Thread 718373614

GTA 6 map is tiny compared to 5
>b-but we have vice city AND mexico
Then why is the map reveal a couple roads and rivers lmoa

But was GTA V's map any good in your opinion despite its size? I thought it was filled with pure nothingness when you were outside the big (small) city.

?

>>718373614 (OP)
Why would they make it smaller than 5 when they could just make 50% of it a desert to pad the size?

>>718373614 (OP)
>the map reveal

>>718373772
>This
GTA V easily has the worst map out of all of the 3D GTAs. It’s an uninteresting city and a vast empty desert with one mountain up north.

so just like all gta maps then?

>>718373614 (OP)
??? Are u ill?

>>718374526
look at that map nig

>>718373882
>escobar international airport
lmao. this is how i know this leak is legit

>>718373614 (OP)
>mexico
Shan't be playing.

>>718373614 (OP)
If making the map smaller is what they need to do to give it any actual substance, then by all means make the map smaller. The map in GTA V is 70% empty bullshit and should serve as a tutorial for developers on what not to do when designing an open world map.

>>718373882
>left one
>homer simpson
everytime

>>718376338
Been playing V lately and it's crazy to me that the made so many neat places like roofs of buildings accessible but there's just nothing there. If it was smaller like VC and SA, these little out of the way places would definitely have a weapon pickup, collectable, rampage, fucking something. They could keep the map design but make it feel way better by just filling it with stuff to collect.
Felt the same way with Elden Ring. Old souls maps are so packed with shinies in nooks and crannies that I get whiplash going from them to ER where it's like the guy in charge of item placement just didn't show up.

>>718380127
I've said multiple times on here that V is the only GTA that I've played that feels like it was phoned in and made because of a mandate rather than because of a genuine desire on Rockstar North's part, and the map was one of the main things that gave me that feeling. It just feels like an overreaction to people complaining about the lack of a countryside area in IV (despite IV having a very detailed world). Like they heard people asking for a countryside similar to San Andreas, and just attached a giant empty chunk of land with a couple tiny towns and a big mountain in it to LS and called it a day.

>>718373882
I do hope this map makeup is kid of accurate. While I want some rural areas, with VC I want it more about inner city areas.
Though I guess you just need to look at IRL forida and it will be like that with more swamps than mountains.

>>718373772
GTAVs map was great for flying, sailing and going on long drives but like you said outside of the city it was nothingness and nobody really enjoyed spending time in the woodlands and mountainous region near chilliad. You get lost in there and you are there for ages trying to get out back to a road.

>>718374660
You think that's the whole map of the game?

>>718380127
>>718382558
It was clear GTAV was made with T2 telling them they needed to make a massive world for online shit as online gaming was the go to thing and GTA4 online was barebones.
Of course they probably didn't realize how bit it would get but it was clear they had a B team set up to take over and make the online a live service game while the A team made the next game RDR2.

>>718382558
Has nothing to do with it. The actual reason is hardware limitations. Most of the countryside was scrapped to make the game run on the PS3. Like 80% of vegetation had to be removed.

>>718373614 (OP)
the map is 2 times bigger than 5s. I hope its enough

>>718373772
>>718384863
I replayed the single player after a long time recently and its crazy just how many tourist trails and spots are in the countryside. Theres NPCs walking and small waterfalls but it still feels incredibly desolate and dead. The illusion shatters and it becomes apparant that its just a game

>>718387367
Remember it is a PS3 game.
GTA6 is gonna be a PS5 game and essentially from not until like 3-5 gens in the future games are not gonna get much better.
Slightly better frame rates, loading times and resolution but not much increase in overall quality.
What I mean by that is GTA6 should (stipulating should strongly) be the "definitive" GTA game as in as much content, area, NPC and car density that we will see in a GTA game.
I do imagine GTA 7 or 8 might increase NPC amounts and car density but that is about it when it comes to quality overall of the map.game.

>>718373614 (OP)
Can you tell me the next lottery numbers while you are here?

>>718373614 (OP)
You're retarded.
>>718387115
I just hope it has shit to do in it. Los Santos was boring because there was nothing to do.