← Home ← Back to /v/

Thread 718353290

31 posts 10 images /v/
Anonymous No.718353290 >>718353410 >>718353483 >>718353561 >>718353720 >>718353879 >>718357906 >>718361496 >>718361656 >>718361912
How can people seriously say Dark Souls 3 is the best.
Anonymous No.718353410 >>718356289 >>718360276 >>718361057 >>718362193 >>718362215
>>718353290 (OP)
It has the best waifu
Anonymous No.718353483
>>718353290 (OP)
spider patches is terribly unnerving
Anonymous No.718353495 >>718353636 >>718359651
Seriously.
Anonymous No.718353561
>>718353290 (OP)
How did the graphics regressed that much? Shartborne engine looks terrible.
Anonymous No.718353636
>>718353495
I like 3's the most there because the head looks really disheveled, and I like the really spiky shoulders, and the chest looks like it has been chestbursted. At the same time 1/2's version looks good and both need to exist because 3 is a sequel to 1 and really shows the end of the souls universe.
Anonymous No.718353720
>>718353290 (OP)
As much as I like to shit on DS2, it had some decent character models but nothing on DS1 level. The rest looks ugly.
Anonymous No.718353879
>>718353290 (OP)
it's not the best but it was a return to form after whatever the fuck dark souls 2 was trying to achieve and that's why it got praise. also it may not be the best in the franchise but it's got some great boss battles and that's what counts and I know you're going to talk shit about how these games have just turned into boss rush simulators but they always had challenging boss fights even if I somewhat agree with the sentiment that the first game wasn't entirely about bosses. it just makes sense from a gameplay perspective; what else are you going to put on offer in a combat-centric game such as this?
>exploration
>new abilities
>a more cohesive story
>a focus on side quests with choices and differing resolutions based on what you've done
>simulation like elements like hunger and the need for sleep
uhhh bros it's not that kind of game. it's not the kind of fallout new vegas type of experience, I don't know why you want that from this game.

you something something eric. whatever.
Anonymous No.718356289
>>718353410
fpbp
Anonymous No.718357071 >>718357663 >>718357790 >>718358039 >>718358797 >>718361575 >>718361919
>better combat and bosses than DS1
>better everything than DS2
>better exploration than bloodborne
>more variety than sekiro
>less bloat than elden ring
how the fuck can anybody say that ds3 isn't the best one
Anonymous No.718357663
>>718357071
idk DS2 would be top tier if it got a remaster with soul memory removed
Anonymous No.718357790 >>718358121
>>718357071
I like DS3 a lot and genuinely the only way to explain what I dislike about it is "a certain je ne sais pas"
It's smoother, better layouts, decent bosses, I've played through it several times, but it just doesn't quite have the memorability of 1.
2 is literally just for PvP, it's great for PvP, the actual game is shit.
Bloodborne is mixed, the levels are meh but rally is a great mechanic and made fights more fun since you get more "by the skin of your teeth" moments
ER was fun to play through once but after the first run it's just a slog to get between the actually decent areas
Anonymous No.718357906
>>718353290 (OP)
>How can people seriously say Dark Souls 3 is the best.
who ever said that? I've never seen or heard anyone say that outside of trying to make DS2 trannies mad
Anonymous No.718358039
>>718357071
>better exploration than bloodborne
That's not really saying much.
Bloodborne is about as on-rails as DS3, the main difference is that BB has a novel setting whereas DS3 is the same shit again except everything is dead and grey.
Anonymous No.718358121 >>718360047
>>718357790
>"a certain je ne sais pas"
It's the structure.
DS1 has a compelling scenario and world design, DS3 does not.
In DS3 you have the exact same goal for the entire game (kill these random dudes), and you're almost never let off the leash. In DS1 your goals change as the game progresses and you can get properly lost.
Anonymous No.718358797 >>718359550
>>718357071
DS3 has the worst combat of the series. the starter weapons outclass everything else in the game by a huge margin, and the regular light attack is the best option for every situation with every weapon, theres no reason to do heavy attacks or even the weapon arts which cost meter and yet often do less damage than a single light attack. I tested nearly all of them to find one that does even a little bit more dps than its weapons light attack and the only ones in the game worth doing are moonlight sword, anything with lance charge, and quickstep kind of. and parry, of course, which is at its weakest in DS3 in my shitty opinion. on top of all this, the bosses are fine but enemy design overall is fucking awful, what the fuck are those running goat guys in the swamp
Anonymous No.718359550
>>718358797
>find the dark sword early on in the game
>for some reason its 5000000x better than anything else in the game and dominates pvp
>literally gets nerfed a dozen times by fromsoft and people still used it for pvp over everything else
Anonymous No.718359651
>>718353495
2 looks like a Halloween costume
Anonymous No.718360047
>>718358121
good way to put it
I think it's also more disjointed, even though you can see everything from walls of lothric ds1 felt a lot more connected
Anonymous No.718360276
>>718353410
thats not Yuria (or Anri)
Anonymous No.718361057
>>718353410
This is objectively true
Anonymous No.718361496
>>718353290 (OP)
They played it first.
Anonymous No.718361575
>>718357071
>better combat and bosses than DS1
>better everything than DS2
>better exploration than bloodborne
All wrong.
>more variety than sekiro
>less bloat than elden ring
Correct but what a low bar holy shit.
Anonymous No.718361656 >>718362131
>>718353290 (OP)
DS3 was the game where Souls became rollslop
Anonymous No.718361912 >>718362024
>>718353290 (OP)
it's the only souls game where i really engaged with pvp, the fight clubs were a lot of fun. the co-op was also awesome. with the ds3 remake rumors going around, my theory is they will incorporate their new fancy nightreign netcode and make it a truly polished multiplayer experience.
the gameplay incorporated a lot of bloodborne dna and just feels better and faster to me also
Anonymous No.718361919
>>718357071
>better combat and bosses than DS1
Translation: It's easier to spam two buttons and win every fight.
>better everything than DS2
Translation: I'm too low skill and retarded to beat a game where you can't spam two buttons and win every fight.
>better exploration than bloodborne
Translation: Dark Souls 3 is longer and has more areas.
>more variety than sekiro
Translation: Dark Souls 3 has more weapons I can spam one button with.
>less bloat than elden ring
Translation: Dark Souls 3 with a boring open world is obviously even worse than Dark Souls 3.
Anonymous No.718362024 >>718362065
>>718361912
Why the fuck would they do a DaS3 remake so soon, or at all? That reeks of zoomer wish fulfillment. I've seen BBfags coping about getting a remaster/remake as well which is also pathetic.
Anonymous No.718362065
>>718362024
dark souls 3 turns 10 years old in less than a year
Anonymous No.718362131
>>718361656
I 100% agree. It's the first one where I distinctly remember not having to pay attention as much and could just rollspam or R1spam through everything without much punishment.
Anonymous No.718362193
>>718353410
>discount maiden in black
>best waifu
Anonymous No.718362215
>>718353410
I would like to put a child in that belly