>>717848238 (OP)
Yeah, the HotD1 de-make was already god-awful cash grab.
Not only are the visuals fucking gross, but they COMPLETELY REMOVED GIBBING, and replaced it with Max Payne 2 -tier ragdoll physics + ugly blood sprites.
If they were going to do all this why not remake it in the true sense? Like RE2 or SH2 you know brand new game.
They literally just badly recreated the original game lol what is the purpose here what are we doing? This feels malicious. I'm serious though. The Wii release was great why do we need this?
>>717848460 >Like RE2 or SH2 you know brand new game.
Not only did the demakes of both of those games suck donkey dick, but making a whole new experience would take more work than just copying someone's homework.
>>717848651
I Reetwomake has some merits as a video game.
But why not just release original game again if you were just going to... release the game again? Making brand new assets to arrange in the exact same way** feels completely retarded?
>>717848812
Most of the time, it's simply to just "refresh the IP ownership", and to shed off the baggage of the OG title's licenses, royalties, or simply just the archaic tech it runs on - that the average, lazy GenZ dev cannot reverse-engineer to work on modern HW.