
That's an insult to COD.

>>717828228
Really? That's beyond retarded. I used to throw an ACOG on my snipers in BF3/4 to get rid of the glint.

>>717802812 (OP)
It's dogshit but just like BF1 it's successfully attracted the normie/casual audience enough for them to gaslight history into being called a good game while also parading around the corpse of battlefield

>>717828139
I hate this on a spiritual level.

>>717828395
You're being fooled into thinking AI bots are people. EA dumped a fuckton of money on "dynamic engagement", won't say how much but it's insane.

If you want real Battlefield play Planetside 2 or RenX

>>717828228
lule that's ridiculous

I honestly think glints could be a good game mechanic so long as they were limited to being visual when you were ADS in a direction near to the location of the sniper. This would give the sniper more of a chance to shoot the person trying to spot them, but it would still stop snipers from being totally invisible at long range.

>>717823951
Play Squad.

>>717828348
Same, even in Battlebit before the acog glint update I would just destroy people with iron sights by aiming at the glint.
I do hope it's just a BETA feature

>>717802812 (OP)
auto spotting should be removed
fixed the game youre welcome

>>717803242
>Starts playing CS when its in its worst state
>Currently you can just run and gun while killing ppl around corners (not wallbanging)
>Movement acceleration is tied to framerate
>Bullet spread is tied to framerate

Amazing with friends. Horrible alone

>>717823012
>'83
it's never gonna take off with a name like that

Mogged by The Finals

>>717828475
No point in going backwards. Just because Dice fucked it up then it doesn't mean other great things might be happening in FPS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hL2Ay6gFhY

Although i am curious to see if that battlefield 2142 remaster managed to get back a playerbase.

>>717828313
It feels like the maps are designed for 32 players like BC2. Even the larger maps are chaos with enemies everywhere

>put auto
>check what it does
>puts everything on low
>ok.jpeg
>put DLSS
>play
>wtf are these cool graphics
>test them, models move about
>go very close to vehicles or the ground or rocks
>2003 tier textures
>move at medium distance
>perfectly playable and crisp enough to not notice Low settings
I don't get it. How does this work and makes games enjoyable even at low on potatoes?
My gun models look legit too. No issues.

>matchmaking
>no server browser
>w*men soldiers
>have to do something in bios to play a fucking game

great job, really makes me want to play it

>>717828475
This. Reservoir, Field_X and Walls provide better vehicle combat than any modern Battlefield games. Walls and Eyes provide aggressive air combat

>>717828502
I hate snipers but the glint mechanic is ridiculous.
Constantly get distracted by glints that arent even looking at you.
Maybe reduce glint° which I assume is around 180° and make bullet drop more significant idk

>>717828403
notice how at the 48 second mark his brain stopped working and he just shoots between two people because he can't decide which to focus on and splits the difference
if I had schizophrenia I would accuse xher of using some form of AI aimbot that stopped working

I LOVED BF2042, I put 10k hours in it with my friend pod.

The BF6 beta was incredible!!! We had a total blast.

>>717828772
>No point in going backwards.
They are better games with players still playing them. Instead of allowing these games to die, you should continue to play them. There's no sense of rewarding modern AAA for underachieving.

>no point going backwards
Tell that to the developera of modern gamea

>>717828139
And of course people see that crap and will then assume that is how it has to be played so everyone despite their ability, their reaction speed etc will play like that because they see zoomers running around at capeshit sped around the map. Not only can i not play like that due to ability I also refuse to play like that because it isn't fun. So unless Portal really does give people the power to create maps, give control over all the mechanics to slow the game down, slower TTK,, movement speed etc etc then it's just a product to sell to the COD crowd. The only good news is then maybe someone else will come in to fill an actual Battlefield type game once again

apologize

>>717828631
>stuff tied to framerate that shouldnt be
>as if valve would do such a thing
>look it up
>some enless reddit thread about bullet frame warp
>your bullets land miles away if your framerate is too high
>your bullets vanish if your framerate is too low

>>717829225
Every battlefield game combined didn't even remotely have the playerbase of MW2019, not even the same industry.

>>717829164
What I'm saying is that this game looks like it has combat that isn't complete shit and retains the direction of the better older games. At least i trust Red Orchestra's devs to deliver on that. They have experience and they know what they're doing.

what the market needs is a proper arena shooter.

>>717829390
Red Orchestra was shit, ran like shit on my every PC. Way too CPU bound game, not even Arma struggled as much as Red Orchestra

>>717829492
RO is the shit, shut the fuck up you retarded bot.

>>717829225
We all liked this CoD though. It was a true return to form and focused entirely on great gunplay, solid movement options, and being tacticool. Basically, it was kino.

>>717829663
The only people who ironically hate 2019 the most are COD lifers who played after black ops 2, seriously they resent this game so hard and want slop like cold war or BO6

>>717829492
Look at the way it writes out "Red Orchestra" fully, twice, doesn't abbreviate like a normal person would. This is an AI marketing agent. Now it'll get defensive and aggressive or fuck off and re-engage as someone else.

>>717829313
hes more like saying BF6 is just a MW2019 styled reboot

>>717829842
That's an incredible insult to MW2019, holy shit these EA marketers are such vile cunts. Scammed everyone with 2042 back at scamming again like nothing happened. Zero ethics.

>>717829567
>>717829819
This is why PC gaming is not dying, but already fucking dead, because imbeciles like you came over and champion these shitty games. When Arma 2 with massive maps runs better than RO2, you know the RO's a fucking joke, and also its devs. Only people playing RO are autists because they don't see how broken their game is.

>>717829961
Bleep Bloop go suck a dick, robocop.

>>717820770
in bf3 you could earn them for free

>2000+25
>models still can't hold steering wheel
why

melee is so fucking WEAK
35dmg?
what in the fuck, and finishers are so gay and lame

>>717830014
Hello marketing shill! Here only to promote new games, on a dead gaming platform. 0.02$ has been deposited to your Indian bank account.

>blow a rocket to 3 guys
>doesn't hit anyone directly
>everyone is alive
Rockets should multikill with splash damage.

>>717830268
I think it's good they didn't make rockets too overpowered against infantry. Those compilation videos kinda kill the vibe of a good BF game

>"people" getting upset there's women in the game when skins that change race/gender already exist
The complaints about the black sniper always make me bust out in a fit because they literally give you a skin to turn him white in the beta.

>>717830268
i know they did this for balance to reduce spam but explosives, rpgs in particular, feel fucking terrible
there needs to be at least a 5 ft instagib radius for splash damage, they just feel fucking awful to try to use in a pinch against infantry
like you can take down a whole building facade with an rpg but it won't kill the 2 guys posted up in the room laying down fire from out the window

>>717829961
>This is why PC gaming is not dying
>It's dying because i mentioned a PC focused dev
No, you're just making up retarded reasons. Rising Storm 2 was also fantastic and has such a strong modding community that it's spawned future games like Black Orchestra Worldfront 37-54

It's very bizarre to state PC gaming is dead because of Anti Matter/tripwire when their games have always had the strongest community on PC. they're a PC centric developer.

>>717819051
I thought V was generally considered to be bad like 2042 was, yet it has way more players than 4? It's on PC gamepass so I might as well give it a go.

>>717830268
>wants RPGs/noobtubes to instakill
First of all, kill yourself. RPGs are anti-armor, not anti-people. Learn to aim and stop farming for cheap kills just cause you can't aim.

Second of all, RPGs aren't frag grenades even IRL. Their purpose is to penetrate heavy armor, so there's very little splash damage to the sides. You can literally stand a meter away from an RPG impact and be fine, aside from burst eardrums. It's more realistic. Don't you retards want more realism and less video game arcadey-ness in this game?
>waah why is there womyns in this WW2 game? so unrealistic
>we want fantasy weapons that never existed IRL

>>717830268
>hit indestructible wall
>do nothing
ok this is epic

>>717830745
>You can literally stand a meter away from an RPG impact and be fine
prove it

>>717830745
>auto micro aim follow assist with a billion bullets per seconds
You must of these guys or the corner jump types.

>no, you can't detroy that whole building on C, because you just can't ok?:)

>>717830860
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RPG-7

Have a fun read, faggot.

>>717830942
>waaaah I can't get headshots so I need something to vaguely aim at the target

>>717808339
And those games made millions, what's your point?

>>717828139
look he's even running no optic just like in his cowadoody game

>>717830384
>it feels awful to use an anti-tank launcher in a pinch against infantry
that's the point retard
either hit your rocket or die

>>717828139
Any game that glorifies these kinds of compilations are instant dead. They remove all depth from the game

>>717803242
The PUBG shooting mechanics have ruined every single FPS for me and it pisses me off.

So which battlefield should I play while I wait for 6? I hear V isn't as bad as I've been told but I should avoid 2042 entirely. I never played V because of the "if you don't like it, don't buy it" stuff but it's on PC gamepass so I'll give it a download.

>>717831030
if you think a 1.2 kg TNT equivalent explosive won't kill someone within 2m you're retarded
should have at least 5 ft splash damage radius for balance
it's not a Halo rocket launcher but it is absolutely not harmless to infantry

>>717831828
None. All newer Battlefields from 3 onwards are shit, and despite what oldfags are telling you, every Battlefield before BC2 is janky as hell and not fun to play unless you're suffering from osteoarthritis.
Which leaves BC2, but good luck finding a server for that game.

>>717828817
... why are billboards printed at 10-15 DPI, gallery hangouts at 150-200 DPI and handheld fine art at 300 DPI? One of the reasons for the abysmal performance of nu/games is the inability of developers to budget the rendering of textures and geometry. They'll resolve 100% detail at distances that make it impossible for players to discern it.

>>717832128
4 is just 3.5 so I know you're talkin shit.

>>717832128
>All newer Battlefields from 3 onwards are shit,
This. Planetside 2 unironically is closest thing to old BF games, and if you want more arcadey game you go with renx