>>718378225
lol you are so low IQ you dont even comprehend that youve backed yourself into a corner regardless. even if we agree that my current argument is not what i initially meant, which I do not agree on, that would still mean that i have now presented a second argument different than my initial statement, which you cannot refute
im not "telling myself i won", i did win, i presented an argument that you cannot refute, and you know you cannot refute it, which is why you are refusing to address it. if you have a counter argument, then by all means, lets here it
people in megaton are shown raising brahmin, engaging with traders, and peddling hunted wildlife, as well as scavenging goods.
the proportion of the food sources we directly see does not match the population of the game because what we see is only a symbolic interpretation meant to communicate to us on a basic level where these people source their food. this same symbolic communication is also used in fallout new vagas. this symbolic communication is a necessity due to the limitations of videogames of a medium and the limits of technology and the game engine when the game was created. New vagas of course directly shows a little bit more, but the extra things new vagas shows that fallout 3 doesnt, ie the sharecropper farms, are entirely proportional to differences in the narrative, which in new vagas features a region with much more developed societies and infrastructure, compared to the capital wasteland in which the only previously large and influential faction in the region has downsized considerably in the lead up to the events of the game, and the region has become much more unstable, with much smaller, more rag-tag settlements compared to new vagas, which features a literal fully functional city (which is also symbolically communicated in its scale just like the food )
