Thread 717818627

there are people that did ID verification to use roblox voice chat

>>717818627 (OP)
This will eventually affect other games.

I'm glad I took both the retro/old games pill and the pirate pill. I would be pretty pissed if Steam asked for my ID alongside dick pics to access my library.

>>717818757
Yeah, I did. With this.

>>717818627 (OP)
>Game itself is 18+
>therefore you already confimed you're 18+ when buying it
>somehow you need to confirm again when going online

>>717818943
Unironically, how will our tech overlords distinguish AI generated pajeets from the real ones? This shit is gonna fail so bad.

>>717818627 (OP)
Based. If porn games get this treatment then violent video games should as well.

>>717818757
They already have your fingerprint with your phone, if you use a face unlock which is even more retarded if you do that, they have your face too.

>>717818943
Seems legit

>>717818943
I believe it, you may enter the server with full admin rights

>>717819885
>mfw i use a dumb phone with a T9 text keypad as my main phone in current year

>>717819885
i don't use fingerprint technology on my phones

It's interesting that even a giant like Rockstar has to bend the knee, where is the socialist that like to whine that corps have more power than governments nowadays? Come on, it's the biggest gaming company right there bending the knee just as a way to avoid getting the boot.

>>717820078
To get past the new porn verification my nephew said he just scanned a guys face on a magazine cover kek

>>717818627 (OP)
>is supposedly to protect kids
>95% of the time it's used to prosecute chuds who complain about immigrants, trannies and faggots

I find it funny how we at the 3rd world have more freedom than them.

>>717819885
I've never owned a phone with a fingerprint sensor, so that's not true.
>>717820078
Same.

>>717819113
Flawless ID verification is easy to implement if you're willing to actually go all in on it and invest some money in the program. JUST set up offices where people would show up in person with their real documents and acquire their online ID. How the fook are you going to cheat your way out of that?

>>717818627 (OP)
kwab

>>717820268
the problem with the west is every 5-10 years the establishment comes out with some draconian bullshit under the pretense of something it's taboo to be against and then some vocal minority of uppity retards everyone else doesn't feel like getting browbeat by carries that torch until it actually becomes legislation. I'm starting to believe suffrage was a KGB psyop or something like the free love movement was

>>717818627 (OP)
that used to be the case, nowadays not having you private data asshole spread wide open is "suspicious" to a lot of "people"
>>717820875
yeah, all this shit is just easing people into it. tie it to SSN and tie every little bit of activity online to this ID and bam, ez. east asian countries already do stuff similar to this to try to keep their digital walled gardens whitu piggu free afterall.

>>717819113
They wont. The israeli tech used for this is just to scoop up info about you for advertising. Btw it was breached in 2024 already so have fun millions of jeets accessing your data if you verify online.

>>717821820
>nowadays not having you private data asshole spread wide open is "suspicious" to a lot of "people"
Not even 30 yet and I fucking despise the absolute state of this world. Growing up, it was drilled into me to NEVER post anything identifiable of me online, not only by the government at the time but by teachers in school and my parents. Its why I stayed the fuck away from social media and stuck to games. Now they want me to hand over all identifiable data for almost everything and if I don't the powers that be see me as some kind of criminal for wanting to have some privacy.
At this rate, won't even be able to take a shit without going through some kind of ID verification to unlock the toilet in a decade or so.

>>717818943
>Joshposting in /v/
Good grief. He really is the king Brin

>>717820875
Isn't this what the UK did with porn a few years back? You had to go to a newsstand and show your ID which they'd verify as real and then they'd give you an access code to give to your ISP and they'd unblock the porn sites for you.
>>717823261
When I started applying for jobs over a decade ago I got multiple rejections with the reason stated being "We couldn't find you on Facebook".
It's only gotten worse since then.

>>717823684
Rejected for not having a Facebook account? I won't lie, there's a part of me that wants to scream bullshit but I know you're telling the truth with all the application horror stories I've heard from me mates over the last few years.

>>717823956
Not having a social media presence is seen as shady. Many companies not only require you to use social media, they require you post everything publicly so they can see it or make you "friend" their HR manager.
They use this to screen potential hires to see if they engage in anything that might make the company look bad or be liable at some point in the future.
Millions of people have been rejected from jobs because they don't have Facebook, or their Facebook account contains too few posts, or they posted a picture of themselves drinking at a party and that's an indicator of a risk that the company would rather not deal with.

>>717820078
Based

>>717818627 (OP)
I got their photo right here.
Speaking of which would a face shot of Trevor pass their photo check?

>>717824487
just use the actor’s face

>>717818943
kek

>>717818627 (OP)
what's Jake Gyllenhaal doing there?

>>717818627 (OP)
Obviously its different when you share it with the company or government in charge of making the online environment safe and accountable vs when you share it with some random pedo.
That advice was never given because of the anarcho-commie rationale you are using now.
Don't be disingenuous.

reminder that "post hand" is a fed trick to help build their dossier on you by including biometrics

>>717827445
>t. brownie

>>717827445
I don't know about that but actual paid shills from India are given folders with hand photos to use so it's all meaningless. Chances are that yours will end up used too if you post one and it isn't very specific to the conversation at hand.

>>717818757
Does roblox unironically require id verification for voice chat?

>>717829327
Yes, they implemented it alongside the voice chat update.

>>717819113
>>717818943
you can't verify with just an ID alone, you also need to verify that's it's you on the ID by using the camera in real life and taking selfies and 3D views. So good luck.

>>717823684
>isn't this what teh UK did with porn a few years back?
No? That's fucking outlandish even considering the new Online Safety Act. In the UK ISPs usually turn on the safe browsing mode by default when you set up your broadband which does prevent access to a lot of sites, but you can usually turn it off in the router settings and if you can't, you can just call support and they'll turn it off for you.

By the end of the century, you'll be required to wear a bodycam 24/7 thatll automatically be scanned for wrongdoing by our AI overlords.

>>717828030
Grim

>>717830994
Cuck timeline

>>717829590
simply refuse
you are not obligated to provide full data for them to deepfake you whenever they'd like

>>717828030
good luck with getting a photo of hand with accurate timestamp proof
it's too fucking obvious otherwise

Photo identification is incredibly easy to fake, I managed to verify my X account by going to thispersondoesnotexist com and taking a picture of my screen.