>>718179034 (OP)
The new empire map is kind of lame. Idk if its just me, but I didn’t feel it. Rush is almost good, teams too small and maps small for the gamemode unlike in bf4 and 1
>>718179161
The Cairo map is still pretty fun, though the debris on it really impairs my view like crazy, the tank in that map is really cool too >>718179463
U-Uhhhh
Tell me one gameplay mechanic that was done better in BF1 than in BFBC2, BF3,BF4 or BF5. I will start: The suppression mechanics from BF3 were not present.
>>718182620
You can alternate between a driver and gunner in an attack plane/bomber to fend off fighters. Most bf like 3 and 4 had jets circling around until one off each other
>>718182935
i was honestly thinking about getting it since bf6 is such a piece of shit. i would be playing on console though, i have to assume the playercount is very low and it would probably be full of nothing but dudebros who have been playing it together for almost a decade, just like BFV was when i played it this year
still, its only 11 bucks, so might just get it in the future
>play conquest >game starts off great, everything is super smooth >after 3 minutes there starts to be noticeable desync >after 6 minutes I'm rubber banding and so are enemies >after 10 minutes the game is completely unplayable >enemies teleport back and forth constantly, the same enemy will round a corner 3 times, movement feels like I'm under water
How the fuck do I fix this shit
>>718185476
Yeah but the tanker for example already has a repair tool, and you don't even have to get out of your vehicle to repair, just there as long as your not shot by something. A pilot can just evade easily and fully repair for another strafe
>>718185854
Ye i meant just swapping seats to solo a enemy chopper. Theres just no real aerial combat that plays out like what you described in a modern setting. And desu. while im here to throw a tantrum about how gameplay wise BF1 is the most gutted and simplistic entry in the series i have no authority on jusging the arrial combat in that game because i didnt really use planes at all. The only thing i remember is that the bomber was heavily overtuned.
>>718186516
Simple can sometimes be the better option, like I see nothing wrong gunplay wise in game but MAYBE ttk since everything can pretty much two tap you like smgs >real aerial combat
Its a bideogame anon
Bombers should be tanky anyway because they need to sponge incoming artillery to get a kill/suppress the enemy. They are also such huge targets that are practically free xp for the enemy unless you're really good at evading with a heavy/standard bomber >t. Max plane rank
>>718186775
Yes its a video game and im the last one that would call for realism in bf but theres just no common planes that shoot guns backwards in jet combat in the eras that 3,4, 6 or bfbc covers.
>>718179034 (OP)
do people still play bf1 on pc?
bf1 was fun but not really accurate to ww1 obv
i was playing bfv and bf2042 each installment of bf seems to get worse ever since 1
>>718187548
Oh I know that, which is why I like the aerial combats in bf1 because you COULD do that. You’re right that modern air combat can’t do that, but if somehow they can somehow manage to make it happen in a realistic fashion, I can probably say that 4 and 3 have superb air combat
