← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 718203423

9 posts 8 images /v/
Anonymous No.718203423 >>718203780 >>718204517 >>718204527 >>718204572
Tomorrow is the 11 year anniversary of Gamergate. Everyone say something nice about Zoe Quinn. I'll send your nice messages to her on Bluesky.
Anonymous No.718203703
Why don't you go back and stay on bluesky?
Anonymous No.718203780 >>718203830
>>718203423 (OP)
Most of the GG anons left (more like forced out of) 4chan at the time. They probably came back after that Aussie went postal on a Mosque ruining their little Neo-7chan.

Who cares about this bitch anymore? She is irrelevant today and there are worse people than her now fucking with the gaming industry.
Anonymous No.718203830
>>718203780
>GG anons
You mean reddit tourists.
Anonymous No.718204517
>>718203423 (OP)
My favorite part of gamergate was when /v/ donated money to a girls in gaming charity to create vivian james to prove they werent sexist
Anonymous No.718204527 >>718204658
>>718203423 (OP)
I unironically believe that while game journalism has been too close to the industry - both being complete cesspits filled with dishonest and the dregs of humanity - that much of the rage against her as a person, was indeed rooted in misogyny, considering that it was her who became the focus of attention rather than the press guy, whose name has long been forgotten, who handed out good reviews for sex (and I think there also was some sort of messy relationship involvement in general).
Gamergate would have been better focussing on something real rather than some literally who and her indie game which nobody heard of, let alone played.
Anonymous No.718204572
>>718203423 (OP)
saw her on bumble once, she didnt swipe on me
Anonymous No.718204658 >>718204759
>>718204527
Press guy kept his mouth shut.
Fat dumb whore kept yapping about being unfairly targeted just for trading some lil ol sex for good reviews and how it was ackchually misogyny to care about ethics in journalism.

One of these people deserves to be hated regardless of their gender. Can you identify who that is?
Anonymous No.718204759
>>718204658
Yes, the press guy for trading good reviews for sex, not the dev trying to trade sex for good reviews. When talking about ethics in journalism, the problem factor is obviously the journalist here. Do you understand this?