Thread 718328141

Let's settle this

>I like to play my games for 2 hours before moving on forever.
No Man's Sky
>I like to play my games for 2,000+ hours and may or may not move on.
Starfield

I feel like Sean lied more than Todd making him the ultimate liar.
His game ended up being better in the long run while Todd's is dead and forgotten

>>718328646
(you)

>>718328141 (OP)
Settle what?
NMS was garbage but is now good.
Slopfield was garbage and is still garbage.
The end.

>>718328776
NMS was also built from scratch around the structure they wanted it to have.

Starfield took an engine not meant for that kind of structure and tried to force it in, leading to "loading screens: the game".

if NMS had a little more conflict it would do literally everything better than shartfield
>but anon NMS doesn't have quests and NPCs to interact wi-
sometimes dead is better

>>718328141 (OP)
Both are shit but I'd rather play saarfield.

>>718328926
No one ever says how nms is good they just say it's good. What do you even do in the game? From what I understand is you just fly to the center of the galaxy that doesn't sound very fun I have a feeling it's all cope.

>>718331028
Well, there's plenty of things you 'can' do but are pretty inconsequential in the end.
You can do some basebuilding which can be fun for a moment, you can do the quests which boils down to fetch/kill quests, you can learn the alien languages, you can go to anomaly and do shit with other people, you can hunt for gear upgrades and/or cool ships. But in the end you'll always come back to "hold LMB to mine this mineral" kind of gameplay.
My experience with it is that I played it for 90 hours and dropped it.

Doesn’t matter Uncle Ben, Outer Wilds is better than both of ‘em

>>718328646
You need a more elaborate bait
Barely anyone answered

>>718328141 (OP)
NMS is older yet it's more alive.
Slopfield is so dead even the community patch got dropped.

As an interplanetary space adventure, Star Wars Outlaws rapes both of these games sideways.

>>718333945
have a (you)

>>718332137
So it's one of those indie games that people praise for busywork another one off the top of my head is kenshi I bet it has the same gameplay loop and you have to pretend to have fun with the only good part of the game being the exploration.

>>718333945
Try to spot it.

>>718334345
Thankfully I'm not a PC fatty who goes with trends. I'm a big boy who can make my own mind up.

I like Starfield but it's no contest. NMS still pumped out large updates for free with a smaller team while Starfield could easily do the same with only losing a few mill out of its total profits but the biggest update was one land Rover and maps lol

>>718328141 (OP)
starfield might be shit but is at least actually a game
no man's sky is the most fake paid demo shit ever conceived

>>718328141 (OP)
the thing that bothers me the most about no man's sky is that while there is a gargantuan amount of content, the actual sci-fi part of the game is very lacking, and you end up just scouring the galaxy for a nice planet to build your massive mansion on.
there are no moons, no orbits, nothing but a static png of the sun rotating around the current "system" playfield
it's so goddamn boring

>>718335980
Lmao, imagine defending the loading screen simulator FLOPfield

>>718336180
>there are no moons, no orbits, nothing but a static png of the sun rotating around the current "system" playfield
Supposedly they planned to do all that, at least the orbits, but playtesting showed it was too confusing for players...