Thread 718073929

Servers open until 23:59 Sunday or whatever
old CPUs in shambles.

>>718073929 (OP)
>i5 40% higher than a 9800X3D

What the fuck is up with this game?

>>718073929 (OP)
These results don't make any sense
Why would a 9800X3D be so low? I have better numbers with a 7800X3D and a 4090

>>718074670
Clock speed over cores I assume

>>718074725
>>718074670
>>718074723
the i5 has more cores+ its a beta

Match quality is about to skyrocket now that the west coast dads are going to work as well

they need to nerf engi pocketing. tanks with 2 dedicated engis lying ontop repairing 24/7 will take any point on breakthrough

>>718074670
There is no benchmark mode the numbers are made up.

>>718075294
Even worse. every tank I've seen so far has like 10 engineers orbiting it, spamming rpgs and repairs

>>718075294
I wish that was me

>>718074771
>>718074723
>>718074670
>>718073929 (OP)
the reviewer forgot to setup their bios for gaming instead of aida64. coretuning level 2 (different names under different am5 boards) increase your fps majorly for bf6.

>>718073929 (OP)
This is the worst 'battlefield' experience I have ever had.

>>718075516
Literally says right there
>maximum CPU limit
so you're coping

>>718075884
>Core Tuning Level 2, often found in AM5 BIOS for Ryzen CPUs, is an optimization setting that tweaks memory timings to reduce latency and potentially improve gaming performance. It's typically recommended to leave this setting at Level 2 (or Auto) as it's designed to work with modern processors and their advanced prefetchers. Disabling prefetchers, which Level 2 aims to optimize, can actually hinder performance.

>>718075884
ESL retard.

>>718076050
>>718076108
dumbasses

I have an old ass i7-7700K that still runs just about anything I need

>>718073929 (OP)
Jeets feel validated whenever a game requires the newest high performance CPU

How to fix battlefield

>open the game engine up to modders and make modding extremely friendly
>large scale tactical maps
>slower movement, more realistic ballistics and damage
>not everything pew pew pew
>total destruction, includding terrain
>squad focus like 2

Why does squad have to be such shit. Why cant we get a good large scale arcade shooter. Jesus just fucking remake 1942 if you can figure out how to code ships and on map artillery ever again.

I stopped playing the beta today. Uninstalled and I will not buy the game.
Gunplay is NOT satisfying at all. It's a chore to shoot, there's too much recoil. The antitank class is OP, too.
THanks for reading my blog

>>718076939
Oh yeah and maps are shit, too. Too small, too much goddam cities. But the mountains are sniper galore, too.

how does a 7950x3d have half the performance of a 9950x3d and similar to a 5600? Must be a poor benchmark.

>>718074670
Pretty sure this chart is bullshit and they made some kind of mistake because other bench markers results contradict this.

my 9900K is running so hot recently, I think its on its way out

>>718077018
Its pure bullshit. At most you see like a 20% perf boost in some games, and sometimes almost no difference. There's no way in hell the 7950x3d got 50% vs a 9950x3d.

>>718077103
>other bench markers
suspiciously not cited by you at all

>>718073929 (OP)
>DDR4 with 2666/2933 MT/s speeds
I don't know if this is Gaystar or PC Gay Hardware but those faggots don't know shit about anything.

>>718075294
All me bby.

>>718073929 (OP)
5800X3D STONK

>>718077368
Hardware unboxed, now go kill yourself nigger.

Battlefield sucked since Bf3 was an even worse bc2 instead of an improved bf2. I hadn't played once since Bf3 and it's hilarious that people acted like this is a return to form...yes the 45kg Chinese woman is slinging around an lmg as the default truly amazing.

The maps are unironically faster paced than cod4. Even those maps had some corners you could camp and not be shot in the back. The destruction is still set dressing unlike bc2. The maps are tiny with openings everywhere meaning objectives are never held for a minute. Extremely poorly designed attacker vs defender map balance. I'm not even starting on the nitpicking of the supposed amazing audio, the open classes, the shit menu, the fact games just end immediately once tickets run out just those small little details that people don't even think about because they've accepted eating shit for 15 straight years. Only 2 of 9 maps will even be the proper combined arms experience and one of those Is a fucking Bf3 map. The rest are basically infantry only.

How the fuck can they not even have basics down like rotating maps, rotating attack and defence. The games not even 2 months away lmao.

>>718075294
Flank around and shoot them off

BF6 dropped the ball,

Should I apologize to 2042 and get it once and for all?

>>718079951
Imo, no.
I enjoyed BF6 way more than 2042, that one felt awful to play.

i heard they were adding another map to play this weekend, brooklyn i think? is it on all modes or just infantry only like i heard it was?

>>718081757
Yes and also there's a new leaked map to be dropped on saturday

>>718082281
KKKKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>718082281
really? so that means the beta will have 5/9 of the launch maps playable? brave move on their part
for what its worth, i think the game is fun but i cannot give EA money. it would weigh on my conscience if i stopped them from going bankrupt one day

is 5800x3d the most goated cpu of all time?

>>718073929 (OP)
>200 watts to play battlefield
lol lmao even

>>718078418
HardwareUnboxed only tested 9000 series but you knew that, prick.

new map fucking sucks

im getting dmr fatigue bros. i dont think theres any point to using this weapon class

>>718073929 (OP)
>3440x1440
>5600x
>4090S
30-100 fps without DLSS AND Frame Generation.

>>718073929 (OP)
comfy with my 8 year old mobo and 5800x3d

>>718073929 (OP)
game is gay