>>717901334
>>717898697
Always think what the implication of arguments mean, and understand why it means some systems are horribly mismanaged.
If this is correct, then it means that women don't know shit about male media, and thus there shouldn't be a drive to have so many god damn women and consultants. That means thousands of women without a job. Do you think they want to hear that?
Until they challenge diversity mandates, this will never change. Companeis will go down in flames before it changes.