Thread 718216679

Whats up with all the people protecting the decision to make RPGs completely ineffective against personnel and using as "realism" as an excuse because muh RPG is meant to shoot armored things? This has to be either really bad players or industry plants, right? Furthermore they conveniently neglect to address that grenades also do little to no damage. C4 for some reason still feels like explosives though, but I am sure reddit will complain about it until it gets nerfed though.
This is a general trend with all video games BTW, every weapon that does a lot of damage gets nerfed or doesn't exist at all.
It is quite funny because as an oldfag I remember people memeing about bad players should go play "Nerf Arena blast" which was a kiddie shooter with drawn out awkward gunfights and when I looked into some gameplay footage recently it seemed to me like it is actually less forgiving than a modern FPS shooter. Also for arguments sake, let's just accept the "realism" angle. Is it realistic to drop down in a parachute from a 3 story building and resuscitate your teammate that just go shot with 12 bullets from an AR?
When you have close to instantaneous respawns I don't see why weapons can have a little punch to add spice to the game.

>>718216679 (OP)
dude its a videogame, a fast paced arcade shooter where you turn off your brain.
the fuck you expect realism for?
if you want realism go play Arma reforger.

This "OP weapons = bad" Dogdoodoo player mentality has ruined many games. I used to play the early FPS games and they rightfully so revealed who had a quick mind or not.. If you wanted to be good you had to accept the realities of the game, not complain about them until the developers turns it into something less rewarding for those who dedicate time to the game, that is to say the hardcore fanbase. If you don't cater to them then the game will die as the experience becomes blend and repetitive.
One prime example is the doom franchise and its reboot of the series. Doom2k16 MP at launch was spot on.. it had everything the good old fps games had, quick movement, power ups that needed to be memorized and most importantly of all, powerful weapons that enabled you to spam tight positions in prediction of enemy movement to suppress their progress, but this play-style is too foreign for today's gamers.. that is to say gen-z. So what happened? Suddenly with a 25% decrease in damage the entire gameplay got shifted towards drawn out random chance battles so the losers could feel like they were good at the game for a short period of time before the game got abandoned by all. Another key takeaway here is that those that are most vocal about weapons being "OP" are just gonna abandon the game regardless as soon as the next tranime triple a title comes out so listening to them in the first place thinking they somehow represent "the community" is a fatal mistake.

>PS3 graphics
>Named soldiers
>Less maps than BF4 (2013 PS3 game)
>Less weapons than BF4
>Maps are small as shit
>No recoil
>Weapons don't sound like weapons
>Soldiers move like crazy even tho they have like 100 kg of gear on them
>No server browser
>Aim assist
>Battlepass
>Bots in servers
>Female soldiers
>No artillery
>Worse destruction than BFBC2 (2010 PS3 game)

>>718216840
>the fuck you expect realism for?
I don't expect realism, but realism is used as the main argument from what I suspect are industry plants as to why RPGs do next to no damage because "it is le muh meant for shooting at hurr durr metal and armored vehicles hurr durr so therefore there should also be no splash damage or something because I am a retard who under-achieve in all fields in life and please let me for once feel like I am average"

>>718218763
thanks fren.

>>718216679 (OP)
I'm fairly sure they will add Anti-Infantry ammunition for the RPG so calm your nuts. However you have BC2 Carl Gustav to blame why they are cautious about making RPGs to strong.

>>718216679 (OP)
Skill issue

yeah bro they should increase the speed of running, get rid of vehicles, and make every weapon instakill people, they should also make it so if you get 60 kills you can call down a nuke and instawin the match. also they should add beavis and butthead as skins.

has a BF game every made anti tank weapons good agaisnt infantry? Only thing I can think of is maybe the carl gustav in BC2

RPG 2 shots infantry like most other BF games, why are people freaking out?

rockets are shit against infantry to incentivize you to pick something else you fucking retards, why would you pick anything but rockets EVER if they could also oneshot people in a giant AOE?

>>718220531
Cod shitters got cut off from their mothers credit cards and got bullied off the game for not having the latest tranny media skin. Now they're here.

>>718216679 (OP)
RPGs are anti vehicle you're not meant to be blasting them at corners for instakills that would be insufferable to play against

>>718216679 (OP)
No you're just retarded.
Of course the anti-tank weapon is bad against infantry. Do you have an issue with stingers sucking against infantry too? Or rifles not doing damage against tanks?

>>718220160
I would rather die to Gustav than a shotgun.

>>718221780
It wouldn't matter if the maps weren't so fucking tiny

You actually can oneshot soldiers with an RPG out to a significant distance since the rockets move realistically really really fast so I don't know what you're complaining about

nice rage bait

theres already a meta

there will be a meta if ea doesnt run closed class lists ALWAYS

>>718222902
i once oneshot someone from point blank with rpg
he just ate it, no explosion lol

>>718222902
>>718223074
Its once again shit netcode, the 80% bot lobbies felt really good but you can only play them until youre level 15

>>718216679 (OP)
@grok please summarize

>>718216679 (OP)
EA anticheat is overpowered to the point whwrw it causes systemic stutters. Just by having it installed on your computer it causes random stuttering, even when not in the game.