Thread 718170192

I am convinced 99% of 1 frame flicks (Essentially locking on to a target in a FPS in 1 frame which 100% looks like aimbot) are basically only possible in highly choreographed instances when you know the exact position of your enemy and you are standing in a specific spot where you practiced. And you upload the successful attempts to YouTube making it look like its a real skill.
And cheaters who blatantly use Aim-bot are trying to push the idea that its an actual skill you can learn and do consistently 100% of the time so they can keep using cheats and not get banned or even worse keep selling cheats promising their clients they wont get banned.

Because iv never seen this shit done in actual competitive play.

>if i cant do it its cheating
shes unbanned and still kicking your ass at gaming! try again!

>>718170312
Why cant any Professional players who play FPS for money do it.
Why is is a skill exclusively reserved for tranies and random literally who streamers.

>>718170192 (OP)
I mean i can see it being a thing in a game where you play the exact same small little map thousands of times. If youve played dust2 for 10000 hours you could probably do it. It's all about timing and positioning and shooting down the same road from the same wxact position thousands of times. But for sonething more open ended like battlefield, no

>>718170724
Its the point i am trying to make.
Its why some people will blatantly defend obvious cheating in games whit extremely dynamic maps or huge maps.
Even in a game like Owerwatch its impossible to do perfect one frame flick consistently because not only can people jump and shoot whit almost no penalty different characters also have different heights and hit-boxes making 1 frame flick headhsots impossible only you only trained on killing one exact specific character who always comes from a specific spot at the same exact speed.

I can except a lucky flick every once an while. I take issue when the dude does it 5 times in a row.

Something a lot of people seem to ignore online is that auditory reaction time is considerably faster than visual. You can test yourself on any number of websites, and confirm it with a real world example of a starting pistol for competitive running events vs some sort of red light/green light system. With that + any kind of intuition, be it meta map knowledge, seeing the enemy player earlier in the round, etc. you can get some pretty unreal looking flick shots.
All that said, I haven't watched the tranny clips that this thread is not-so-subtly about.

>Because iv never seen this shit done in actual competitive play.
real players do not flick to off-screen targets, they flick to positions on the map that targets are likely to be in, which is possible because maps have doorways and chokes that players will always pass through so there are certain lines of fire which are much more likely to be effective once you know the map and the approximate position of other players

>>718171387
You say "Clips" when you should have said "Clip"
It's ONE clip that keeps getting posted out of 30+ hours of gameplay now

Does it look suspicious? Yeah
Can you clearly see the giant red dorito on the radar before he shoots? Yeah
Have any of the Anons in this thread ever actually been good at games, let alone good enough to clear a room of people by simpling aiming? No, I'm afraid not.

>>718171387
Its basically perfect target tracking and borderline 1 frame flicks on to targets behind walls on a completely new map in a completely new game.

>>718171662
>completely new map in a completely new game
I played the urban map twice and already memorized the layout and know exactly where the spawns/sight ways are. Just because you can't do that, doesn't mean others can't.

Literal fucking skill issue

i've seen railgun/instagib matches on quake and unreal tournament with more believable aim than what modern shooter players show.

>>718172186
I think the way the aim flicks to the guy on the right after un-aiming towards the end of the clips looks more weird than the initial flick but I don't play this game. It doesn't help that someone decided to alter the footage with stupid slowmo crap.

>>718172186
ledditroons unironically defending this

>>718172404
>I think the way the aim flicks to the guy on the right after un-aiming towards the end of the clips looks more weird than the initial flick
It's telling that this is all supposedly 100% intentional skill-based movement and yet instead of flicking to the next guy and then shooting him too they cancel ADS after the precise one frame flick and start running because the player didn't actually realise he was there.

>>718172576
>because the player didn't actually realise he was there.
That was the impression that I got as well.

>>718172186
i tried talking to my tranny about this but just got the "i dont see any cheating" response and some shit about aim autists training for it so i quit while i was ahead.

THE
AIM
COMMUNITY

Time to sit back and watch anons seethe, fuckin lel

>>718172795
WE ARE REAL AND VALID

>>718170192 (OP)
They're not possible at all even if you were to immediately throw your mouse across the room, not to mention that it is impossible to draw an exact line while doing so

>>718172576
>precise one frame flick

>>718170458
They do. Its not. Hope this helps!

>>718170312
>she

>>718170312
>still kicking your ass at gaming
I'd rape him in Quake. I don't play games that require Windows.